Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

13

Aug

2007

Candidates, Canidates Everywhere - And Not a One Worthy of My Vote
Monday, 13 August 2007 21:56
by Stephen P. Pizzo

I spent the last week coming to terms with the fact that not a single candidate running for President is worthy of the job. Not in the Democratic Party, or the GOP. And no worthy third party candidates have emerged yet either.

So I decided to sit down and try to sort out what is is I don't seem to like about any of the current batch of candidates. Forget deep thinking and rational analysis. Because I suspect I, like most other voters, don't caste of our final vote rationally. I believe other motivations are trump rational thinking when it comes to picking the person we hope will become our national savior every four years. Emotions like fear, personal and religious values and our old standby reason, “the lesser of two-evils.” In other words, we don't vote with our heads. We vote with our gut.

So that's what I tried to sort out last week. All the policy blather aside, what's my gut reaction to these candidates. I didn't even try to fair and balanced. And if you are looking for the most penetrating analysis of these candidates, stop reading now, because you sure a hell aren't about to get it from what follows.


The Democrats

Hillary R. Clinton: Hillary is the anti-Christ of Democrats According to polls, 50% percent of registered have been bewitched by this shape-shifter. I figure that if you think you're sick of George W. Bush after 7 years in office, just wait until you get a snoot full of a Hillary Clinton administration. If elected President I fear she may be the last Democrat to see the inside of the Oval office for a generation. And the same goes for the next woman nominated by either party for that office. And she's not even much of an improvement over what we have now. Hillary is at least as big a serial liar as Bush, and just as shameful at it. For example, earlier this month she gang-banged Obama for saying he would take nukes off the table in dealing with Pakistan's unruly, terrorist infested tribal regions. Hillary claimed it proved Obama was too unseasoned and naive to be president. But wait -- just two months before that Hillary herself told reporters she would take nukes off the table in dealing with Iran's nuclear ambitions. Holy on-the-record hypocrite, Batman. I don't want four more years of that kind of cynical duplicity, phony baloney, valueless and dangerous crap. And that's what I fear a Hillary Clinton presidency would be. Same old, same old, only this time in a pantsuit.

Barack Obama: I had such hopes for Barack. But, so far, they have been hopes unrealized. To call the Obama campaign uninspiring would be an understatement. It verges on somnolent. I was ready and eager for a young Martin Luther King/JFK hybrid. Instead all I've gotten so far is a nice, smart, mild-mannered, well-spoken, well-meaning, tan version of an upwardly mobile Chicago alderman. I had hoped for more, lots more. Because, if America ever needed a no-nonsense dope-slap-upside- the-head kinda president, it's now. But rather than swinging for knockouts, Barack has turned out to be a cross between Oprah and Dr. Phil.

John Edwards: He's smart enough. He's ambitions enough. He's too pretty by half. I wouldn't hold that against him except that he seems to care way too much about it. Something deep within tells my gut that it says something about a person when they can get a perfectly acceptable $25 haircut anywhere in the US but pays $400 for a stylist instead. Is that petty of me? Probably. But, over my 62-years of rubbing elbows with all kinds of people I've learned more than a bit about character. And somewhere among all that are data that gives me concern about this guy. A rich guy who billing himself a champion of the poor, who spends a year getting himself filmed working with poor people, but stops long enough to get $400 haircuts. Maybe I shouldn't find that kind thing a turnoff, but I do. Bottom line on Edwards – He's too cute by half (physically and politically.) The only thing about him that makes him even passingly creditable is his wife, Elizabeth, who if were running instead of her husband, I would vote for with out hesitation.

Bill Richardson: A nice guy, but reaching. Sure he's held a lot of high-level jobs in government, but it those were his peak career moments. Richardson just doesn't “feel” like Presidential material. VP, maybe, but not P.





Joe Biden: OMG, imagine four or eight years of having to listen to that windbag. Joe is smart-- just ask and he'll tell you. Don't ask, and he'll tell you – and tell you, and tell you, and tell you... Because all Joe Biden does – besides having his teeth-whitened – is talk. Poor Joe was born a century too late. He would have made a bigger splash back in mid-1800s when senatorial windbags were all the rage. Biden would make a great Secretary of State, but not a good President. Besides, if you think Bush has burned out the US military, Biden would do the same thing to the White House press corps. His entire administration would one long, non-stop extemporaneous news conference. I have visions of Helen Thomas fleeing the White House Press room screaming, “No, no... not another news conference?!!! ... I can't do it.... Let me cover golf or American Idol. Just get me out of the Biden White House....”



Chis Dodd: Don't like him. Every time I see him I expect Madam Tussaud to show up to return him to his place in her Wax Museum.







Mike Gravel: No thanks. We already tried turning the nation over to a raving lunatic, and it hasn't turned out well.

 

 

Dennis Kucinich: I like him. But I'm not ready for a socialistic solution to every problem that comes down the pike. While a single-payer health system is a good idea, turning the entire health care industry into not-for-profit enterprises would kill innovation. Whether liberals like to admit it or not, free enterprise is almost always more efficient and dynamic than government. Rather than removing the profit motive from medicine, the answer lays in installing and maintaining a government regulatory system that tempers inevitable free enterprise excesses.


Republicans

Rudy Giuliani: Oh man, if Republicans think Bill Clinton's “personal habits” were an embarrassment wait until they get a taste of a Giuliani presidency. Ruddy Rudy would wear out the sheets in Lincoln bedroom. Then there's current Mrs. Judith (don't-call-me-Judi) Guiliani Whoa! This is one needy gal. If you think Nancy Reagan was piece of work, wait until you get a gander at Judi. Just spend a few minutes scanning the Vanity Fair profile of her. Then close your eyes and try to imagine all the things that could set Judith off as First Lady. And imagine the soap opera that would ensue when (not if, when) President Rudy decides that Judy is past her “use by” date and tries to toss her out of the White House. Talk about the War of the Roses!



John McCain: Remember the old Mr. Magoo cartoons? I do.




 

 
Mitt Romney: This guy is difficult to describe because our lexicon has no words to capture this level of slickness. (My pal, Tony Seton over at QNN suggests oleaginous.) Every time I see this guy on TV I expect him to say something like, “Do you know how much you'd save on your heating bill and maintenance if you installed our aluminum siding on your home?” Then there's the whole Mormon thing. I know it's politically incorrect to dump on person's belief structure, but when it comes to choosing a new Commander-in-Chief I think we need to put some limits on that indulgence. I mean it's unnerving enough that all the candidates running believe it's important to trot out their spiritual creds – mostly the Christian variety. In a time when real weapons can anniliate mankind, I am uneasy that we insist on electing only certified spirit worshipers to the presidency. But Romney's religion, Mormonism, is a bridge too far along that path. Mormons rank right up with Scientologists for unadulterated nonsensical beliefs. Would you put Tom Cruise in the White House? I hope not, (though after two Bush victories it's clear voters are quite capable of doing just that.) Anyway, don't ask Romney if it's “boxers or briefs,” because it's neither. It's worse.



Sam Brownback: When it comes to religious nuts, Brownback is the macadamia of the GOP pack.

 






Tom Tancredo: The Southwest's David Duke-lite




 

 



Mike Huckabee: Mild-mannered and nonthreatening. Huckabee is the Mr. Rogers of the GOP candidates. But if you didn't care for your visit to Mr. Bush's neighborhood, you won't care for Huckabee's either. Mike is just George minus the smirk.

 



Duncan Hunter: If you're looking for a guy who really would “bomb, bomb, bomb.. bomb bomb Iran,” Slam Duncan is your man.

 


Ron Paul: I like this guy. His honesty is refreshing. But Ron is to GOP what Kuchinich is to the Dems. Rather than socializing everything in sight Paul would cut everything and everyone loose and let social and economic Darwinism sort out the winners and losers. Ron Paul is right about a lot of things, especially on how the US, and most other nations on earth, manipulate their currencies to create one fool's paradise after another – each of which vaporizes when it's bubble bursts. But Paul's extreme libertarian solutions would have American streets looking like old Calcutta in four years.


 

So here I am. Fools to the left of me, clowns to the right. Stuck in the middle without a candidate to vote for.
More from this author:
Predictions for 2007 (6331 Hits)
by Stephen P. Pizzo The War: Jenna & Barbara Bush will not be part of their dad's troop surge. Ditto for any member of the Cheney clan. ...
White House Chess (5927 Hits)
by Stephen P. Pizzo The Washington media spent the holidays trying to guess what the President's new plan for Iraq might be. Meanwhile in the...
Fine Mess You Got Us Into This Time (7475 Hits)
by Stephen P. Pizzo At the moment all the focus is on what George W. Bush is going to do about the mess he's made of Iraq. But the larger...
New Lies Forward (5920 Hits)
by Stephen P. Pizzo Well it's a new year, and you know what that means... time to update the administration's list of stated reasons for it's...
The GOP's Comprehensive Immigration Reform Scam (6430 Hits)
by Stephen P. Pizzo Traditional conservative, William F. Buckley was once asked how he would describe a “liberal.” He thought for...
Related Articles:
Read This Before You Vote (11465 Hits)
If one were to believe the hype, nothing less than the fate the civilized world is riding on the results of the upcoming midterm elections....
Top Ten Reasons Why You Might Vote Democrat in 2008 (5506 Hits)
by Mickey Z. 1. Everything changed on 9/11 2. Republicans are evil 3. You're picky about which lies you opt to believe 4. If...
National Peace Organizations Call on Congress to Stop Funding the Occupation of Iraq and Vote to Bring our Troops Home in 2007 (13293 Hits)
Congress Dithers as Americans Across the Country Mark the Beginning of the Fifth Year of War and Occupation of Iraq Silver Spring, MD -- On...
A Veto Is a Vote for Eternal War (3775 Hits)
by David Swanson For George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, 2008 is too soon to end a war that they intend to last forever. 2008 is too soon to stop...
My Hat is in the Ring! Ten Reasons to Vote for Chartier. (5654 Hits)
by Tom Chartier You know, there’s nothing quite like flu-induced feverish delirium to make one think clearly. Three weeks of the flu and my...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (4)add comment

a guest said:

0
There is no perfect candidate
Just like there is no perfect mate.

You find the one that will best fight for what you believe in, what is important to you.

I love Biden. He can talk about foreign policy all day and all nite, and I would hang on his every word.
 
August 13, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
What free enterprise is no good at is honoring the social contract.
Mr. Pizzo:

Free enterprise is all about making money. It begins and ends there. So which part of a single-payer health care system do you think we should turn over to free enterprise? And if free enterprise has got hold of ANY PART of our health-care system, how can you call it a single-payer system? You admire free enterprise, but you don't like Ron Paul? You don't like socialism but you favor single-payer health care? Sounds to me like you're a guy who can't afford health insurance because he's a compulsive gambler.

Your problem is that you've been drinking capitalism Kool-Aid for so long that you've forgotten what you're drinking.
 
August 14, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
“turning the entire health care industry into not-for-profit enterprises would kill innovation. Whether liberals like to admit it or not, free enterprise is almost always more efficient and dynamic than government.”

Innovation in the business of keeping people alive? Are you crazy! What the hell has innovation got to do with it? And ‘free’ enterprise is more efficient? Efficient for whom? What like Halliburton is ‘efficient’ at screwing the taxpayer?

Bill
 
August 14, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
Free enterprize has the tendantcy to manipulate those into corrupting those and that is why the top 1 percent richest love socialistic capitalism more than anyonelse. Most middle/upper classes don't give a shit about you unless you buy their products, hey what a great social environment WE all live in.

The richest are the ones who triumpth total freedom of choice because it is them decide where your university degree is going to get you in life.
 
August 14, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top