|
by Steven Argue
Thirty eight years ago, on May 4, 1970, at Ohio’s Kent State University, the National Guard opened fire on students protesting the US war in Vietnam. The students were shot from distances of 275 to 400 feet, giving lie to claims that the students posed a threat to the Guardsmen. Four students were murdered and nine were injured. Nobody ever did time for those murders.
Before May 4, 1970, an anti-war movement had been building in the United States. The American people were increasingly impatient with the war, and an active anti-war movement helped build that kind of consciousness. People wanted an end to the war and Nixon kept promising a “light at the end of the tunnel.” On April 30, 1970, Nixon announced the invasion of Cambodia. This was the opposite of what people wanted to hear. Protests erupted on campuses that had not had them in the past, like Kent State. For many, the cold blooded murder of students at Kent State and murders of students soon after at Jackson State, were the final straw.
Immediately after the Kent State shootings 8 million students went out on strike, and some Universities, such as Berkley, were taken over by students and faculty as anti-war universities. After May 1970, the majority of those drafted were already opposed to the war before they got to Vietnam. This brought an end to the war. The US government could not win the war because they were facing fierce battles from the Vietnamese and many US soldiers were actively resisting the war. Commanding officers were winding up dead as they tried to force soldiers to kill people in a foreign land for a war they did not believe in. Nixon could not win a war with drafted soldiers who refused to fight, and this was a factor that forced the U.S. government to withdraw from Vietnam.
Three million Vietnamese were murdered as a result of the US occupation
of southern Vietnam and massive U.S. bombing of the north. Over 50,000
US soldiers died. It was resistance, both by the Vietnamese people, and
the resistance of the anti-war movement in the United States that
brought an end to the US occupation of Vietnam. Had the working class
of the United States been ready to join that strike of 8 million
students in May 1970, we would have potentially had a revolution in the
United States, but at that time the working class was not ready.
Today, after the lessons of Vietnam, and after decades of bi-partisan
union busting, outsourcing, privatization, and declining living
standards for the US working class, the U.S. working class is now
stepping out and taking the lead in the struggle against the criminal
occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. On May 1st, 2008 10,000 U.S. port
workers of the ILWU went out on strike against the U.S. occupations of
Iraq and Afghanistan, shutting down all 29 ports on the West Coast for
eight hours. Within the union, Vietnam Vets were some of the strongest
advocates of the strike.
Joining the strike in solidarity with the demand of immediate
withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq were the Iraqi port workers at Umm
Qasr and Khor Alzubair. They joined U.S. workers in a deeply symbolic
one hour strike to end the occupation.
In going out on strike, the union ranks of the ILWU defied the rulings
of an arbitrator, who twice ordered them not to strike. They also
defied the employers of the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) who
declared the strike “illegal”. This is the kind of defiance the working
class will need to emulate in other industries, both to end the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan, and to start winning better contracts.
Today, over a million Iraqis have died as a result of the U.S.
invasion. In addition, the U.S. has installed a religious death squad
government where women's rights have eroded, the economy has
deteriorated, the environment has been seriously devastated by the
radiation of US DU weapons, millions of refugees have fled the country,
people are often arrested without cause and tortured, the US bombs
civilians from the sky, and basic infrastructure like water and
electricity have been destroyed by the US and not rebuilt by the US
occupiers.
It is also a war that has cost the U.S. thousands of lives, tens of
thousands of casualties, and trillions of dollars in debt. Yet, for a
few extremely wealthy Americans it has meant massive profits for
military contractors and other businesses with contracts in Iraq and
Afghanistan. In addition, multinational companies like Exxon, BP and
Shell are drooling as the U.S. government tries to force an oil law
down the throats of the Iraqi people that would turn ownership of Iraqi
oil over to these corporations.
Meanwhile, the pro-war Democrat Party voted for the war and keeps
voting to fund it. Today, the Democrats are once again pushing for $178
billion in funding for the war. Neither Clinton nor Obama would promise
to withdraw all troops from Iraq by 2013 ("The Democratic Presidential
Debate on MSNBC", New York Times 9/26/07). In addition, the two of them
have offered differing versions of expanding these wars into Iran and
Pakistan.
Whoever wins the upcoming election, it will take increased action by
the working class to end these wars. ILWU member Jack Heyman is correct
in saying of the May 1st strike against the war, “There's precedent for
this action. In the '50s, French dockworkers refused to load war
materiel on ships headed for Indochina, and helped to bring that
colonial war to an end.” The longshore workers’ May 1st strike does
indeed show the way forward. More strikes, and bigger strikes, along
with building a workers’ party independent of the Democrats and
Republicans, can indeed end these wars.
Recommend this article... |
Writings 
Subscribe to this comment's feed
