Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Tue

16

Oct

2007

It’s insanity, stupid! Al Gore and that Nobel Peace Prize
Tuesday, 16 October 2007 12:48
by Gabriele Zamparini

The Nobel Peace Prize to Al Gore opened a heated debate: was it right to award a mass murderer and war criminal? This is a curious question that certainly would have a meaning in a sane world, certainly not in ours. A few days ago, commenting on this blog about this ordinary episode of folly, I wrote that Al Gore was
“(…) a top war criminal that in a sane world would be hanged or imprisoned for life. But we are not living in a sane world – just in case someone wonders – and it’s not the first time that a war criminal and mass murderer has been rewarded with the Nobel Peace Prize.”
On CounterPunch, Alexander Cockburn wrote,
“When Gore goes to get the prize [… he] should be forced to march through a gauntlet of widows and orphans, Serbs, Iraqis, Palestinians, Colombians, and other victims of the Clinton era.”
These words give exactly the value of the Nobel Peace Prize to Al Gore. Unfortunately Cockburn mixes this argument (that I share totally) with his skepticism (just to use an euphemism) about the man-made climate change and – in my opinion – this other argument risks to delegitimize the main point of Cockburn analysis.

The problem is not the topic, climate change, whose consequences are of so huge importance to jeopardize the very survival of life on this planet. I personally welcome the Nobel Peace Prize to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. But I think there is a problem when a Nobel Peace Prize goes to a war criminal and mass murderer. This problem I believe is called insanity.

Always on Cockburn’s CounterPunch, Jan Oberg, director of the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research in Lund, Sweden, wrote,
“The 2007 Nobel Peace Prize - particularly the part to Al Gore - is a populist choice that cannot but devalue the Prize itself.”

I don’t know how much value and prestige (another word used by the author in his article) the Nobel Peace Prize has, probably it depends on whom you ask. Who knows how the East and the South of the world see this Prize given from the North and the West to "one of them", and one who has the blood of millions of innocent lives on his hands? It seems more like the West celebrating itself, another Oscar one could say, just in Scandinavian flavour.

Maybe the problem comes when the word "peace" is separated from the word "justice" in a world that completely forgot the meaning of the latter while the word “peace” is used by ruthless mass murderers. Signs of sanity could be still seen when the Nobel Prize was given (for Literature) to (among others) Fo, Saramago, Pinter - as in the past to Sartre and Russell. That sanity coming from the West paying attention to its own critical voices rather than five people, appointed by the Norwegian parliament, deciding what peace is and who should be rewarded with a prize for it.

It’s frankly difficult to understand what Martin Luther King, Mother Teresa, Desmond Tutu, the 14th Dalai Lama and the likes have in common with Al Gore, Jimmy Carter and Henry Kissinger, (or Menachem Begin, Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin for that matters). It’s difficult to understand the meaning of this year Nobel Peace Prize given while the genocide in Iraq is completely ignored by the same world that now celebrates the new laureate [who’s much responsibility for that genocide as well]. It’s difficult to understand it but it’s certainly not the only sign of insanity.

It’s difficult to understand the meaning of the U.S. Congressional Resolution, calling to recognize the Armenian genocide committed a century ago while that very same US Congress is responsible, now and here, for the Iraq genocide and the carnages in Afghanistan and Palestine and while the Native Americans are still waiting for their genocide to be recognized.

It’s difficult to understand why a British historian should be sentenced to prison in another European country for his opinion on facts happened sixty years ago when in the same days the government of his country is co-responsible, here and now, for the genocide of the Iraqi people and the carnage in Afghanistan.

It’s difficult to understand why we should have an organization called United Nations when that organization, year after year, has done just the opposite of what its Charter states.

And with all the due respect for the man and his highly valuable teaching, it’s very difficult to understand why the 14th Dalai Lama, already Nobel Peace Laureate, decided to accept the Gold Medal from that same US Congress responsible for the Iraq genocide and for the carnages in Afghanistan and Palestine (among many, many, many other places).

It’s difficult to understand the insane world we live in and probably not understanding it is the only sign of sanity we can count on.

P.S.

Dr. Gideon Polya, an Australian scientist, has just published “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” (G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007; 220 pages, 24 tables; ISBN 1921377051)

Polya ends the preface to his book with this line:
“Peace is the only way but silence kills and silence is complicity. We cannot walk by on the other side.”
Probably that’s also the only way to keep our own sanity.
More from this author:
Lynching Saddam - Part 10: Virtue, Terror and the Western public opinion’ s bloodthirsty schizophrenia (8253 Hits)
by Gabriele Zamparini, The notorious Kafka-esque trial is over; the Baghdad’s bordello turned its red lights off. Iraq President...
Iraq Genocide: Silence is complicity (5135 Hits)
by Gabriele Zamparini On September 18, the Associated Press sent out the following news item: IAEA Chief Warns Against Striking Iran...
The Oracle Iraq Body Count (3634 Hits)
by Gabriele Zamparini The Toronto Star informed us: "The death toll could be twice our number, but it could not possibly be 10 ...
The New Iraq Horror Show (4417 Hits)
by Gabriele Zamparini "I always thought it was very important that Saddam Hussein be deposed." - Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the...
WANTED - Who killed the anti-war movement? (3745 Hits)
by Gabriele Zamparini After the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington – and in spite of nationalist propaganda of unprecedented levels...
Related Articles:
No-brainer: Hillary loves Dick (Cheney, that is) (6032 Hits)
by Mickey Z. When you're bored, get on board. For some that might mean a surfboard, a snowboard, or maybe a skateboard. For Vice President Dick...
Be All That You Can Be: Leave the Army (6505 Hits)
By David Swanson As long as there has been a U.S. military, people have been leaving it. That choice has never been more appropriate than...
Peace Groups Hold “Mandate for Peace” Congressional Call-in Day In Advance of Iraq Study Group Report (8516 Hits)
Thousands call Congress to remind their representatives that voters issued a Mandate for Peace in the mid-term elections and expect Congress to end...
Media Sham for Iraq War -- It’s Happening Again (9530 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The lead-up to the invasion of Iraq has become notorious in the annals of American journalism. Even many reporters,...
It’s Not Just Bush: We’re Accountable Too (5120 Hits)
by Heather Wokusch Click on arrow to listen to Heather's Podcast here: www.heatherwokusch.com/podcasts/We_Are_Accountable_Too_48KBs.mp3 ...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)add comment

Guest said:

0
Dissecting the climate change debate.
It truly is the height of irony that Gore was a prominent player in the fulminant spread of global neoliberalism along with its hyperconsumerism, greed is good ideology, and the concommitant environmental damage. All relevant details of Gore's complicity in fostering a New International Economic Order that despises worker safety and environmental regulations has conveniently sailed down the memory hole.

Cockburn's skepticism about climate change may reflect a broader undercurrent of skepticism about the elite's continual efforts to create "pseudo-crises" for the purpose of ramming through unpopular reforms. A reading of Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine explains this process in remarkable detail. Creating a crisis, exaggerating the risks associated with existing social problems, and manufacturing pseudo-crises are methods routinely used by TPTB to usher in radical reforms.

It is a known fact that since the 60s and 70s, and possibly earlier, in various examples of correspondence, neoliberal proponents have suggested that hyping the possibility of global warming and environmental damage would be a useful tool to further centralize economic and political power as the rationale for a global tax and global governance.

Climatologists appear to have strong evidence that mankind is affecting the earth's climate. The threat of severe environmental damage has been around a long time. Prevention would have been a more reasoned and less costly approach. So why all the media hysteria now? Is it a coincidence that the pace for regional government development and international trade agreements usurping national laws has quickened?

Living in a system that exploits crises or creates the false impression of impending crises along with an utter lack of transparency to the process of public policy creation can set up a false dichotomy of believing there exists either a serious problem that needs to be addressed or we are being subjected to a pseudo-crisis. However, in this situation, there is an element of truth to both views. With climate change we have a serious ongoing problem of human caused environmental damage but the preferred democratic solution is probably going to be developing sustainable decentralized communities responsive to needs of local inhabitants. Such a democratic solution will never be on the radar for Gore and his supranational elite caste.
 
October 17, 2007
Votes: +0

Peggy McGilligan said:

0
TWO WORDS: AL GORE
Nobel Peace Prize: NEW Global Warming Antiperspirant

AP – Al Gore has for a long time been full of hot air. He has a vivid imagination about the world around him. His inherent mistrust of the seasons stems from an episode of the Twilight Zone, in which the Earth gets too close to the Sun. Summers are hot & sticky, and Al is probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures needed to create a more effective global deodorant.

If college roommate Tommy Lee Jones, could save the City of Los Angeles from errant magma (Volcano), and the world entire from a giant cockroach (Men In Black), then certainly Al Gore deserves a prize for his initiative to combat global wetness. The same active ingredient and trusted formula that kept our leaders dry during the Cold War – now in unscented. As the planet heats up, you don’t have to! Clinton tested: guaranteed to leave no trace.

Now that Global Warming has been legitimized, a “private group” out of Monterey, California, wants to seed the North Atlantic with iron oxide pellets to help plankton absorb more carbon dioxide (greenhouse gasses). Strategy: “cleanup the planet and make a buck on the side.” Another inconvenient truth: how these Bolshevik’s misguided scam to pirate the “Peace Dividend,” sparked the worst terrorist attacks, to date, on United States soil: http://theseedsof9-11.com

Ps. I like a good spoof, but I also know the facts of this matter are incontrovertible.

 
October 18, 2007
Votes: +0

Birdzilla said:

0
AL GORE THE BLABBER MOUTH
The all time hypotcrit and liar he was given two awards he didnt deserve its travisty gore still drives around in his gas guzzling 4 mpg limos or flying around in his atmosphear contaminating gulfstream jet and using $30:000 worth of electricity in one home Those oscar judges should all be sent to the spicemines of kessel,elba II or the devils aseriod
 
October 01, 2009
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top