Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sun

23

Dec

2007

Potentially Dangerous
Sunday, 23 December 2007 20:47
by Jayne Lyn Stahl

Back in 1950, J. Edgar Hoover, FBI director for nearly half a century, had a plan for the "permanent detention" of 12,000 Americans at military bases, and domestic prisons, according to a document declassified on Friday and reported by The New York Times. His goal was to have then President Truman suspend habeas corpus, and arrest any person deemed "potentially dangerous."

So, you might find yourself unfortunate enough to be on J. Edgar's list only because you're thought to have the potential for being dangerous. One wonders what Mr. Hoover's definition of the word "dangerous" was, and how that might be instructive in light of today's political climate. Can it be said that danger, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder?

It was also Hoover's idea to construct a behemoth, all-encompassing arrest warrant, not unlike the ubiquitous National Security Agency spy program, which could be issued to facilitate the massive arrests stemming from years of investigations by the bureau. Evidently, "Hoover's list" took some time to prepare.

Should the plan to incarcerate more than ten thousand Americans have panned out, it would not have been the first time a debacle of this nature had occurred on native soil. In 1920, Hoover organized the Palmer Raids, in which thousands of people were rounded up, and labelled pinkos and radicals, providing precedent, if not impetus, for the Korean War game plan.

The Palmer Raids were the precursor to the Great Purge of Josef Stalin which has, interestingly, also come to be known as the "Great Terror." War sure comes in handy, not just for those fat, juicy war contracts, making the rich even richer, but for classifying those who don't get with the program as "potentially" risky, hence worthy of taxpayer expense to sweep them up, hole them up somewhere, divest them of their First Amendment rights, and disenfranchise them.

Hoover sent his proposal to Truman in July, 1950, in the first two weeks after combat began in Korea, and two months later, the president approved a measure which allowed for detaining "dangerous radicals." It is unknown what Truman's response to Hoover's plan was inasmuch as the plan itself was never implemented, even when the Chinese entered the Korean War, and the president felt compelled to declare a state of emergency. Wouldn't you just love to be a fly on that wall? No, not the Berlin wall, but the wall separating President Truman and J. Edgar Hoover!

It would be fascinating if a future document were to be discovered showing a debate between the president and director of what was the signature intelligence agency of the day. There could be no controversy when it came to Hoover's unilateral vision of those who posed the most egregious risk to national security, as well as his goal of protecting the country "against treason, espionage, and sabotage." By his own admission, 97% of those he deemed "potentially dangerous" were U.S. citizens, so his call to suspend habeas corpus was as unconstitutional then as it is now. Hoover's plan granted the right to a hearing, but the nuance of evidence was nowhere to be found.

We may not know much, but we can make an educated guess that J. Edgar would be a big fan of military tribunals, and having to enter a guilty plea before seeing counsel, as well as granting immunity to commanders-in-chief from war crime charges. Overall, one can imagine that Mr. Hoover would be a huge proponent of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and would tip the scales in favor of expanded surveillance powers for the N.S.A. . In fact, he'd probably have pedicures with Vladimir Putin, then go back to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and blitz the server containing millions of "deleted" White House emails, some of which may even prove that the president conferred with counsel before ordering the destruction of "enhanced interrogation" videotapes. Not only does presidente 43 allow for indefinite detention of prisoners without redress, or access to counsel, but he rubber stamps methods of interrogation which wouldn't even pass J. Edgar Hoover's smell test.

One can only hope that Congress doesn't roll over for President Bush again, in this investigation, as it did a year ago September, when it allowed the president to suspend habeas corpus for anyone classified as an "unlawful enemy combatant," a phrase coined by former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Ostensibly, Mr. Rumsfeld never read the Constitution any more than his colleagues, in Congress, as the Constitution clearly states that habeas corpus may only be suspended when public safety is jeopardized by "rebellion or invasion."

The Supreme Court recently reaffirmed the habeas corpus right of U.S. citizens, but is only now hearing arguments about whether non-citizens, at Guantanamo Bay, should be entitled to the same rights as were granted by the Magna Carta some five hundred years ago, but who's counting? So, here we are, fifty years later, in the midst of a "war on terror," and only now coming to learn that the intelligence arm of our own government was about to perpetrate a "Great Terror" on 12,000 of its own citizens.

What is the purpose of the past if not to be instructive? We must never again allow the canibals of abstractions like "potentially dangerous," and war on terror, to infect us with the kind of arrogance, and self-righteousness which, in trying to pass itself off as patriotism, is little more than thinly disguised abuse of power.
More from this author:
Following in the Footsteps... (6424 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The manic warriors, in Washington, are at it again, only now they've found someone who can manage more than one syllable at...
Worldwide Open Season on the Press (9571 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl On an otherwise quiet street in Istanbul, this morning, a 53 year old Turkish citizen of Armenian descent was gunned down...
On Hillary's announcement... (5583 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl You may have read the transcript of a speech given by George McGovern in The Nation last week in which he rightly...
An Open Letter to "The Decider" (5938 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl While the odds are probably better of getting a response from Santa, there are a few things I'd like to say if you can...
"Notes from the Undergrown: State of the Oilman Address" (5916 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The president's speech last night was more important for what it didn't say than for what it did. In an address that could...
Related Articles:
Dangerous Minds (13236 Hits)
by David Edwards "Our complex global economy is built upon millions of small, private acts of psychological surrender, the willingness...
This is where George Bush gets dangerous (5332 Hits)
By Ahmed Amr We now have six years of evidence that George Bush is not all there. The occupant of the White House has consistently...
Something Dangerous is Happening in America - We Must Confront It. (4149 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler America’s Moral Crisis Many Americans feel a sense of alarm about the moral condition of American...
MEET JESSICA THE HIPPO - LESS DANGEROUS TO HER HOUSE THAN BUSH IS TO OURS (5124 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo Interesting how this lovely hippopotamus, Jessica, is less dangerous to her house than George W. Bush is to our White...
The Sputtering But Still Dangerous CheneyBush Juggernaut (2761 Hits)
by Dr. Bernard Weiner It's the usual M.O. from CheneyBush. They still act and speak as if nothing has changed politically from when they first...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)add comment

Steve said:

0
Button Button who
has the button. Imagine that those files of piles of dirt that ol' J. Edgar had on everyone could be accumulated at the touch of a search button or two. Ya think they could be used to pressure people into do the bidding of the button pusher? All quiet on the habeas front?

Nah. There are other real reasons too...but, just fun for thought even if its not talked about much, if at all. Even as a possibility. Who'd do that kinda thing anyway? No one I know. You know of anyone?
 
December 23, 2007
Votes: +0

Jimmy Montague said:

Jimmy Montague
We may not know much but we can make an educated guess --
We may not know much but we can make an educated guess that the CIA (for which Bush and Cheney have no use anyway) is going to play the whipping boy for Bush and Cheney. Congress is going to investigate the hell out of the CIA during the next 12 months. Expect embarrassing revelations about CIA whenever Congress rolls over for Bush in some other matter. The aim is not to fix the system but to distract public attention from the fact that Congress still refuses to oppose the criminal presidency of George W. Bush.
 
December 24, 2007
Votes: +0

Steve said:

0
R.I.P.
Just browsing back through some of my comments...and others' too...

Congress is gonna set the telecoms free.

When that law is signed by ol' pres b, that about closes the last privacy loophole and provides an end date to the mythological beast called 'the right to privacy'. That end date gives those curious folks of the future a historical date upon which to begin the study of the why and of the how of its passing. Assuming they are allowed to.
 
January 25, 2008
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top