Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Thu

24

Jan

2008

Recession? It’s the ‘business cycle’ stupid
Thursday, 24 January 2008 15:28
by William Bowles
The spirit of graft and lawlessness is the American Spirit.
— Lincoln Steffens, The Shame of the Cities, 1902
Last night’s late night news on BBC2 (22/1/08) had five ‘experts’ pontificating on about the ‘business cycle’ and they spent around twenty minutes trying avoid explaining where Capitalism was headed and whether anybody or institution had any control over it. They failed miserably, talk about empty heads talking, it was an embarrassing display of denial, something the BBC is really good at,
‘Stock indexes are set to be highly volatile in coming weeks, they warned.’
Volatile? At least that’s what the European Central Bank and the Bank of England are telling us. Volatile is bank-speak for powerless. If you judge the latest crisis of capital accumulation by the headlines in the ‘business’ section of the MSM, you could be excused for thinking that it’s all down to jittery investors what with statements like,
“The uncertainty about corporate earnings growth in 2008 has risen, not only in the financial sector,” said Matthias Schellenberg, managing director at ING Investment Management. “The markets are expecting a flood of profit warnings in the next few months.”
 
We have been living with the ‘boom and bust’ cycle of capitalism for centuries and whilst it’s true that that the ‘boom and bust’ cycle is intrinsic to capitalism, MSM ‘explanations’ for its causes are laughable. Take for example the BBC’s Q&A Webpage where we read under the heading ‘What can stop the falls [in the value of shares]?’
‘That's a tricky one.’
In other words, nothing can be done about it, followed by a series of anodyne ‘answers’ to the question which reveal two things about corporate media coverage of capitalist economics:

1. Never call a recession a recession, just keep on saying that it’s ‘around the corner, maybe’, a ridiculous response given that we are already in a recession as any fool can see.
‘The big question is whether we are just seeing a bad month for shares - or whether this is the start of a bear market that could see share prices sliding for years.’
So questions get answered with, you guessed it, more questions.

2. Blame it all on the ‘sub-prime mortgage’ scandal but don’t even begin to question the real cause of ‘cheap’ credit. The BBC’s Q&A page says,
‘All of the problems were kicked off by record levels of defaults on sub-prime mortgages in the US. ‘Sub-prime mortgages are [were] offered to people with inferior credit records or unpredictable incomes.’
It goes onto say that,
‘It turned out that US lenders had been repackaging the debt and selling it to banks worldwide. The default levels meant that the repackaged debt was of questionable value.’
‘Questionable value? Repackaging? It turned out!’ But it stands to reason that if you lend money to people who haven’t a hope in hell of repaying it (as they were conned into the deals in the first place) then the result is inevitable; repossessions and the inevitable collapse of the housing market (and then some).

Contrast the BBC’s innocuous description of the situation with the following,
‘President George W. Bush called for $145 billion in tax cuts, describing the measures as a “shot in the arm” for the U.S. economy, which caused stock values to plunge in Australia, Tokyo, Hong Kong, China, and across Europe. “There's something approaching panic in the market,” said an analyst with Bank of America.’
— Source: ‘The News Dissector’, 23 January, 2008
What the BBC doesn’t explain is its disengenuous description of bad debts as ‘repackaging’, in other words, burying the damn things in financial ‘instruments’ so complex that nobody has any idea where these bad debts actually are (devised by a bunch of greedy nerds with useless degrees in economics and business ‘management’).
‘Fraud, corruption and racketeering went so deep as to make an important contribution to the greatest single crisis the United States faced during the 20th century — the Great Depression.’ — ‘Gangster Capitalism – The United States and the Global Rise of Organized Crime’, p.54
Move over Halliburton, been there, done that.

But the real cause can be traced back to the ‘de-regulation’ of the financial markets and especially the banking sector. ‘De-regulation’ is just news-speak for the legalisation of what used to be a crime and obviously with good reason (remember the Savings & Loan crisis of the 1980s? See my ‘Bush Family Connections: Silverado Savings & Loan Scandal’, itself the first major effect of de-criminalising, sorry, deregulating the laws governing the actions of the financial sector).

In turn, it reveals the simple fact that capitalism is fundamentally a criminal endeavor of grand proportions, one that makes the ‘Mafia’ a bunch of amateurs (See ‘Selling the biggest lie of them all – Capitalism’, my review of ‘Gangster Capitalism – The United States and the Global Rise of Organized Crime’ by Michael Woodiwiss).
It was only because of the ‘29 Crash that under Roosevelt’s ‘New Deal’ the state imposed regulations on the business ‘community’, for just as with today’s meltdown, the ‘29 Crash was caused in large measure by the criminal actions of the capitalist class, the self-same laws that were abolished in the 1980s. So what goes around, comes around eh.
‘The number and variety of rackets in the United States during the 1920s and early 1930s was vast. Many Americans knew or at least suspected that politicians, judges, lawyers, bankers and business concerns collected many millions of dollars from frauds, bribes and various forms of extortion.’ — ‘Gangster Capitalism – The United States and the Global Rise of Organized Crime’, p.47
The irony of ‘de-regulation’ is that it came about as a result of the last major crisis of Capital, the so-called Energy Crisis of the early 1970s and the falling rate of profit following the actions of countries like IRAQ in nationalising their oil industry and of OPEC raising the price of oil.
“Do we want the communists to own the banks, or the terrorists?” asked financial commentator Jim Cramer. “I'll take any of it.”
Neo-liberalism, letting the market decide and ‘de-regulation’ is just a polite way of describing Gangster Capitalism or back to business as usual before those damn Commies interfered with a good thing.

Thus the BBC, along with the rest of the capitalist press, dare not speak the ‘credit crisis’ by its real name — Capitalism, nor obviously the real history of ‘boom and bust’ lest we, the public finally cotton to what’s going on and who will the pay the price, as ever, the poor of the planet.
 
More from this author:
NATO’s Inferno (7991 Hits)
Civilised (adjective): cultured, educated, refined, enlightened, polite, elegant, sophisticated, urbane Civilise (verb): to enlighten, educate,...
Leaving the Scene of the Crime? (7791 Hits)
by William Bowles “ The Armed Forces Press Service recently quoted Army Chief of Staff General Peter J. Schoomaker as saying that the current...
Crisis Management (7381 Hits)
by William Bowles Perhaps the most difficult thing to do when dealing with current events is to establish the link between economics and politics....
Capitalism – past its sell-by date? (8764 Hits)
by William Bowles Review: The Chávez Code – Cracking US Intervention in Venezuela by Eva Golinger Perhaps the greatest triumph of...
Capitalism first – climate last (8510 Hits)
by William Bowles I think it should be pretty clear to all by now that regardless that the ruling elites of the planet know what’s in store...
Related Articles:
Media Sham for Iraq War -- It’s Happening Again (9457 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The lead-up to the invasion of Iraq has become notorious in the annals of American journalism. Even many reporters,...
It’s Not Just Bush: We’re Accountable Too (5084 Hits)
by Heather Wokusch Click on arrow to listen to Heather's Podcast here: www.heatherwokusch.com/podcasts/We_Are_Accountable_Too_48KBs.mp3 ...
Bush is right, it’s time for America to change course (4687 Hits)
by Ed Kociela The one thing George Bush got right during his speech to the nation Wednesday night is that it is time to change America’s...
The War Is Stupid (4139 Hits)
by Aaron B. Pryor A few years ago, I felt that I needed a simple phrase that would distill everything I needed to know about the invasion and...
It’s Got to Be Gore: Part I and II – The Challenge Facing the Next President (4817 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler These have not been normal times in America. Under this Bushite regime, the soul of our country has been in ...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)add comment

Joe Noory said:

0
...
I find it curious that you never find any "hard truthes" about any society other than the United States. How is this any different from centuries of European peevishness that plainly assumed that their own shit doesn't stink?
 
January 24, 2008
Votes: +0

William Bowles said:

William Bowles
Response to 'Recession'
Well, I have to disagree with about this, it just so happens that European shit does stink only not quite as much and these days, it doesn't stick to everything the same way US shit does. European imperialism largely belongs to another age (tho' not for the want of trying eg, Blair's insane desire to resurrect the British Empire).

And if you take the trouble to read other essays I've penned, you'll find that I do target European capitalists, but basically it comes down to the simple fact that US imperialism is the biggest shit of them all.

Go well

Bill
 
January 24, 2008
Votes: +0

John said:

0
...
So your a communist and your stupid ideas are going to save us all?? Get a life you idiot.
 
February 05, 2008
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top