In Ruben Cantu's case, the evidence gathered after his execution
supported his innocence, making jurors who espoused his execution de
facto accessories to his demise.
According to the July 24, 2006 Houston Chronicle:
"Cantu's long-silent co-defendant, David Garza, just 15 when the two
boys allegedly committed a murder-robbery together, has signed a sworn
affidavit saying he allowed his friend to be falsely accused,
[even]though Cantu wasn't with him the night of the killing. And the
lone eyewitness, the man who survived the shooting, has recanted."
Thanks to an imperfect justice system that depends too often on skewed
and tainted testimony, Cantu's judge, his lawyers, and the jury of his
peers became unwitting accomplices in his murder. A difficult cross to
bear for the jurors, as underscored by Miriam Ward, forewoman of the
jury that convicted Cantu, "We did the best we could with the
information we had, but with a little extra work, a little extra
effort, maybe we'd have gotten the right information. The bottom line
is, an innocent person was put to death for it. We all have our finger
in that."
In the case of African American gang member and Crips co-founder Tookie
Williams, who was convicted of murder and executed by lethal injection
in a slow death in California in December 2005, those who convicted him
bore the burden of their decision for over twenty years. Tookie's case
was particularly difficult because of his total transformation in
prison. In his two and a half decades on death row, Tookie Williams
went from legendary hard-core gang member to legendary proponent of
non-violence and the dissolution of gangs.
Even if Tookie's jurors believed their death penalty decision was
rightful till the end, they still witnessed the public outcry over his
touted rehabilitation from criminal gang member to respected author and
sage. They observed years of public disdain toward their capital
punishment decision, and a concerted international effort to overturn
it. Probably not the response they had envisioned when they convicted
the cofounder of a notorious gang.
For the legal professionals on Tookie's case, and on all death penalty
cases, the consequences of execution may be par for the course. But for
jurors called upon to fulfill their civic duties, even if they
supported capital punishment prior to the case, the ramifications of
participating in another person's death can be momentous.
And now another potential Cantu catastrophe waits forebodingly in the
courts, causing discomfort for the condemned, his family, his
guilt-ridden witnesses, and his uneasy jurors.
As recently as last week, Troy Anthony Davis, a 38 year old
African-American man from Georgia, convicted of killing a white
policeman, received a 90 day stay of execution from his July 17th
execution date. In Davis' case, like that of Cantu, the conviction was
based entirely on witness testimony, although seven of the nine
non-police witnesses admitted their testimonies were coerced by police.
They have also recanted their stories. Nine witnesses have implicated
another man in the murder.
Martina Correi, Troy Davis' older sister, a former U.S. soldier
currently battling breast cancer, advocates tirelessly on her brother's
behalf. She says of Troy, "When you have no gun, no gun powder residue
and no physical evidence, and all the witnesses point to someone else,
how can you still want to execute Troy?"
But Troy Davis' case has been plagued by questionable law as much as by
questionable evidence. As reported on Amy Goodman's "Democracy Now,"
none of the powerful testimony on Davis' behalf has been heard because
of the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act signed by
Bill Clinton that restricts federal reviews of state death penalty
convictions. Davis' case is further compromised by a 1995 Congressional
vote eliminating funding to organizations providing legal assistance to
indigent prisoners on death row. The Georgia Resource Center, defending
Davis, had a budget cut of over two-thirds which prevented Davis from
earlier introduction of his new,
hopefully exculpatory evidence.
As in the case of Ruben Cantu, Troy's faulty witnesses and his jurors,
are feeling the potential burden of fostering an irreversible
miscarriage of justice.
Fifteen years after they helped convict Troy Davis, two of his jurors
have come forward to state they want his life spared. According to the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution, one witness, Tonya Johnson, who lied in
her testimony to the police, has stated, "'If Troy Anthony Davis is
executed Tuesday, [I] will be in mourning. It will be hard to live with
myself after what I [have] done.' Hard because Johnson believes Davis
is an innocent man. Harder still because she says she did not tell the
whole truth to police when they questioned her about the events that
took place on a summer night in 1989. 'Fear ate at [my] soul then.'"
In 1972, The Supreme Court said in Furman v. Georgia that death penalty
laws were "arbitrary and capricious." But after a ten year hiatus, the
United States reinstated the death penalty in 1977. It is impossible to
foresee how many innocent men and women may be executed by our flawed
legal system. It is also impossible to foresee how many well meaning
jurors will be duped to convict them.
Troy Davis has already sacrificed fifteen years of his life on death
row. Over the next ninety days he should be afforded due process to
save him from unnecessary murder, and to save his citizen jurors, and
even his accusers, from a lifetime of remorse.
The quality of mercy and the "system" must improve.
"Quality of Mercy"
All you hypocrites and liars
In the temple seeking gain
All you senators and lawyers
With your motives to explain
All you victims and heroes
Your petitions to complain
All you murderers and martyrs
On the fields where you lay slain
On the just and unjust alike it doth rain
And the quality of mercy is not strained
Vengeance and revenge are just two words for pain
And the quality of mercy is not strained
(Michelle Shocked, "Quality of Mercy" "Dead Man Walking" Soundtrack)