Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Thu

08

Nov

2007

What YouTube doesn't show - YouTube spread news of Florida's Taser incident fast. But instant media doesn't always tell the whole story.
Thursday, 08 November 2007 12:08
by Dennis Jett

If a picture is worth a thousand words, how many are conveyed by a video tape? Whatever the number, it is not always enough to understand the situation. That will not stop many people from rushing to judgment based on what they think they know. Their views are formed more by the media stampede and their own biases than by what really happened. And that says a lot about how people react and how information is used today.

Take the case of Andrew Meyer, the University of Florida student who had a Taser used against him by campus police at a speech by Sen. John Kerry (D) of Massachusetts last month. Videotapes of the incident made the evening television news and immediately found their way onto YouTube.

People around the world saw the incident replayed as thousands of newspapers and television stations picked up the story. The YouTube videos were viewed more than 3 million times.

As the story spread, many people formed a firmly held opinion. I also had an opinion on the event, but my perspective was unique. I was the moderator of Sen. Kerry's talk and the only other person on stage with him.

The Florida Department of Law Enforcement was called in to investigate whether the actions of the officers were appropriate. Their 300-page report was recently turned over to university officials. (A summary of it is at www.president.ufl.edu/incident/.) The report concluded the officers acted "well within" their guidelines and also pointed out that the student had provoked an earlier disturbance on campus. He boasted at that time to a friend that if he liked that confrontation he should come to Kerry's speech and see a real show. In a letter released October 29, Mr. Meyer publicly apologized for his "failure to act calmly" during the speech and admitted he had "stepped out of line" and was truly sorry for tarnishing the university's image.

What was not on the YouTube videos was the fact that the student disrupted the speech twice. After Kerry had responded to numerous questions, I announced that one final one would be taken from the microphone on my right. The student then grabbed the microphone on the left and loudly demanded that he be allowed to ask a question. When a female police officer intervened and tried to escort him out, he broke away and continued shouting. At that point, Kerry said he would take the student's question, but would respond first to the questioner who was supposed to have been last. As he finished answering that question the famous videos began.

Because the student had already been disruptive once, there were police officers and officials of ACCENT, the student organization that brings speakers to campus, standing next to him. When he launched into a diatribe and used a vulgar expression, the mic was cut off and he was carried off to the applause of many in the audience, all the while resisting the police.

The reaction of some on the political right who saw video was that the student was silenced because he had asked the senator an embarrassing question. Some on the left suggested his freedom of speech was suppressed. Neither version could be further from the truth.

On television, any number of talking heads offered similar thoughts or ones that were even more farfetched. But the electronic news media require only that those on the air speak with conviction. Any real insights or even information are entirely optional and usually rare. The pundits in print were often equally uninformed and off the mark. Few were willing to wait until a thorough investigation laid out the facts and, when it did, it was barely news. A relative handful of articles came out on the 300 page report and even fewer on Meyer's apology.

In an age of instantaneous communication, there seems to be a widespread expectation of equally rapid judgment. No one was lynched, but the virtual mob, fed by the media and a post-your-own-videos website, drew all the conclusions they needed for a verdict. And what the truth eventually turned out to be hardly got reported. It would be useful for the electronic media (besides NPR and PBS) to offer context and analysis and for the pundits to hold their judgments until they had more facts. That would require the former to cut back on the celebrity news and the latter to engage in less populist pontification. Neither will happen unless the audience demands it.

Dennis Jett, former US ambassador to Peru and Mozambique, is dean of the International Center at the University of Florida. His second book, "Why American Foreign Policy Fails," will be published in May.
 
More from this author:
The Iraq reality: No way forward (4272 Hits)
by Dennis C. Jett The year 2007 undoubtedly will bring its share of unexpected events. But here is one that should catch...
Get out - now (3667 Hits)
by Dennis Jett Despite all the rhetoric and resolutions emanating from Washington, two fundamental facts about the war in Iraq won't...
Expect no World War III for now (3196 Hits)
by Dennis Jett Everybody relax. We are not going to bomb Iran. The reason why we are not is obvious. But because it does not add ...
Patriot Act (2939 Hits)
by Dennis Jett Why is it that those who proclaim their patriotism the loudest often demonstrate the least understanding of what this country...
Bush fans can't prewrite history (2485 Hits)
by Dennis Jett Some people want to rewrite history even before it happens. Just look at the growing gaggle of pundits asserting that President...
Related Articles:
You and What Army? Bush Legions Starting to "Unravel" (11866 Hits)
Is it possible the largest and most advanced military in the history of the universe is ready to bust? According to General Barry McCaffrey (ret.)...
Mosaic TV - World News from the Middle East (14152 Hits)
  Mosaic features selections from daily TV news programs produced by national and regional broadcasters throughout the Middle East....
When "anti-war" doesn't mean anti-war (6293 Hits)
by Mickey Z.   A casual stroll through most major U.S. cities would provide ample opportunity to encounter numerous stickers, buttons,...
Midterm Elections 2006: It's Always Darkest, Right Before ... It Goes Completely Black (9822 Hits)
by Phil Rockstroh If voting could change the system, it would be illegal. --Theodore Adorno "I can't go on. I'll go on....
Philly Inquirer: Making Biased News out of Mole Hills (8384 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff For an example of shameless partisanship and promotion of one candidate in the news pages, it would be hard to find a ...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (6)add comment

Jay said:

0
...
According to Dennis Jett arrest and tasering is now an acceptible way to handle a forceful questioner; especially if many in an audience agree by clapping. Furthermore, a "diatribe and vulgar expression" are certainly grounds for this action.
Dennis fails to mention the severity of the legal charges threatened against Mr Meyer, which of course forced his contrition.
Dennis, you and John Kerry are part of the problem. It is your america as much as Mr Bush's that we all fear.
 
November 08, 2007
Votes: -2

Patrick said:

0
...
Nothing you can say will erase what I saw. And what I saw is unadulterated fascism.
 
November 08, 2007
Votes: -3

Kai said:

0
WTF!?!?!?!
Dennis, are you kidding me? Do you seriously expect any rational and educated person to believe that the student DESERVED to be tasered because of his actions? I don't care how loud he spoke. I don't care if he used vulgarity. I don't care if he called Sen. Kerry names. Use of a taser by law enforcement is done ONLY, O-N-L-Y, when there that law enforcement officer is threatened with PHYSICAL HARM! At no point in time did the student constitute a physical threat to anyone at the event and he did not resist arrest. I think you need to read up on the 1st Amendment and the Constitution before you release a public statement such as this that does nothing but support the move of this country to a fascist regime.
 
November 08, 2007
Votes: -2

Jimmy Montague said:

Jimmy Montague
Try it yourself next time.
I read that the student "launched into a diatribe and used a vulgar expression." I did NOT read that the student posed a physical threat to anyone. So I urge Dennis Jett: Next time you speak out of turn, say something inappropriate, or start an argument in public, don't complain if a platoon of police should knock you down and shove a taser up YOUR backside. The police will have a 300-page report which justifies their behavior in any event, and the rest of us already know: you think their behavior is entirely justified.

Surely you are NOT an American born and bred? Say it ain't so! Please.
 
November 09, 2007
Votes: -2

Sisyphus39 said:

0
...
Non-lethal weapons are not "non-lethal"! Those police guidelines are not 'of the people.' We are being conditioned to accept this kind of treatment so as to be under the control of police. It is most disturbing to an American to see that college students accept it.
The police are even allowed to invent a felony crime on the spot. "Resisting arrest" makes a felony of human physical reflex. With that weapon in their arsenal, police have the power to arrest anyone at any time in any way -- and if the person isn't eager to go along in lock-step, the cost can be high -- in time, in money, in reputation, and mostly in the cost of confidence in the police and respect for the law.
RESIST!
 
November 09, 2007
Votes: -1

Jimmy Montague said:

Jimmy Montague
Can we assume --
Obviously, Dennis Jett's thesis in "Why American Foreign Policy Fails" is that American diplomats are not yet empowered to taser the diplomats of foreign nations who disagree with American policy. Congressional action to remedy said defect will surely be forthcoming.
 
November 10, 2007
Votes: -1

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top