Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Tue

26

Jan

2010

How Alternative Media Provide The Crucial Critique Of The Mainstream - Richard Keeble Responds To Tim Luckhurst
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 06:25
by Media Lens

Introduction

On January 4, Tim Luckhurst, former BBC journalist and current Professor of Journalism at the University of Kent, wrote an article in the Independent with the dramatic title, ‘Demise of news barons is just a Marxist fantasy.’ Luckhurst argued that leftist critics are gleefully predicting the end of corporate journalism:

“There will be no further need for newspapers or broadcasters to host debates and represent public opinion. The internet will let every citizen speak for themselves. The masses will seize the means of media production. We will witness an era of revolutionary change.” (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/opinion/tim-luckhurst-demise-of-news-barons-is-just-a-marxist-fantasy-1856668.html)

But according to Luckhurst “there is an elementary delusion behind the idea that amateurs can report accurately”. How so?:

“... the public right to know [cannot] depend on the dictates of an individual's conflicted conscience. Such decisions should be guided by professional priorities and ethics. The fallacy rests on the delusion that private ownership by capitalists has damaged journalism. The facts suggest the opposite. Since the first American newspaper baron, James Gordon Bennett I, created the New York Herald, and his British disciple Alfred Harmsworth followed with Britain's Daily Mail, profit-driven ownership has liberated reporters.

“Before the barons, journalism readily succumbed to direct sponsorship by political parties. Impoverished publications were bullied by powerful litigants. They could not afford professional reporters and printed opinions not facts. Afterwards, while journalism has often exercised power without responsibility, it has done so in the name of a version of the public interest that is gloriously independent of the state.”

Luckhurst concluded:

“There is not yet a single one-size-fits-all model for profitable, professional journalism in the 21st century, but a powerful alliance of commerce, conscience and intellect is converging around the certainty that such journalism is essential if representative democracy is to endure.”

We responded to the article on January 5:

Dear Tim Luckhurst

Hope you're well. I enjoyed your article in the Independent, 'Demise of news barons is just a Marxist fantasy.' You write:

"In fact, the people who now predict the end of professional journalism's reign of sovereignty have attacked edited, fact-based reporting for decades."

Who are these Marxists predicting the end of the reign of professional journalism? And who are the people who "have attacked edited, fact-based reporting for decades"?

You write that "there is an elementary delusion behind the idea that amateurs can report accurately". But isn't there an elementary delusion behind the idea that corporate professionals can report accurately and honestly? After all, corporate media are tasked to report on a world dominated by allied giant corporations. These are the corporations on which newspapers like the Independent and Guardian depend for fully 75% of their revenues (from advertising). Isn't the conflict of interest obvious and important?

Best wishes

David Edwards

We received no reply. We wrote again, twice, and again received no answer.

We asked Richard Keeble, Professor of Journalism at the University of Lincoln, what he thought of Luckhurst’s piece. His reply was so interesting that we asked if he would expand it for a Guest Media Alert. This he has very kindly done. Sincere thanks to Richard for taking the trouble. We hope you enjoy his article.

How Alternative Media Provide The Crucial Critique Of The Mainstream

By: Richard Keeble


I welcome Tim Luckhurst’s contribution to the debate over the future of journalism (“Demise of press barons is just a Marxist fantasy”, Independent, 4 January). But I disagree with him profoundly. Tim places far too much stress on the role of professional journalists in the current “crisis”. It is clearly important to work for radical, progressive change to the corporate media from within.

The closeness of the mainstream to dominant economic, cultural and ideological forces means that the mainstream largely functions to promote the interests of the military/industrial/political complex. Yet within advanced capitalist economies, the contradictions and complexities of corporate media have provided certain spaces for the progressive journalism of such excellent writers in the US, UK, France and India as John Langdon-Davies (1897-1971), Martha Gellhorn (1908-1998); George Orwell (1903-1950), I. F. Stone (1907-1989), James Cameron (1911-1985), Albert Camus (1913-1960), Phillip Knightley (born 1929), Seymour Hersh (1937), Susan George (1939), John Pilger (1939), Barbara Ehrenreich (1941), Peter Wilby (1944), Arundhati Roy (1960), George Monbiot (1963) and Naomi Klein (1970). Many of these have combined an involvement in the corporate media with regular contributions to the “alternative”, campaigning media.

Crucial Role Of Alternative Media

But most significantly Tim Luckhurst fails to acknowledge the crucial role of the non-corporate media in the development of progressive journalism. Historically, the alternative media have helped provide the basis on which an alternative, global, progressive public sphere has been built. For instance, John Hartley has highlighted the centrality of journalists such as Robespierre, Marat, Danton and Hébert to the French Revolution of the 1790s.

In the UK, in the first half of the 19th century a massively popular radical, unstamped (and hence illegal) press played a crucial role in the campaign for trade union rights and social and political reforms. In his seminal history of these early radical, “citizen” journalists, James Curran commented: “Unlike the institutionalised journalists of the later period they tended to see themselves as activists rather than as professionals. Indeed many of the paid correspondents of the Poor Man’s Guardian, Northern Star and early Reynolds News were also political organisers for the National Union of Working Classes or Chartist movement. They sought to describe and expose the dynamics of power and inequality rather than to report ‘hard news’ as a series of disconnected events. They saw themselves as class representatives rather than as disinterested intermediaries and attempted to establish a relationship of real reciprocity with their readers.”

Later on many feminists, suffragettes (such as Sylvia Pankhurst), trade unionists and anti-war activists were both radical journalists and political agitators.

Informal underground communication networks and newspapers (such as the Sowetan in the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa during the 1970s and 1980s) were crucial in the independent movements in Africa and India. Jonathan Neale, in his seminal study of the Vietnam War, identified around 300 anti-war newspapers in the armed services during the course of the conflict. Seymour Hersh’s exposure of the My Lai massacre of March 1968, (when US soldiers slaughtered up to 504 men, women and children) was first published by the alternative news agency, Despatch News Service.

From 1963 to 1983, the Bolivian miners’ radio stations highlighted the rights of workers. In Poland during the 1980s alternative publications of the Polish Roman Catholic Church and the samizdat publications of the Solidarity movement played crucial roles in the movement against the Soviet-backed government of the day. In Nicaragua during the 1980s and 1990s the Movement of Popular Correspondents produced reports by non-professional, voluntary reporters from poor rural area that were published in regional and national newspapers – and they helped inspire revolutionary education and political activities. In the 1990s, the Revolutionary Association of Women of Afghanistan bravely reported on the abuse and execution of women under the Taliban producing audio cassettes, videos, a website and a magazine.

This century we have seen the use made of websites by reformist movements in Burma and more recently (with Twitter, Flickr, Facebook and YouTube) in Iran. Similarly, in Peru, in 2009, Indigenous activists used Twitter and YouTube to highlight human rights abuses as more than 50,000 Amazonians demonstrated and went on strike in protest over US-Peru trade laws which threatened to open up ancestral territories to exploitation by multinational companies.

Celebrating The Internet And Blogosphere


Today, the internet and the blogosphere provide enormous opportunities for the development of progressive journalism ideals in both the UK and globally. Stuart Allan, for instance, celebrates the bloggers and the “extraordinary contribution made by ordinary citizens offering their first hand reports, digital photographs, camcorder video footage, mobile telephone snapshots or audio clips”. A great deal of this “citizen journalism” (while challenging the professional monopoly of the journalistic field) actually feeds into mainstream media routines and thus reinforces the dominant news value system. The internet and blogosphere only become interesting when they serve to challenge the mainstream as crucial elements in progressive social and political movements.

Moreover, we need to follow John Hartley in making a radical transformation of journalism theory. We need as both academics and citizens to move away from the concept of the audience as a passive consumer of a professional product to seeing the audience as producers of their own (written or visual) media. Hartley even draws on Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which he suggests proclaims the radical utopian-liberal idea that everyone has the right not only to seek and receive but to “impart” (in other words communicate) information and ideas. If everyone, then, is a journalist then how can journalism be professed? “Journalism has transferred from a modern expert system to contemporary open innovation – from ‘one-to-many’ to ‘many to many’ communication.” Let us see how this redefinition of journalism can incorporate many different forms of media activity into the alternative public sphere.

Firstly, there is the role of radical, non-mainstream journalists. George Orwell (1903-1950) is best known as the author of Animal Farm (1945) and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) but he was also a distinguished progressive journalist who concentrated most of his writing on obscure, alternative journals of the Left – such Controversy, New Leader, Left Forum, Left News, Polemic, Progressive, Politics and Letters. From 1943 to 1947 he was literary editor of the leftist journal, Tribune, and through writing his regular “As I Please” column, instinctively developed a close relationship with his audience. This relationship was crucial to the flowering of Orwell’s journalistic imagination.

While he realised mainstream journalism was basically propaganda for wealthy newspaper proprietors, at Tribune he was engaging in the crucial political debate with people who mattered to him. They were an authentic audience compared with what Stuart Allan has called the “implied reader or imagined community of readers” of the mainstream media.

Today, in the United States, Alexander Cockburn and Jeffery St Clair produce Counterpunch, an alternative investigative website (www.counterpunch.org). Out of their writings come many publications. There’s also the excellent Middle East Report (www.merip.org), the Nation (www.thenation.com), Mother Jones (www.motherjones.com), Z Magazine (www.zcommunications.org/zmag), In These Times (www.inthesetimes.com); in Chennai, India, Frontline (www.frontlineonnet.com); in London there’s the investigative www.corporatewatch.org.

Coldtype.net in the UK brings together many of the writings by radical journalists, campaigners and academics (such as Felicity Arbuthnot and William Blum). Dahr Jamail is a freelance journalist reporting regularly from a critical peace perspective on the Middle East (seewww.dahrjamailiraq.com) while Democracy Now! is an alternative US radio station (with allied website and podcasts) run by Amy Goodman overtly committed to peace journalism.

Drawing Inspiration From Chomsky

Chris Atton argues that alternative media such as these often draw inspiration from Chomsky’s critique of the corporate myths of “balance” and “objectivity” and stresses, instead, their explicitly partisan character. Moreover, they seek “to invert the hierarchy of access” to the news by explicitly foregrounding the viewpoints of “ordinary” people (activists, protestors, local residents), citizens whose visibility in the mainstream media tends to be obscured by the presence of elite groups and individuals.

Then there’s the role of radical intellectuals such as the American historian Tom Engelhardt (www.tomdispatch.com). Other radical intellectuals prominent in the blogosphere have included the late Edward Said, Noam Chomsky, Norman Solomon, James Winter, Mark Curtis and the recently deceased African intellectual campaigner and journalist Tajudeen Abdul-Raheem. In the UK, activists David Edwards and David Cromwell edit the radical media monitoring site www.medialens.org which monitors the mainstream media from a radical Chomskyite/Buddhist perspective and in support of the global peace movement. Professor David Miller and William Dinan are part of the collective running www.spinwatch.org which critiques the PR industry from a radical, peace perspective.

Some research centres play important roles in the formation of an alternative global public sphere. For instance, http://globalresearch.ca is the website of the Centre for Research and Globalisation, an independent research and media group based in Montreal. It carries excellent articles by Michel Chussodovsky, Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa. Special subjects on the site include US war agenda, crimes against humanity, militarisation and WMD, poverty and social inequality, media disinformation and intelligence. There is also the website produced by the London-based Institute of Islamic Political Thought (www.ii-pt.com).

Political activists often double as media activists. Take for instance IndyMedia (www.indymedia.org). It emerged during the “battle of Seattle” in 1999 when thousands of people took to the streets to protest against the World Trade Organisation and the impact of global free trade relations – and were met by armoured riot police. Violent clashes erupted with many injuries on both sides. In response 400 volunteers, rallying under the motto “Don’t hate the media: be the media”, created a site and a daily news sheet, the Blind Spot, which spelled out news of the demonstration from the perspective of the protestors. The site incorporated news, photographs, audio and video footage – and received 1.5 million hits in its first week. Today there are more than 150 independent media centres in around 45 countries over six continents. Their mission statement says:

"The Independent Media Centre is a network of collectively run media outlets for the creation of radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of the truth. We work out of a love and inspiration for people who continue to work for a better world, despite corporate media’s distortions and unwillingness to cover the efforts to free humanity."

In the UK, Peace News (for non-violent revolution), edited by author and political activist Milan Rai and Emily Johns, comes as both a hard copy magazine and a lively website (www.peacenews.info) combining analysis, cultural reviews and news of the extraordinarily brave activities of peace movement activities internationally. As its website stresses, it is “written and produced by and for activists, campaigners and radical academics from all over the world”. Not only does their content differ radically from the mainstream. In their collaborative, non-hierarchical structures and sourcing techniques alternative media operations challenge the conventions of mainstream organisational routines. Atton describes the alternative journalism of the British video magazine Undercurrents and Indymedia as “native reporting”. “Both privilege a journalism politicised through subjective testimony, through the subjects being represented by themselves.”


Fitwatch: Monitoring The Monitors


Members of Fit Watch, a protest group opposed to police forward intelligence teams (Fits), the units that monitor demonstrations and meetings, similarly combine political and media activism in their “sousveillance” – the latest buzzword for taking videos and photographs of police activities and then uploading them on to the web. They are part of a growing international media activist, protest movement. In Palestine, for instance, B’Tselem, the Israeli human rights group, gave video cameras to 160 citizens in the West Bank and Gaza and their shocking footage of abuses by Israeli settlers and troops was broadcast on the country’s television as well as internationally.

Citizens and campaigners in the UK and US who upload images of police surveillance or brutality on to YouTube or citizens who report on opposition movements via blogs, Twitter and websites in authoritarian societies such as China, Burma, Iran and Egypt can similarly be considered participants in the alternative media sphere. Commenting on the role of citizen blogs during the 2003 Iraq invasion, Stuart Allan stressed:

“... these emergent forms of journalism have the capacity to bring to bear alternative perspectives, contexts and ideological diversity to war reporting, providing users with the means to connect with distant voices otherwise being marginalised, if not silenced altogether, from across the globe.”

And for Atton, participatory, amateur media production contests the concentration of institutional and professional media power “and challenges the media monopoly on producing symbolic forms”.

Peace movement and international human rights organisations also produce excellent campaigning sites which can be viewed as forms of activist journalism. For instance, http://ipb.org is the site of the International Peace Bureau founded in 1891 and Nobel Peace Prize winner in 1910. It currently has 282 member organisations in 70 countries. Or there is the Campaign for the Abolition of War (http://www.abolishwar.org.uk). Formed in 2001 following the Hague Appeal for Peace in 1999, its founder president was Professor Sir Joseph Rotblat FRS, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate; while its founder chair was Bruce Kent. They work closely with the International Peace Bureau in Geneva for an end to arms sales, economic justice, a more equitable United Nations, political rights for persecuted minorities, a world peace force (instead of gunboat democracy), conflict prevention and education for peace in schools, colleges and the media.


Exposing Human Rights Abuses

The organisation, Reprieve (www.reprieve.org.uk), campaigns on behalf of those often unlawfully detained by the US and UK in the “war on terror” and its director Clive Stafford Smith writes regular pieces for the “quality” press and the leftist New Statesman magazine, highlighting cases of abuse. For instance, on 10 August 2009, he wrote in the Guardian of three cases of government cover-ups. In the first, the government was refusing to hand over to the High Court details about the horrific torture of Binyam Mohamed (in Morocco and at the notorious US detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba) on the grounds that it would endanger future intelligence co-operation with the Americans.

In the second case, after the government admitted that two men had been taken for torture (“rendered” in the jargon) via the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia, they were still refusing Reprieve’s requests for their names. And the final case involved cover-ups over Britain’s complicity in the renditions of prisoners from Iraq to abuse in Afghanistan. In the US, the American Civil Liberties Union (see www.aclu.org) has consistently campaigned to expose the human rights abuses which have accompanied the “war on terror” and produced a important series of reports on the issue.

Finally, Tim Luckhurst is wrong to suggest that advocates of alternative media are fired by “postmodern, Marxist fantasies”. Certainly my own writings on journalism and teaching for 25 years have not been based on any fantasies but rather grounded, in part, on a real desire to problematise the notion of professionalism. So, while clearly acknowledging the many achievements of progressive professional journalists I have always seen it as one of my crucial responsibilities as an educator to present students with an alternative to professionalism – drawing, indeed, for inspiration on a critical engagement with Marxism and postmodernism amongst a range of important concepts.


Richard Lance Keeble, Professor of Journalism at the University of Lincoln, is the joint editor of Peace Journalism, War and Conflict Resolution, shortly to be published by Peter Lang. David Edwards, of Media Lens, has a chapter titled “Normalising the unthinking: The media’s role in mass killing”. Richard Keeble’s chapter, “Peace journalism as political practice: A new, radical look at the theory”, expands on some of the ideas in this piece. John Pilger provides a Foreword.


SUGGESTED ACTION

The goal of Media Lens is to promote rationality, compassion and respect for others. If you do write to journalists, we strongly urge you to maintain a polite, non-aggressive and non-abusive tone.

Write to Tim Luckhurst
Email: t.luckhurst@kent.ac.uk

Please copy your emails to us:
Email: editor@medialens.org

A new Media Lens book, 'NEWSPEAK in the 21st Century,' by David Edwards and David Cromwell has just been published by Pluto Press. John Pilger writes of the book:

"Not since Orwell and Chomsky has perceived reality been so skilfully revealed in the cause of truth."
http://www.medialens.org/bookshop/newspeak.php
More from this author:
Dangerous Minds (12787 Hits)
by David Edwards "Our complex global economy is built upon millions of small, private acts of psychological surrender, the willingness...
RAPID RESPONSE MEDIA ALERT: THE LIBERATED AND THE DEAD (8971 Hits)
by Dave Edwards The BBC On The Haditha Massacre The title of the BBC news report was suitably ‘balanced‘: ‘Iraqi Deaths.’ Not...
Media Alert: Patriotism as Propaganda (7069 Hits)
by Dave Edwards On December 24, the Independent on Sunday‘s front page featured a portrait of a British soldier gazing pensively into the...
The Locus Of Responsibility (7342 Hits)
by David Edwards In his book Necessary Illusions, Noam Chomsky summarised the stark divide separating media treatment of state crimes: ...
Somalia - A Trip Down Memory Hole Lane (7931 Hits)
by David Edwards Following recent American airstrikes in Somalia, the words ‘Black Hawk Down’ have been mentioned dozens of times across...
Related Articles:
The New Media Offensive for the Iraq War (10289 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The American media establishment has launched a major offensive against the option of withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. ...
Mafia Hit On The Media (12163 Hits)
by John Weaver If I simply stood anywhere near Boris Berezovsky, I’m sure my hair would fall out and my skin would turn yellow. ...
Media Sham for Iraq War -- It’s Happening Again (9169 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The lead-up to the invasion of Iraq has become notorious in the annals of American journalism. Even many reporters,...
RAPID RESPONSE MEDIA ALERT: THE LIBERATED AND THE DEAD (8971 Hits)
by Dave Edwards The BBC On The Haditha Massacre The title of the BBC news report was suitably ‘balanced‘: ‘Iraqi Deaths.’ Not...
Can’t You See? Crucial Differences Too Many on the Left Seem to Miss (4513 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler It is often said, as a way of proving that the Democrats are no different from the Republicans: “The Democrats...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org said:

0
Letter to the Center for Journalism At the University of Kent 'Where journalists have greatness thrust upon them'
Hello,

Co-incidentally, the following is the text of letter written to Tim Luckhurst et. al. It delves into the aspect of journalism that is almost the antithesis of the statement quoted above: “there is an elementary delusion behind the idea that amateurs can report accurately”. I would state my un-delusional thesis as: 'there is an elementary delusion behind the idea that even professionals can report accurately'.

I would only additionally comment on this quote: "the public right to know [cannot] depend on the dictates of an individual's conflicted conscience".

That statement, minimally, is one of ignorance of history if it is accurately quoted in full context. A professor of journalism surely must know that Ben Franklin's making journalism the fourth un-tethered pivot of democratic checks-and-balances in a Republic form of government was entirely hinged on the small presses using only their conscience to keep check on the corridors of power. I do not believe that when he, as a small press owner himself, accorded consititutional protection to the only profession, journalism, that he had anything else in mind other than conscience as its primemover. I do not believe he anticipated mega-corporations making a "profession" of that moral endeavor, making it second to only the oldest profession on earth!

While Alternate Media surely suffers from many deficiencies - the least of which are COINTELPRO like "cognitive infiltrations" ; indeed also "individual's conflicted conscience", for like greed but unlike psychopathy, it plagues quite equitably ; wild speculations of the ignorant ; almost cultish blind following of lauded dissent-chiefs as much as it is of imperial scholars in the mainstream, etcetras. - its strengths are that even an ordinary person like myself, and a thousand others (or ten thousand, or is it now 100,000 thousand?) perhaps even more skilled than I, not professionals, not mega-paid or mega-glorified to project our opinions and analyses, but writing/reporting/analysing/connecting-the-dots solely from the burden of our conscience, can take on many a lofty paid "professional".

And not to issue an idle boast, but show me one single "professional journalist" from any mainstream news organization who has forensically covered, for instance, the most momentous event of our time, "imperial mobilization", and people have come to understand it from their professional coverage of it rather than its systematic deconstruction in the Alternative Media, and I'll gladly leave my thankless burden to the professionals.

It is only their failings - their midget-minds, their ignorance, their co-option in the service of empire, their "psychological cataracts" which perpetually blind them to the sins of their own nation (unless they suffer casualties) - which forced me to take up the pen in the first-place. I seriously doubt if anyone today in professional journalism - not of the I.F. Stone generation - can eloquently report even a Hegelian Dialectic by demonstrating its empricism in current affairs. They wouldn't be drawing their fat paychecks anymore (or invited to the White House press briefings as dutiful stenagrophers) even if they could figure out what it means!

And that's just one of the many tragedies of journalism which has become all but an instrument of the 'mighty wurlitzer'. The Alternative Media is also not immune from its pernicious capacity for manipulating public opinion among “the crowd of simpletons and the credulous”. For, “when the voting papers of the masses are the deciding factor”, it is necessary to systematically both manufacture consent (mainstream media), and manufacture dissent (alternate media).

Finally, thank you for the above article as it contributes to shedding analytical spotlight on the very process itself which was ab initio deemed to spotlight power and its incantations. Nay, one which: "should bear witness to the misery of the world, should be provocative by being independent, should rebel against all hidden and open pressure and manipulations, should be the chief doubter of systems, of power and its incantations, should be a witness to their mendacity", BUT DOES NOT! And unless the cancer is acutely dissected and fully diagnosed from its masking symptoms, there will never be a curing protocol.

Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org


---


Letter to the Center for Journalism At the University of Kent 'Where journalists have greatness thrust upon them'

To: journalism [at] kent.ac.uk

Subject: Re: Why Rupert Murdoch is a Desperate Man (or How Will Journalism Survive the Internet Age?)

Original Date: Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:47 PM

Revised Date: Sunday, Dec. 06, 2009 3 PM

Dear Prof. Tim Luckhurst, Ian Reeves, Sarah Lonsdale, Richard Pendry and Dr Suzanne Franks,

I came to your website centreforjournalism.co.uk following the story about Rupert Murdoch titled: “Why Rupert Murdoch is a Desperate Man (or How Will Journalism Survive the Internet Age?)” thinking how superficially the issues of Journalism are formulated by most everyone who even dares to think reform, including in this article, thus already ensuring that the core issue will never be identified amidst the red herrings perpetually chased by even those with genuine expressions of concern.

And I discovered that you have a new school of journalism and are training a new generation of – stenographers hopefully not – I. F. Stone legatees. So I thought I'd gratuitously offer a link to a letter outlining some of the real challenges to journalism. It was written in partial response to Prof. Robert Jensen's September 15, 2009 article: “Can journalism schools be relevant in a world on the brink?” The rest of the response is cited in [2] in the letter:

print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/09/challenges-to-journalism-reform.html

Please feel free take from that letter what you feel is useful, and discard what is not.

If you would permit me to make a gratuitous suggestion as well: It would surely be useful to your young students to become exposed to unvarnished reality at an early age. Perhaps due to their youthful inexperience in not knowing political correctness and not being hampered by the long list of thought-crimes which experience garners, they might come up with new solutions to the age old problem of hegemony and the role modern journalism plays in enabling it.

Before teaching them about journalism, do teach them about Zbigniew Brzezinski's “The Grand Chessboard”. Please get them to identify the crucial role journalism plays on the Grand Chessboard according to its own grandmaster's handwriting. Followed of course by an immersion into the Republic of Plato, and studying the relevance of “The Simile of the Cave” to modernity when it is deemed by imperial pundits themselves that “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”, and therefore, requires both Orwellian 10th and 11th edition Newspeak dictionaries to be distributed to the newsrooms to un-permit thought-crimes. They might in fact even try analyzing one of these being used today as a case study: “The Israel Project’s 2009 GLOBAL LANGUAGE DICTIONARY”.

I will take a bet that by going this provocative route early in your young idealists' education when libraries still exist and there is no overt restriction on what young students may or may not read, you are bound to produce a substantial number of high intellectual energy honest professionals who won't be indoctrinated into the axioms of empire. A majority of them will surely not acquire its 'la mission civilisatrice', nor own its 'white man's burden', and nor ever be plagued by its many shades of Orientalism which often looks upon the rest of the world with jaundiced eyes instead of the clear lens of truth.

The tools to uncover these truths when “Deception is a state of mind and the mind of the state” require acute forensic training starting at a young age rather than merely being taught how to write wonderful prose while rehearsing puppetshows in all their fine minutiae.

Furthermore, exploring at an early age what function does this truth-telling serve – how does it affect change – when the democratic public has already been made “prisoners of the cave”, might enable them to solve the complex problem of how many generations of de-briefing work is it to pragmatically undo what Goethe had stated, and which has become the unfortunate reality du jour: “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free”?

Otherwise, I am afraid, the only “greatness” any journalism school will be thrusting upon the young minds is producing more 'embedded' stenographers serving mainly the interests of the “Philosophers” outside the cave holding up their placards of “truth” for those within! This is a universal problem of journalism today and I hope that your training program can begin to address it with some measure of efficacy. Additional aspects of the many challenges besetting journalism are analyzed in my 2003 book “Prisoners of the Cave”, in Chapters 4 through 7. It is available on my website, FYI.

Best regards,

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

http://humanbeingsfirst.org

California, United States.

Source URL: print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/12/journalists-greatness-thrust-uponthem.html


 
February 05, 2010 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top