Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

31

Dec

2007

Ron Paul in 2008? Just Say No to Dr. No
Monday, 31 December 2007 19:49
by Jason Miller
“Capitalism is the legitimate racket of the ruling class.”
— Al Capone
It has taken Nuremberg-class war crimes, craven ineptitude by Congressional Democrats, foreclosures on every other home in the neighborhood, and a metaphorical gun to our heads when we fill our gas tanks, but growing numbers of us US Americans are shedding our smug insularity.

“Ron Paul in 2008” has become the mantra for untold millions who are realizing that the establishment in the United States is an abomination that needs to be torn down and replaced. Ostensibly, Dr. Paul is the populist maverick we need to shake up the system and set our nation on a path to sanity and viability. His political coffers are overflowing with cash, almost none of which came from corporate or “special” interests. He is principled and consistent. And his position on a number of important issues aligns with the interests of the masses.

When he appeared on Meet the Press on December 23rd, even Tim Russert, one of the system’s most prominent cheerleading whores, couldn’t rattle him. It would certainly have been difficult not to admire Paul’s frontal assault on a number of the “sacred cows” that Russert and his ilk in the mainstream media work so hard to defend.

Consider several of the broad-sides Paul leveled against our malignant status quo:
MR. RUSSERT: Would you cut off all foreign aid to Israel?

REP. PAUL: Absolutely.

REP. PAUL: They don’t come here to attack us because we’re rich and we’re free. They come and they, and they attack us because we’re over there.

MR. RUSSERT: “Because we’re over there.” And then you added this on Tuesday: “But” al-qaeda has “determination. The determination comes from being provoked.”
How have we, the United States, provoked al-Qaeda?

REP. PAUL: Well, read what the lead–the ringleader says. Read what Osama bin Laden said. We had, we had a base, you know, in Saudi Arabia that was an affront to their religion, that was blasphemy as far as they were concerned. We were bombing Iraq for 10 years, we were–we’ve interfered in Iran since 1953. Our CIA’s been involved in the overthrow of their governments. We’re bought right now in the process of overthrowing that nation. We side more with Israel and Pakistan, and, and they get annoyed with this. How would we react if we were on their land–if they were on our land? We would be very annoyed, and we’d be fighting mad.

MR. RUSSERT: Do you think there’s an ideological struggle that Islamic fascists want to take over the world?

REP. PAUL: Oh, I think some, just like the West is wanting to do that all the time. Look at the way they look at us. I mean, we’re in a, we’re in a 130 countries. We have 700 bases. How do you think they proposed that to their people, saying “What does America want to do? Are they over here to be nice to us and teach us how to be good Democrats?”

REP PAUL: ….But the point is I’m not against the FBI investigation in doing a proper role, but I’m against the FBI spying on people like Martin Luther King. I’m against the CIA fighting secret wars and overthrowing government and interfering…
Amen to ending over a hundred years of imperialistic foreign policy, breaking up the military industrial complex, cutting off our financial and military support of the genocidal squatters in Palestine, and reining in the torturers and assassins in our “intelligence” community. His pursuit of these goals is certainly an objectively sound reason to support Ron Paul.

Yet despite these highly laudable positions, Paul is potentially as treacherous as the creatures of the system most of us have come to loathe. Compared to opportunistic moneyed elites like Mitt Romney or Hillary Clinton, Paul is indeed an alluring candidate.

However, he has at least one very deep flaw which would almost certainly make his presidency an unmitigated disaster for the poor and the working class the world over:

Ron Paul ardently supports the libertarian notions of laissez faire, free markets, deregulation, and privatization.

In an ironic and almost comical twist, the imperialism, corporatism, and prefigurements of fascism he has so accurately identified (and vowed to eradicate) are symptoms of monopoly capitalism, a mature form of the system that his libertarian principles would serve to buttress and amplify.

In “The Shock Doctrine” Naomi Klein amply documents the widespread murder, mayhem, and misery caused by implementing a libertarian economic doctrine (as the United States facilitated under the tutelage of Milton Friedman and his acolytes) throughout South America, Southeast Asia, Russia, and China. Savage capitalism at its finest. And for evidence that it CAN happen here (in our “enlightened” Western culture), one need only look back to the Gilded Age and Dickensonian England.

Regardless of how malformed it was due to the relentless pressure applied by the United States via the nuclear arms race we initiated to break it and our HUGE economic advantages, the Soviet Union represented a powerful counter-balance to the forces of unrestrained capitalism. Upon its collapse, the capitalists of the world united and set out to eliminate the hard fought gains the working class had made throughout the Twentieth Century. And Dr. Paul wants to hand those cynical bastards the keys to the kingdom by dismantling what is left of government restraints on the bourgeoisie.

Contrary to the agenda advanced by Ron Paul, “all government” is not inherently evil. It is true that the federal government we have now is an enemy to the masses in many respects. But Uncle Sam is not our foe because he “over-regulates” the parasitic capitalists who are raping the planet, “steals” our money through taxation, or acts as a “nanny state” by providing what has become a nominal safety net for the poor and elderly, as Paul suggests. He is our adversary because he is looking out for the wealthy elite and views people like you and me as disposable. In contrast to Lincoln’s vision — “of the people, by the people and for the people,” we have a government of the rich, by the rich, and for the rich.

While Ron Paul MIGHT be able to slay the dragons of the military industrial complex and undue Zionist influence, his adherence to a “prehistoric” form of capitalism has the potential to essentially eliminate what is left of the rapidly eroding gains the working class and poor have made over the last century.

Despite his apparent opposition to the powers that be, a vote for Ron Paul is still a vote for our continued enslavement by a system predicated on greed, selfishness, and the prosperity of the few at the expense of the many. In fact, unless by some miracle a viable candidate who opposes capitalism actually emerges, the act of voting in our bourgeois democracy is little more than a validation of our servitude.

So don’t participate. Our ruling elite can’t mouth hollow platitudes about democracy if they don’t have voters.
Jason Miller is a recovering US American middle class suburbanite who strives to remain intellectually free. He is Cyrano’s Journal Online’s associate editor and publishes Thomas Paine’s Corner within Cyrano’s. You can reach him at JMiller@bestcyrano.com
 
More from this author:
Unleashing the Christ Within:Last Hope for the Moribund Soul of a Nation? (6913 Hits)
by Jason Miller “What shall it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?” -Jesus Christ Humanity’s...
To the Victors Belongs Impunity (6221 Hits)
By Jason Miller Of Incorrigible Transgressors, Tacit Complicity, and Lady Justice’s Conspicuous Absence “The illegal we...
Milton Lost: Can We Regain Paradise? (7111 Hits)
by Jason Miller [I dedicate this essay to the untold millions who suffered as a result of Milton Friedman’s creation of an ...
Blind Obedience to the Canons of Capitalism: Sick Societies, American Dalits, a Nation of Lady Macbeths (12048 Hits)
By Jason Miller [Author’s Note to Establish Context: I composed this on 11/24/06, the day after Thanksgiving] “Tell me...
O Come Let Us Adore Them: Treasuring our American Values of Greed, Self-Interest, and Enlightened Oppression (7086 Hits)
By Ragnar Redbeard III “What kind of a society isn't structured on greed? The problem of social organization is how to set up an...
Related Articles:
The Rumsfeld Memo: “I was just about to change everything….Really!?!” (8659 Hits)
by Mike Whitney By now, everyone has heard about Rumsfeld’s memo. It was leaked to the New York Times supposedly without Rumsfeld’s...
Rockford, Illinois: Terrorist Plot Foiled? Or Just Another Knucklehead Stung? (8846 Hits)
Surely the Washington Post had fun trying to keep the word "entrapment" out of this story: An Illinois man has been charged with two...
It’s Not Just Bush: We’re Accountable Too (5087 Hits)
by Heather Wokusch Click on arrow to listen to Heather's Podcast here: www.heatherwokusch.com/podcasts/We_Are_Accountable_Too_48KBs.mp3 ...
Just Like with Torture, Cheney's Got His Teeth Sunk into Iran (5968 Hits)
by Russ Wellen So much creative destruction, so little time. First the Republicans lost their majority status in Congress. Then the Iraq...
Baghdad Ho! Ann Coulter Discovers It Really Is Just Like LA (4394 Hits)
by R.J. Eskow Critics have called Ann Coulter's comparison of Baghdad to LA ridiculous - but they haven't read her searing "Iraqi...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (11)add comment

Danny said:

0
Dr. No
Ron Paul or collapse of the US....it's that simple
 
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

Scott said:

0
Nothing to worry about
Even if you disagree with Paul's views on free markets, it is illogical to be fearful of them. Unlike most if not all of the other candidates, Ron Paul has respect for the rule of law and the balance of a 3 branch government. The executive branch has taken too much power lately, and we've been conditioned to think, for some reason, that the president is a dictator who can do whatever he or she pleases. Believe it or not... the president's whim's do not become law the moment he or she steps into office. Paul is the only candidate who will begin to address the problems of an overly corporate controlled government. He is needed at this time to point the country back in the right direction. if your opinion is that some of his views are a bit extreme (an opinion I personally don't share), they will be tempered by Congress and Pau's respect for the balance of power defined in The Constitution.
 
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

Max Rakrl said:

0
...
The Shock Doctrine gets facts wrong from the start. Big Government props up Big Business. Without imperialistic wars, halliburton could not exist at its current size. Unfortunately for many idealists, greed will never be extinct, and big government creates unchecked corruption (eg united nations). The more regulation and large government- the larger and more powerful will be the business interests. Real power to the people comes thru the limits of government.
 
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

jebba said:

0
South America got Fascism, not free markets
Sitting here in Buenos Aires I can testify that they sure as hell didn't bring libertarianism here nor to anywhere in South America. If you fear libertarianism because you think that's what South America got, you are justified. But it ISN'T libertarianism at all, certainly not the kind Ron Paul advocates.

-Jeff
 
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

Michael said:

0
WTF are you smoking?
At least it would be legal under Ron Paul...

You my friend need a grip...
 
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

tj said:

0
Nothing to worry about
because Ron Paul will never be allowed to be president. You really don't think voters decide this, do you?
 
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

Observer said:

0
The Shock Doctrine's GLARING OMISSION
911 was the shock the patriot act etc were the re-programming.
 
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

Kiel said:

0
Yes they can!
"So don’t participate. Our ruling elite can’t mouth hollow platitudes about democracy if they don’t have voters."

Even though voter turnout rates have been dismal in the US for a very long time, this hasn't stopped our elites from "exporting democracy" through imperial wars to other countries! Apparently enough people believe these "hollow platitudes" to march to war.

Non-participation is not positive action. Electing someone who will dislodge the festering, entrenched interests is a strong step toward national viability. This shakeup in politics will activate more and more critical minds in the electorate -- this can only be a good thing. In any case, capitalism has been shown in history to be a more vital and robust economic system than socialism, regardless of the good or evil.

Keep in mind that, though far from perfect, our system of justice is a stronger and less corrupt institution than its counterparts in South America decades ago. This system, beholden to the people through appointments by elected representatives in the government, is the bulwark against evils of pure capitalism.

Ron Paul in 2008!
 
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

Cawdor said:

0
cawdor01@mailinator.com
"In “The Shock Doctrine” Naomi Klein amply documents the widespread murder, mayhem, and misery caused by implementing a libertarian economic doctrine (as the United States facilitated under the tutelage of Milton Friedman and his acolytes) "

Too bad Jason did not do his research (like most MSM talking heads). Dr.Paul is a student of Mises Austrian school of Economic theory not Friedman.

For Jason to make that statement is an error of negligence

As for his continuing socialist rant against the "evils" of communism, he fails to mention that no socialist regime has successfully existed without either a catastrophic collase, crushing fascism, or outright theft of an invidual's wealth and property.

Dr. Paul is correct in that only free markets and no governmental influence except in the areas of safety and liberty are the best solution to the economy.

The subsidization of mega-corps and welfare recipients will be removed as well as the bane of inflated prices for goods and services imposed by the State,

The introduction of sound money and the removal of the Fed Reserve will allow the dollar to have value.

The combination of the 2 allows for people wealth to grow since the dollar will be worth more and that products will be cheaper, thus the amount of wealth needed to own "things" will not be as high as it is now under.

As more peple have wealth they will need more things, creating new oppurtunities, thus creating more jobs.

The last thing needed is the rule of law to keep businesses in-line with the freedoms and liberties of the American peole.

Again this is another platform of Dr. Paul, thus showing his proficiency in seeing the complete picture nedded for success in America.

Americans do not need more socialism prescribed by Jason, it has always failed and it will keep failing because of the inherent inefficiency, mismanagement and lack of openness inherent in it.

 
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

g. Anton said:

0
Candidates Bought and Paid For
How do you tell to whom a presidential candidate owes his allegiance? Follow the money. With a few minor league exceptions, all of the candidates except Ron Paul have been bought and paid for by big business. These other candidates are without exception following in lock step our current president, who is classical fascistic colonialist and war criminal.




 
January 02, 2008
Votes: +0

One Tuza said:

0
Abolish the Federal Reserve and the IRS
Wake up America! Educate yourself! If you want to know why Ron Paul wants to get rid of the Federal Reserve and the IRS, visit http://www.freedomtofascism.com and check out Aaron Russo's documentary, "America, From Freedom To Fascism" Bulk order it for $1.25 each and send it to your non-computer literate baby boomer friends, heck, all of your friends and relatives!
WE THE PEOPLE need to take back our Republic!
(BTW, I'm 62 years old)
 
January 12, 2008
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top