Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





A Fighter: What the Dems Most Need in a Presidential Candidate
Monday, 31 December 2007 21:30
by Andrew Bard Schmookler

We are now approaching the end of a most disappointing political year (at least for those who had such hopes as I had), and the beginning of the presidential primary season.

What was most disappointing about the year now ending is that, in the aftermath of the American people giving the Democrats majority control of Congress, the Democrats showed so little will and ability to fight.

As the Democrats are about to begin choosing their standard bearer for the battle for the White House next fall, I maintain that the single most important characteristic the Democrats should base that choice upon is, “Who is most able and willing to fight the Bushite forces.

In making that assertion, I may be committing the proverbial error “fighting the last war.” But I don’t think so. The face-card Bushites may leave office, but the Bushite forces behind them are not going away. Remaining to bedevil any Democratic president will be the Murdocks and the Limbaughs and the corporate thugs who think our democracy should serve as a tool for their own private greed. There will still be those other forces in the Republican Party that make acting like a fascist the preferred campaign strategy of almost every major Republican candidate.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

What we do not need, in the face of such forces, is a Democratic leader who will recapitulate the strategies of capitulation that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have enacted so cravenly this year.

My main purpose here is not to engage in candidate endorsement. But this is how this criterion – that we need a fighter – sorts out the field for me.

Clinton has been able to persuade me that, in some sense, she is “tough.” But her vote to label the Iranian Republican Guard as a “terrorist organization” (among other things) tells me that she cannot be relied upon to use her toughness where it is needed. She seems more eager to counter the perception of female=weak, so that she can get elected, than she does to fight Bushite fascism.

Obama has made it a hallmark of his campaign to sound the note of reconciliation, of bringing people together. In many situations, I would applaud this. But to talk about reconciliation when there’s still a war going on, and when the enemy is still dominating the field, takes a spiritual virtue and converts it into a sign of faulty judgment. We need a warrior now, and if Obama cannot understand that this is a moment to fight, then he’s not our man.

Of the three candidates who seem to have a reasonable shot at the nomination, only Edwards has spoken like the fighter we need. As I mentioned in a commentary to an earlier piece, I am still wondering what it says about his judgment and his capacities as a warrior that Edwards refused in the general election campaign of 2004 to be even as tough as too-wimpy John Kerry wanted him to be, and to tackle Darth Cheney head-on in those debates. But the John Edwards we see in the campaign these days, and who made his fortune as a courtroom warrior, might conceivably have the guts and the skills to tackle the dark Bushite forces in the coming general election campaign and thereafter from the Oval Office.

Among the other candidates Dennis Kucinich has been reliably feisty, and Chris Dodd this month played a heroic role – countering Harry Reid – in blocking that Bushite-protecting FISA legislation. These men are fighting the fight. But they do not appear to be real contenders for the nomination.
More from this author:
The “Prophetic Social Movement”: Then and Now (8367 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler On Election Night of 2004, as I lay in bed much of the night awake and miserable, I found myself teetering on the...
The Dems’ New Power: Investigative Hearings Done Right (7480 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler On Election Day, America took a step that history may show to have been absolutely crucial in saving this republic....
Waging Battle, Building Peace: The Paradox Confronting the Democrats (7644 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler Confronting the Paradox   The goal is no less than to defeat the evil that, in recent years,...
The Dems’ First Step on Iraq: The Kind of Hearings We Need (7980 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler WHERE CHICKENS COME TO ROOST The Democrats need to achieve two things with respect to the mess in Iraq: 1)...
When Failure is Better than Success: What Americans, and the World, Owe to the Disaster in Iraq (11286 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler There can be no doubt that the failed American invasion of Iraq has been a terrible thing. Because of...
Related Articles:
You and What Army? Bush Legions Starting to "Unravel" (14918 Hits)
Is it possible the largest and most advanced military in the history of the universe is ready to bust? According to General Barry McCaffrey (ret.)...
Some Things You Need To Know Before The World Ends (19970 Hits)
" Thank you for not putting a bomb in your luggage." "President Bush said the United States is still under the threat of attack ...
The Anti-Empire Report - Some things you need to know before the world ends (14569 Hits)
by William Blum The jingo bells are ringing "Who really poses the greatest danger to world peace: Iraq, North Korea or the United...
Threats to Hugo Chavez As Venezuela's December Presidential Election Approaches (15187 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman   On December 3, 2006 voters in Venezuela will again get to choose who'll lead them as President for the next six...
All you need is love (...and a small, well-trained army) (7953 Hits)
by Mickey Z. Warning: This article has not been approved by the Department of Homeland Security. Read at your own risk. Thomas...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (1)add comment

Bill said:

Sir, I suggest you do some research..I've researched both Democrats and Republicans on issues......and I found that Democratic Progressive front runner Dennis Kucinich is "hands down" the most prominent on all the issues which, in turn, will lead America to prosperity through courage and strong leadership ability....which is well lacking in the rest of the field......Kucinich 08
December 31, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123