Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sat

01

May

2010

National Institutes Of Health Has Given Priority To Bioweapons Research
Saturday, 01 May 2010 07:19
by Sherwood Ross

The priorities of the National Institutes of Health(NIH) in the area of bacteriology have been “catastrophically re-ordered” by emphasizing bioweapons research over non-bioweapons research, a prominent authority states.

Giving priority to bioweapons research at NIH, started under the Bush Administration and continuing under President Obama, “diverts resources from critical public-health and scientific objectives,” says Richard Ebright, Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J.

“The negative impact has been most severe in bacteriology, in which NIH research priorities have been catastrophically re-ordered---with research on bacterial bioweapons receiving more support than research on the top five bacterial causes of death combined---and in which non-bioweapons research has suffered catastrophic losses in resources and personnel,” Ebright said.

Ebright cited the examples of research into two bacterial pathogens: “Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, which claim 40,000 and 20,000 U.S. lives each year, respectively. Each kills more Americans than HIV-AIDS (15,000 U.S. lives) “but neither of these bacterial pathogens is on the list of NIAID Priority Pathogens,” Ebright pointed out. (NIAID, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is the subdivision of NIH responsible for infectious-disease research.)

“These two killer bacterial pathogens are not in NIAID’s ‘Category A’, with the anthrax bacterium and the smallpox virus, or even in NIAID’s ‘Category B’ or ‘Category C,’" Ebright says. “Something is wrong---very wrong---when NIAID fails to prioritize the top infectious cause of U.S. death,” he said in an email to this reporter.

Other top bacterial causes of U.S. deaths include Enterococcus faecium/faecalis, Clostridium difficile, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. “Of these, only the last is on the NIAID Priority Pathogens list and this pathogen is only in Category C,” Ebright said.

Asked “What is the mood of the scientific life sciences community at this time toward the Administration?” Ebright responded, “Hopeful expectation” but “growing concern that, thus far, there has been more continuity [from the Bush Administration] than change.”
 

The scope of the government’s involvement in bioweapons research, may be gauged from its estimated expenditure of $70 billion since 9/11 and the fact that, according to Ebright, more than 400 U.S. institutions are engaged in such work.

Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois, Champaign, said that in constant dollars the $70 billion “is twice what they spent on the Manhattan Project to develop the A-bomb---ergo, this is a weapons program.”

Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 for the U.S., said President Bush “turned the NIH into a front organization for biowarfare work,” and “(President) Obama is simply continuing the Bush policies” and is “now even exporting biowarfare capabilities to Third World Countries.”

Asked about the scope of the nation’s biowarfare activities, Boyle estimated there are “about 13,000 death scientists involved…(so) Dr. (Josef) Mengele has arrived on American campuses all over and the universities’ Institutional Review Boards (to review biowarfare research programs) are a joke and a fraud, too.” (Mengele was a German SS officer and physician who, during WWII, performed diabolical experiments on prisoners at the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in Poland.)

Boyle said, “There is so much money involved that universities simply are not going to turn down these proposals no matter how reprehensible they might read…”

At his own University of Illinois, Boyle said, previous biowarfare research and development contracts with the Pentagon clearly stated: “We have selected pigs (to gas with biowarfare agents) because they have a circulatory system and a respiratory system similar to human beings.”

Boyle said, “I am sure similar type biowarfare contracts that are clearly anti-human, anti-ethical, illegal and criminal on their face alone have been approved all over (at) American universities by now. Money talks. Ethics walks.”

Sherwood Ross formerly worked for the Chicago Daily News and contributed regular columns to Reuters and UPI. His articles on biowarfare have been published in The Humanist and other magazines. Reach him at sherwoodross10@gmail.com

More from this author:
Prevent Future Massacres by Curbing Bullying (6616 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross Society could reduce the number of senseless killings on campuses and in workplaces and shopping malls if it paid closer...
Bush Arms Dictators Around The World (7969 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross “In the last six years, Washington has stepped up its sales and transfers of high-technology weapons, military training, and...
CIA’S Overthrow of Iran in 1953 Reaps Bitter Harvest For America (7210 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross Iranians’ hatred of America dates back to the CIA’s violent 1953 overthrow of democratic Prime Minister Mohammed...
The Housing Bubble, Bailout, Good Jobs and Goodfellas (6149 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross The rush to bail out Wall Street is tragic. It’s as if the sun wouldn’t rise tomorrow unless Congress acted immediately....
The United States of England (8528 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross Why don’t we call America the United States of England? It may be a separate entity politically and geographically, but today...
Related Articles:
Armagideon Time: Bush's Nuclear Folly and the National Security Lie (12651 Hits)
Written by Chris Floyd This story is appearing today at Truthout.org. "The Bush Faction's remaining claim to political...
National Impeachment Movement this Saturday in Philadelphia! (8367 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff, With Democrats in control of Congress again, it's time to start a national campaign for impeachment. Nancy Pelosi may...
Impeach for Change Kicks off National Campaign (7617 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff The kick-off session of the new national movement for impeachment of President Bush (and Vice President Dick Cheney), Impeach...
650,000 dead given voice in Congress (5112 Hits)
by Stephen Soldz I just watched the Congressional briefing on the Lancet Iraqi casualty study: "650,000 excess deaths in Iraq". ...
Are you a health nut? (5083 Hits)
by Mickey Z. January is resolution season. Holiday shopping frenzies subside and unwanted relatives return home as millions of Americans vow...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

Stork said:

0
Next time research before you write.
I love reading Opinion Articles by people who have no idea what they are talking about.

Ignorance point 1). Institutional Review Boards only review Human Subjects research. Not Biodefense research.

Ignorance point 2). The NIH has spent billions of dollars fighting cancer. Does that make it a Weapons Program too? For that matter we spend hundreds of billion on Social Security and Medicaid so they are even bigger weapons programs.

Ignorance point 3). Pigs are used in Biodefense research because they can't use humans. Duh. How can someone test a potential treatment unless they have a disease model. Ergo we have to use Pigs, or mice or rabbits or monkeys...etc. Double Duh!

Ignorance point 4). In fact, Staphylococcus aureus is studied using BioD money. The strain of Staph that causes the vast majority of deaths in the US are antibiotic resistance. Look up MRSA on google or Bing. Category C on NIAID's list includes antibiotic resistance. Ergo BioD dollars funds Staph aureas research.

Ignorance Point 5). I believe that Ebright also does BioD research. Or at least research using BioD dollars. Did you ask him?

There are more Ignorance Points (you certainly fit a lot into such a small article) but you would have to start paying me to continue pointing out your total lack of knowledge.

But I guess stupid is allowed an opinion too. Sigh.....

S

 
May 02, 2010
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top