Most conscionable peoples who abhorred the idea of war
mongering, at the time made fun of President George Bush – without
appreciating the treadmill that had been constructed for them to keep
them
inefficaciously occupied while the 'war on terror' made incremental baby-step progress through small faits
accomplis of
continually creating more
“revolutionary times” in the
“Global Zone of Percolating Violence” which made, what was otherwise
“inconceivable in normal times”, entirely
“possible”. It spanned the gamut of peoples willingly giving up their
“essential liberties for a bit of temporary safety” from the ubiquitous terrorists hiding under their beds, to
acquiescing to invade other unarmed, disarmed, and sitting-duck nations with the barbarianism of unparalleled
“shock and awe”. With all newsmedia
cheerleading
the war effort, most peoples in America were initially not impacted by
the wars being fought 20,000 miles away in some exotic lands of the
unknown 'barbarians' who had dared to attack America!
But
seven years have now passed, and most Americans are now indeed being
impacted even in their daily lives due to the far away battles. With
diminishing social spending, as a major chunk of the national budget is
going into
“imperial mobilization”, which
in FY 2009 is slated to be 3.2 trillion dollars, the soaring gas prices
that is now past $4.0 a gallon, and the cost of living shooting
skywards in sync with rising bankruptcies and housing crises, most
peoples have had enough.
And yet, the same handful of
conscientious rabble rousers are no where near doing anything different from what they were doing 7 years ago. Most are still clamoring for
“impeachment”,
still clamoring for mindless protests in streets, and still merely
paying lip service to the proverbial dissent on the treadmill of
inefficacy. Instead of trying to understand the reasons for their
inefficacy and failure, instead of conducting post-
mortems to understand the nature of the beast that is driving the train of
“imperial mobilization”, or indeed, what
“imperial mobilization”
really means in practice apart from its bombastic sounding import, and
instead of studying its methods and tactics, instead of using Jujitsu
and Judo on the opponents in astute gamesmanship on the 'Grand
Chessboard', the
conscionable peoples have
continually worked outside the pale of the very institutional
frameworks which the 'hectoring hegemons' have figured out how to
exploit effectively to
seize the many instruments of 'empire' in order to realize their own objectives of
“full spectrum dominance”. At best, some sit as
spectators in imposing testimonies by various 'hectoring hegemons' before the Congress, holding merely their placards or courageously shouting
“Bring them home! Bring them home!” and
“promptly [being] escorted out of the committee room and arrested.” How effective!
Vladimir Putin
summed up the achievements of the 'hectoring hegemons' so aptly last
year that it is worth repeating to the Americans over and over again:
“
what
is a unipolar world? However one might embellish this term, at the end
of the day it refers to one type of situation, namely one centre of
authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making. It is
world in which there is one master, one sovereign. And at the end of
the day this is pernicious not only for all those within this system,
but also for the sovereign itself because it destroys itself from
within. And this certainly has nothing in common with democracy.
Because, as you know, democracy is the power of the majority in light
of the interests and opinions of the minority.”
And yet the
dissent space and its glorified dissenting priests still wander-on
aimlessly, or perhaps deliberately, condemned for the entire lifetime
of World War IV to remain on the treadmill of inefficacy, lost, so to
speak, searching for the 'land of
Canaan'.
For the past seven years, since 911, not a single institutional
frame-work construction was pursued by the dissent space. Some of these
ideas were outlined in
Chapter 7 of this 2003 book “Prisoners of the Cave.”
Not a single post-mortem was conducted to understand why dissent has
failed. Yet hundreds, or perhaps thousands of public speeches and
gatherings have been enacted, and hundreds of books have been written
to make lots of big bucks for a handful of dissenting priests. A
majority of these books contain no prescriptions, only rehearsed
histories or narratives of various crimes in progress. Yet, not a
single
institution has been constructed that
could become an effective counterpoint to the 'hectoring hegemons', nor
any institutional changes vigorously pursued that could efficaciously
'check' the hectoring hegemons' attempts to further their diabolical
craftsmanship of
“imperial mobilization”.
Only
proclamations, platitudes, and bravados is all that is on record from
the famed American dissent space and its dissenting priests. As a mere
plebeian, I too am equally guilty of failing to stop
“imperial mobilization” despite much vigorous 'jihad' on the 'treadmill'.
It's high time to end that losing streak on this treadmill of
inefficacy that has worked great in favor of the hectoring hegemons
don't you think? Indeed, if I was one of them, I'd just love this
dissent space! For it simultaneously achieves two purposes: one, it
evidently makes little domestic impact on
“imperial mobilization”;
and two, it gives a convenient illusion to the conscionable peoples who
are sure to arise in any community, that they are engaged in serious
battle for their 'Civil Rights', for 'World Peace', for 'Justice', for
motherhood, and
apple pie.
Well let's pull the plug from that treadmill shall we?
The impending Nuclear Attack on Iran is looming ahead, as noted in this ominous analysis:
Heads-up warning to the American Peoples – Nuclear attack on Iran appears imminent!
And some 'activist' members of the Congress who oppose the war
mongering and invading of other nations on false pretexts, have already
resigned themselves to the idea that there is nothing they can do about
the imminent attack, and instead, have become content in only issuing
what they will do afterwards, even gaining some traction among the
dissent stream:
“
He [John Conyers] is circulating a letter among his colleagues
for signatures, a letter addressed to Bush letting him know that an
attack on Iran will result in impeachment hearings. LET'S ASK EVERY
MEMBER OF CONGRESS TO SIGN ON! I know it seems bassackwards
and we want impeachment before a new war, not after, but this is a way
for us to show Conyers the support that will be there any time he moves
forward.”
Surely the lives and tabula rasa of 70 million peoples in that densely populated region of humanity – the cradle itself of the
Western civilization, and among the oldest on earth – cannot be a foregone conclusion?
Surely this isn't merely a game? A dog thrown on the freeway in Los
Angeles gets more sympathy from the entire American nation than the
'lesser' peoples who experienced, are experiencing, and surely will
experience – unless the courageous peoples of America and the world put
a stop to it –
the imperial “algebra of infinite justice”.
There must be a better way than just empty and entirely vacuous threats of what one will do afterwards, ex post facto, such as
"impeachment".
So what, even if this 'magic bullet' was magically unsheathed and
lodged into a single instance of monumental criminals after more than
2000 'targets' are obliterated, some with nuclear weapons, in a
defenseless nation that possesses no effective deterrence against
predatory high-tech nuclear invasion? And these
“impeached”
criminals will be replaced by another of the same genre of 'hectoring
hegemons' soon enough. What one does after the nuclear 'Rubicon' is
crossed becomes rather irrelevant to the victims don't you think?
Surely it mattered much to the cataclysmic destruction of Iraq and
Afghanistan, and the entire
“Global Zone of Percolating Violence” from
Kosovo to
Lebanon, how hard the antiwar protesters yelled in the streets of America? Or that it mattered greatly to the dead Vietnamese, or the
forgottened
Cambodians, and the even lesser known Laotians, that Nixon left office
in disgrace! I can imagine someone suggesting that surely, we ended up
saving several millions of the 'lesser' humanity by ending the American
killing spree sooner! It would be interesting to see if a restitution
court ordered an 'eye for an eye' restitution plus fair compensation
for pain and
suffering by the standards of
the aggressor civilization itself, that whether anyone from the
aggressor civilization might still think so!
The entire point must be that the nuclear Rubicon is NEVER ever crossed.
That
“imperial mobilization”
is itself derailed as the DNA imprint of America's foreign policy
abuses upon the 'lesser' humanity. It is perhaps easy to imagine the
gravity of the matter if the roles were reversed, and the Iranians, now
the new sole superpower, sought regime change in 'the Great Satan' with
preemptive
'Deathstar' like
'Phaser' strikes that had no defense known to man? (oops – I just gave away the secret for the next mantra)
As is expressed in this humble letter by Project Humanbeingsfirst to the
Journal of 911 studies courageous scientists still busily engaged in figuring out how the towers fell
:
“
I
hope you would also permit me to share this one final lament. I
sometimes sense that even well intentioned peoples in the United States
often tend to forget that other's dead and destroyed are not mere
statistics to their loved ones. Sitting 20,000 miles away from the
murderous war zone, it is easy to become engrossed in solving the
riddles of 911, or rehearsing interesting histories in conference halls
that are already fait accompli. Can the conscionable peoples in this
nation at least make it a point to also sometimes imagine, as a
shocking thought experiment, that with every falling American bomb upon
a 'lesser' peoples, paid for from their own tax dollars, their mom,
dad, sister, brother, kids, wife, and the family dog is killed? What
courses of action, and with what urgency, would one take then?”
let's together renew focus on how to efficaciously prevent further
“imperial mobilization”
under any pretexts. We have already seen that what worked in the 1960s
era as a peoples' mass antiwar movement, has absolutely no traction in
the modernity du jour. There are no masses to move.
The following seed idea from the
heads-up warning cited earlier is based on one key insight:
“Imperial mobilization” is institutional, and all encompassing. Yes a truism of course. But it leads to the following
corollary: Any real resistance to
“imperial mobilization”, in order to be effective, also has to be institutional, and under institutional frame-works.
If astutely and vigilantly pursued – with 'moves'
look-ahead,
employing both 'pawn' tactics and strategies as in a geopolitical chess
game played on the 'Grand Chessboard' against 'ubermensch'
Grandmasters – then it can surely create real impediments to new
“imperial mobilizations”.
And certainly at this stage of the domestic 'game' when the American
peoples are already war-weary, deception-weary, and precariously
perched at the brink of financial insolvency. In other words, the
conditions are ripe in America for the following to become an
efficacious measure, if it can be brought to fruition through proper
'political' planning and resource mobilization before the inevitable
“oops, too late!”
“
Firstly, anything, including all
'nuclear terrorist acts' on American soil, or anywhere in the world,
all shocking revelations by whistleblowers, all leaks in newspapers,
and all phantasmal mantras that distract from the afore-stated goal,
regardless of how compelling the reasons, must be treated by the unwary
and gullible American public and its intellectual dissenting-chiefs, as
red herrings, pretexts, and deceptions for premeditated "imperial
mobilization" by their nation's rulers.”
The quoted
paragraph above is obviously where the outstanding work already done by
many conscionable peoples and forensic detectives over the past several
years on analyzing false pretexts for the previous phase of
"imperial mobilization" to
“birth-pang the new Middle East” based upon the
“catalyzing event like a new pearl harbor" of 911 and the various
“doctrinal motivation” based upon the fictions of WMDs and 'radical
Islamism', can be useful.
However, previous expositions of history is not sufficient, even though
perhaps a necessary part of the bigger picture, because, the antagonist
is not
uni-dimensional – but rather '
uber' sophisticated, and diabolically imaginative.
For instance, see the following
letter to Messrs. Matthew Bunn of Harvard
on his testimony before the Committee on Homeland Security on Nuclear
Terrorism in April 2008, and the following re-assessment of the
so-called
'shocking' whistleblowing disclosures by the genuinely courageous Ms. Sibel Edmonds
that is also occupying the attention-span of the 'dissent space' but
the significance of which, in the humble opinion of this scribe, is
really that of a political red-herring.
Thus, the new mantras being deftly
spun,
starting from the 'loose nukes' of Pakistan that will miraculously be
hijacked by the 'al-qaeeda', to the presciently proclaimed 'The Day
After' as prognosticated by President George Bush himself
“that will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”, are the obvious setups to be blamed upon Iran. Zbigniew Brzezinski had already
laid
out a plausible scenario in February 2007 while testifying before the
Senate Foreign Relations Committee. See a further outlandishly
plausible scenario that can culminate in drawing both Iran and Pakistan
into
“shock and awe” as the culprit nations, in the following
wakeup call to the Pakistani peoples.
There are many analyses available from Project HumanbeingsfirstTM at
http://humanbeingsfirst.org
that already go into sufficient analytical depth to warrant reproducing
any further evidence here that the 'war on terror' is a total
fabrication diabolically crafted for
“imperial mobilization” to achieve
“full spectrum dominance” in the guise of fighting 'synthetic terror' that is easily
synthesizeable, especially among the Muslims today by “shock and
awing”
them, maligning their religion, and ensuring that both sides or all
sides are kept armed and financed in the ensuing 'Muslim on Muslim'
violence. For that constructs the much needed
“revolutionary times”
further enabling all the necessary pretexts, mantras, and phobias to
keep the American and Western peoples scared silly that these
stick-wielding
antediluvians are their biggest nemesis since Hitler. And these same guys in the Hindu Kush mountains will now perpetrate the next new 911.
This new
“catalyzing event” will surely be so shocking – for what else can
“make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”
– that the Congress, which has a history of almost trivially being
arm-wrestled by the Executive branch into 'United we Stand' with them,
will authorize a nuclear 'retaliatory' attack as
“'defensive' US military action”.
This is where there is an immediate institutional opportunity for astute intervention by the
“populist democracy” which is projected to be
“inimical to imperial mobilization” – the hectoring hegemons' worst nightmare:
“
Secondly,
if there is reason for the United States to nuclear decimate any
country or any peoples in purported 'self-defense', the American
peoples must demand a ratification of the decision to go to war through
a public referendum – let its great “populist democracy” speak directly
in the modernity of the 21st century before it is called upon to make
its sacrifices, before it is called upon to pay its taxes to fund the
war, and before it is called upon to acquire innocent blood on its
hands!”
The quoted paragraph above is what Project Humanbeingsfirst humbly proposes become the new focus of all
conscionable peoples on how to institutionally derail
“imperial mobilization” from within America by its genuine American patriots. Externally, on the 'Grand Chessboard', it will only be derailed in a
détente which will only come about when new
“full spectrum alliances” are constructed among the Asian nations for the
“full spectrum deterrence”
from all foreign marauders. An example of that being the SCO (Shanghai
Cooperation Organization) overnight turning into a NATO like alliance –
the Asian Treaty Organization – of all the Asian countries. The ruling
elite in these nations has so shrewdly been co-opted by the world's
sole superpower that even in their own genuine self-defense against
foreign invaders, they are unable to unite – when even the lowly
buffalos are able to come together to defend their own
against any
'hectoring hegemons' of nature.
Thus, staying focussed on the topic at hand, for domestic resistance to
imperial barbarianism from within the United States, the idea is that
enormous public pressure is immediately put on the Congress to create
public hearings to examine the devolution of their powers to declare
war, and to seek the pulse of the nation through direct public
ratification in a public referendum, before using their own
Constitutional powers to declare (or not declare) war. Please do
examine this approach.
This is eminently within the existing Constitutional framework and does not require any Constitutional
Amendment, as the Congress is merely creating another 'gating-input' to its decision making.
Such a law would also mandate, in order to be practicable, creating
credible 'systems' under which such public voting under any proposed
'declaration of war' by the Executive Branch under any circumstance can
be affected within 24 to 72 hours - or that order of time-frame. It is
the same time-frame under which the Congress itself labors, and thus,
seeking external ratification will not hamper its own deliberation when
done in parallel, but it will eventually be controlled by external
public ratification – by a public whom they purportedly represent
anyway under the Constitution.
Today, technologically speaking, such rapid public referendum is not
only feasible, but quite practical, whereas it wasn't quite the case in
the previous decades. Of course, we will not get into how 'such
systems' can also be subverted-type red herring conversations here,
except to note that by law, these 'systems' can also be mandated to be
open-sourced, with 'legal' and public bodies mandated to oversee the
systems, the processes, and the deployment and execution.
Furthermore, while the following may be thought by some as excessive
polemics, it can be the real impetus for the 'next move' on the
domestic 'Grand Chessboard', so to speak:
“
Even
better, draw the soldiers, officers and war-technicians from the pool
who vote for war! If they can vote yes to invade other nations and
wantonly shatter the tabula rasa of a 'lesser humanity', then they must
also first be willing to sign up for doing it themselves – instead of
having a draft of economic conscription. Every 'yes' voting home in
America must have at least one 'patriot' from the immediate family show
up on the front-lines without exception – or their 'yes' vote is void!”
The solution-space outlined in the preceding paragraphs is but one institutional approach. There may be others.
But whatever the case, the resistance to “imperial mobilization” must be elevated to the national institutional-level framework somehow.
And the Congress compelled to setup public hearings on the very subject
matter of 'prevention' before the fact, rather than 'reaction' ex post
facto, in blanket recognition of their dastardly proclivity to be
bulldozed by the Executive, and co-opted by special-interest lobby
groups.
Such public hearings can be used to further explore the solution space
of how Congress can temper their non-independence from the Executive.
And as in the case of the overarching suggestion made here, examine
devolving some of their powers to create a limited checks and balance
upon their own decision making powers for certain important national
decisions through direct public referendum.
This idea also creates a more participative democracy, and without
requiring any Constitutional changes (and that is an important
consideration for the response times needed here). Additionally, since
law making at some point involves the Executive to sign-off, the
Congress can examine the devolution as part of their own deliberation
process, thus side-stepping the Executive. An outsider can only
speculate on the modalities of implementation, and peoples more capable
must look at the issues involved – but not be deterred by roadblocks
that are surely to be thrown ones' way by sophisticated Straussian
'hectoring hegemons' who can construct any 'Noble Lie' and any '
technique of infamy' on the fly. One must be prepared to effectively counter the various and sundry circus clowns and
patsies who will incessantly bleat nay-saying on the air.
There may still be time before the
cataclysmic
nuclear Rubicon is crossed. Although the attack on Iran appears
imminent, it is not yet a fait accompli. There is many a slip between
the cup and lip – and until that tipping point has rewritten history,
the operative principle for the conscionable peoples in the United
States of America must be to work on its prevention. Perhaps prominent
peoples, prominent scholars and lawyers, and prominent (former)
statesmen can be enlisted in this cause with an immediacy and urgency
as if the lives of one's own family, and one's own loved pets, depended
on it! There are supposedly 46 Congresspersons who are seeking
impeachment. Perhaps they can be the beginning.
I long for
that day when all nations' foreign policies, trade relations, and all
international laws and interfaces are built upon the principle espoused
in the Biblical Golden Rule – for what a reign of justice and peace of
a thousand years would that be! Truly a
“Zion that will light up all the world”. Why not?
The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary
geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied
EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley
(patents
here),
and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden
2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at
http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at
http://Humanbeingsfirst.org.