Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sat

20

Oct

2007

Ellen Degeneres' Misuse Of Media And A Challenge To Right That Wrong
Saturday, 20 October 2007 18:51
by Linda Milazzo

For the past two days I've been immersed in conversations with several principals in the Ellen DeGeneres-Mutts & Moms-Iggy the Pup fiasco. And fiasco it is. I've spoken with Ellen's publicist, Ellen's dog trainer, the Vice President of Publicity for Telepictures (which produces Ellen's show), the attorney for Marina Baktis and Vanessa Chekroun (owners of Mutts & Moms in Pasadena, CA), and several respected animal rescue experts in the Los Angeles area — many who have worked with Mutts & Moms.

For readers who are unaware of the Ellen DeGeneres/Mutts & Moms fiasco, here is a video synopsis:



This past Monday, on her popular daytime talk show, Ellen DeGeneres dissolved into tears as she recounted her experience of adopting a puppy (Iggy) from a pet adoption agency (Mutts & Moms in Pasadena, CA — which to her credit, DeGeneres didn't name). After two weeks, Ellen and her partner, Portia de Rossi, decided Iggy was incompatible with their household and gave Iggy to Ellen's hairdresser (Cheryl Marks) and the hairdresser's eleven and twelve year old daughters. But the legal contract Ellen signed with Mutts & Moms forbade Ellen from giving Iggy away, and required Iggy to be returned to the Agency should Ellen decide not to keep him. By giving 7 lb. Iggy to her hairdresser and not returning him to Mutts & Moms as stipulated, Ellen broke her contract. As a result, Mutts & Moms went to the hairdresser's home, where, in the presence of the police, they confiscated Iggy, returned him to their agency, and found him another home.

Germane to this synopsis is the resultant vitriol that drove the HUMANS involved to such an impasse that rational negotiation on Iggy's behalf became impossible. Mutts & Moms failed to give the hairdresser's family its fullest consideration as legitimate adopters, and used its legal leverage to remove Iggy from a home where he was wanted. DeGeneres used the full extent of her celebrity to ignite a fan-based frenzy that resulted in death threats to the impoverished owners of Mutts & Moms. In addition, Baktis and Chekroun have likely lost their animal rescue business and small store. An online petition to Free Iggy has been launched by Ellen's supporters, while an earlier online petition, which asked petitioners not to adopt from animal rescue organizations until Iggy is returned, has rightfully been taken down.

Still the saddest repercussion of all is the potential for tens of thousands of dogs and cats to go unadopted, and to be euthanized, due to the anger engendered toward rescue groups as a result of this debacle.

Below are are few clarifications of inaccuracies reported by the media on this story:

1. Iggy did not live with DeGeneres and De Rossi for the full two weeks before he was given to hairdresser Cheryl Marks. Iggy was left in the care of Los Angeles dog trainer, Zach Grey (UrbanTails.net), who reunited Iggy with DeGeneres and De Rossi after 9 days of individual and group training — at which time Degeneres and De Rossi concluded that they didn't want a young puppy — UNDERSCORING THE NEED FOR THE CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENT TO RETURN ANIMALS TO THEIR AGENCIES IF THE ANIMAL IS UNWANTED. The fact is, DeGeneres and De Rossi did what thousands of adopters do. They wanted a puppy, but realizing the amount of work a puppy takes, they couldn't make that commitment. Can one honestly fault Mutts & Moms for enforcing a provision that protects rejected animals? If Mutts & Moms were to PUBLICLY disregard this requirement, it would pave the way for anyone to overrule this safeguard and recklessly dispose of an animal.

2. Contrary to the negativity generated toward Mutts & Moms by the powerful DeGeneres camp and biased media pundits, the animal rescue experts with whom I've spoken were complimentary toward the organization. Ricky Whitman, Vice President of Community Resources for the Pasadena Humane Society (PHS), told me she was not clearly represented in the press when quoted as saying "her group would've handled this [Iggy situation] very differently.

What Whitman actually meant is that since PHS has contracts to provide animal control services to different cities, they would have been required to remove Iggy in the presence of animal control officers and under much more stringent conditions — hence "differently." Whitman lauded the owners of Mutts & Moms for their rescue accomplishments, stating, "We have worked closely and well with Mutts & Moms in the past. We have honored them for their work." Whitman recounted the story of a pit bull puppy who'd been raised in a small bunny hutch. According to Whitman, Mutts & Moms was the only organization willing to accept the difficult task of rehabilitating this unfortunate animal — an accomplishment Whitman praised highly.

3. The DeGeneres camp's contention that Mutts & Moms went to the media FIRST does not square with the timeline of events. On the evening Mutts & Moms confiscated Iggy from the hairdresser's house, TMZ (also a Telepictures product) had been called to video the visit. According to Keith A. Fink, attorney for Mutts & Moms, it was the DeGeneres camp who contacted TMZ — NOT the media shy, show-biz naive owners of Mutts & Moms. Indeed, my own experience with the owners of Mutts & Moms bears witness to their abject fear of media, since their own attorney was unable to goad them into speaking with me or with the other media attempting to make contact.

4. The "Moms" in the name Mutts & Moms doesn't identify Marina and Vanessa as "moms" who rescue animals. The "Moms" in Mutts & Moms denotes the organization's inspired mission to adopt mother dogs from shelters once they have given birth and nursed their puppies — an arduous undertaking, since mother dogs are often euthanized after nursing their litter.

In the final analysis, this Ellen DeGeneres-Mutts & Moms-Iggy saga is a private issue between private individuals that landed on the national stage. If Ellen intended to use her show as the platform to manipulate this matter, she has made a dangerous error in judgement. She has crossed the regrettable line from comedy pulpit to bully pulpit and used her mega platform to attack "the little guy" — or in this case — "the little gals." And it's caused significant harm.

Yesterday on the phone, Laura Mandel, Vice President of Publicity for Telepictures, described Ellen as "a real person with real emotion." On this there is no doubt. But Ellen is also an incredibly powerful woman able to influence legions of fans. Beyond her cameras are millions of viewers she knows nothing about, capable of acts she can't control. They worship Ellen and protect her with a vengeance — and right now their vengeance is centered on two frightened rescuers who don't deserve their wrath. I've read some fan comments. Their hatred for Marina and Vanessa is shocking.

In the entertainment business, there is the long-standing concept of "a pro." "A pro" is an entertainer who, regardless of personal travails, faces the audience and does the job. In my opinion, Ellen is teetering between a "pro" and a woman who's unclear about her "job." She's abused her power by publicly challenging those less powerful. Rosie O'Donnell took on the President. Rosie also took on Trump. Others take on corporations, like Exxon and the airlines. But Ellen has challenged two defenseless woman with no resources — no fame, no fortune, no accolades and no ovations. Only attorney Keith Fink has come forth to champion their cause.

Across the nation, because of this fiasco, animal rescue organizations have taken an enormous hit — for which helpless animals will bear the brunt. To help revitalize this noble profession, I'm calling on Ellen DeGeneres to step up and intercede. I'm asking her to use her brilliance, her compassion, and her enormous reach to convene a panel of rescue professionals on her own show as quickly as possible to discuss what these organizations do and how they do it. There are lessons that need to be learned and rules that must be understood. My hope (though far-fetched) is that if Ellen does choose to do this, Mutts & Moms will participate — without the caviat that Iggy be returned to Cheryl and her daughters. There's an important lesson for Cheryl's daughters in all of this that has somehow been forgotten. The fact is, a contractual rule was broken. Sometimes the greater lesson is understanding the need to honor the rule — rather than the need to circumvent it.

On a personal note: For those who believe I'm holding Ellen to an unfair standard by suggesting she shield her personal issues from her viewers, I'll answer with this. One of the greatest gifts I've been given in my lifetme is the opportunity to teach. Every day I face rooms filled to capacity with adult students who care a great deal about me. I've faced them when I'm happy and I've faced them when I'm sad. I've faced them after losing family members, losing beloved animals, losing relationships, undergoing surgery, and more. But I neither share nor show my burdens. It is not my student's job to bear them. Nor is it Ellen's viewers' job to bear hers. We are simply there to serve.
 
More from this author:
Comic Relief, Celebrity and Remembering Little Harry (6881 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo Hooray for Hollywood! Yes, I'm a believer. I'm not an 'ignoranti' who believes celebrities are vapid and have nothing to...
"Americans Can't Handle Another Impeachment" Is Republican Propaganda. Don't Be Deceived. (9841 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo "Americans can't handle another impeachment." So say the supporters of George W. Bush in their anti-impeachment...
CAN JIMMY CARTER DO FOR PALESTINE WHAT JACK MURTHA DID FOR IRAQ? (7490 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo Other than 2002 Nobel Prize Laureate, Jimmy Carter, no American politician has spoken honestly about Israel's occupation of...
Kennedys, Bushes and Oil: Public Interest vs. Self Interest (8419 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo The history of the United States is filled with prominent families who achieved wealth, power and influence...
The Dissapperance of George P. Bush (6313 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo It was the year 2000. The new millennium. It featured a rising new star from a prominent American family. His name was George....
Related Articles:
Why Nancy Pelosi Has it Wrong on Impeachment (9437 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Forget her "Pledge," She Took an Oath: Why Pelosi is Wrong on Impeachment House minority leader Nancy Pelosi...
No-brainer: Hillary loves Dick (Cheney, that is) (5875 Hits)
by Mickey Z. When you're bored, get on board. For some that might mean a surfboard, a snowboard, or maybe a skateboard. For Vice President Dick...
Midterm Elections 2006: It's Always Darkest, Right Before ... It Goes Completely Black (10026 Hits)
by Phil Rockstroh If voting could change the system, it would be illegal. --Theodore Adorno "I can't go on. I'll go on....
The Dems’ New Power: Investigative Hearings Done Right (5781 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler On Election Day, America took a step that history may show to have been absolutely crucial in saving this republic....
The New Media Offensive for the Iraq War (10362 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The American media establishment has launched a major offensive against the option of withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. ...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (8)add comment

Milo's Mom said:

0
I agree completely
The whole reason for those contracts is to protect the animals from people like Ellen. That is why resuce agencies do home checks. Sure she gave the dog to someone she knew, but remember not everyone does that. Some people just release the dog on the street. Also, this is a dog that has already been abandoned at least once before and now Ellen has done it to Iggy again. What if the hairdresser decides in a year they don't want Iggy. That is why there are rules in place everyone has to obey them. The fact that you are a star doen't change that. Ellen knew what she was doing when she went on air. She wanted to intimidate these women. I applaud them for not backing down. I am disturbed by all those that threaten these women for trying to do the right thing for an innocent animal. I wonder how many of them are animal owners and would let their animal move in with someone they knew nothing about.
 
October 20, 2007
Votes: -1

Nancy said:

0
Dog and Cat Rescuer
Across the nation, because of this fiasco, animal rescue organizations have taken an enormous hit — for which helpless animals will bear the brunt.

And therein lies the real tragedy of this debacle - the hundreds, if not thousands, of dogs and cats on death row in animal control shelters that will die because rescue organizations will have difficulty placing the animals they've already rescued and won't have room for new intakes.

Thank you, Ms. Milazzo, for your objective and truthful article.
 
October 20, 2007
Votes: +0

tj said:

0
golly!!
Gosh, problems, problems!!

If only Americans could get this excited about the genocide they are committing against people!

 
October 21, 2007
Votes: -1

Teresa Osborn said:

0
The sad example set for our children
Excellent analysis, thank you.

The saddest thing of this entire fiasco is the example Ellen has set for the rest of the world. She has an opportunity, as a highly respected celebrity, to show the young people of our country how to act responsibily. But, instead, she showed them that if you disagree with a rule, a law, a legal contract, just ignore it and if someone challenges the rightness of your actions, use your money and power to crush them.

The reason there are so many animals put to death in shelters each year is that we live in a disposable society. If something is just a little too much effort, hey, just throw it away. Is it any wonder that our children think it too much trouble to work.

Teresa Osborn
Lone Star Shih Tzu and Lhasa Apso Rescue
www.shihtzu-rescue.com
 
October 21, 2007
Votes: +0

HohnJonz said:

0
Ellen (Dorothy) Degeneres vs. The Wizard Of Oz vs. MaM's
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=HohnJonz
 
October 22, 2007
Votes: +0

... said:

0
Lessons

If you want to adopt from or donate to a rescue, make sure that their license is current and ask for references.

Avoid grief by avoiding rescues with requirements you don't agree to.(Maybe petfinder can add an area where you can rate rescues if you have been verified to have filled out an application with them.)

If you have never adopted, or have a history of adopting animals that do not fit into your home, foster before committing to an adoption.

If you are a rescue, keep current on all legal requirements and screen potential adopters well.

If you are a rescue, make sure you only pursue legal recourses in enforcing your contract.
 
October 23, 2007
Votes: +0

ereader said:

0
Ellen DeGeneres is still doing pet “adoption” segments. Really?
Does any one see the hypocrisy of someone who preaches tolerance and a strong women’s agenda but drives a non-profit run by two women who try to save female, mother dogs (I.e. the “mom’s” of mutts and moms) and their litters out of business?

Does anyone else hear some duplicity when?
1) Ellen, seemingly, has a long personal history of giving way many dogs she was supposed to have adopted.
2) Ellen won’t “speak” about the dog situation, but she will try to do some satire on her show about her crying fest.
3) Ellen won’t “speak” about Mutts and Moms she still has the audacity to continue to do “pet adoption” segments on her show less than a week from her closing down one and harming countless others.
 
October 24, 2007
Votes: +0

LA DOG LOVER said:

0
GET ALL THE INFO FIRST !
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY! IF THE RESCUE'S WERE NOT ABOUT THE MONEY, IT WOULD NOT MATTER WHO THE DOG WAS GIVEN TO, AS LONG AS THE DOG HAS A GOOD HOME. WHEN SOMEONE ADOPTS A DOG, THE DOG SHOULD BELONG TO THE ADOPTER NOT THE RESCUE GROUP. SINCE THE DOG HAS TO BE RETURNED TO THE RESCUE GROUP IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE DOG IS BEING LEASED AND NOT OWNED, HOW DOES THAT SOUND, IS THE RESCUE GROUP GOING TO REEMBURSE ELLEN FOR THE MONEY SHE PUT INTO TRAINING AND OTHER SERVICES GIVEN TO THE DOG. A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF PET PIMPING!!!
 
October 24, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top