by Andrew Bard Schmookler
WHY CAN’T PEOPLE SEE?
My naming my website “NoneSoBlind” indicates how struck I have been that so many of my fellow Americans have been unable to see something I regard as so blatant, as well as so vital, about the regime wielding power in America. How can people who otherwise seem intelligent, and who otherwise seem decent, fail to see that this Bushite gang is a bunch of criminal, lying thugs? How can they not see that this regime is a means by which evil forces are dismantling all that’s best in America?
I’ve found this blindness on the part of so many of my countrymen has not only surprised but also deeply troubled me. And so not only have I, in crafting my forum to deal with these dark times, drawn upon the old English Protestant saying, “There are none so blind as those who will not see.” But I’ve continued publicly to wrestle with the question of how this blindness is to be understood.
Early on, here on NSB, I posited a psycho-cultural explanation of how the vulnerabilities and defects of otherwise good people are being exploited by these Bushite “masters of the theater of the moral lie.” Thus in the piece, I suggest that people who have imbibed an overly strict morality, and have therefore been unable to integrate their forbidden impulses into their conscious selves, have unconsciously welcomed a chance to identify with the enacting of evil under the guise of the Bushites’ false righteousness. (See: Here’s the puzzle: How is it that many remarkably decent people can support leaders who are remarkable precisely for their lack of such decency? Which can be found here. )
And in more recent weeks, I called attention to some stunning research that demonstrates that a great many people in America today can have their political views driven in the direction of fascist values and perspectives by having their fear of death evoked, sometimes even in very indirect and subtle ways. The research described in the piece by John Judis (?), published originally in The New Republic, suggests one possibly important factor in the warping of political perception by many of those who have given their support to this fascist regime;
Now I’ve come upon another line of thinking that may help illuminate this puzzle of the dangerous blindness of so many Americans. Before I make this latest foray into solving this puzzle, let me first say that the answer need not be one factor or another, but can be some mixture of all of them, and perhaps others besides. Deep human behavioral phenomena are often “over-determined,” i.e. are brought about by subtle and intricate combinations and interactions of forces.
Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.
I just happened lately to be reading the book Animals in Translation by Temple Grandin (an autistic woman who has become famous for her understanding of animals. In the course of her discussion, she talks about how “normal people literally don’t see a lot of things.” She writes (p. 24):
There’s a famous experiment by a psychologist named Daniel Simons…called Gorilla in Our Midst, that shows you how bad people’s visual awareness is. In the experiment they show people a videotape of a basketball game and ask them to count how many passes one team makes. Then, a little while into the tape, while everyone is sitting there counting passes, a woman wearing a gorilla suit walks onto the screen, stops, turns, faces the camera, and beats her fists on her chest. Fifty percent of all people who watch this video don’t see the gorilla!This theme recurs later in the book, as she introduces the concept of “inattentional blindness” (which is the title of a book by Arien Mack and Irvin Rock). One key part of the idea is that people tend to see only what they are looking for. Grandin writes (p. 51):
Even when the experimenters ask them directly, “did you notice the gorilla?” they say, “The what?” It’s not that they don’t remember the lady in the gorilla suit…These folks actually didn’t see the lady gorilla in the first place.
[I]t’s practically impossible for a human being to actually see something brand-new in the first place… Humans are built to see what they’re expecting to see, and it’s hard to expect to see something you’ve never seen.CAN WE MAKE THE LEAP?
Maybe it’s mixing up two kinds of phenomena that occur on such different levels that they cannot be understood in the same terms. But nonetheless, the question occurs to me: Might the inability of many Americans to see the blatant fascist evil before their eyes for what it is be an instance of inattentional blindness? Perhaps, according to this idea, these Americans simply cannot see what they are not looking for.
It is not clear that the failure to notice a woman in a gorilla suit putting herself for a moment before a camera showing a basketball game can be compared to the failure of people to notice that an American presidency has become, before their eyes, the very kind of dishonest and thuggish regime Americans have traditionally prided themselves on opposing. But then again, perhaps the phenomena are akin: for some people, such evil in the White House might be the kind of thing so new and unexpected that they simply cannot see it.
Grandin speaks of human beings in general. But it should be recalled that though — amazingly — fifty percent of people failed to see the woman in the gorilla suit, the other half of the people in the study did see her. And so whatever may be the tendencies of human beings generally, this inattentional blindness seems to be the result of other factors as well.
My guess is that people differ in their ability to see the new; that they differ in how ready they are to accommodate their conceptual framework to take into account new information entering their visual field, as opposed to the inclination to disregard any such information that challenges their pre-existing scheme of understanding.
The phenomenon of “inattentional blindness,” according to that hypothesis, would be a function of how humans are “built,” as Grandin says. But also of how their life experiences have shaped their motivational structures to develop flexibility vs. rigidity of expectation and perception.
Which brings us back around to those other explanatory frameworks for this American blindness. Fear, it has been shown, greatly diminishes people’s tolerance for ambiguity: so those people who have been most vulnerable to fear are probably also those who have the least tolerance for the uncertainties that come with the acknowledgement of the unexpected phenomena that cannot be assimilated into their pre-existing view of the world. And further, those whose psychological structure has required the continual practice of denial and distortion, I would predict, are more likely to be those who fail to notice the woman in the gorilla suit.
Or the fascist evil in the White House.
(Knowledge Systems, 1989). He has written two books on the problematic relationship between economic forces and human needs,Andrew Bard Schmookler is an author, speaker, and radio talk-show host.
Schmookler studied as an undergraduate at Harvard College, where he graduated summa cum laude in Social Relations in 1967. Schmookler went on to earn his doctorate in 1977 at the University of California at Berkeley and the Graduate Theological Union in a program specially created to accommodate his comprehensive theory of human history.
In 1984, Dr. Schmookler was awarded the Erik H. Erikson Prize by the International Society for Political Psychology. And in 1985, he was selected by Esquire Magazine as "one of the men and women under forty who are changing the nation." He was selected, in 1999, as one the "Outstanding People of the Twentieth Century" by the International Biographical Centre (of Cambridge, England).
Among Schmookler's books are several bearing on the problem of war and peace, including the prize-winning book The Parable of the Tribes: The Problem of Power in Social Evolution (hardback from the University of California Press, 1984; paperback from Houghton Mifflin, 1986; second edition from SUNY Press, 1995), Out of Weakness: Healing the Wounds that Drive Us to War (Bantam Books, 1988), and Sowings and Reapings: The Cycling of Good and Evil in the Human SystemThe Illusion of Choice: How the Market Economy Shapes Our DestinyFool's Gold: The Fate of Values in a World of Goods (Harper Collins, 1993). ). 1997 saw the publication of his personal and philosophic memoir on illness, aging and mortality in the human condition, Living Posthumously: Confronting the Loss of Vital Powers (Henry Holt and Co.).
Dr. Schmookler's most recent book (published by M.I.T Press) is Debating the Good Society: A Quest to Bridge America's Moral Divide, which explores some of the basic issues that underlie this country's political and cultural polarization.
For the past decade, Dr. Schmookler has conducted regular radio conversations -in both red states and blue states-- about the important political and moral controversies of our times. He makes monthly appearances as a guest (by phone) on radio programs on stations in Ohio (WOSU-AM), Minnesota (KAXE-FM), and Virginia (WSVA-AM) to discuss such controversial issues.
Dr. Schmookler makes regular speaking appearances, presenting his ideas to audiences at places such as Harvard University, St. John's College in Annapolis, the University of Wisconsin, Loyola University in Chicago, Principia College, as Presidential Lecturer at the University of Montana, and at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars in Washington, D.C., as well as to Unitarian congregations around the country and to the Ethical Societies of both St. Louis and Washington.
Andrew Bard Schmookler is married and is the father of three children.
by Andrew Bard Schmookler On Election Night of 2004, as I lay in bed much of the night awake and miserable, I found myself teetering on the...
by Andrew Bard Schmookler On Election Day, America took a step that history may show to have been absolutely crucial in saving this republic....
by Andrew Bard Schmookler Confronting the Paradox The goal is no less than to defeat the evil that, in recent years,...
by Andrew Bard Schmookler WHERE CHICKENS COME TO ROOST The Democrats need to achieve two things with respect to the mess in Iraq: 1)...
by Andrew Bard Schmookler There can be no doubt that the failed American invasion of Iraq has been a terrible thing. Because of...
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites