PROFITEERING ON HUMAN TRAGEDY
In the main, that
ideology rests on a narrow, greed-oriented economic and political
philosopy that barely recognizes the concept of a "public good."
Instead, the goal is what can be gained by private corporations and
individuals if the "public good" is removed from the equation so that
"free market" forces are permitted to act unconstrained.
The
idea is to return to some imagined "clean slate" where those
free-market forces can be allowed to do their stuff absent governmental
interference and oversight. The economic "shock therapy" visited upon
developing Latin American countries and the Iraq War/Occupation provide
just two examples of such human intervention.
Often, however,
Mother Nature through earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, etc. wipes the
slate clean so that the greed paradigm can be allowed to flourish by
removing (usually poorer) residents who get in the way of corporate
desires. Klein incisively and movingly relates the tale of what
happened in Sri Lanka in the wake of the tsunami disaster, where the
local fishing villages were turned into luxurious tourist sites by
money-hungry government officials in cahoots with Western developers.
(Page 385)
Klein uses the term "disaster capitalism" to refer to
these "orchestrated raids on the public sphere in the wake of
catastrophic events," where the forces of greed view such tragedies "as
exciting market opportunities." (p.6) She quotes a Republican leader in
Louisiana: "We finally cleaned up public housing in New Orleans. We
couldn't do it, but God did." Katrina, Klein says, is a clear example
of the new "preferred method of advancing corporate goals: using
moments of collective trauma to engage in radical social and economic
engineering." (p.8)
In short, in "disaster capitalism" there
are huge profits to be made from other peoples' misery, and since the
welfare of the public is of no import in this economic/political
theory, all that is needed for full control and enhanced profits are
ways to optimally manage that misery.
MAN-MADE TRAUMA AND CHAOS
If
nature doesn't provide that trauma, humans can. According to Klein,
that's what "Shock & Awe" was all about in Iraq and which will be
used in other attacks as well. The idea is to traumatize an entire
culture through death, destruction, deprivation, fright, and often
torture. One U.S. entrepreneur in Iraq stated it baldly: "fear and
disorder offer real promise" in the marketplace. (p.9) This is
reminiscent of Condoleezza Rice's famous comment after 9/11 that the
terrorist tragedy offerred conservatives a good "opportunity" to move
quickly on their business and political agendas.
Much of the
rationale for this type of thinking was born from Milton Friedman's
economic model developed at the University of Chicago in the 1950s and
beyond. Klein, oddly enough, doesn't even mention the complementary
teaching by political philosopher Leo Strauss, the Machavellian
godfather of neo-conservative extremism, who also was on the Chicago
faculty; many of Strauss' students became key players in the CheneyBush
Administration. Strauss in a nutshell: grab what you can get by
whatever means necessary.
While Friedman's tough, corporate
model can be, and has been, imposed on democratic cultures, Klein
notes, "authoritarian conditions are required for the implementation of
its true vision." (p.11) And thus aggressive, tough strictures are
often employed, often by dictators or invading armies or world
financial institutions.
In non-dictatorships, government (which
takes its cues from public clamor for services) must be effectively
neutered or "hollowed-out" over time. The aim is to privatize as many
of those public-need functions as possible, so that huge amounts of
money can be made and, as it happens, healthy chunks of that cash can
then be funnelled back into party coffers to aid proponents of
free-markets to stay in office and expand their power base.
(Conservative activist Grover Norquist aims for the day when government
will be shrunken to the point that it can be "drowned in a bathtub.")
In the Bush Administration, Klein writes, "the war profiteers aren't just clamoring to get access to government, they
are the government; there is no distinction between the two." (p. 314)
PRIVATIZING GOVERNMENT ITSELF
As
we have seen time and time again in the Bush Administration, virtually
every possible government function is outsourced to corporate
contractors, often with no bidding for those contracts. The
middle-class and poor get stomped on and squeezed, but the corporate
behemoths and multinationals — the Bechtels and Halliburtons and
Blackwaters and KPMGs — make out like bandits. Graft and corruption are
built into the system, with billions simply disappearing into corporate
black holes, with the Administration conveniently looking the other
way. And the general public, of course, winds up paying for all this
transfer of wealth and is left holding the bag in the form of lack of
spending on public needs and infrastructure upkeep and a huge debt
burdening future generations.
"A more accurate term for a system
that erases the boundaries between Big Government and Big Business is
not liberal, conservative or capitalist but corporatist," writes Klein.
(p. 87) (Mussolini described this amalgam of government and business as
fascism.)
"Its main characteristics are huge transfers of
public wealth to private hands, often accompanied by exploding debt, an
ever-widening chasm between the dazzling rich and the disposable poor,
and an aggressive nationalism that justifies bottomless spending on
security. ... Other features of the corporatist state tend to include
aggressive surveillance (once again, with government and large
corporations trading favors and contracts), mass incarceration,
shrinking civil liberties and often, though not always, torture." (p. 15)
At
times, Klein seems to be suggesting that such behaviors are but
unfortunate and accidental by-products of over-zealous free-marketeers,
but mostly she leans in the direction of a conscious conspiracy on the
part of the corporatist manipulators of the economy and body politic.
For example, she says, "the extreme tactics on display in Iraq and New
Orleans are often mistaken for the unique incompetence or cronyism of
the Bush White House. In fact, Bush's exploits merely represent the
monstrously violent and creative culmination of a fifty-year campaign
for total corporate liberation." (p.19)
LATIN AMERICA AS CHICAGO LAB
Milton
Friedman's economic model, engineered by his former students (Klein
calls them the "Chicago Boys") placed in key countries around the
world, rested upon, to use Friedman's words, inflicting "painful
shocks: only 'bitter medicine' could clear those distortions and bad
patterns out of the way." (p. 50) But time after time when economic
shock therapies were tried out in the real world — downsizing
government, eliminating millions of jobs, deregulation of industries,
etc. — the resulting social chaos and dislocation were so horrific that
the experiments had to be trimmed back or reconfigured, often using the
very Keynesian mixed-economy approaches that are anathema to the
Friedmanites.
The first public laboratory for Friedman's drastic
economic model was Latin America in the '50s and '60s and then beyond:
Iran, Indonesia, former colonies in Afria, etc. But, says Klein, rather
than encourage and bring democracy to Guatamala, Brazil, Argentina,
Chile, et al., the result was the CIA-engineered "overthrow of
democracy in country after country. And it did not bring peace but
required the systematic murder of tens of thousands and the torture of
between 100,000 and 150,000 people." (p. 102)
Iraq, she
indicates, is merely the latest manifestation of what happens when
private profit and private power are the be-alls and end-alls of
government policy, complemented by imperial hegemony resting on a
belief in American "exceptionalism."
"As proto-disaster
capitalists, the architects of the War on Terror are part of a
different breed of corporate-politicians from their predecesors, one
for whom wars and other disasters are indeed ends in themselves. ...
That's because what is unquestionably good for the bottom line of these
companies is cataclysm — wars, epidemics, natural disasters and
resource shortages. ... Public service is reduced to little more than a
reconnaissance mission for future work in the disaster capitalism
complex." (p. 311)
SHOCKING & AWING IN IRAQ
Nowhere
is this more evident that in Iraq, which contains all four of those
calamities (war, epidemics, natural disasters and resource shortages)
in one convenient location:
"After the crusade had conquered Latin America, Africa, Eastern
Europe and Asia, the Arab world called out as its final frontier...The
architects of this invasion were firm believers in the shock doctrine —
they knew that while Iraqis were consumed with daily emergencies, the
country could be discreetly auctioned off and the results announced as
a done deal."
"The architects of the war surveyed the global aresenal of shock
tactics and decided to go with all of them — blitzkrieg military
bombardment supplemented with elaborate psychological operations,
followed up with the fastest and most sweeping political and economic
shock therapy program attempted anywhere, backed up, if there was any
resistance, by rounding up those who resisted and subjecting them to
'gloves-off' abuse...[an] experiment in mass torture for months." (p. 331)
Torture and the other dislocations usually occur early as a
demonstration model; the extreme maltreatment is not aimed solely or
sometimes even mainly at those persons tortured or killed, but are
designed to stimulate a general sense of chaos and fright and to
"destroy the parts of society that those people repesent," such as
resisters, political activists, or labor organizers. (p. 101)
So
why did the U.S. Occupation go so badly? One could name a host of
reasons, but certainly a huge one is an obvious blind spot in the
theory of American exceptionalism:
"It was this theft of
Iraq's reconstruction funds from Iraqis, justified by unquestioned,
racist assumptions about U.S. superiority and Iraqi inferiority — and
not merely the generic demons of 'corruption' and 'incompetence' — that
doomed the project from the start. (p. 347) ... It was straight-up
corporate gorging on state coffers." (p. 355)
"[The Bush
Administration} had commissioned a kind of country-in-a-box, designed
in Virginia and Texas, to be assembled in Iraq. ... Iraqis did not see
the corporate reconstruction as 'a gift': most saw it as a modernized
form of pillage," in cahoots with a corrupted Iraqi government
bureaucracy. (p. 347) At that point, a huge number of those
disenchanted, angry Iraqis joined the armed rebels.
RENTING-BACK ESSENTIAL SERVICES
So
what lies in store for the future, now that so many major countries are
little more than national-security police states, with their
traditional governmental public-service functions outsourced or
otherwise "disappeared"? Klein looks into her crystal ball:
"The
next phase of the disaster capitalism complex is all too clear: with
emergencies on the rise, government no longer able to foot the bill,
and citizens stranded by their can't-do state, the parallel corporate
state will rent back its own disaster infrastructure to whomever can
afford it, at whatever price the market will bear. For sale will be
everything from helicopter rides off rooftops to drinking water to beds
in shelters." (p. 319) Blackwater providing armed guards in
post-Katrina New Orleans was just the tip of the iceberg (p. 421), or
Sandy Spring, GA., where the entire city government is run by the
private corporation CH2M Hill.
"But the [disaster] industry
has far greater ambitions, including pri
vatized global communication networks, emergency health and
electricity...the contracting-out of police and fire departments to
private security companies...and the ability to locate and provide
transportation for a global workforce in the midst of a major disaster.
... [We are witnessing] the expansion of the narrow military-industrial
complex into the sprawling disaster capitalism complex. Today, global
instability does not just benefit a small group of arms dealers; it
generates huge profits for the high-tech security sector, for heavy
construction, for private health-care companies treating wounded
soldiers, for the oil and gas sectors — and of course for defense
contractors." (p. 420)
And
the stock markets reflect that reality, rising as disasters occur. Says
Klein: "Shock-therapy 'reforms' have been the crack cocaine of
financial markets." (p. 87)
COUNTERING THE GREED MERCHANTS
Can anything be done to
counter the rise of the national-security/disaster-capitalism states?
Klein says the blowback is already happening against
disaster-capitalism all over the globe, but is most clearly evident in
Latin America where leaders and populations are rebelling against U.S.
hegemonic desires and harsh IMF policies. They are learning to "build
shock absorbers into their organizing models," Klein writes. (p. 453)
In
Europe, two countries (France and Holland) rejected the European
Constitution, the French because they saw that document as "the
codification of the corporatist order," what they called "savage
capitalism." More and more grassroots-generated collectives are being
started in Brazil to reclaim unused land, and in Argentina hundreds of
bankrupt companies "recovered" by their workers have been turned into
democratically-organized cooperatives. (p. 455)
These are small
steps, to be sure, but they may represent strong, active anti-disaster
capitalism tectonics about to emerge. Certainly, the appearance of this
brilliantly argued book is a giant and necessary step in turning this
country, and the world, around.
Bernard Weiner, Ph.D. in government & international relations, has
taught at universities in California and Washington, worked as a
writer/editor for the San Francisco Chronicle for two decades, and
currently serves as co-editor of The Crisis Papers
(www.crisispapers.org). To comment: crisispapers@comcast.net .