Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Tue

15

May

2007

They're Not Benchmarks
Tuesday, 15 May 2007 08:40
by David Swanson

The new war money bill passed by the House on May 10 does not include even a nonbinding end date for the war. It does fund the war for a shorter period of time at one shot, but the Senate doesn't like that idea, and the bill must be reconciled with whatever the Senate passes. So, what's left in the bill that Bush doesn't like? Benchmarks!

But there are two problems with this. Bush DOES like them. And they're NOT benchmarks. A benchmark is a standard of excellence against which other items are measured. Or it's a measure of progress toward a goal. The so-called benchmarks in the House bill are nothing of the sort.

Here's the relevant section:

"SEC. 1710. (a) BENCHMARKS- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, fifty percent of the funds appropriated by this Act for assistance for Iraq under the headings `Economic Support Fund' and `International Narcotics and Law Enforcement' shall be withheld from obligation until the President certifies to the Committees on Appropriations and Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committees on Appropriations and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives that the Government of Iraq has—"

Then the bill lists five (count em!) so-called "benchmarks," starting with:

"(1) enacted a broadly accepted hydro-carbon law that equitably shares oil revenues among all Iraqis;"

This law has been drafted. Vice President Dick Cheney's lobbying for its passage may have been the primary motivation for his recent trip to Iraq. Far from equitably sharing oil revenues, it hands the bulk of them over to foreign (probably largely US and British) corporations. This is the number one "benchmark", the theft of the oil of a nation we aggressively attacked and occupied. Is this a benchmark against which we will measure the theft of Iran's oil? Or in what sense is this a benchmark? And what about it are we to imagine Bush does not like?

"(2) adopted legislation necessary for the conduct of provincial and local elections, taken steps to implement such legislation, and set a schedule to conduct provincial and local elections;"

This is ludicrous. The majority of Iraqis have already backed ending the occupation. A majority of the members of their current parliament have signed a bill to end the occupation. And we're going to threaten to end the occupation unless they hold elections and act like a democracy? Is this a benchmark against which we'll measure episodes of Monty Python? Or in what sense is this a benchmark?

"(3) reformed current laws governing the de-Baathification process to allow for more equitable treatment of individuals affected by such laws;"

Oh, great, we're also going to threaten to leave unless they undo destructive laws that we imposed on them. Of course, we'll tell them what the new laws should be. But they'll still have a democracy, because – don't forget – we've already demanded that they hold local elections. But who will get the contract for the vote-counting machines?

"(4) amended the Constitution of Iraq consistent with the principles contained in Article 137 of such constitution; and"

This involves a process of amending "their" Constitution. We are demanding that they complete it or else… we'll end our occupation of their country.


"(5) allocated and begun expenditure of $10,000,000,000 in Iraqi revenues for reconstruction projects, including delivery of essential services, on an equitable basis."

Hmmm. So, after destroying their country, occupying it for years, slaughtering perhaps a million citizens, driving millions more to flee the country, and generally ruining their society, while dumping hundreds of billions of US dollars into war profiteering corporations pretending to reconstruct Iraq, we're going to demand that the Iraqis shell out $10 billion to pay for the reconstruction themselves. Or else, you guessed it, we'll leave and allow them to begin ending their nightmare without our "help".

These are our much vaunted BENCHMARKS. This is how the Democratic Party is "standing up to" Bush and Cheney. Let's face it. The Iraqi government is better representing the wishes of the American people in this matter right now. The following groups and organizations want to end the occupation:

The Iraqi Parliament

The Iraqi people

The active-duty US troops in Iraq

The American people

The following groups and organizations want to keep funding this war:

The White House

The Congress

The war profiteers

The U.S. media

But who is most impacted by the other benchmarks, the graves, the endless miles of dead bodies? Imagine trying to fit a million, three thousand, four hundred dead bodies into the U.S. Capitol. They would not fit. Not unless somebody burned them. Come to think of it, that might be a contract worth bribing someone for.
 
More from this author:
U.S. v. Bush (6644 Hits)
By David Swanson Now, we almost all agree that Bush and Cheney have done bad things. But have they actually committed crimes? If you know...
The Melbourne Minutes: New Downing Street Memos from Down Under (7728 Hits)
By David Swanson Over a year before the United States launched an endless war on Iraq in what President George W. Bush told Congress was...
Be All That You Can Be: Leave the Army (6371 Hits)
By David Swanson As long as there has been a U.S. military, people have been leaving it. That choice has never been more appropriate than...
Closer to Home (6126 Hits)
By David Swanson I did something worse than St. Augustine did when I was a kid. I must confess I broke into a house on the other side of...
Honesty in Iraq (5311 Hits)
By David Swanson The Minneapolis Star-Tribune recently published an editorial that said of Bush: "His pronouncements now bear no...
Related Articles:
The Best Reasons Not to Impeach, And Why They're Wrong (5978 Hits)
By David Swanson Political questions are tricky and complicated. Sometimes causes that are just and good must take a backseat to...
It's Alright, Ma, They're Only Bleeding: Dems Sell Out, Slaughter Goes On (6103 Hits)
by Chris Floyd As so often happens with some new sickening outrage, words fail me in confronting the base cowardice of the Democratic...
And They're Off! (2359 Hits)
by Will Durst As the curtain mercifully falls on the Most Important Election of Your Lifetime, the nation breathes a collective sigh of...
They're Coming: Freedom Flotilla Two and Others Planned (1714 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman The European Campaign to End the Siege on Gaza (ECESG) is "an umbrella body" of 34 European human rights and...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top