Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sat

17

Mar

2007

Doomsday Book: Bush Literary Lunch Foretells Horrors Ahead
Saturday, 17 March 2007 16:43
by Chris Floyd

Stop what you're doing and go read – right now – Glenn Greenwald's account of the recent "literary luncheon" that George Bush held with a gaggle of extremist neocon "scholars" in the White Ho use. Read of the poison flattery they lovingly smeared all over Bush's ego, of the brutal and ignorant prejudices they confirmed him in, of the unbridled military aggression they advocated. Read how they fed Bush's megalomaniac belief in his "divine mission," like Byzantine courtiers or al Qaeda groupies assuring the Leader that he walks in God's favor and is answerable to no one and nothing but the Almighty.

Read too of how Bush eagerly lapped up their "lessons," nodding in solemn agreement with their fawning assessment of his greatness – even adding to it, saying that he was greater than Winston Churchill because the British leader was a secularist, an agnostic, and lacked the rigid blinders of crude, unquestioned faith that gives Bush such an unwavering certitude in the rightness – and righteousness – of his actions.

(This is hubris indeed, given that Churchill is the tutelary god of the neocons and all the other militarists of the American Empire crowd. Indeed, the Claremont Institute – yet another extremist pressure group on the war-whooping Right – has just announced it is giving its Statesmanship Award to none other than that eminent ex-statesman and certified slaughterer of civilians, Donald Rumsfeld, at the Institute's annual dinner in honor of – who else? – Winston Churchill. The Claremont Institute is of course devoted to restoring "the principles of the American Founding to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life." However, the Institute's view of these principles may differ slightly from that of the Founders themselves – a saucy crew largely made up of questioning, doubting, agnostic, non-blinkered secularists. For example, one of the Institute's most prominent board members is Howard Ahmanson Jr., the rightwing moneybags who for many years was the principal funder of the "Christian Reconstructionist" movement. This movement, many of whose adherents and allies now have ready access to the corridors of power and exercise great influence on the formation of government policy, advocates the imposition of a totalitarian theocratic state, with every aspect of public and private life governed by a Sharia-like blanket of religious law. Some of the fearsome strictures openly championed by the Reconstructionists include slavery for the poor who fall into debt, execution – by stoning -- for homosexuals and other transgressors, revocation of citizenship for non-believers, and a worldwide jihad to exert God's dominion over the globe. Bush, of course, is very much at home with such lumpish, grunting, primitive minds; but one suspects that Churchill – much less Jefferson, Madison and Franklin -- would find a dinner with these cretins pretty heavy going.)

But aside from the fascinating – if sick-making – spectacle afforded by Bush's neocon chowdown, Greenwald cuts to the deeper meaning of the event: we're doomed. The bloodthirsty baying of these servile ministers is the only voice that Bush attends to. Witness the "surge" in Iraq, launched in arrogant defiance not only of the will of the American people (neither party pays any attention to that) but also of a broad swathe of the Establishment elite, including the faction of Bush's own father. Instead, Bush turned to Frederick Kagan -- yet another well-wadded neocon courtier with absolutely no expertise in the Middle East, no knowledge of Iraq, no military experience, no qualifications at all save for his adherence to militarism, empire and the inherent greatness of George W. Bush. Bush will follow their lunatic agenda of "creative destruction" and imperial conquest to the end – because it is his agenda. Greenwald's conclusion is grim, but all too true:

Irving Kristol [husband of luncheon attendee Gertrude Himmelfarb] has written in the past about the need to exploit religious and moral concepts in order to manipulate the masses, and his intellectual North Star, Leo Strauss, has advocated -- as Strauss scholar Shadia Drury documented -- that "those in power must invent noble lies and pious frauds to keep the people in the stupor for which they are supremely fit" -- a view Kristol has endorsed. One can see that dynamic powerfully at work in the interaction between these neoconservatives and the President. They have seized upon the President's evangelical fervor and equated his "calling" to wage war for Good in the world with the neoconservative agenda of endless wars in the Middle East.

And the more unpopular the President becomes as a result, the more of a failure these policies are, the more strongly they tell him to ignore all of that, that none of it matters, that his God and history will conclude that he did The Right Thing, provided that he continues steadfastly to pursue their agenda. And the President believes that. That is why nothing will stop him in pursuing the path he created years ago when, in January, 2002, he became convinced to name not only Iraq, but also Iran, as standing members of the "Axis of Evil" (even though our relations with Iran were rapidly improving at the time) and cited the 9/11 attacks in order to all but vow war on those countries, despite their having nothing to do with those attacks. The President's "lessons" at the feet of neoconservatives continue, and he is as faithful a student as ever.
More from this author:
Immaculate Conception: A Squirt in the White House (13805 Hits)
George W. Bush's innumerable sycopants like to potray him as a down-to-earth man of the people: a man's man, tough and fearless, a good-ole-boy...
Thunder on the Mountain: The Murderers of Democracy (11830 Hits)
“Shame on your greed, shame on your wicked schemes. I tell you this right now, I don’t give a damn about your dreams.” -- Bob Dylan,...
War in Heaven: Woodward's Book and the Establishment Insurgency (12601 Hits)
Bob Woodward has long been the voice of the American Establishment – or of certain quadrants of it, at any rate. When Richard Nixon's...
Swing Blades: Don Rumsfeld Bats Both Ways (10662 Hits)
In February 2003, I wrote a column for the Moscow Times detailing Don Rumsfeld's personal – and profitable – connection with North Korea's...
Red October: Killing the Truth in Moscow (11799 Hits)
I. Early October can be dismal in Moscow. The short, harsh summer is over, the brief and beautiful refreshment of September has passed,...
Related Articles:
The Bush Magical Mystery Political Capital Tour (9873 Hits)
The Bush War Cabinet is invoking the memory of 9/11 as justification for their systematic shredding of constitutional and human...
Why Bush wants immunity from prosecution for war crimes (239082 Hits)
Although not as widely remarked as the elimination of habeas rights and the consecration of torture, the recently passed Senate torture legislation...
You and What Army? Bush Legions Starting to "Unravel" (11914 Hits)
Is it possible the largest and most advanced military in the history of the universe is ready to bust? According to General Barry McCaffrey (ret.)...
"Boiling Point" - Eroding Freedom: From John Adams to George W. Bush (13111 Hits)
Put a frog into a pot of boiling water, the well-known parable begins, and out that frog will jump to escape the obvious danger. Put that same...
Why Bush Smiles: Victory is at Hand in Iraq (11922 Hits)
Despite George W. Bush's ostentatious bucking up of the Iraqi government yesterday, it is very likely that there will indeed be an...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)add comment

Russell Wellen said:

0
Question Answered
Bush never seemed to me to have enough strength of character to be as stubborn and single-minded as his policies. With Billmon's retirement, Glenn Greenwald may be the finest blogger extant. We owe him a huge debt for enlightening us about who's steering Bush's course. Thanks also due Chris for shedding light on Greenwald's revelations.
 
March 18, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
Elizabeth Gyllensvard
Golly. This is grim. For more horror, read this account--
http://www.weeklystandard.com/...yferd.asp
Reader of the Free World: A literary luncheon with the president.
by Irwin M. Stelzer
03/12/2007, Volume 012, Issue 25
 
March 19, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
The Bush Zone
GWB has always reminded me of Martin Sheen's blank slate presidential candidate in the movie "The Dead Zone", whose election will mean apocalypse if not stopped by the main character. Except, of course, without Martin Sheen's charisma, speaking ability or political savvy.

To state that Mr. Bush does not have
enough strength of character to be as stubborn and single-minded as his policies
is to give him credit for character traits and ownership of said policies that I would never grant, personally.

I might agree that he has no particular character traits one might find necessary for building a team of learned professionals and taking personal ownership of policies that are built by political consensus and compassion for the nation he ostensibly serves.
 
March 19, 2007 | url
Votes: -1

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top