Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

10

Sep

2007

This was No Accident: Nuclear Weapons are Different
Monday, 10 September 2007 21:58
by Dave Lindorff

Nobody should fall for a story that those six (yeah, it was first reported as five, but now the original military whistleblowers have told Army Times it was six) nuclear-tipped cruise missiles that were flown in launch position on a B-52 from Minot, ND to Barksdale, LA, were put on there inadvertently.

I had some experience with the way nuclear weapons get handled, as compared to conventional weapons, and I can assure you that there is no way anyone would just “accidentally” pick up the wrong weapons.

Back in 1978, I was working as an investigative producer/reporter for the news program “28-Tonight” at KCET-TV in Los Angeles. I got word from some anti-nuke/peace organization that there were nuclear weapons being stored at the Seal Beach Naval Station south of Los Angeles. There was concern about this on two counts: first of all, it was a very densely populated urban area, and second, the weapons were allegedly being stored under the flight path of a busy civil airport, where a crash could easily happen.

Together with a cameraperson, I went down to the base. It was bisected by a highway. On either side of that two-lane road were big mesh wire fences. On the south side of the road, the fences were older, and topped with ordinary barbed wire. On the north side, there was a higher, new looking fence topped with coiled razor wire. There was then an interval of bare soil beyond which was a second fence, also topped with razor wire. Clearly, the security on the north side of the road was much greater.

Beyond the south fence were the weapons bunkers — long high mounds of earth, covered with parched sod. Each was perhaps 75 feet long, and 15 feet high. There was a concrete doorframe in the middle of each with an old iron door in the middle. No one was visible anywhere.

On the north side, however, there were similar bunkers, but these mounds were bigger — perhaps 20 feet high and much longer. The piled-up earth looked newer, and the entrances were much more solid looking. As well, the door to each had an armed guard standing in front of it.

Clearly whatever was being stored in the bunkers on the north side of the street was much more important than whatever was stored on the south side.

We stopped our car and got out, and the photographer started snapping still photos of the scene.

Immediately there was commotion inside the compound. Within less than a minute, a jeep came roaring towards us, filled with marines who were armed to the teeth. Guns drawn, they ordered us, from behind the fence, to stop photographing and to stand where we were. Moments later there were sirens, and more armed jeeps sped towards us from both directions along the road. We were quickly surrounded by armed marines who asked us what we were doing.

We told them we were investigating the nuclear weapons storage at the base.

They told us we had to go to the base headquarters, and took the camera.* (The photographer, a pro at this stuff, had already snapped a role and stashed it in her pocket, so when they later took out and exposed the roll of film in the camera, we still had our visual evidence).

*As an interesting aside, we were on a public road, and yet military guards took us into custody (albeit without formally arresting us). It was a clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act that — at least until Bush and the Republican Congress got rid of it last fall — barred active-duty military troops from police functions in the domestic US. It was also a clear demonstration of what happens when the military gets the authority to act like cops, as they are now legally empowered to do.

At base headquarters, the commander grilled us. Our station was called, and after it was confirmed that we were indeed journalists, he had officers confiscate the film in the camera, chastised us for bothering the base, and then, refusing to comment on whether or not there were nukes on the base, sent us on our way.

My point in recounting this journalistic adventure is to note that nuclear weapons and warheads are not stored together with conventional weapons. They are also guarded much more tightly than are conventional weapons. There is simply no way that a ground crew could accidentally stroll into a weapons storage center and pick up the wrong missiles. (There’s good reason for this, too, even aside from security issues: nuclear weapons have fail-safe triggers, and are not prone to just exploding on their own, but conventional weapons are different. They can and often do go off by accident, and if one were stored amidst nuclear weapons and this happened, it could shatter the nuke and spread dangerous nuclear material all over the place. As a result, whether at Seal Beach Naval Station or at Minot AFB, nuclear weapons are strictly segregated from other weapons materials.)

It’s clear that so far, no one in Congress or in the corporate media is asking the hard questions about this very disturbing incident.

I would say that the chances that those Advanced Cruise Missiles and their W80-1 nuclear warheads were loaded accidentally on that B-52 are exactly zero. So the question is: who ordered this flight, and why?

Until we have answers to those questions, we have to assume the worst — that this was deliberate, and thus sinister in the extreme — not the best.
 
More from this author:
BREAKING NEWS: Eisenhower Carrier Group Sails for Iran Theater (23836 Hits)
The nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Eisenhower and its accompanying strike force of cruiser, destroyer and attack submarine slipped their moorings...
U.S. Military Has Killed Up to 238,000 Iraqi Civilians (11287 Hits)
A just-released study by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, published in the current issue of the prestigious British medical journal The...
Bush's Middle East Strategy, and Presidency, Lie in Ruins as Republicans Scurry Away (9721 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Well, so much for Iraqi “sovereignty.” So much too for "staying the course" and for "fighting the terrorists...
Time for Truth and Consequences (8907 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff The Bush administration, losing the war in Iraq, has come with a "new" strategy: setting a timetable for Iraq's...
Let's March in January! An Impeachment Call to Action (11060 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff I'm going to go out on a limb here and predict that, barring some incredible act of criminal cynicism such as the...
Related Articles:
This Is The Way Of Dictatorships. (9390 Hits)
If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier... just so long as I'm the dictator.” George Walker Bush, 2000 Was...
Read This Before You Vote (12007 Hits)
If one were to believe the hype, nothing less than the fate the civilized world is riding on the results of the upcoming midterm elections....
Behind Bush's Nuclear Gift to Terrorism (9382 Hits)
by Chris Floyd I am now writing a piece for Truthout.org on the wider ramifications of the Bush Administration's lunatic dumping of a...
Armagideon Time: Bush's Nuclear Folly and the National Security Lie (15126 Hits)
Written by Chris Floyd This story is appearing today at Truthout.org. "The Bush Faction's remaining claim to political...
National Impeachment Movement this Saturday in Philadelphia! (8803 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff, With Democrats in control of Congress again, it's time to start a national campaign for impeachment. Nancy Pelosi may...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment

a guest said:

0
...and furthermore
...a comment posted to the Wapo's Early Warning blog that should make sense to anyone who has any experience at all with the military, and it's protocols:

The only "mistake" here was the leak.

I am a vet. We would shut down a camp for a missing M-16. You are telling me they lost 6 nukes? A base commander let those things be moved and he didn't know? That is a joke.

The military doesn't use intelligence or competence to secure things. They use protocol. There is a check, then a check of the check, then everyone who checked checks in and is checked, and then they all have it written in a log.

You may loose some boots or gas masks, but weapons of this nature don't get lost or mistakenly moved. The only people waiving this off are people who know NOTHING about the military or what this means. These weapons were moved to a forward base on purpose.


Source: http://blog.washingtonpost.com...ing_d.html

 
September 10, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
I used to handle nukes for the navy. Everything about them is different than regular weapons. They absolutely do not get accidently put on a plane. There's too many checks and double checks just to move them out of the ammo mag.

As far as worrying about a plane crash setting them off. It's not going to happen. The most that would happen is the HE will go off and spread a bit of radiation around. Sort of like a dirty bomb. No 'shrooms though. We had a bomber go down at RAF Lakenheath UK a long damn time ago. A big mess but no clouds etc.

About your getting taken in by the military. If the road has wire on both sides. The road is more than likely part of the base. They've always had the authority to pick you up, give you a speeding ticket or whatever there.

Loved the article by the way.
Peace,
Dilligaf ?
 
September 12, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top