by Stephen P. Pizzo
PLEASE!Do 40% of Democrats really want Hillary? Really? That's the question I ask myself each time I see polls that say that Hillary Clinton is the choice of 40% of Dems polled. If that's true I have just one thing to say to those folks:
What the hell's wrong with you people!? Are you the Democratic party's version of the GOP's red state morons – the ones who put George W. Bush in the Oval Office – TWICE? Because by supporting Hillary you are vying for precisely that sort of infamy.
Listen... and listen well – Hillary zombies – pay attention for damn it!
Hilary Clinton is Tom DeLay on estrogen.
And that's neither a sexist remark or the slightest exaggeration. I'm not talking about her politics, I'm talking about her stone-cold, calculating, triangulating soul.
That woman is not worthy of your support. Hillary is just as mean as Tom DeLay, just as self-centered, and even a more shameless, principle-free conniver. And, as David Greffen told Maureen Dowd, she's a liar.
Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.
Just like Tom DeLay, Hillary has surrounded herself with advisers, handlers and sycophantic gofers that can best be described the poltical equivalent of a mob. Like DeLay's former political mob, Hillary's gang are mean, play dirty and play for keeps.
You think I'm kidding? Okay, then put your mind where your vote is and go to this web site. Watch Chris Mathews interview yesterday with Hillary's chief spokesman, Howard Wolfson. I'll wait here until you return:
(Scroll down and click on this character's photo to start the video)
Now, is that what you want to replace the Bush presidency with? Is that the kind of slash and burn politics we need for another 4 or 8 years? Do you really want to replace Tony Snow's obfuscation and lies with Howard Wolfson's mean-spirited insinuations and transparent connivance? Really?
Didn't you get enough of “depends on what the meaning of 'is', is?” Because that's precisely what you will get with a President Hillary Clinton. Did you watch the video? Chris Mathews asked Wolfson – the man Hillary has chosen to be her chief spokesman – if he, Wolfson, was speaking for Hillary when he lashed out at Obama. Wolfson replied with a version of “that depends on what you mean by “speaking for.”
And what did Hillary have to say about the Obama flap? When asked yeasterday she proceeded to prove David Greffen was right. She lied. She responded that she wasn't going to engage in “the politics of personal destruction.”
Right. Of course she wasn't. The Godmother never gets blood on her own hands. Instead she had sent her sleazy hit man, Howard Wolfson, to do the dirty work for her. (Hillary learned the value of deniability from Bill.)
So was Wolfson speaking for Hillary when he smeared Obama? If he wasn't she could have disavowed his anti-Obama smear. But she didn't. Instead she took a page from the Bush/Kerry race. You remember, when the "Swift Boat Vets for Truth" smeared John Kerry and Bush just shrugged and said he wasn't going to get involved. It worked. If Hillary is anything she's practical. It's all about winning and if something works, it's eithically neutral to Hillary Clinton. (Does she regret her vote for the war? No. Because, at the time, it was what worked for her.)
This Obama flap was just a taste of what a Hillary presidency would be like – a bitter taste.
I am not going to beat this mare to death. I just want to beg those Democrats that keep putting Hillary at the top of polls to think before they answer that question next time. Get off your Hillary fixation and make an effort to get to know the many other Democrats running for that nomination, some of whom are far more likely to win and be good Presidents than Hillary Clinton. And, far more likely to heal and reunite our abused and bleeding nation.
Because if your support for Hillary continues and she wins the Democratic Party nomination, there are only two possible outcomes and they are both too awful to contemplate: she'll lose to her Republican opponent or -- she'll win.
by Stephen P. Pizzo The War: Jenna & Barbara Bush will not be part of their dad's troop surge. Ditto for any member of the Cheney clan. ...
by Stephen P. Pizzo The Washington media spent the holidays trying to guess what the President's new plan for Iraq might be. Meanwhile in the...
by Stephen P. Pizzo At the moment all the focus is on what George W. Bush is going to do about the mess he's made of Iraq. But the larger...
by Stephen P. Pizzo Well it's a new year, and you know what that means... time to update the administration's list of stated reasons for it's...
by Stephen P. Pizzo Traditional conservative, William F. Buckley was once asked how he would describe a “liberal.” He thought for...
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites