Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

23

Jul

2007

Conyers: 3 More Congress Members and I'll Impeach
Monday, 23 July 2007 13:57
by David Swanson

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers has said that if three more Congress Members get behind impeachment he will start the impeachment proceedings.

I was a guest today on Bree Walker's radio show. She's the progressive radio host from California who purchased Cindy Sheehan's land from her in Crawford, Texas.

Bree attended an event on Friday in San Diego at which Congressman Conyers spoke about impeachment. Her report was extremely interesting. I had already heard reports that Conyers had said: "What are we waiting for? Let's take these two guys out!" But, of course, what we're waiting for is John Conyers. Is he ready to act? It was hard to tell from that comment. In January, Conyers spoke at a huge rally on the National Mall and declared "We can fire them!" but later explained that what he meant was that we could wait for two years and Bush and Cheney's terms would end. Was this week's remark just more empty rhetoric?

It appears to be more than that. Bree Walker told me, on the air, that Conyers said that all he needs is three more Congress Members backing impeachment, and he'll move on it, even without Pelosi. I asked whether that meant specifically moving from 14 cosponsors of H Res 333 to 17, or adding 3 to the larger number of Congress Members who have spoken favorably of impeachment but not all signed onto bills. Bree said she didn't know and that Conyers had declined to take any questions.

Either way, this target of three more members seems perfectly doable. It's safe to assume, I think, that we're talking about impeaching Cheney first. But, even if Conyers is talking about Bush, the target is perfectly achievable.

First, there are Congress Members like Jesse Jackson Jr. who have spoken out for impeachment but not signed onto H Res 333. They should be urged to act now! Second, there are dozens of members who signed onto H Res 635 a year and a half ago, Conyers' bill for an investigation into grounds for impeachment, who have not signed onto H Res 333 yet. Third, one of the excuses citizens often hear from lots of Congress Members for not signing onto articles of impeachment is that not enough of their colleagues have signed on and therefore "we don't have the votes." Well that just changed. Now three more votes is all that's needed to get this machine rolling. Fourth, many of the 14 Congress Members backing H Res 333 have used similar excuses to justify refraining from lobbying their colleagues to join them. That can now end. Our 14 leaders can do more than just put down their names.

Now, if Conyers begins impeachment proceedings in the House Judiciary Committee, we should all be clear on what that will mean. If it is serious, it will not mean sending any subpoenas or contempt citations to the emperors' court. Bush and Cheney have already repeatedly refused to comply with subpoenas.

President Richard Nixon did the same, of course, and his refusal to comply with subpoenas constituted the offense cited in one of the three Articles of Impeachment approved by the House Judiciary Committee on July 27, 1974 as warranting "impeachment and trial, and removal from office." But Bush and Cheney have gone further, ordering former staffers not to comply with subpoenas, and announcing that the Justice Department will not enforce any contempt of Congress proceedings.

What the impeachment of Cheney or Bush will be is very, very fast. It will not disrupt or distract from the important business of passing nonbinding resolutions and holding all-night gripe sessions over bills destined to be vetoed. Impeachment in the case of Dick Cheney need not take the three months it did for Nixon or the two months it did for President Bill Clinton. In fact, it could take a day. Here's why:

Bush and Cheney's lies about Iraqi ties to al Qaeda are on videotape and in writing, and Bush and Cheney continue to make them to this day. There was no al Qaeda in Iraq until the invasion.

Their claims about Iraqi weapons have been shown in every detail to have been, not mistakes, but lies.

Their threats to Iran are on videotape.

Bush being warned about Katrina and claiming he was not are on videotape.

Bush lying about illegal spying and later confessing to it are on videotape. A federal court has ruled that spying to be a felony.

The Supreme Court has ruled Bush and Cheney's system of detentions unconstitutional.

Torture, openly advocated for by Bush and Cheney and their staffs, is documented by victims, witnesses, and public photographs. Torture was always illegal and has been repeatedly recriminalized under Bush and Cheney. Bush has reversed laws with signing statements.

Those statements are posted on the White House website, and a GAO report found that with 30 percent of Bush's signing statements in which he announces his right to break laws, he has in fact proceeded to break those laws.

For these and many other offenses, no investigation is needed because no better evidence is even conceivable. This impeachment will be swift. And it will require only a simple majority. We already know that the Democrats can vote as a block if they want to, and that a few brave Republicans might join them.

Whether the Senate will then convict Cheney will depend on how much pressure citizens apply and how much information the House manages to force onto television sets. The latter could be surprisingly large and substantive, since the conflict of an impeachment is certain to generate incredible ratings.

But even an acquittal would identify the Senators to be removed from office by voters in 2008. And Cheney (or Bush) would still have been 100% impeached. Al Gore didn't run for president pretending he'd never met Bill Clinton and pick Senator Joe Lieberman as a running mate because the Senate convicted Clinton (it acquitted).

The timing of Conyers' remark may be related to the steps the White House has recently taken to assert "unitary executive" dictatorial power. Bush has commuted the sentence of a subordinate who obstructed an investigation into matters involving Bush and Cheney. And, as mentioned above, neither subpoenas nor contempt citations will go anywhere. Impeachment is no longer merely the appropriate step that it has been for the past six years. It is now the only tool left to the Congress for use in asserting its very existence as a functioning body of government.

But the timing is also quite helpful to the grassroots movement for impeachment, and rather symbolic. Five years ago this Monday, the meeting was held at #10 Downing Street that produced the Downing Street Minutes. Over two years ago, then Ranking Member Conyers held a hearing in the basement of the Capitol, the only space the Republican leadership would allow him. At that hearing, several Democratic Congress Members for the first time began talking about impeachment. The witnesses at the hearing were Ambassador Joseph Wilson, attorney John Bonifaz, former CIA analyst Ray McGovern, and a then unknown gold star mother named Cindy Sheehan. They discussed the evidence of the Downing Street documents, which added significantly to the growing body of evidence that Bush and Cheney misled the Congress about the case for war.

This Monday, Sheehan and McGovern and a great many leaders of the movements for peace and impeachment will lead a march at 10 a.m. at Arlington National Cemetery. We will march to Congressman Conyers' office and ask to talk with him about impeachment. We will refuse to leave without either a commitment to begin at once the impeachment of Cheney or Bush or both, or our arms in handcuffs. The same day, groups in several states around the country will be sitting in and risking arrest for impeachment in the district offices of their congress members.

Not everyone will be able to take part. But everyone can take two minutes on Monday and do two things: phone Chairman Conyers at 202-225-5126 and ask him to start the impeachment of Dick Cheney; and phone your own Congress Member at 202-224-3121 and ask them to immediately call Conyers' office to express their support for impeachment. Your Congress Member might just be one of the three needed, not just to keep us out of jail but to keep this nation from devolving into dictatorship.
 
More from this author:
U.S. v. Bush (6450 Hits)
By David Swanson Now, we almost all agree that Bush and Cheney have done bad things. But have they actually committed crimes? If you know...
The Melbourne Minutes: New Downing Street Memos from Down Under (7444 Hits)
By David Swanson Over a year before the United States launched an endless war on Iraq in what President George W. Bush told Congress was...
Be All That You Can Be: Leave the Army (6202 Hits)
By David Swanson As long as there has been a U.S. military, people have been leaving it. That choice has never been more appropriate than...
Closer to Home (5923 Hits)
By David Swanson I did something worse than St. Augustine did when I was a kid. I must confess I broke into a house on the other side of...
Honesty in Iraq (5093 Hits)
By David Swanson The Minneapolis Star-Tribune recently published an editorial that said of Bush: "His pronouncements now bear no...
Related Articles:
More “Culture Wars” Gibberish from nutcase David Brooks (10869 Hits)
Most of us know David Brooks as the balding goofball on “The Jim Lehrer News Hour” who shrugs his shoulders and giggles gleefully whenever...
We The People: An Open Letter to Congress (7588 Hits)
By Tom Chartier Dear Members of the 110th Congress: May I offer my congratulations to those of you who are newly elected. To ...
Impeach for Change Kicks off National Campaign (7625 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff The kick-off session of the new national movement for impeachment of President Bush (and Vice President Dick Cheney), Impeach...
First Real Test for Democrats: The Lame Duck Session of Congress (7287 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Forget all the talk about civility and compromise. It's clear that President Bush and his aiders and abettors in the...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

a guest said:

0
PRESSURE = COMMERCE
That didn't turn out too well, did it.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/24/2736/

I hate doing this yet again here at AFP, but since Americans still labor under the delusion they inhabit a democratic republic, it becomes necessary to point out that impeachment isn't "doable" without a party representing the public good.

Democratic voters haven't had a party for many years.

Rather than conduct themselves as members of an opposition party, D.C. Dems have refrained from challenging Bush's Reign of Terror - and have often assisted it. Their neglect and complicity in the dismantling of The Republic has culminated - by design - in a crisis largely of their own making. This is their strategy. It will continue to be their strategy because there is no cost associated with it, no matter how much harm it yields.

Desperation means Democratic votes in a presidential election. The Democratic Congress doesn't challenge Bush-Cheney because Democratic politicians are experts at convincing their constituents COURAGE and ACTION are just around the corner. The Democratic Congress itself is not challenged by the people most responsible for its conduct - the voters responsible for their election. Should anyone be surprised when Conyers, Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats in Congress ridicule, scold and ignore citizens who expect more than empty rhetoric and careerism in the face of naked criminality on the part of the Bush-Cheney Administration?

FORGET THE BALLOT BOX. The presidential election is too distant for electoral considerations. The voter has one tool: the ballot. That's all The Voter will ever have: a ballot that becomes worthless when representatives are owned and operated by entitities other than voters.

The citizen is not constrained by the ballot box, and it is a citizens' movement that is most needed today. It does not currently exist. Will it ever?

The Republic is not ill. It is dead. Americans' collective failure to pronounce it as such - deluding ourselves that phone calls and petitions and "awareness" actually matter - is paradoxically what prevents reclaiming what we are guaranteed by The Constitution: self-governance.

What politicians understand is COMMERCE. When it flows, all is right with the world. There are only "problems" when COMMERCE is a problem. The dead bodies and scarred souls can pile up in Iraq - AND IRAN - and at home for years on end, just as they did last year and the year before and the year before that. But nothing will change as long as COMMERCE functions. This is what American citizens adamantly refuse to consider. We keep doing the same things and expecting a different result. That isn't going to happen. The sooner people realize this, the sooner we can break out of our national paralysis.

Organizers would come from near and far to protest the World Bank if it showed up in San Francisco, but Nancy Pelosi can say "Impeachment is off the table," and nobody feels compelled to DEMAND otherwise. Were COMMERCE to find itself inconvenienced in San Francisco, rest assured, Madam Speaker's position would be less rigid. So, where are the people? Going about our business because it's just another day in The Empire.

Democrats don't want to impeach. They want a big, scary monster for their convention in Denver next year. Is this acceptable to conscientious citizens? It appears so. But, still, I type... trying to change people's minds about making polite appeals by phone or mail or whatever other toothless mechanism we choose. The only thing that matters to the political establishment is COMMERCE. Until people begin to understand this - and act in accordance with that understanding - we will always have what we have today: Citizens who don't understand what a "demand" is, and; (2.) an increasingly oppressive, unresponsive, unaccountable government from which nothing is ever demanded.

Impeachment isn't a matter of what is "doable" in Congress. It's a matter of whether citizens are willing to do what is necessary to apply PRESSURE on Congress - and that doesn't come from the phone or a letter or a petition. Nor does it come from the ballot box. "Pressure" takes one form: COMMERCE. The Founders knew it. Why do we deny it? We ignore this fundamental truth at our peril - and the peril of those with whom we share this planet.

If Nancy Pelosi and her fellow Democrats refuse to do what is right, then citizens are well within their rights to converge on San Francisco and DEMAND she reconsider.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.

Am I?
 
July 27, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top