I admit to feeling a little like the weatherman who keeps saying it's going to rain, and who eventually is proven correct. I feel certain that the Bush/Cheney regime is going to launch a disastrous attack on Iran, but have made several calls, which have been proved wrong, beginning back in October 2006, when I wrote that it looked like several aircraft carrier battle groups were being put in position for the assault, but then it was called off, thanks to the intervention of former Secretary of State James Baker, who moved to release, several months early, the opinion of his "Iraq Study Group" three months early, which called for negotiations with Iran.
Now it looks like the attack is coming soon.
The Washington Post's Ann Scott Tyson is today reporting in an article headlined, Joint Chiefs Chairman Says US Preparing Military Options Against Iran, that Admiral Michael Mullen, the nation's top military officer, thinks the US military is not stretched too thin to take on Iran, and that Iran is becoming an "increasingly lethal and malign influence" in Iraq.
This article comes only a day after a US civilian ship under contract to the US military to deliver supplies to Iraq fired on Iranian boats in the Persian Gulf--just the kind of aggressive action that could lead to an Iranian reaction and trigger a full-blown US response.
The Persian Gulf is now crammed full of US attack ships, ranging from a missile-armed nuclear sub to aircraft carriers packed with tomahawk cruise missiles and fleets of attack aircraft larger than most nation's entire air forces (and also with nuclear weapons).
Other things also point to an attack, most significantly the pushing out of Adm. William Fallon as Central Command chief, and now his replacement by Gen. David Petraeus, who is widely seen as a "political" general who is essentially a yes-man for Bush and Cheney.
I would say the die is cast, and that it awaits only the pretext.
There would be no melodramatic Congressional debate over the reasons
for going to war against yet a third nation this time around. Thanks to
the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) passed by
Congress in October 2001 (and never subsequently rescinded) to
authorize the attack on the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Iraq, which Bush
and Cheney have illegally and outrageously interpreted as a declaration
of a global and unending "War on Terror," the administration is
claiming it has the right to attack any nation it defines as
"terrorist" at any time, without authorization. Presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton helped promote war against Iran a few months ago by
backing a Senate resolution authored by Sens. Joe Lieberman and Jon
Kyle that defined the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a "global
terrorist" organization. That was all Bush and Cheney needed, as
Clinton, Lieberman and Kyle clearly knew.
In what has to be one of the understatements of the century, Adm.
Mullen said he knew that conflict would be "extremely stressing" and
"disastrous on a number of levels."
Indeed it would. Troops in Iraq are already on their fourth and even
fifth rotation, and the "surge" troops in Iraq for the past year are
being sent home, not because their job of "stabilizing" Baghdad is done
(hardly! violence is increasing!), but because there's nobody left to
replace them, and they've been there for 15 brutal months.
Worse yet, oil prices have hit a record $122/barrel and are causing a
US and even a global recession--but that figure will be doubled the
minute any US attack on Iran begins. This is because war with Iran
would immediately bring all oil shipments through the Persian Gulf,
which supplies 20-25 percent of the world's oil, to a halt. Even if not
one tanker were sunk, no insurer would cover a tanker in that region.
Moreover, Iranian sappers, and their allies in Iran, Turkey and Saudi
Arabia, could be expected to take out vulnerable pipelines, refineries
and even well-heads in retaliation to any attack.
So an attack on Iran would mean global economic collapse.
Hold on to your hats. I hope I'm proved wrong yet again, but I'm afraid
we're in for a bumpy ride. Even if there is no attack, the level of
threats against Iran now emanating from the White House and the
Pentagon are sufficient to keep driving oil prices skyward.
Americans should look at those pump prices and see Bush's and Cheney's faces in the digital display.
They should also think of the gas they pump as blood, because it is
going to be spilled in prodigious quantities if the US goes through
with an attack. Not only would countless innocent Iranians be killed by
US bombs and rockets and by any radiation released by attacks on Iran's
nuclear facilities (the more so if the US or its Israeli ally use
nuclear bombs in that attack), but the toll of US military casualties
could be expected to soar, as Iran's Shia allies in Iraq predictably
turn on American forces in support of Iran.
Clearly this is all madness, but it is also predictable madness. The
Bush/Cheney regime is finishing out its last year as the most
disastrous, most unpopular, most loathed presidency in the nation's
history, and may even be facing criminal prosecution for war crimes
once out of office. It has approached each election since taking office
by upping the military jingoism. I see no reason to see their political
strategy changing. It is critical to them that John McCain and the
Republican Party hang onto the White House, and in their view, getting
the US into an all-out war with Iran is just the way to do that.
I'm afraid you don't need a weatherman to know which way this ill wind's blowin'.
Writings 
Subscribe to this comment's feed
