Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

10

Nov

2008

War in Afghanistan Could Doom Obama Presidency
Monday, 10 November 2008 16:31
by Lawrence Velvel

We hope for Barack Obama to have all the success in the world. And given his smarts — he seems far and away the smartest president-elect in the last 45 years — he should although, as one person put it to me, people hope for so much from him that there conceivably could be no way he will not disappoint and begin to catch tremendous flak, even early on. Yet one nonetheless hopes he will be tremendously successful.

There are, however, a few things about which he should be very careful, in the interest of both himself and the nation. To me, foremost among them is the possibility of war in Afghanistan. Obama has said we should get out of Iraq, but fight in Afghanistan. If he really believes that instead of just having said it for campaign purposes, and if he really does it, then his presidency is already doomed. Neither Alexander the Great, nor the British nor the Russians succeeded there. The British once sent out a column of what — 20 or 25 thousand troops? — of whom I think two returned (that's two as in two, not as in two thousand). The Russians had, I think, about 150,000 men there and lost what, about 14,000 dead, despite modern weapons, if I remember correctly? There is something about the countryside, the people, the mindset that does not admit of victory by invaders. We found out in Viet Nam and Iraq that we cannot accomplish our imperial military aims any better than the British, the French (in Algeria and Indo China) or the Russians could. And we already have learned in Afghanistan that we cannot convert that opium growing, warlord-ridden nation into a democracy that focuses on other things. If Obama were to fight a war in Afghanistan, his Presidency would be as good as over. Huge numbers of us who supported him, and have hopes for him, will leave him and begin assailing him.

I have mentioned at other times that war has destroyed five presidencies in the last 90 years, those of Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon and George W. Bush. History says it will destroy Obama's too if he really meant it when he said he will fight in Afghanistan, that graveyard for empires.

And, when one thinks about it, why fight in Afghanistan? Initially we fought there because its government, the Taliban, had harbored Al Qaeda. So we decided to depose the Taliban instead of simply destroying Al Qaeda's camps — a very questionable decision, if one that was at least understandable given the temper of the time. But in the long run it didn't work. The Taliban are back. The opium is back. The warlords continue. And when they have to, Al Qaeda personnel simply go into Pakistan. To think we are going to change the situation (without the commitment of at least what — a million men? 1.5 million men?) defies both recent history and long term history since Alexander the Great. Even if we were to commit a million men, Al Qaeda will simply go to Pakistan. And then what will we do — invade Pakistan? Not to mention that our military actions and our actions against prisoners are our opponents' finest recruiting tools and thereby promote endless war.


Better to try to achieve peace, use humint to locate enemies, and, if and when necessary, destroy enemy camps or bases with all that vaunted high tech military stuff like predators and guided bombs.

One can only pray that a smart guy like Obama sees the light on this and does not fight a war in Afghanistan. Otherwise one will in future have to write that war destroyed the presidencies of Wilson, Truman, Johnson, Nixon, Bush and Obama.

There is another, lesser matter that I think Obama should be careful about. It is being said that, to some extent, he is filling his transition team and administration with persons from the Clinton Administration. (It would be harsh to call them retreads, would it not?) There are obvious reasons for this: experience and keeping peace within the Democratic Party are two of them. When Carter failed to do this in 1976, his administration foundered, partly for lack of experience. But if Obama goes too far with this, he is going to create bitter enmity among so many who had much to do with his success and who will be very put off by a second coming of Clintonia.*



Lawrence Velvel is Dean of the Massachusetts School of Law(MSL) at Andover and a frequent commentator on contemporary affairs. He is the author of “Blogs From A Liberal Standpoint 2004-2005”(Doukathsan), winner of the bronze medal in the essays category from ForeWord for 2006. He has also been honored for his work in the field of legal education, as his law school provides a practicable, quality, affordable education for students from low-and middle income backgrounds and minorities who would otherwise be unable to obtain a legal education. Further information: contact Dean Velvel at velvel@mslaw.edu
More from this author:
The Bigger The Company, The More Disastrous The Mistake (1977 Hits)
by Lawrence Velvel In younger days I was an antitrust lawyer for a considerable number of years. Most of my work, and my cast of mind,...
Federal Judges Accepting All Expense Paid Junkets to Right Wing Conferences. (2368 Hits)
by Staff Federal judges were attending corporation-sponsored conferences at posh watering holes, at times on the very subjects of cases they...
Move to End Internet Neutrality Seen as Blow to Ordinary Bloggers (1384 Hits)
by Lawrence R. Velvel If the cable and phone companies that transmit Internet data are allowed to charge higher rates to some producers for...
The Four Torture Memos, Eichmann, And The Obama Administration (1408 Hits)
by Lawrence Velvel I have read the four memoranda that were recently released by the DOJ and authorized torture. Permit me to invent a similar...
President O’Bomber Denies CIA Not Connecting Dots On Terrorist Plans (1770 Hits)
by Lawrence Velvel (Satire) In an exclusive interview, President Barack O’Bomber said it was not true “that our (CIA) analysts were not...
Related Articles:
Lieberman and McCain's Desired Escalation Could Result in the Next World War (4585 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo Yesterday, January 6, 2007, Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman, two-thirds of the trio of tyranny (along with...
Afghanistan - Treading on the Toes of Iraq (4866 Hits)
by Ehsan Azari The two-day NATO’s heads of government summit in the Latvian capital, Riga, on November 28-29, has ended with incremental...
If Beal Street Could Talk – Part 1 - Bush's Escalation Speech (6120 Hits)
by David Swanson I'd like to request that nobody shout during this event, and I'll tell you why. I watched Bush's speech with some people ...
Paradoxes Doom Bush’s ‘New Strategy’ in Iraq (4811 Hits)
by Nicola Nasser President George W. Bush’s paradoxical “new strategy” in Iraq is doomed by its own contradictions as much as by...
Is Barack Obama Ready to Be Leader of the Free World? (4899 Hits)
by Ed Kociela The question isn't if America is ready for a black president. The question is if Barack Obama is ready to be president. ...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top