Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

28

Jun

2010

Afghanistan: Another Victim of British Hypocrisy
Monday, 28 June 2010 03:04
by Bryan Raynor

Many influential people in Monarchical Britain believe that it is justifiable to send its military to Afghanistan to occupy, invade, overrun, dominate, coerce, suppress, rule - call it what you will, in order that Britain’s so called ‘democracy’ can be installed in your country! What an insult, what impertinence to the millions of Muslims living in Afghanistan.

No matter what word is used to describe Monarchical Britain’s foreign policy objective however, the end game is power and dominance of an Islamic State, and the inevitable change to its culture that would follow at the behest of a Crusading Imperialist aggressor from the West. It is hardly surprising therefore that the citizens of Afghanistan and other Middle East countries refuse to accept this Colonial intrusion into their affairs and the need to logically resort to rejection and legitimate resistance, as we in the British Isles would resist if the boot was on the other foot.

My reference to Monarchical Britain’s “end game of power and dominance” is based on alleged comments made by a Cabinet Minister in the new Coalition government. And I quote:

“....Britain was not a global policeman; we are not in Afghanistan for the sake of an education policy in a broken 13th.Century country. We are there to see our Global interests are not threatened”. So much for the phoney comments about British ‘democracy’!

Moreover, while apparently wishing to install our ‘democracy’ on other Nations States, Britain continues to subject its own people to draconian measures of dictatorial disinformation. The enquiry into the Bloody Sunday tragedy in which thirteen innocent citizens of the Republic of Eire were killed by British troops is just one example; where the delay of a thorough and transparent enquiry into the catastrophe was regarded by many as a conscious withholding of vital information from the public for decades.

And yet this example is as nothing to the distortion placed upon the Freedom of Information Act 2000; Britain’s discriminatory bending of the Act to suit the Royal Family. And I quote in part with minimal editing from The Times June 2010.

“The Royal Family and the Royal Household were exempted from direct request for information under the freedom of Information Act 2000… so members of the public are unable to access information held in the Royal Archives. The exemption is intended to protect communications between the Queen and her ministers and other public bodies from appearing in the public domain.”

It beggars the question, what does the Queen and her successors have to hide from a public that has every right to know what interactions and conceivably POLICY DECISIONS are being made between the Queen and HER Government in their name? The outrageous Royal Exemption means that the public will not be able to know the real truth until many years after the demise of each and every Royal. That isn’t democracy. That is Dictatorship!

Indeed, is this one example of hypocritical warping of British ‘democracy’ (not forgetting the numerous other distortions), what the people of Afghanistan and other Islamic States in the Middle East want from Monarchical Britain? I doubt it! But whatever the outcome it seems reasonable to expect Muslims around the world to reject such hypocrisy forthwith.

In conclusion, bring all the Queen’s troops home and not just the Queen’s privileged Grandson Prince Harry! Let’s pursue peace, peace, peace instead.
 
More from this author:
Royal Porton Down (3490 Hits)
by Brian Raynor Before royalty opens or gives its name to anything, exhaustive checks are made to eliminate any adverse and potentially...
Britain’s Monarchy set on dominating Islamic Middle East for at least another 30 years? (5151 Hits)
by Bryan Rayner That is the shocking and unwelcome news for Muslims and the Islamic world as we are informed of the Queen’s agreement with her...
In Praise of Killing Muslims - The British ‘Royal Public Relations’ Disaster (3192 Hits)
by Bryan Raynor The over bloated coverage relative to Prince Harry in the British media has been unyielding in the last few days, and even out...
Britain’s Monarchy set on dominating Islamic Middle East for at least another 30 years? (3638 Hits)
by Bryan Rayner That is the shocking and unwelcome news for Muslims and the Islamic world as we are informed of the Queen’s agreement with...
Governing Monarchy: It’s manifest role in the Radicalisation of British Politics, Culture & Society. (5726 Hits)
by William Gladys If there were Lunatic Asylums for Institutions, I have no doubt that ‘Megalomanic’ British Monarchy would have been...
Related Articles:
Is Another Recession Looming? Growth Slows, Housing Fizzles (6314 Hits)
By Seth Sandronsky U.S. economic growth rose at an annual rate of 1.6 percent in July–September, the slowest in more than three...
"Americans Can't Handle Another Impeachment" Is Republican Propaganda. Don't Be Deceived. (10117 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo "Americans can't handle another impeachment." So say the supporters of George W. Bush in their anti-impeachment...
Another Bloodbath in Lebanon? (6927 Hits)
by Mike Whitney “The Lebanese government has nearly doubled the size of its security forces in recent months by adding about 11,000...
Rockford, Illinois: Terrorist Plot Foiled? Or Just Another Knucklehead Stung? (8849 Hits)
Surely the Washington Post had fun trying to keep the word "entrapment" out of this story: An Illinois man has been charged with two...
Another Litvinenko Cluedo (6569 Hits)
by Copydude An interesting walk-on part in the Litvinenko drama is that of Andrei Sidelnikov. So far, he has made few column inches. In...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top