Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Ecce Homo—Saddam Hussein
Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:22
by Richard Marsden

It’s not often one witnesses the defeat of a morality.

But that’s what Saddam Hussein, feet shackled, hands tied, inflicted  on Bush and Blair, and their acolytes, in those moments before he was hung.

Courtesy of digital technology, this extraordinary event was witnessed by millions around the world. Plain as day.

Morality has always been the driving force of Anglo-American aggression towards Iraq. It is the enabler of other, baser motives. This morality is the Judeo-Christian kind. Pervasive and taken-for-granted, it’s as invisible to Westerners as water is to a fish.

This morality is the mortar of global capital. When its heart was pierced on September 11, 2001—let us leave aside by whom—it responded with a visceral lust for vengeance. This emotional need was shaped by Christian-Zionists around Bush, who used it to fuel and underwrite the demonization of Saddam Hussein and the rape and pillage of Iraq society.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

The link between 9/11 and Iraq is moral and emotive. It is the need to assuage pain by inflicting still more pain, preferably upon a weaker party. This moral right and emotive need made superfluous any legal right.

On this basis, Bush and Blair, these Old and New Testament moral crusaders, mobilized the most potent military force the world has ever seen and unleashed it against a society brought to its knees by sanctions and rendered practically defenseless.

At every opportunity, this armed morality has humiliated Iraqis—whose own morality centres on honour and dignity—in retribution for the humiliation of the United States. The toppling of his statue in Firdos Square on April 9, 2003; Saddam down a hole; Saddam being medically inspected as if he were a vagrant; Saddam in his underpants. All of these events were staged-managed by the Americans for the “folks” back home.

Arabs and Muslims are much better placed to evaluate Saddam’s actions than Westerners. Sustaining “our” goodness, the moral validity of what “we” have done to the people of Iraq, requires sustaining Saddam Hussein’s "evilness". Seldom has one person been subjected to such an enormous campaign of vilification for such immoral ends.

The execution of Saddam Hussein was the final act of this morality play. This was the “justice” to which he was brought. The stage was set for his final humiliation. To his credit, he refused to follow the script and turned the tables on those who brought him there. He denied them the pleasure of feeling morally superior.

Saddam Hussein’s life will be argued over for many years, but on this everyone can agree: Nothing reveals a man’s moral character so much as having his own death staring him in the face. Few among us will die on the gallows, but we must all face death alone. Nothing, no-one can help us. We must rely entirely on our inner resources.

How a person faces death reflects how they have lived their life. Dying, like living, is a skill requiring disciplined practice. Some fall apart, blame others and turn this way and that looking for an escape. Others grimly batten down the hatches, stare blankly ahead and let death overtake them. The exceptional ones go to meet it with equanimity.

Knowing you are about to be hung by your enemies following a fraudulent trial, at the behest of foreign invaders who have destroyed your country, would tax the moral resources of a saint. Or, in this case, a martyr.

Saddam Hussein demonstrated how to die with courage, honour and dignity. Ponder for a moment how Bush and Blair would behave in similar circumstances? Recall too that during the showdown over “Weapons of Mass Destruction” Saddam Hussein was the only one of the three to tell the truth.

Ordinarily, at an execution, the condemned man is hooded or blindfolded, to hide his shame, to spare him sight of his own death rushing towards him. But Saddam forewent this. He stood bare-faced, facing death, not hiding from it.

His constrained body emphasized the expressions of his face. It showed no sign of fear, or submission to the power about to kill him. His eyes did not stare into the void. He listened attentively to what his executioner said to him. He is quick-witted to the end, rising above the verbal barbs of his tormentors.

It was his executioners who were hooded. They could see, but not be seen. Ostensibly, this was for fear of reprisals. And yet they stood and moved furtively, like guilty men. The arrangement of their bodies lacked order. They moved as if their hoods were to spare us the sight of their wretchedness.
Saddam Hussein, surrounded by hostile men, about to be lynched, refused to be terrorized. America lifts up its skirts at the mere idea of danger and sees terror around every corner.

He was not horrified—the horror is ours.

This was the death of a man of exceptionally strong will. It was a death that shamed all those who slandered how he lived.

Is this the behavour of a man who would hide in a hole to evade capture by the Americans? It gave the lie to that piece of propaganda.

Here’s one thought that might have sustained and amused him in the final hours:

An occupying power hands over a man to his enemies who taunt, mock and then execute him. Where have we heard this before? Bush and Blair should know the answer—two thousand years ago in Roman-occupied Palestine.

Jesus was sacrificed to atone for the sins of the guilty. For whom was Saddam Hussein sacrificed?

He was hung, with indecent haste, not for what he did to Iraqis—for Bush and Blair would hang a hundred times over—but for what he knew about the Americans.

And it was for their sins he was sacrificed, on the first day of Eid ul-Adha, 2006.

1. This essay is best read in the context of my earlier essay The Trial of Saddam Hussein and the coming trials of  George W. Bush and Anthony Charles Lynton Blair.

2. By far the best commentary on Saddam Hussein's death is his own: Final letter from President Saddam Hussein to the People of Iraq

3. The title's Ecce Homo [‘Behold the Man’], of course, is an allusion to the words attributed to Pontious Pilate when presenting Jesus to those demanding his execution; and also to Nietzsche’s Ecce Homo: How One Becomes What One Is.

Dr. Richard Marsden is a professor in the Centre for Integrated Studies, at Athabasca University, which is Canada's open university, specializing in distance education.
More from this author:
The trial of Saddam Hussein and the coming trials of George W. Bush and Anthony Charles Lynton Blair (8572 Hits)
by Richard Marsden   Sunday's announcement of the verdict in the trial of Saddam Hussein and his seven co-defendants was, of course, timed...
Britain's pride—America's fall? (4643 Hits)
by Richard Marsden Tony Blair believes that the British, whom, to their undoubted displeasure, he embraces as ‘we’, should be immensely...
How the Iraq Resistance Unmasks the American State and the Promise of Zapatismo (5550 Hits)
by Dr. Richard Marsden The state is not the reality which stands behind the mask of political practice. It is itself the mask which prevents our...
Related Articles:
The sentencing of Saddam Hussein (8669 Hits)
by Craig Murray I hold no brief for Saddam Hussein. He is a gruesome dictator who is much better out of power, and a dangerous man who is...
The trial of Saddam Hussein and the coming trials of George W. Bush and Anthony Charles Lynton Blair (8572 Hits)
by Richard Marsden   Sunday's announcement of the verdict in the trial of Saddam Hussein and his seven co-defendants was, of course, timed...
Saddam Hanging Video - The Execution of Hussein who was Hung Yesterday (14540 Hits)
Saddam may have killed thousands of Iraqis. He may have gassed the Kurds. He may have looked the other way when his 2 sons raped and murdered...
Hussein and Ford = Dead Criminals (5200 Hits)
by Mickey Z. If there is anyone left who questions the depth of the hypocrisy and the blood lust of the American Empire, the events of the...
Selective Justice and the Execution of Saddam Hussein (5842 Hits)
by Gregory Elich   Hailed by President Bush as an act of “justice,” former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was executed on the ...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (2)add comment

a guest said:

"Judeo-Christian" morality?
There is no such thing. This is one of the most absurd canards to appear in the post-World War II period. Judaic morality calls for an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth; Christian morality directs you to turn the other cheek. Judaic morality calls for revenge; Christian morality condemns it.

No difference can be simpler or easier to understand. So why does this absurd phrase get endlessly repeated?
January 24, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

Bill from Saginaw: Morality and cowboy justice
To the neo-con think tank gurus surrounding George Bush, the link between 9/11 and Iraq was more than just moral and emotive, a reflexive desire to assuage hurt and national humiliation by inflicting greater hurt and humiliation upon others (people who just happened to occuply a strategic geopolitical region rich with oil).

The link between 9/11 and the shock & awe invasion of Iraq was also a half baked stab at deterrence: somebody blind side me, I'll start kicking asses and taking names. As Rummy noted, sweep it all up, related or not. Bring it on.

This is, of course, the mentality of the schoolyard bully, like an adolescent frontier gunslinger who believes deep in his gut that garnering a reputation for having an itchy trigger finger will make folks think twice about fronting The Man in broad daylight, or taking pot shots from afar.

An eye for an eye was a formula for proportionate justice. These were words of limitation. No longer a life, or a limb, or both eyes for an eye. Never more than one eye for an eye.

Turning the other cheek was a metaphor for creative, nonviolent response to violent injustice. Prevent future wrongs through self restraint, example, if need be by restraining the wrongdoer.

Little George's mad crusade into Mesopotamia as a payback for 9/11 made a mockery of Judeo-Christian morality between individuals. It was also a dangerous and counter-productive perversion of deterrence theory, as applied to nation states and nongovernmental entities like al Queda.

Just the sort of thing that can get us all bushwhacked some day big time, unless we hurry up and turn this around.
January 24, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123