Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Fri

09

Feb

2007

America’s ‘Global War On Terrorism’
Friday, 09 February 2007 18:36
by Shahid Alam

One day Mulla Nasruddin went to his neighbor, known to be a mean fellow. “Sir,” he explained, “your ox has gored my cow and killed her after she refused his amorous advances.” His neighbors shot back, “So what has that got to do with me? Should a man be held responsible for what an animal does.” The Mulla answered cheekily, “Thank you, Sir. It was my ox that gored your cow.”
Idries Shah, The Pleasantries of the Incredible Mulla Nasruddin

The United States declared a ‘global war on terrorism’ within days of the attacks of September 11, 2001 on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Instantly, terrorism was elevated by the US establishment and media into the greatest, most ominous threat the ‘civilized world’ had faced since the collapse of communism.

Why did the United States choose to frame its imperialist posture after 9-11 as a ‘global war on terrorism?’ Not a few have been puzzled by this way of justifying the new projection of American power. Terrorism is a tactic, not a country; it is tool, not an ideology or an end. How does one wage war against a tactic or a tool?

Nevertheless, the frame was cleverly chosen. It was and remains a most effective tool for mobilizing the American public behind the neoconservative project of using wars – multiple and endless, if necessary – to deepen America’s global dominance and to make it irreversible.


On September 11, 2001 nineteen terrorists tragically brought death to Americans on their own soil. Barring the attacks of Pearl Harbor, this was unprecedented in American history. The terrorists had demonstrated that Americans were vulnerable to attacks inside their own shores. It now appeared that the blowback from US policies in the Middle East could reach across the Atlantic to hit the US itself. To say the least, this was disconcerting.

American policy makers chose to magnify this new vulnerability to advance their imperialist goals. By constantly harping on terrorism, by hyping the threat of terrorist attacks, fearful Americans would both endorse curbs on liberties at home and endless wars abroad – anything that would prevent ‘Islamic’ terrorists from crossing American shores. The ‘global war against terrorism’ looked like the perfect tool for producing these twin results.

The rhetoric of terrorism had other uses too. Terrorists operate without a return address, are ready to strike anywhere, and sometimes die with their victims. Instead of tracking them down through surveillance and police work, the United States has used the elusiveness of terrorists to justify pre-emptive strikes and wars. In addition, since terrorists may be hiding anywhere, the war against terrorism must be global.

Just as importantly, the United States has used its rhetoric of terrorism to delegitimize all forms of resistance. This occurs in two stages. First, US agencies employ a definition of terrorism that covers all groups that use violence as a means to achieve political ends, even legitimate political ends. Thus, Hamas and Hizbullah are ‘terrorists.’ Next, individuals or groups who provide ‘material assistance’ to ‘terrorists’ are also ‘terrorists.’ The United States has stretched this logic to delegitimize all resistance movements that it views as contrary to US interests.

Although the United States has almost exclusively targeted Muslims in recent years, it continues to insist that Muslims per se are not the enemy. They only target those who are ‘terrorists’ and those who support ‘terrorist.’ It is a clever distinction that empowers the ‘good’ Muslims who are on our side – mostly corrupt and despotic rulers – to fight the ‘bad’ Muslims, who are ‘terrorists.’

In other words, the ‘global war against terrorism’ is a powerful rhetorical device that mobilized overwhelming domestic support – at least, before the Iraq war became a quagmire – behind America’s imperialist posture that depended on endless, pre-emptive and illegal wars.

It is scarcely surprising, therefore, that ‘terrorism’ – as the new cover for a more invasive imperialism – has quickly come to dominate the global public discourse. A Google search for ‘terrorism’ turned up 72 million hits, not too far behind the 97 million hits for ‘democracy.’ Taken together, the related terms ‘terror,’ ‘terrorism,’ and ‘terrorists’ generated 236 million hits, which exceed the 210 million hits for ‘freedom.’

A Google search also reveals that the ‘global war on terrorism’ is directed primarily at Muslims. A search for exact phrases that combined ‘Islamic,’ ‘Muslim,’ ‘Moslem,’ and ‘Islam and,’ with ‘terrorism,’ ‘terrorists,’ and ‘terror’ yielded a total of 3.3 million hits. On the other hand, exact phrases that combined ‘Tamil’ with ‘terrorism,’ ‘terrorists,’ and ‘terror’ turned up only 26,000 hits. Substituting ‘Jewish’ for ‘Tamil’ produced 211,000 hits.

Why is the talk of terrorism directed overwhelmingly at Muslims? Despite the rhetoric of a ‘global war on terrorism,’ by now we know all too well that this war is aimed at Muslims, mainly at Muslims in the Middle East. This is a war of ‘colonial pacification’ of Islamic lands: the Muslims must be ‘pacified’ to secure ‘our’ oil wells in the Persian Gulf, and to entrench Israeli hegemony over the Middle East. This is also a religious war for the radical core of American evangelicals; it fits into their theology of end times. We ignore this only at our peril.

M. Shahid Alam is professor of economics at Northeastern University. He is author of Challenging the New Orientalism (IPI Publications: 2007). Visit his website at http://aslama.org. He may be reached at alqalam02760@yahoo.com. © M. Shahid Alam
More from this author:
Two White Sisters in Asia: Israel and Australia (7877 Hits)
by M. Shahid Alam “Israel has not fully acknowledged the value of working together with Australia in Asia. It’s a way for us to...
Zionism: Pitting the West Against Islam (8312 Hits)
by M. Shahid Alam It is tempting to celebrate the creation of Israel as a great triumph, perhaps the greatest in Jewish history. Indeed, the...
An ‘Islamic Civil War’ (4948 Hits)
by M. Shahid Alam The war that Western powers – primarily US, Israel and Britain – began against the Islamic world after September...
Has Regime Change Boomeranged? (5140 Hits)
by M. Shahid Alam In the early 1990s, the fall of the Soviets produced a surge of triumphalism in the US. After defeating the fascist...
American Mamlukes (4426 Hits)
by M. Shahid Alam It is a fact little known in the West, outside the circle of historians of Islamicate societies, that Islamicate states...
Related Articles:
An Open Letter to the New Congress - Investing in Hate: America’s Support of Israel (10657 Hits)
by William A. Cook “[It] is wrong to suggest that the Jewish people would support a government in Israel or anywhere else that...
America’s Narcissists indifferent to Iraqi casualties (4782 Hits)
by Ahmed Amr You can’t make this stuff up. George Bush believes that “the Iraqi people owe the American people a huge debt of...
America’s Moral Crisis (5670 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler Many Americans feel a sense of alarm about the moral condition of American society today. Many in the liberal...
The Media on ‘Global Terror’ (4346 Hits)
by William Bowles You know... it’s amazing really, considering that for centuries Europeans have been invading other countries, enslaving...
America’s Moral Crisis (4249 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler Many Americans feel a sense of alarm about the moral condition of American society today. Many in the...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top