Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sun

26

Nov

2006

The Washington Post's War Against Social Security - Editorializing while reporting
Sunday, 26 November 2006 04:17
By Seth Sandronsky

Lori Montgomery of the Washington Post reporter has a problem with Social Security. 

She writes:
"the rising costs of Social Security and government health-care programs by offering to open talks with no preconditions."
They are on tap as subject for debate in future talks between the GOP and Democrats in Congress.

Medicare and Medicaid are at-risk financially.  In brief, the reason for the financial fragility of Medicare and Medicaid is the affordability crisis of the U.S. health-care system.

Against this backdrop of the national health-care crisis, Social Security is the most successful insurance program going.  The key to its success is the social pooling of risk.  Social Security is not an investment.


Individual savings accounts are not insurance coverage.  President George W. Bush has tried to partially privatize Social Security, proposing individual investment accounts for younger workers.  They remain the rhetorical target as potential members of the president’s “ownership society.”

Now increasingly, these younger workers face being paid lower wages as new hires.  Add their student fees for higher education that are rising with a grim constancy.  The White House is well aware of the social conditions that this demographic is living, which can make it desperate and therefore at-risk to scare tactics.

One example is the oft-repeated claim that Social Security will be gone when young workers retire.  Thus there is a need to change the program now.  The go-to guy for such Social Security reform is Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr.

As the Bush presidency faces low polling numbers for its foreign and domestic policies, he needs political allies for yet another go at building support to reform Social Security.  So we see an olive branch of sorts being extended to the Democratic-majority Congress to discuss Social Security.

The problem with the administration’s plan to privatize Social Security remains what it has been.  The program’s finances are sound, on rock-solid ground for the next 40 years with no change at all, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reports.

Presumably, the Post reporter is ignorant of this fact. It is not arguable.  Maybe that explains the editorializing in her reporting,  combining the finances of Social Security with Medicare and Medicaid.

                                                               ###

Seth Sandronsky is a member of Sacramento Area Peace Action and a co-editor of Because People Matter, Sacramento's progressive paper www.bpmnews.org/.  He can be reached at: bpmnews@nicetechnology.com.

Social Security - a Breakdown
{youtube}Tts2uTWt6e8{/youtube}

 

More from this author:
“Every Honest Politician” Sebastian Mallaby’s Distortions (5365 Hits)
by Seth Sandronsky, As U.S. midterm elections near, the topic of political honesty draws some pundits like moths to light. Take...
Is Another Recession Looming? Growth Slows, Housing Fizzles (6126 Hits)
By Seth Sandronsky U.S. economic growth rose at an annual rate of 1.6 percent in July–September, the slowest in more than three...
University Unity - California professors and students join forces (4379 Hits)
by Seth Sandronsky The recent election win of an incumbent and centrist GOP governor in California over his Democratic rival by double digits...
To Rent or Own in the US? (3371 Hits)
by Seth Sandronsky Are you a renter now in the US? If so, perhaps thoughts of ditching that arrangement with a landlord and buying a home are...
Related Articles:
U.S. Service Academy Graduates Unite Against Illegal Iraq War (12199 Hits)
Atlantic Free Press Netherlands – (October 26, 2006) – The overwhelming response by alumni of United States service academies to the...
Catapulting the Propaganda with the Washington Post (11868 Hits)
by Chris Floyd The ever persipacious Angry Arab, As'ad AbuKhalil, plucks out the hidden (or not-so-hidden) propaganda in a passing...
The “Prophetic Social Movement”: Then and Now (6616 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler On Election Night of 2004, as I lay in bed much of the night awake and miserable, I found myself teetering on the...
Armagideon Time: Bush's Nuclear Folly and the National Security Lie (15064 Hits)
Written by Chris Floyd This story is appearing today at Truthout.org. "The Bush Faction's remaining claim to political...
India on 20 cents a day - The fine print in the reporting of global poverty estimates (4774 Hits)
by Aseem Shrivastava The World Bank — which has to be applauded for having made the first such attempt — started making international...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

hewhoasks said:

0
Well, sure
Yes, talk with no preconditions: the Republicans (a few of them) can once again propose the "personal accounts."

Then tell them "no." Heck, even when the Republicans controlled Congress the proponents couldn't sneak personal accounts through: too many Republicans would not go along. With every Bush road show appearance the public support for the scheme went down. "Personal accounts" are an obvious bad idea. Period.

Or, instead of saying "no" just ask the proponents to show an analysis (not just wild claims and propaganda) that shows the personal accounts will even work. That should shut them up: an analysis won't show that. An analysis will show that "personal accounts" as the basis of a general retirement scheme are just a government-mandated, government-controlled bubble scheme.

We need a discussion. We need it to be demonstrated that "personal accounts" are not the way to provide general retirement security.
 
November 26, 2006
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top