Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Thu

05

Feb

2009

Lack of Data on Medical Outcomes seen as Threat to Public Health
Thursday, 05 February 2009 19:14
by Sherwood Ross

Information about the quality and cost of medical care “is preeminently unavailable” not only to patients but even to doctors, specialists and insurers, so that all concerned parties literally are “flying blind,” a noted legal authority warns.

“Doctors, clinics, hospitals, etc. are not required to assess the quality of the care they are providing,” including the outcomes of that care, “or whether they are providing it less expensively or more expensively than other providers,” writes Lawrence Velvel in an essay, “The Urgent Need For Information On The Results (i.e. The Outcomes) of Medical Care.”

People “don’t really know” whether one cancer or heart center is doing a better job than another or “whether a given surgeon is a disaster who loses a disproportionate number of patients…” Velvel writes in his book “An Enemy of The People”(Doukathsan).

This might not matter if all doctors, hospitals, and clinics provided roughly equal care but “differences in quality and results are staggering,” Velvel says, quoting the findings of two Harvard business school professors that have studied the issue. They are Elizabeth Teisberg and Michael Porter, co-authors of “Redefining Health Care” from Harvard Business School Publishing.

Teisberg and Porter believe extensive statistics must be kept so that doctors can refer patients to the better caretakers. By so doing, the business professors say, they will also be referring patients to the less expensive providers “because their quality will in part reflect experience and, in various ways, consequent efficiency,” Velvel points out.

“Sometimes less expensive is better,” he writes, because “less expensive can reflect experience…can reflect better ways of doing things, and can reflect avoidance of wasteful, useless, but expensive treatments.”

Presently, at most hospitals, a patient with, for example, a spinal injury case is seen by doctors from different departments--radiologists, surgeons, anesthesiologists, orthopedics specialists, etc. But Porter and Teisberg contend a hospital should incorporate the various specialists into one department dedicated exclusively to spinal injuries.

“This will give all of them more experience with and knowledge of the relevant kind of medical problem---spinal problems,” Velvel writes, and “will foster communication among the different specialists and thereby lead to better treatments, will create a body of knowledge…about what treatments do or don’t work, (and) will encourage desirable experimentation to discover better methods.”

The business professors believe hospitals are best off selecting their specialty departments rather than attempting to staff a specialty department for every medical condition, thus eliminating “the horrendous cost of purchasing very expensive machines.”

“The competition in medicine,” Velvel continues, will, according to Porter and Teisberg, “provide both the best and least expensive care at the ‘medical condition’ level---the best and least expensive care for spinal problems, kidney problems, heart problems, etc.”

“Hospitals or clinics which provide the best care at the least cost,” Velvel goes on to say, “will get the most business and, very importantly, other doctors and institutions will begin using (will find it competitively necessary to use) the practices which the successful ones have shown are the best to date.”

However, for true competition to exist, it is critical for information to be available to the public on quality and cost. “Otherwise people are buying blind, are buying high cost items because advertising has persuaded them,” Velvel writes. And by making statistics on outcomes available, “inferior” providers will either have to emulate the successful providers or find themselves out of business.

Velvel says in the past medicine has often resisted quality comparisons “because doctors don’t want to be shown up” or because such statistics might prove misleading if hospitals that take on the most serious cases are judged besides hospitals that won’t. But Teisberg and Porter say it is now possible to produce “risk adjusted” figures on outcomes, adding that some medical institutions are already doing this.

Velvel concludes, “If we want to improve the situation in the field of health care, it is essential…to vastly improve the amount of information that is publicly available about outcomes and costs.”

Institutions that, according to “Redefining Health Care,” are already analyzing medical results, include the following:

Best Doctors, Inc., Boston (617) 426-3666
Preferred Global Health, Boston, (617) 369-7900
Institute For Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, (617) 301-4800
National Quality Forum, Washington, D.C. (202) 783-1300
The Leapfrog Group, Washington, D.C. (202) 292-6713
Pinnacle Care International, Baltimore (1-866) 752-1712
The National Committee For Quality Assurance, Washington (202) 955-3500
Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality, Madison (608) 250-1233
United Resource Networks, Golden Valley, MN , (1-800) 847-2050
Alpha-1 Foundation, Miami, (305) 567-9888
Pacific Business Group On Health, San Francisco (415) 281-8660

Sherwood Ross is a Miami-based media consultant to Massachusetts School of Law at Andover and columnist. He formerly reported for the New York Herald-Tribune and The Chicago Daily News. Reach him at sherwoodr1@yahoo.com)

More from this author:
Prevent Future Massacres by Curbing Bullying (6650 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross Society could reduce the number of senseless killings on campuses and in workplaces and shopping malls if it paid closer...
Bush Arms Dictators Around The World (7979 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross “In the last six years, Washington has stepped up its sales and transfers of high-technology weapons, military training, and...
CIA’S Overthrow of Iran in 1953 Reaps Bitter Harvest For America (7223 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross Iranians’ hatred of America dates back to the CIA’s violent 1953 overthrow of democratic Prime Minister Mohammed...
The Housing Bubble, Bailout, Good Jobs and Goodfellas (6175 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross The rush to bail out Wall Street is tragic. It’s as if the sun wouldn’t rise tomorrow unless Congress acted immediately....
The United States of England (8609 Hits)
by Sherwood Ross Why don’t we call America the United States of England? It may be a separate entity politically and geographically, but today...
Related Articles:
Kennedys, Bushes and Oil: Public Interest vs. Self Interest (7943 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo The history of the United States is filled with prominent families who achieved wealth, power and influence...
A Packet of Fear for Christmas: Channel Tunnel Threat "Far Graver" Than WWII (4738 Hits)
Jason Burke, writing for The Observer, has all the scary details. The Channel tunnel has been targeted by a group of Islamic militant terrorists...
Lynching Saddam - Part 10: Virtue, Terror and the Western public opinion’ s bloodthirsty schizophrenia (7151 Hits)
by Gabriele Zamparini, The notorious Kafka-esque trial is over; the Baghdad’s bordello turned its red lights off. Iraq President...
Are you a health nut? (5091 Hits)
by Mickey Z. January is resolution season. Holiday shopping frenzies subside and unwanted relatives return home as millions of Americans vow...
Agape: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (8859 Hits)
by Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. The word “agape” literally means “love.” More specifically, in the New Testament it referred to the fatherly...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (4)add comment

April said:

0
Great places to get more information!
When I need answers on anything medical relatedI always visit Ask A Nurse and they always have the right answers for me.
 
March 06, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

April said:

March 06, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

medical billing software said:

0
What ever happened to confidentiality
What is going on in the worls,sharing our medical documents via digitally.I understand it is a two way street between digital and normal filing.
 
March 16, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

emr said:

0
Patient doctor priveleges?
I believe electronic medical records should not be connected to the internet in anyway.
 
March 16, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top