Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sat

11

Nov

2006

Bye-Bye Coke, Hello Pepsi - Anatomy of the Midterms
Saturday, 11 November 2006 07:13
by Joshua Frank

The big losers on Election Day were of course President Bush and the Republican Party, but there was another loser too: the conspiracy theory that had it that a slick operation run out of Karl Rove’s office, and working in cahoots with the makers of the electronic voting machines increasingly being installed by voting districts around the country would steal the key elections electronically.
I always felt that this conspiracy theory was over the top, and that it moreover was having the pernicious effect of creating massive cynicism about elections that would keep many people from voting who otherwise might have.

There's no way to know how many people didn't go to the polls because they decided that it would be a waste of time, but I sure have heard plenty of people saying, over the past year, "What's the point? The Republicans are going to steal the election anyway."

Well, if they were ever going to steal an election, this would have been the one to do it to. The last thing a criminal president whose popularity is in the cellar needs is a Congress armed with subpoena power in the hands of the opposition party. Surely, if Karl Rove could have tinkered with the numbers on those voting machines in just a few dozen districts, or in states like Montana or Virginia where the margin was a few thousand votes, and where the key voter registrar officials were fellow Republicans, he would have done it.

Instead, we saw dozens of congressional races and a handful of key Senate races switch to the Democrats, and sometimes by the narrowest of margins.

I am certain that Rove and his legions of dirty tricksters did their level best to intimidate and discourage minority and low-income urban voters from going to the polls. Greg Palast and others have ably demonstrated how Republicans have mastered the art of removing people from the rolls who should not be removed, of tricking people into thinking they'd registered to vote when they hadn't, and of threatening some groups of voters--mostly blacks and Hispanics--into not voting for fear of being arrested on some trumped-up charge. There have also been plenty of documented cases of Republican Party attempts to establish burdensome and illegal photo ID requirements. All these things have certainly lowered Democratic vote totals by millions of votes.

But the systematic tampering with voting machines that some warned would happen and that people have claimed happened in 2004 and 2000, simply didn't occur--and I suspect didn't occur those years either.

I’m not saying it couldn't be done from a purely technical point of view. Techies at Princeton have proven that the machines made by Diebold can be hacked. Others have hacked machines made by Sequoia Systems. And certainly if ATM machines can be made reasonably safe and reliable, voting machines should be able to be made equally so. But all that being said, showing it can be done, and actually having it done are two very different things.

Certainly the idea of having elections that use electronic voting machines which keep no paper record of votes is stupid and is just asking for trouble. Just consider the election district where a voting official forgot to push "save" to record the vote totals before turning off the machine! Or consider the Virginia Senate race, where they can't really do a recount even if Sen. Allen wants one, because a third of the voting machines have no paper record of what voters did. We don't do our ATM business without a receipt, or buy gas at a pump by credit card without a receipt, so why on earth would we accept the idea of voting without a receipt?

So let's fix the system so it has a verifiable paper trail.

But let's also stop the paranoia about massive vote-stealing conspiracies.

Karl Rove is about as much a genius as George Bush is a talented leader. The sinking ship of the Bush administration and the Republican Party is proving that. The way I see it, if you can be beaten by the current Democratic Party, you've got to be pretty pathetic!

Instead of telling people that the Republicans are going to hack the vote, we should be telling people that voting is a critical responsibility. We should also be fixing the election system so that the real threats to a fair vote--the impediments to voting that we know are being erected by Republicans--become illegal.

More from this author:
Hillary Clinton and the Pro-Israel Lobby - The Semiotics of Iniquity (4742 Hits)
by Joshua Frank George W. Bush's position on Iran is "disturbing" and "dangerous", reads a position paper written in...
Offering a Response to Senator Webb - What America Really Needs to Hear (5543 Hits)
By Joshua Frank Shortly after President Bush’s State of the Union address last week Jim Webb, the freshman Senator from Virginia,...
A Willful Abandonment of Progressive Ideals - Dump the Dems, Unite Against the War (5333 Hits)
by Joshua Frank We should have known it was coming. Even though the Democratic Party rode the antiwar wave in to Congress last...
Obama's Israel Problem (5301 Hits)
by Joshua Frank Sen. Barack Obama isn't quite sure how he feels about the lopsided situation between Israel and Palestine. Less than two...
The Price of Fire in Latin America (4015 Hits)
by Joshua Frank Ben Dangl is the author of The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia(AK Press 2007) and the...
Related Articles:
Stealing the Midterms and the Power of Myth (26242 Hits)
by Mike Whitney “The masses have never thirsted after truth. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever...
Today's Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies and the Merchants of Death (2246 Hits)
by Zahir Ebrahim Today's Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies and Senseless Warfare – Educate Yourself The Merchants of Death and their Errand Boys...
Anatomy of Modern Lies and Senseless Warfare – Educate Yourself (2894 Hits)
by Zahir Ebrahim The Merchants of Death and their Errand Boys and Girls “I am aware that there is still some who would question,...
Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory (2745 Hits)
by Zahir Ebrahim Some may rationally ponder that how is it, that such a long running global conspiracy for world government as outlined in Project...
Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory By Zahir Ebrahim (10776 Hits)
by Zahir Ebrahim Some may rationally ponder that how is it, that such a long running global conspiracy for world government as outlined in...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment

Pablo said:

0
Rope a dope
I can appreciate the thigh slapping 'schedenfraude' of progressive's everywhere watching Bush and his Fourth Reich cohorts licking their electoral wounds but I fear it may be very short lived.

Fact - the electronic voting machines can be easily rigged. If there was any genuine concern to truly protect the validity of the democratic mandate there would be a simple 'cash point' style paper trail. There isn't and with Democrats now bracing themselves to become kings of the hill, the momentum to protect the integrity of elections will slip down the agenda.

I'm disappointed by articles like this which uses the hackneyed "conspiracy" label to undermine those people who's main concern is the integrity of the elections.

Surely good sites like this should be doing all they can to support this cause.

Yeah let's all whoop at Rumsfield's bloodied scalp but also be careful of a 2008 knock-out sucker punch.

The USA has switched brands. It went from Coke to Pepsi, but guess what - inside the American 'body politik' - it's still rotten.
 
November 11, 2006
Votes: +0

Griffon said:

0
Naive again?!
This is the second article this week that disputes the conspiracy view of electoral rigging. What's going on?

That the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen is beyond dispute. That the voting machines were hacked is beyond dispute. It has been shown how it was done.

If this article was in the NYT or WaPo, I would not see it as unusual, but here on this site for thinking ans informed readers, I have to ask what the agenda is.

Well, what is it?
 
November 12, 2006
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top