Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

10

Sep

2007

Was That Nuclear-Armed B-52 Flight Destined for Iran?
Monday, 10 September 2007 12:22
by Dave Lindorff

There’s something definitely screwy about the August 30 incident in which a B-52 bomber flew from Minot AFB in North Dakota to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana carrying five fully armed Advanced Cruise Missiles, each equipped with nuclear bombs capable of exploding at anything from 5 kilotons to 150 kilotons.

The government has been quick to say that the flight, which violated a number of long-standing orders regarding shipment of nuclear weapons in US airspace, was a “mistake.”

But was it a mistake?

The biggest question is why a B-52 armed with nuclear-tipped cruise missiles would fly to Barksdale AFB. If, as reported, the weapons were being transported to be decommissioned, which supposedly is the destination for 400 of these doomsday weapons, then they should have been destined for Kirtland AFB in New Mexico, near the Pantex plant outside Amarillo, TX, where they would be dismantled. As Michael Salla writes in a disturbing piece in Saturday’s edition of OpEdNews, the weapons should also not have been flown at all on a B-52, as there have been standing orders for 40 years against such flights over US soil, following several accidents in which bombs or nuclear-armed rockets were lost because “broken arrow” incidents including inadvertent bomb drops or crashes. A second order, issued in 1991 at the end of the Cold War by George Bush’s father, barred the loading of nuclear weapons on any bomber. Any pilot would have known this, as would any ground support people loading the missiles on the B-52.

According to Salla, if these five cruise missiles were really being transported by air to Texas for decommissioning, they should have been disarmed and flown in specially designed transport planes that are built to resist nuclear leakage in the event of a crash. They would never be transported under the wings of a B-52.

What makes the incident even more suspicious is that Barksdale AFB is a staging area for B-52s being sent to the Middle East for combat duty. As the website GlobalSecurity.org reports: “Barksdale Air Force Base is headquarters for the 2d Bomb Wing, Eighth Air Force and 917th Wing. The 2d Bomb Wing provides global combat capability and trains all B-52 combat crews.”

The official Barksdale AFB website says: “Barksdale warriors and B-52s have a proud tradition serving both at home and abroad in support of the Global War on Terrorism; they have played vital roles in combat operations supporting Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and Operation Iraqi Freedom.”

The original expose of the B-52 flight appeared in the newspaper . Staff writer Michael Hoffman writes that his initial source for the story was three officers “who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to discuss the incident.”

So this is a case where some military officers who knew something wrong was happening did the honorable, patriotic thing and went public with a publication they trusted, both to do the right thing, and to protect them.

So what is actually going on here?

Salla suggests the worst: that this was likely a deliberate action, ordered through a chain of command outside the Pentagon. Salla notes that it has been widely reported that the top brass in the US military (note: with the exception of some wackoes in the Air Force), have staunchly opposed any use of nuclear weapons in the event of an air attack on Iran. So an order to send nuclear-armed cruise missiles to the Persian Gulf region, if that’s what this flight was, would not likely have come through the normal chain of command from the Secretary of Defense through the Air Combat Command (ACC, successor to SAC). It would, Salla hints darkly, have come through the back channel set up since even before 9-11 by Vice President Dick Cheney, who is known to be pushing for an attack on Iran, and who would like nothing better than to use nuclear weapons to disable Iran’s nuclear processing facilities.

We’re talking about high treason, if Salla is right.

And the seriousness of what happened — five nuclear-tipped cruise missiles, in firing position, flown across the width of the continental US in violation of all standing orders to a base that is a staging area for B-52 flights to the Persian Gulf war zone — demands a full public investigation.

The Democrats in charge of Congress, and the Republican minority, may not have the stomach to stand up to the Bush administration’s obsession to keep the bloodletting going in Iraq, and they may not have the courage even to put a stop to plans to attack Iran, but even the most reprehensible weasels and cowards among them should have the basic decency to know that this bizarre and suspicious flight needs to be investigated to the fullest to get to the bottom of what was going on.

Salla suggests that behind the scenes, Gates and the generals, who clearly distrust and dislike the vice president and who don’t want an Iran attack, will use this incident to go after the vice president and force him into a “medical” resignation. He says that the exposure of the flight will also put any attack on Iran on hold, because military leaders will be worried that there are other nuclear weapons that have been introduced into the equation secretly, either for use in Iraq or for a “black flag” operation against US forces.

Let us hope so they are right, and that this will be Cheney’s undoing.

I’m not as confident as Salla, however.

If it turns out that Cheney was behind this incident, that its goal was as sinister as Salla suspects, and that it was only the brave action of several officers who went public and leaked information about it that led to the undoing of the plan, it may take more than behind-the-scenes pressure from the Defense Department to take down the vice president.

Moreover, if Cheney simply resigned, without the incident being exposed publicly, Americans would not ever know how close we came to global disaster, martial law, and the end of America as we know it. It is essential that Congress get to the bottom of this one.

Every person remotely connected to this mission needs to be called before Congress and put under oath to explain what happened. An independent prosecutor should also be named to start a criminal investigation.

Note: Back in the early 1970s, my wife and I knew an Air Force reservist who told us he was flying secret missions for the government, to Central America and to the Middle East. He never explained what these were, but it was clear that they were connected with secret operations of a military nature. This individual, who had turned belatedly against the Vietnam War, and had begun to question what he was doing in secret, died under mysterious circumstances in his apartment. His mother went to the morgue to pick up the body only to discovered to her horror that it was not her son. Someone had removed his corpse, making any investigation as to cause of death impossible. There are sinister operations carried on by this government, and this looks like one that is as sinister as it can get. The crew of that B-52 and the ground crew that loaded it, should be watching their backs.
 
More from this author:
BREAKING NEWS: Eisenhower Carrier Group Sails for Iran Theater (24072 Hits)
The nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Eisenhower and its accompanying strike force of cruiser, destroyer and attack submarine slipped their moorings...
U.S. Military Has Killed Up to 238,000 Iraqi Civilians (11495 Hits)
A just-released study by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, published in the current issue of the prestigious British medical journal The...
Bush's Middle East Strategy, and Presidency, Lie in Ruins as Republicans Scurry Away (9872 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Well, so much for Iraqi “sovereignty.” So much too for "staying the course" and for "fighting the terrorists...
Time for Truth and Consequences (9046 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff The Bush administration, losing the war in Iraq, has come with a "new" strategy: setting a timetable for Iraq's...
Let's March in January! An Impeachment Call to Action (11234 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff I'm going to go out on a limb here and predict that, barring some incredible act of criminal cynicism such as the...
Related Articles:
No-brainer: Hillary loves Dick (Cheney, that is) (5977 Hits)
by Mickey Z. When you're bored, get on board. For some that might mean a surfboard, a snowboard, or maybe a skateboard. For Vice President Dick...
Be All That You Can Be: Leave the Army (6459 Hits)
By David Swanson As long as there has been a U.S. military, people have been leaving it. That choice has never been more appropriate than...
Crime of the Century: Are Bush & Cheney Planning Early Attack on Iran? (7965 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Back on October 9, I wrote in the Atlantic Free Press and The Nation that it looked like the Bush-Cheney gang,...
For the New Year: MediaChannel Honors The “We” That Care (5065 Hits)
by Danny Schechter Annual Media Awards Recognize the Best of the Brave–who are the media heroes of 2006? Danny Schechter shares his; who...
Bush’s “Surge”: An Interpretation that Connects it with the Regime’s Deep Darkness (5148 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler, A FUTILE AND IRRATIONAL COURSE Let me start with my two premises: First, I am...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (8)add comment

a guest said:

0
...
Some reports say it's 6 warheads. Is it 5 or 6? I've heard some reports even say that it took off with 5 and landed with 6. I've also noticed some papers (like the Jerusalem Post) have edited their stories from 5 to 6. Why the mistake? This seems pretty important, and you'd think they would get the number right.
 
September 11, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
Far fetched
I know conspiracy theorists love to believe this stuff. If it truly were a "black" mission as you describe, the number of people who knew about it would have been so tightly controlled that it wouldn't have been leaked until after the mission had already occurred. This is simply a MAJOR breakdown in protocols... and more heads are going to roll before all is said and done.
 
September 11, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
The simple answers usually the right one...
I think this flight being noticed is very simply by design. A petty attempt by the powers that be to say "Look what we've got & we are prepared to use them".

It has to be realised surely that any matter after 911 has to have a complete footprint - if its origins had to be traced then they would. Don't over think this folks - the over thinking is supposed to be for those who upset us overseas!
 
September 11, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
This is funny...
Barksdale Air Force Base is not a 'staging area' for B-52's getting ready to deploy. It's a fully operational B-52 base and has been for years. EVERY Air Force Base is a staging area for operations leading to deployment overseas. That's why we all have Operational Readiness Inspections. To make sure that EVERY SINGLE Air Force Base in the world is ready at a moments notice to deploy to an in theater operation.

Additionally, the missiles were not flown to Texas for decommissioning. They were flown to Louisianna (Shreveport).

And taking a quote from an Air Force Base Mission page and pasting it in to make your story more believable is funny too. Just because their mission is to train all 52 crews and saying that they participate in combat doesn't verify your story. It just verifies that B-52's are used in combat, which has been the case for better than 50 years. Way to go!

If you believe this jumbo crock of garbage, than you're goofy.
 
September 11, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
Bloogers are dumb
The leak was from a military publication! You fools; this was intentional, it would be different if MSNBC or someone leaked it, but this was a calculate response or annoucement to a specific party, whose identity we are not privy to in he interest of national security.
 
September 12, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
Get the Facts
As a former member of the Strategic Air Command, all I can say is, get the facts, you aren't even close! Even Salla missed the mark by a long shot (I think he got his PhD from Wal-Mart). These blogs are nothing more than the insane rantings of conspiracy theorists who want to be heard.
 
September 17, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
The plot thickens
Hey conspiracy nuts, google Todd Blue - Niwot . . . security detail, dead, no explanation. The plot thickens.
 
September 19, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
1:Minot, N.D. (AP) Authorities have identified a Minot Air Force Base man killed in a crash on the outskirts of Minot. Base officials say 20-year-old Adam Barrs was a passenger in a vehicle that failed to negotiate a curve, hit an approach, hit a tree and started on fire late Tuesday night.

2:Authorities are investigating the death of a Minot Air Force Base airman who died while on leave in Virginia. Base officials say 20-year-old Airman 1st Class Todd Blue died Monday while visiting family members in Wytheville, Virginia.



3: 7/18/2007 - MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, N.D. -- A first lieutenant from Minot Air Force Base died in a motorcycle accident while on leave in Tennessee July 17.
First Lt. Weston Kissel, 28, was assigned to the 23rd Bomb Squadron as a B-52H Stratofortress pilot.
 
September 22, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top