Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sat

24

Apr

2010

The Good, the Bad, and the Misguided
Saturday, 24 April 2010 07:50
by Jayne Lyn Stahl

In what may be easily called the understatement of the decade so far, President Obama has characterized an Arizona measure that criminalizes undocumented immigration, just signed into law by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, as "misguided." Frankly, higher octane words come to mind. How about unconstitutional?

In these days of gosh, darn, and heck how better euphemize than with a word like "misguided?" Too bad we don't fire off more "misguided" missiles. And, if language is any indication of purpose, the benign appellation can only spell defeat at the polls for Democrats in November, and beyond

After more than eight years of listening to the likes of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld using terms like "bad guys," it's reassuring to know that the commander-in-chief can master polysyllables, but words with higher testasterone levels are needed to describe a law that just passed in a state that nearly produced our 44th president.

Lest there be some surprise about this latest move by Arizona's Republican governor, keep in mind that Brewer also signed legislation that allows people to carry guns into bars, and a measure that lets Arizona citizens possess concealed weapons without a permit.

Okay, but forget Brewer. What do we know about Russell Pearce, the Arizona state senator who sponsored the bill? Apart from being a conservative Republican who served in the National Guard during the Vietnam War, Pearce's Web site boasts of being a fifth generation Arizonan. But, where did the previous generations of Pearces come from, and could they provide legal documentation that meets citizenship requirements now if called upon to do so?

More importantly, could John Adams provide proof of citizenship that might satisfy the new Arizona state law? If Mahatma Gandhi were to find himself in Tucson on a dark street, would he find himself the target of the kind of reasonable suspicion clause of this new law?

A quick visit to Mr. Pearce's Web site will also show how much he values the Declaration of Independence, and entitlement of all to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." What his Web site neglects to mention is that evidently Pearce also believes the pursuit of happiness must come only with a green card.

What about "maverick" John McCain? Even the incumbent Arizona senator has been outspoken in his support for this law that now enables law enforcement to target anyone suspected of being in the country illegally; whatever "reasonable suspicion" may be.

But, is there a difference between being undocumented, and being illegal? Let's be clear here. You are now a criminal in the state of Arizona if you are stopped by police, and you are unable to produce documents establishing an acceptable citizenship status.

The irony is inescapable considering all the fuss about illegality when it comes to immigrants given that there isn't a peep when it comes to thousands of illegal wiretaps, or substantial evidence that a practice, waterboarding, which has long been considered torture was variously used by interrogators at Guantanamo Bay, in Iraq, and elsewhere.

For a country that was founded with what can only now be called the misguided belief in egalitarianism, it is abundantly clear that it isn't breaking the law that is at stake here, but who's breaking it.

True, this isn't the first draconian immigration legislation passed by a state that is also moving to demand future presidential candidates provide documentation that they were born in the U.S., but it is certainly the most hateful in that, if passed, it will put police officers in the position of immigration officials, a concept that has legal precedent thanks to the USA Patriot Act.

For the better part of two and half centuries, immigration policies have been regulated by the federal government, and not by the states. Surely, the president can find more potent language with which to denounce legalizing profiling by skin color, and under the guise of "questioning," one that enables authorities to harass with the objective of deporting those who lack requisite documentation.

Consider that from 1769 through 1882 according to a Smithsonian Institution exhibit, the U.S. excluded only convicts, prostitutes, idiots, and lunatics. From 1882-1943, Chinese were not allowed to immigrate. It wasn't until 1885 that U.S. immigration mandated that there be "no gangs of cheap laborers," according to a Smithsonian Institution exhibit, and this latest Arizona law seems to reflect a mindset we haven't seen since 1885.

Moreover, from the vantage point of Native Americans, those who came here on the Mayflower were illegals who did more than shoot one Arizona rancher. But, this isn't about crime. This is about jobs, and the Democrats better stand up and stand up fast to show that the furthest thing from the minds of people like John McCain, and Arizona's Republican governor, Jan Brewer, is helping working people. All they care about is saving their own jobs.

For the president, and Democratic leadership, not to speak out now in the strongest possible terms, but instead to pussyfoot around, will be not only a missed opportunity, but professional misconduct.

More from this author:
Following in the Footsteps... (6303 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The manic warriors, in Washington, are at it again, only now they've found someone who can manage more than one syllable at...
Worldwide Open Season on the Press (9295 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl On an otherwise quiet street in Istanbul, this morning, a 53 year old Turkish citizen of Armenian descent was gunned down...
On Hillary's announcement... (5430 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl You may have read the transcript of a speech given by George McGovern in The Nation last week in which he rightly...
An Open Letter to "The Decider" (5806 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl While the odds are probably better of getting a response from Santa, there are a few things I'd like to say if you can...
"Notes from the Undergrown: State of the Oilman Address" (5766 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The president's speech last night was more important for what it didn't say than for what it did. In an address that could...
Related Articles:
The Good, The Bad & the Immune from Prosecution (7552 Hits)
by Paul William Roberts Savages we call them because their manners differ from ours. Benjamin Franklin Just returned from a trip to...
The Evil and the Good, the Power and the People: First Installment of a Morley-Andy Exchange (3480 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler Within the past two weeks, this exchange occurred between Morley and me on another thread. I think it a good...
The Evil and the Good, the Power and the People: Second Installment of a Morley-Andy Exchange (3075 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler I never agreed with you more than in the preceding post. Nevertheless I still say that you are a conservative,...
Two Legs Good, Four Legs Equal (4142 Hits)
by Jason Miller “The moral duty of man consists of imitating the moral goodness and benificence of God manifested in the creation towards all...
It's All Good, Again: 'Uptick' in the American-Made Tides of Violence in Iraq (1509 Hits)
by Chris Floyd From the very beginning of the abomination that is the American war in Iraq, imperial courtiers have pushed the same line:...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

Thomas Smitherman said:

0
...
Sigh...

Having no controls over immigration is not progressive, it is libertarian and serves the interest of large capital. Allowing people to work illegally may be liberal in an extreme classical sense, but it is strongly opposed to working class interests as it UNDERCUTS SOCIAL SECURITY, raises unemployment, and depresses wages.

Allowing sanctuary cities where citizens are currently being shaken down in every which way to fund ailing police budgets, but illegal immigrants are let go (because dealing with them is too much trouble - and upsets their powerful employers - and the Feds won't deport them) is clearly antithetical to democratic and republican concepts of the equal application of the law to all.

No, don't respond by saying that George Bush and the Republicans are bad and just want to leave immigrants without any protections. Very good, we all know this, no argument here. But Bush and the elite Republican leadership also consistently supported an extremely liberal immigration policy, the full implementation of which was only blocked by a grassroots conservative-LABOUR coalition. But a purely exploitative policy versus a crackpot 'allow all immigrants in and give them full legal protections and benefits' policy are NOT THE ONLY OPTIONS!!!

Support social security! Support labour! Deport illegal workers (they do in social democratic countries)! Throw exploiting employers of illegal immigrants in jail! Support the republican equal application of the rule of law to all (no benefits for illegals or their exploiters)! This is the rhetoric of social and economic justice.
 
April 25, 2010
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top