Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Wed

24

Jan

2007

Supporting the Troops? Senator Webb Puts Bush in the Cross-hairs
Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:05
by Walter C. Uhler

During President Bush's State of the Union speech last night and during Senator Jim Webb's Democratic Party response, two key observations were made that put the President's continuing mishandling of his illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq into sharp focus.

Although Mr. Bush correctly observed that, "in the minds of the terrorists, this war began well before September 11th," had he been honest, he would have added: "And, yes, we planned to overthrow Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq long before September 11th. We simply used September 11th as a pretext, in order to exploit your fear and rage."

But his most telling sentence was uttered immediately after he admitted: "In Iraq, al Qaeda and other Sunni extremists blew up one of the most sacred places in Shia Islam - the Golden Mosque of Samarra. This atrocity, directed at a Muslim house of prayer was designed to provoke retaliation from Iraqi Shia - and it succeeded. Radical Shia elements, some of whom receive support from Iran, formed death squads. The result was a tragic escalation of sectarian rage and reprisal that continues to this day." Bush then admitted: "This is not the fight we entered in Iraq, but it is the fight we are in."

Hello? Indeed, the Bush administration told us that the fight we entered was supposed to be a "cakewalk," in which Iraqi civilians would be greeting U.S. troops as liberators and with flowers, not IEDs. It was supposed to be a fight justified by Saddam's weapons of mass destruction (which proved to be nonexistent) and his ties to al Qaeda terrorists - another lie. And it was supposed to be a fight that would bring democracy to the Middle East, although international law prohibits unprovoked wars of aggression, even in the name of advancing democracy (itself the height of arrogance).

In fact, before Bush's illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq, most experts doubted the Bush administration's assertions (now seen to be egregious lies) about Saddam's alleged nuclear weapons program. Remember the alarmist lies by Bush and Condoleezza Rice about a "mushroom cloud?" And now we know that Cheney's lies about Saddam's ties to al Qaeda were not only based upon fabrications concocted outside the regular intelligence channels, but were rebutted by no less than five legitimate intelligence reports - which Cheney dismissed as "crap."

Beyond raising the question of whether an invasion to overthrow Saddam might have unforeseen implications for the Sunni/Shia balance in the Middle East, perhaps strengthening the influence of Shiites in Iran, countless experts on Iraq and the Middle East cautioned, before Bush's reckless invasion, that an invasion to depose Saddam Hussein might be met with an insurgency that could bog American forces down in a quagmire. Indeed, how many experts cautioned that it is easier to start a war than end one?

Finally, you'll recall that many experts cautioned, before Bush's reckless invasion, that the insurgency might explode into a civil war, precisely "not the fight we entered in Iraq." Nevertheless, Bush's obsession with "taking out" Saddam caused him and his administration to throw caution and deliberation to the wind. Now, there remains but one more unfulfilled horror that the experts cautioned about before Bush's reckless invasion of Iraq; the possibility that civil war in Iraq will embroil the entire Middle East in a regional war.

Indeed, Mr. Bush, the war has turned out to be quite different from "the fight" YOU "entered in Iraq." Encouraged by the neoconservatives - who have been proven wrong on virtually every aspect of their war-mongering advice concerning Iraq -- you insisted in unleashing the whirlwind there. Every day, Iraqis and/or Americans are dying, thanks to your recklessness. Not only do you have the blood of untold tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis on your hands, as Senator Jim Webb told America last night, you have failed in your duty to support the troops.

A military veteran with a son in Iraq, Senator Webb put Bush in the cross-hairs of irresponsibility last night when he asserted: "Like so many other Americans, today and throughout our history, we serve and have served, not for political reasons, but because we love our country. On the political issues, those matters of war and peace, and in some cases of life and death we trusted the judgment of our national leaders. We hoped that they would be right, that they would measure with accuracy the value of our lives against the enormity of the national interest that might call upon us to go into harm's way."

As almost everybody in the world now knows, "the President took us into this war recklessly." And "the war's costs to our nation have been staggering. Financially. The damage to our reputation around the world. The lost opportunities to defeat the forces of international terrorism. And especially the precious blood of our citizens who stepped forward to serve."

Senator Webb might have added that Bush's reckless invasion of Iraq has transformed international terrorism into a growth industry. And he might have added that Mr. Bush has severely damaged, if not wrecked, America's military. Yet, when he asserted that "the majority of our military" no longer support "the way this war is being fought, Senator Webb's challenge was quite clear: How dare you claim that you are supporting our troops?

Radicals in the Middle East? Let's first get rid of the radicals in the White House!

Walter C. Uhler is an independent scholar and freelance writer whose work has been published in numerous publications, including The Nation, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the Journal of Military History, the Moscow Times and the San Francisco Chronicle. He also is President of the Russian-American International Studies Association (RAISA).
More from this author:
The South Continues to "Make" Race: Will the Supreme Court Follow? (6860 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler A Review of How Race is Made: Slavery, Segregation, and the Senses, by Mark M. Smith (University of North Carolina Press,...
Put on the Spot, Our Punk President Lies Yet Again (6284 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler Whenever I hear President Bush tell another lie (or read that he has told another lie) I'm reminded of the Liar-in-Chief's...
Bringing the "Perps," Bush and Cheney, to Justice (5300 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler A Review of U.S. v. Bush By Elizabeth de la Vega According to President Bush, Saddam Hussein was brought to...
FOX News Fascist, Gretchen Carlson, Swift-boats Sen. Kennedy's Opposition to Bush's "Surge" (5769 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler Although none of the following news nuggets were found in the speech that President Bush delivered tonight, recently, we...
Hoover Institution Hack from Ann Coulter's School of History Slimes "Left" for 9/11 (6112 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler Incredibly, on January 18, 2007, the Lost Angeles Times (no typo) published Dinesh D'Souza's thoroughly biased Op-Ed,...
Related Articles:
The Bush Magical Mystery Political Capital Tour (9843 Hits)
The Bush War Cabinet is invoking the memory of 9/11 as justification for their systematic shredding of constitutional and human...
Why Bush wants immunity from prosecution for war crimes (239014 Hits)
Although not as widely remarked as the elimination of habeas rights and the consecration of torture, the recently passed Senate torture legislation...
You and What Army? Bush Legions Starting to "Unravel" (11878 Hits)
Is it possible the largest and most advanced military in the history of the universe is ready to bust? According to General Barry McCaffrey (ret.)...
"Boiling Point" - Eroding Freedom: From John Adams to George W. Bush (12974 Hits)
Put a frog into a pot of boiling water, the well-known parable begins, and out that frog will jump to escape the obvious danger. Put that same...
Why Bush Smiles: Victory is at Hand in Iraq (11891 Hits)
Despite George W. Bush's ostentatious bucking up of the Iraqi government yesterday, it is very likely that there will indeed be an...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

a guest said:

0
Albert
I find it infuriating that Bush and his Junta continue to blame the Sunni for the attack against the Shiaa Gloden Dommed Mosque in Samarra.

One only has to realise that the Sunni are not prone to committing suicide by deliberately inviting the majority Shiaa to start attacking them, as they are now doing. The Sunni are fighting a resistance against the obscene occupation of their country by the United States of America and by extention, the Zionist occupiers and butchers of Palestine.

Now, whu would the Sunni do all this to invite the anihilation of their people by the Shiaa? The answer to that, for anyone with a functioning brain, is a simple deduction: They did NOT do it.

There is absolutely NO question but that the attack against the Golden Dommed Mosque was a false flag attack carried out by the occupiers and their treasonous quisslings. The object of the attack, which worked perfectly as planned, was to fan the sectarean divide that we see now.

Its ODD to think that the Shiaa and the Sunni were able to live one with the other in the middle East for some 1,400 years without having this form of sectrarian fighting. However, after constant agitation and fals flag attacks against their community, they finally started to retaliate and once blood was spilt and tasted, it became self-perpetrating. Something the occupiers wanted very badly: Divide and conquer.

Isn't it curious to anyone that NOT ONE single investigation ws carried out by any party to determine who might have planted the explosives, or where the explosives had come from. NOTHING!.. WHY? Basically its because they already knew who did it and did NOT want the rest of the world to know it, even though they most likely suspected it.

Another interesting fact is that Samarra is SURROUBDED on three sides by a heavilly fortified burn and only has access to its interior through ONE opening for those wishing to enter or exit. The question then begs to be asked: How did the perpetrators enter the city and how did they avoid detection by the authorities for several hours while setting the charges in a very professional way? Something stinks in denmark, as the saying goes.

After the 1948 massacre of the Palestinians and the illigitame creation of Israel, the Jews attemting to get the Jews in the Arab lands to leave and to settle in the newly formed state, conducted MANy false flag attacks, not the least in Iraq where they attacked Jewish synagogues and blew them up to only cry to the world after those attacks.. " Let my people go! Never again"

That is how the Jews in the Arab lands were driven out. Its ALL documented even though no one speaks of such crimes.

In any case, the Americans and British and Israeli's are swimming in Iraqi blood, as well as Palestinian and Lebanese blood.

When will this nightmare end?
 
January 25, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top