Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Fri

30

Mar

2007

Pro-Israel lobby robs US democracy of meaning
Friday, 30 March 2007 10:00
by Paul Balles

Dr. Paul J. Balles argues that pressure by the pro-Israel lobby in the USA has critically undermined US democracy. He calls for a return of the US government to the people.

Yesterday an Arab friend sent me an email full of photos of Americans holding up signs saying "We're sorry." These were people who felt guilty about what the American government has been doing around the world.

Presumably, their purpose was both to assuage their guilt and to let people outside of America know that not all Americans are warmongers. I also assume that my friend's purpose in sending the photo collection to me was to let me know that not all Arabs think all Americans are as bad as their government.
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
- Edmund Burke
Considering what the Bush regime has accomplished in terms of its own carnage and that of its Israeli puppeteer, for my Arab friend to express a view often heard 35 years ago was - under current circumstances - quite generous.

Much too generous from this American critic's point of view.

Arabs tend to forget at times that America still lays claim to being a democracy, proud to have embraced Abraham Lincoln's reference to a government "of the people, for the people and by the people". It's no longer any of those things.

Joel S. Hirschborn recently asked, "When you can no longer trust the elected representatives what happens to American democracy?” His response: "It becomes an oxymoron." An oxymoron is a contradiction in terms, like “military justice" or a "just war".

Hirschborn added:

We have arrived at a delusional democracy. Delusional because Americans overwhelmingly cannot admit the painful truth that their limited democracy no longer works for the good of most citizens. Instead, through corruption and dishonesty, our representative democracy has morphed into a plutocracy that serves the wealthy, power elites and corporate masters that control the political system and through that the economic system.1

If the government is not "for the people", how did it become a plutocracy that serves "the wealthy, power elites and corporate masters"? Could that happen if the government was "of the people"?

It should be clear from the inaction of a Congress recently voted to represent the electorate's wishes to leave Iraq that the government is not of the people.

In "An Open Letter to the President… Four and a Half Years Later", Sean Penn wrote:

…because, in the absence of a competent or brave Congress, of a mobilized citizenry, that level of power lies in your hands, it is you who have misused it to become our country's and our constitution's most devastating enemy. You have broken our country and our hearts. The needless blood on your hands, and therefore, on our own, is drowning the freedom, the security, and the dream that America might have been, once healed of and awakened by, the tragedy of September 11, 2001.2

When 2 per cent of the American population controls the country, no one can claim that America has a democracy "by the people". The Jewish population in the USA is 2 per cent , and it is represented by the lobbying power of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Is it democracy when 2 per cent of the population effectively controls the government and media? This is the democracy that the plutocrats in charge want to impose on other countries.

According to George Soros, in an article on "Israel, America and AIPAC,” it is a lobby "which strongly affects both the Democratic and the Republican parties. AIPAC's mission is to ensure American support for Israel but in recent years it has overreached itself."3 Later, Soros added, "Any politician who dares to expose AIPAC's influence would incur its wrath; so very few can be expected to do so."

In an earlier article, Juan Cole made it clear that the AIPAC influence on Congress has been ongoing:

With regard to the Arab-Israeli conflict, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and a few allies have succeeded in imposing complete censorship on both houses of Congress. No Senator or Representative dares make a speech on the floor of his or her institution critical of Israeli policy, even though the Israeli government often violates international law and UN Security Council resolutions.4

If AIPAC, representing 2 per cent of the American public controls the American government, how can anyone claim that it's a government "by the people"?

Some still call it "democracy". Is it a democracy for, of, or by the people when a presidential candidate must humble himself/herself before an AIPAC that yields the power of life or death for his/her candidacy?

Photographs of ordinary citizens holding placards saying "we're sorry" to the offended, wherever else in the world they may be, achieves little, if anything, but a weak expression of guilt by a dozen or so peaceniks.

We need to do more. We need to encourage academics like John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt whose study of "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" exposes the influence of lobbyists who represent only a tiny percentage of the population.5

We need more media voices like Nicholas Kristof's. Recently, in a somewhat surprising article - "Talking about Israel" – in the New York Times,. Kristof bemoans the fact that "There is no serious political debate among either Democrats or Republicans about our policy toward Israelis and Palestinians." His explanation:

American politicians have learned to muzzle themselves. In the run-up to the 2004 Democratic primaries, Howard Dean said he favoured an “even-handed role” for the U.S. - and was blasted for being hostile to Israel. Likewise, Barack Obama has been scolded for daring to say: “Nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people.”6

We need to ask our representatives and senators to address the issue of yielding to lobby pressures. We represent much more than the 2 per cent who are putting pressure on them. We need to let our representatives and senators know that we're tired of being sorry throughout much of the rest of the world.

We need to do more than tell the Arab world - or anyone else - that we’re sorry. We need to return the US government to the people.

Notes

1. Hirschborn, Joel S, "Democracy Dreaming", Information Clearing House, 03/26/07

2. Penn, Sean, “An Open Letter to the President...Four and a Half Years Later”, The Huffington Post, 03/24/07

3. Soros, George, “Israel, America and AIPAC”, New York Review of Books, 04/12/07

4. Cole, Juan, "AIPAC's Overt and Covert Ops", AntiWar.com, 08/30/04

5. Mearsheimer & Walt, “The Israeli Lobby and US Foreign Policy”, London Review of Books, 03/23/06

6. Kristof, Nicholas J, op ed, New York Times 03/18/07

 
More from this author:
Perfidy, Duplicity and Deceit (7282 Hits)
By Dr. Paul J. Balles If the world will be gulled, let it be gulled. -Robert Burton Americans refuse to end the reign of the National...
Invisible Men (6614 Hits)
by Dr. Paul J. Balles “I am an invisible man," said Ralph Ellison in the prologue to his novel The Invisible Man, "When...
Freedom Loved and Hated (8318 Hits)
by Paul Balles Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost. --Thomas Jefferson ...
Nothing to celebrate - US elections bad for Arabs (7430 Hits)
by Paul J. Balles Paul J. Balles argues that the Democrats' gains in the US mid-term elections will not lead to a change in US policy in the...
A world of psychopaths - The superiority complex of psychopaths - and Israel and the US (11928 Hits)
by Paul J. Balles Paul J. Balles considers the psychopathic phenomenon of the "superiority complex" as an explanation of...
Related Articles:
Thunder on the Mountain: The Murderers of Democracy (11970 Hits)
“Shame on your greed, shame on your wicked schemes. I tell you this right now, I don’t give a damn about your dreams.” -- Bob Dylan,...
"Where Commerce Sits on Every Tree" Pushing India Toward a Dollar Democracy (6304 Hits)
By Aseem Shrivastava In an article concerned with the rapid urbanization of India and China, Victor Mallet of London's Financial ...
Direct Democracy Lost in Florida and Colorado (8216 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn With all the hoopla about the big Democratic win, little attention has been given to the assault on direct democracy....
Third Parties Fight for American Democracy (8401 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn A great democracy offers citizens sharp political choices. That’s what gives political freedom meaning. With ...
The US and the Middle East: A “Grand Settlement” Versus the Jewish Lobby (10043 Hits)
by James Petras Chances for a change in the direction of US Middle East policy are extremely unlikely. The reason is the growing power of...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (5)add comment

a guest said:

0
AIPAC doesn't represent me!
I'm a secular American Jew. I despise AIPAC and the associated lobbies. My problem with your article is that you lump all American Jews with AIPAC, et al. That's just simply not the case, and it's what AIPAC would like you to think.

Moreoever, you forget about two much larger groups of people with a key interest in a Sparta-like Israel: Christian Zionists (far greater than 2% of the country) and arms dealers and many in the war-policy community who love selling arms to Israel and testing them out.

You might also add all those ignorant people who since 9/11 equate "Arabs and Muslims" with evil, and thus Israel with the last outpost of white, Western sanity in a sick region.

Cast your net a little more widely.
 
March 30, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
I don't see any attack against Jews in General.
I don't see any attack against Jews in General. All I see is a critical analysis of AIPAC and Israel. Please elucidate your claims with some quotes from the article - rather than labelling the writer a 'jew basher'.
 
March 30, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
Quotes:
(1) "When 2 per cent of the American population controls the country, no one can claim that America has a democracy "by the people". The Jewish population in the USA is 2 per cent , and it is represented by the lobbying power of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Is it democracy when 2 per cent of the population effectively controls the government and media? This is the democracy that the plutocrats in charge want to impose on other countries."

That pretty much says that Jews control the country.

(2) "If AIPAC, representing 2 per cent of the American public controls the American government, how can anyone claim that it's a government "by the people"?"

Once again, I reject the claim, made by AIPAC, that they represent me, and I'm part of that 2%. Note, too, what is unquotable, because absent: the massive support AIPAC gets from Christian Right orgs, as well as the confluence of interests in keep Israel Spartized AIPAC has with the military-industrial complex.

(3) "We need to ask our representatives and senators to address the issue of yielding to lobby pressures. We represent much more than the 2 per cent who are putting pressure on them."

Again, "the 2%," earlier said to be American Jews, are said to be represented by AIPAC. That's their claim, not mine.

I judge people as individuals, and if you visit my blog, you'll see I'm pretty critical of Israeli policy.

Feel free to show me where I went wrong in this analysis. I'm used to being called a "Zionist" (not that you said that) from one end and a "self-hating anti-Semite" from another.
 
March 31, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
"That pretty much says that Jews control the country."

No but they control US foreign policy effectively enough. They seem to have a good handle on what is shown in the media also.
 
April 10, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
...well, who cares about, if the AIPAC represents 2% (or 3% or even more, Zionists, Jewish or whatever) of the US population? The issue here is, that a club of rich lunatics (AIPAC), representing a state in violations of so many laws (Israel), has control over the US foreign policy! I think this article just reminds the reader about something outrageous, but less known or understood by the average reader (US citizens). But hey, the US itself has on the other hand control over the policy of so many countries through pretty much the same mechanisms, of course with more violence!
 
April 12, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top