Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Good News for Americans — Your Wages Are Flat!
Thursday, 22 November 2007 21:47
by Norman Solomon

The economic coverage was fairly typical on a recent broadcast of the radio program “Day to Day,” airing nationwide from NPR News.

“There’s actually some good news out today about the American economy,” host Madeleine Brand announced. Then she introduced a reporter from the widely heard “Marketplace” show, Jill Barshay, who proceeded to offer the type of explanation that’s all too common in media accounts of economic trends.

“Well, just to be clear, we’re talking about worker productivity, which is how much stuff we make every hour,” Barshay replied.
“And the Labor Department reported this morning that the hourly output per worker increased 4.9 percent in the third quarter. That’s the biggest jump in labor productivity we’ve seen since 2003. Another part of the report also says that labor costs fell a bit, so we’ve got employees being more productive and costing companies less. And this is important because it shows that the economy might be able to grow without generating inflation.”
Let’s unpack that narrative. From the outset, wages are described only as “labor costs” — which fell, “so we’ve got employees being more productive and costing companies less.”

With that kind of setup near the top of a story, it’s just a hop, skip and a jump to depicting higher income for workers as a threat to the country’s economic well-being.
“Productivity is the economy’s best defense against inflation and recession,” the reporter went on, “and that’s because wages are the most important cost to companies, and most of our wages do go up every year, even if it’s just a little cost of living adjustment.”
And Barshay added:
“So if we’re producing the same amount of stuff every year, then companies have a choice. They either can pass on these wage costs in the form of higher prices on the products we buy, or they take a hit to their profits. So if we’re producing more stuff, if we’re being more productive like we have in this past quarter, then we don’t have to worry so much about higher consumer prices or falling corporate profits.”
I don’t know about you, but I don’t worry much about “falling profits.” Few working people do. What we worry about is job insecurity, lousy working conditions, unpaid hours, evaporating pensions, and healthcare coverage that’s either woefully inadequate or nonexistent.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

But during that Nov. 7 news segment on “Day to Day,” a key theme was the menace of “falling corporate profits.”

The idea that all of us should yearn for high corporate profits is convenient for corporate underwriters and advertisers. But key questions go unasked. Such as: Don’t outsized corporate profits actually represent ripoffs of workers and consumers alike — in effect, underpricing our time and overpricing our purchases?

Such questions, however, are not often asked in mass media. Instead, we keep hearing and seeing coverage about the need to contain the “costs” of paying employees — a frame of reference that portrays an upsurge in worker compensation as a threat to economic well-being rather than an enhancement of it.

As usual, the validity of the reportage hinges on where you sit. If you’re a business owner or major investor, then you may not want to see bigger checks going into pay envelopes. But relatively few of us are company owners or big investors. Most of us depend on income from our own labor.

An insidious aspect of such frequent stories, equating the health of “the economy” with the ability of corporations to hold down payroll “expenses,” is that they discount the importance of the most common human experiences. Routinely, in medialand, people who work for a living are consigned to the peripheral vision of news accounts, while economically powerful individuals and institutions keep occupying the center stage.
More from this author:
Saddam’s Unindicted Co-Conspirator: Donald Rumsfeld (9482 Hits)
By Norman Solomon Saddam Hussein has received a death sentence for crimes he committed more than a year before Donald Rumsfeld shook his hand in...
The New Media Offensive for the Iraq War (14466 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The American media establishment has launched a major offensive against the option of withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. ...
Media Sham for Iraq War -- It’s Happening Again (12267 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The lead-up to the invasion of Iraq has become notorious in the annals of American journalism. Even many reporters,...
Is the USA the Center of the World? (8613 Hits)
By Norman Solomon Some things don’t seem to change. Five years after I wrote this column in the form of a news dispatch, it seems more...
Powell, Baker, Hamilton -- Thanks for Nothing (9965 Hits)
By Norman Solomon When Colin Powell endorsed the Iraq Study Group report during his Dec. 17 appearance on “Face the Nation,” it was...
Related Articles:
Science, medicine, and the gullible Left (Is your spleen superfluous?) (9597 Hits)
by Mickey Z. In a recent National Football League game, Tampa Bay Buccaneer quarterback Chris Simms suffered a ruptured spleen. Simms was...
The Forgiven: Clint Eastwood's Good War (8142 Hits)
by Mickey Z. In the midst of our current, perpetual war against evil, America is yet again reflecting upon the "good war." If Clint...
Philly Inquirer: Making Biased News out of Mole Hills (10757 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff For an example of shameless partisanship and promotion of one candidate in the news pages, it would be hard to find a ...
It's Election Eve, Do You Know Where Your Country Is? (10851 Hits)
by Frank Lindorff When you go into the voting booth tomorrow, here are a few things you need to think about. First of all, this is not a...
Fasten your seat belts for global warming (9067 Hits)
by Mickey Z. Is O.J. Simpson more important than the greenhouse effect? Consider this: I just typed "O.J. Simpson" into a Google...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (2)add comment

Wally said:

Editor...People for a New System
In the commodity production system, where wages represent a fraction of the values produced for the market...workers will always be on the short end of enjoyu=ing all the products and services we produce. The system is undemocratic in that labor has, literally, Nothing to say about what is produced and how it is prioduced.. Corporate rules dominant both out r work places and the political government... CONGRESS IS TIED TO CORPORATE needs FIRST, and to eh NEEDS of the people second and third..., depending on whether or not it is an election time period... This system stinks for Labor, is great for capital investors who often never even know the industry or the product (s) that that are the basis of their accrued (with any "labor) wealth.., like the capitalists whose system we tolerate because we ignore all the Constitutional avenues open to us to change from this corporate auticratic government to an economic democracy in which We, the People, have a direct voice and vote in all matters that affect our lives..., both in our civic governments and in our industrial and service work places.

Our nation's Founding Fathers told us we should change the forms of government whenever these no longer serve the ihjterests of the people majority..., which is of the working class. Let's look into this direction, begin to organize and bring our society into a everyday working democracy.

The laws tell us we can convert all private corporations into socially owned, democratically operated in our own interests..., , a ne sywstem without the poverty and destructiveness of our airs and waters which this present economic arrangement a;wyas oprioduces..., an arrengement in which We, the PEOPLE, HAVE LITTLE, OR NOTHING TO SAY AOUT IT!


No idea of how democracy can be achieved in our country? Find out. Go to.... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewSystem/

We need to break away for thIS "business as usual" box in which al working people are in... The door to get out of it is open ...All we need do is learn how, and the rest will be relatively easy. In union trhere is real empowerment to make our nation one in which we, and our kids, can enjoy all the social wealth which only human labor does produce...,but which this system prevents us from easily using and enjoying. How about it?
December 03, 2007
Votes: +0

Wally said:

Editor... People for a New System...
We can change it, legally and peacefully.


Wally P.

December 03, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123