Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Tue

30

Jan

2007

Exclusive: Earl Grey Killed Litvinenko. You Read It Here Last.
Tuesday, 30 January 2007 01:21
by Copydude

teapartyBy now, you’ve all read the latest crackpot teapot story. So without further ado, I’ve written to one of the hacks who recycled this crap - Justin Penrose, ‘crime reporter’ of the UK ‘Sunday Mirror’.

Dear Justin Penrose,

I have just read your story about the alleged ‘Killer Teapot’.

I put it to you that this story is blatant propaganda and irresponsible, scaremongering journalism, since Scotland Yard is currently saying nothing of the kind. I checked if you didn’t.

As everybody knows, this story, which is doing the rounds, was sourced from an ‘Exclusive’ planted in ABC news.

To be clear, let’s read it together, Justin. Quote:

“British officials say police have cracked the murder-by-poison case of former spy Alexander Litvinenko, including the discovery of a “hot” teapot at London’s Millennium Hotel with an off-the-charts reading for Polonium-210, the radioactive material used in the killing.

A senior official tells ABC News the “hot” teapot remained in use at the hotel for several weeks after Litvinenko’s death before being tested in the second week of December. The official said investigators were embarrassed at the oversight.“



So. ‘An Official says Police say . .‘. That’s not the same thing as ‘Police say’. A good journalist might have bothered to find out who that official is. It is Oleg Gordievsky (MI6) - a prime source of press disinformation in this case to date.

The ABC teapot story originates from an interview with Oleg Gordievsky in Moscow Komsomolets. And, when pressed, Gordievsky admits that it is his ‘personal theory’. But you left that bit out, didn’t you Justin, and wrote, quote, ‘Detectives are convinced . . . ‘ Is that blatant lying or what?

Gordievsky, the ‘Teapot’ source, is the same source who told the Times only last week about the killer being a ‘mystery man with a limp’ and ‘Polonium used to heat up Sasha’s tea’. (Actually against the laws of physics.) I suggest you knowingly used a discredited source.

Now let’s question your other irresponsible claims.

Quote “The “hot” teapot was at London’s Millennium Hotel with sky-high readings of Polonium-210″ “. . . it was STILL IN USE at the posh hotel in Mayfair until December 10 - six weeks after the poisoning.”

1. Polonium, which is unable to penetrate skin or paper, cannot penetrate porcelain. For there to be any residual Polonium in the teapot it would have to be in solid, metallic form - not in a form you can pour into a cup.

2. Even if this were true, the radioactivity in the teapot could not be dated back to the time of the alleged killing. Radioactive decay can only be timed back to the date of the material’s manufacture.

3. Your story is patently not true, since the amount of Polonium needed to kill someone is so small you can’t see it. An amount producing ‘Sky High’ radioactivity would not merely have poisoned a few thousand guests, it would have immediately fried their insides. Including Litvinenko’s.

This story is pure bunk and you owe at least readers an apology and correction. You may well have caused unnecessary distress.

Since you call yourself a ‘crime reporter’, Justin, perhaps you would like to explain why you allege that it was a murder. Here are some of the reasons why no one would ever use Polonium as a murder weapon.

1. It doesn’t silence anyone, as the noise made by Litvinenko demonstrates.
2. It places the poisoner at as much risk as the victim.
3. Because it’s slow-acting, it leaves the victim ample time to identify and accuse poisoner and to instigate revenge.
4. It leaves a glowing and incriminating trail.
5. It’s ridiculously expensive and difficult to obtain.
6. Professionals use fast-acting toxins that don’t leave traces.
7. It is risky, imprecise, difficult to both handle and to administer.
8. No one has ever used it before - obviously.
Your story goes on to brand Mr Lugovoi as the ‘killer’ and includes the line :

Despite the evidence against him, he is likely to escape prosecution because the Russians will not extradite him.”

First, what evidence? Hundreds of people in 48 countries were contaminated, which doesn’t make them all assassins. While any assassin knowingly handling radioactive material would have taken precautions. Reality check here.

Do you honestly believe Mr Lugovoi was trailing around London with a teapot just in case Sasha wanted a ‘hot drink’ ?

Your subsequent statement is totally misleading too. For your information, Russia and Britain signed a new memorandum of understanding on extradition. The Russian prosecutor would be only too willing to extradite Lugovoi for Berezovsky, assuming Scotland Yard has a case.

Wake up and smell the Earl Grey!

This open letter to you is also published on the Internet at ‘Medialens’ forum.
 
More from this author:
Mafia Hit On The Media (12255 Hits)
by John Weaver If I simply stood anywhere near Boris Berezovsky, I’m sure my hair would fall out and my skin would turn yellow. ...
Saint Sasha, The Toenail Puller (10097 Hits)
by John Weaver Tributes to Sasha Litvinenko, the sob story spy, are on all the tear-stained pages of the UK tabloids today. Probably the...
Litvinenko And Limonov (6852 Hits)
by John Weaver Since every British tabloid has linked the dissident Litvinenko with Politkovskaya, let’s link on... As it happens, both...
Get Putin (6864 Hits)
From Erinys website. Kalashnikovs for sale or rent. As Beatroot notes, the crescendo of Russophobia has climaxed into the international press...
The Spy Who Nuked Me (5488 Hits)
by Copy Dude Suddenly the whole Litvinenko business is looking more like Austin Powers than James Bond. Aha. ‘The Trail of Poison Leads...
Related Articles:
U.S. Military Has Killed Up to 238,000 Iraqi Civilians (11174 Hits)
A just-released study by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, published in the current issue of the prestigious British medical journal The...
Who killed Michael Moore? (Why and what's the reason for?) (10857 Hits)
(Inspired by the recent assassination of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya) There's no shortage of outrage on the Left. Plenty...
Read This Before You Vote (11922 Hits)
If one were to believe the hype, nothing less than the fate the civilized world is riding on the results of the upcoming midterm elections....
Treacherous Road to Oslo Begins Here (7957 Hits)
By Ramzy Baroud Attempts to coerce Palestinians into submission have not always manifested themselves in the crude form of a tank, a bullet,...
Who Killed RFK? New BBC Documentary Points to CIA (8789 Hits)
By Chris Floyd Robert F. Kennedy would have been 81 today. Tonight, the BBC will air a documentary about his 1968 assassination detailing...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)add comment

a guest said:

0
...
Well, it is not Earl Grey. The barman said in the Sun he served green tea. And Gordievsky removed from his prevoius story on Radio Liberty Russian Service a forged EU passport of his "real killer" being photographed in Heathrow because there is no passport control for EU passengers from Hamburg. It is strange that Gordievsky didn't know about that. It seems he never left Britain for a long time. But you never knew he said that for the Russians from UK press because that nonsense was censured for British readers. Then he removed from his "theory" a forged Lithuanian passport after a Lithuanian paper pressed him.
 
January 30, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
a message in the cup.
"Professionals use fast acting toxins that don't leave traces". That's right. So, whoever killed Litvinenko have money and power and they are not afraid to show it to the whole World. It was a message.
 
January 30, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
ivanov-su
So, whoever killed .... It was a message

That's right.
But we knew this from the very begining.
So what?
The guest doesn't care who killed?
Because the message will be very, very different depending on KILLER.

And one more thing - we don't know the cause of Litvinenko's death. Yet.
Almost two months after postmortem exam conducted by three!!! experts - and no official statement (except by Gordievsky smilies/smiley.gif... )

 
February 06, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top