Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sun

12

Nov

2006

Nothing to celebrate - US elections bad for Arabs
Sunday, 12 November 2006 05:38
by Paul J. Balles

Paul J. Balles argues that the Democrats' gains in the US mid-term elections will not lead to a change in US policy in the Middle East. He cites Democrat leaders' unconditional support for Israeli crimes and for possible aggression against Iran.

Anyone who believes that the election of a Democratic majority in Congress will make a difference in US foreign policy has either been playing ostrich or supporting the poppy fields.

The Democrats not only choose to cow-tow to the Israeli lobbies, but they fail to resist the "end-time" evangelists, eliminating any possibility of a Democratic majority making a difference in Congress.

Anyone watching the post-election speeches by the new speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, would have heard her mention that she was raised a catholic, and from that developed her moral values.

That speech sounded like an appeal for support from the larger population and not the 40 million evangelicals who support everything that Israel says and does. It also momentarily side-stepped her earlier pronouncements of support for Israel to AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee).

That Pelosi had been lured into the snake pit became unequivocally clear when she attacked Jimmy Carter for writing a book mentioning Israeli apartheid. Jewish organizations in Washington heaped praise on her for her straight-A record on Israel.


Addressing AIPAC, the largest lobby in the US representing a foreign country, last year, Pelosi boasted of how "America's commitment to the safety and security of the State of Israel is unwavering. America and Israel share an unbreakable bond: in peace and war; and in prosperity and in hardship."

She complained that Palestinian National Authority President Mahmud Abbas "has not removed Arafat's corrupt cronies from positions of power, nor has he moved to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure".

There's no record of any praise by Pelosi for the democratic election of Hamas to replace "Arafat's corrupt cronies".

During the same speech, Pelosi labelled any reference to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict being about Israel's occupation of Palestine as "absolute nonsense". She added, "In truth, the history of the conflict is not over occupation, and never has been: it is over the fundamental right of Israel to exist."

The most daunting thing that she said during her presentation to AIPAC was "The greatest threat to Israel's right to exist, with the prospect of devastating violence, now comes from Iran."

To make matters worse, Representative Henry Waxman, in line to chair the House Government Reform Committee, said, in an online chat with Zionist supporters, "There will be some Democratic chairmen who may not share all my views or have as clear a perspective on Israel as I do, but they will not be chairing committees dealing with Israel and the Middle East."

America needs more than just a shift from Republicans to Democrats in Congress if it hopes to move toward peace in the Middle East. The Palestinians are no better off than they were; and there's no less danger of a military confrontation with Iran, unless...

American voters need to make it perfectly clear to their congressional representatives that the recent vote was a mandate to end its warmongering in the Middle East.

That means an end to the American contribution to the carnage in Iraq. It means an end to blind support for Israel's massacres in Gaza and destruction in the West Bank. It means an absolute refusal to entertain military action against Iran in order to mollify Israel and its lobbies in America.


 

More from this author:
Perfidy, Duplicity and Deceit (6887 Hits)
By Dr. Paul J. Balles If the world will be gulled, let it be gulled. -Robert Burton Americans refuse to end the reign of the National...
Invisible Men (6262 Hits)
by Dr. Paul J. Balles “I am an invisible man," said Ralph Ellison in the prologue to his novel The Invisible Man, "When...
Freedom Loved and Hated (8093 Hits)
by Paul Balles Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost. --Thomas Jefferson ...
A world of psychopaths - The superiority complex of psychopaths - and Israel and the US (10506 Hits)
by Paul J. Balles Paul J. Balles considers the psychopathic phenomenon of the "superiority complex" as an explanation of...
Delusional Fabrication (5493 Hits)
by Paul Balles Some of mankind's most terrible misdeeds have been committed under the spell of certain magic words or phrases. --James...
Related Articles:
Midterm Elections 2006: It's Always Darkest, Right Before ... It Goes Completely Black (9285 Hits)
by Phil Rockstroh If voting could change the system, it would be illegal. --Theodore Adorno "I can't go on. I'll go on....
Powell, Baker, Hamilton -- Thanks for Nothing (7788 Hits)
By Norman Solomon When Colin Powell endorsed the Iraq Study Group report during his Dec. 17 appearance on “Face the Nation,” it was...
'Illegal' Execution Enrages Arabs (7594 Hits)
by Dahr Jamail and Ali Al-Fadhily BAGHDAD, Jan 2 (IPS) - The execution of former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein carried out at the start of the...
Stoking Hatred Towards Arabs & Muslims (4319 Hits)
by Edward Strong The unwillingness of American and Western societies to confront naked Islamophobic incitement recalls so many pathological...
Un-President's Day - Until You Change How Money Works - You Change Nothing (18200 Hits)
by Carolyn Baker Economics is the study of our optimization (creation, management, allocation and destruction) of our resources. To optimize...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

Jimmy Montague said:

0
You're right.
And when you're right, you're right. But being right won't solve the problem.

You'd think that Israel's defeat in Lebanon and Uncle Sam's defeat in Iraq would combine to cause a rethink of US policy, but a rethink doesn't seem to be in the offing. Olmert's visit to Washington, I'm betting, is part of Israel's wind-up for an attack on Iran. The Zionist terror wants to make sure that when it launches its attack, it will enjoy the approval of the Democrat majority in Congress. Olmert will, of course, get the assurance he needs.

My only question about the Zionists' impending attack is that I wonder how savage it will be: will the Zionists use nukes (George Bush's plan) or will they not? Any predictions on that question from the wannabe pundits who hang here at AFP?
 
November 12, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top