Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sat

10

May

2008

Lost E-Mails Obscure 'Plame-gate'
Saturday, 10 May 2008 01:12
by Jason Leopold

Earlier this week, the White House disclosed that it could not recover lost e-mails from emergency backup tapes for the period covering the invasion of Iraq and the U.S. failure to find Iraq’s alleged WMD.

This new gap – from March 1, 2003, to May 23, 2003 – also may have wiped out evidence of how George W. Bush and his top aides reacted to the emerging criticism from former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson that the White House had sold the war using false claims about Iraq seeking uranium from Niger in Africa, an investigation by The Public Record has found.

“It seems clear now that the e-mail backups are spotty and that there is no guarantee that there are backup tapes for all of [Executive Office of the President] during the period of concern, March 2003-October 2005,” said Meredith Fuchs, general counsel of George Washington University’s National Security Archive, one of two organizations suing the White House in hopes of forcing the administration to preserve its e-mails.

“There are no tapes from earlier than May 23, 2003,” Fuchs added, referring to an apparent violation of the Presidential Records Act. “So, anything deleted from the EOP network prior to May 23, 2003 (particularly between March 2003 and May 23, 2003) is missing from the backup tapes.”

In a federal court filing this week, the White House confirmed the failure to recover lost e-mails from the emergency backup tapes.

White House Chief Information Officer Teresa Payton and press secretary Dana Perino have blamed the loss of the e-mails on the administration’s transition from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook.

Other e-mails are missing from a period of several weeks from late September to early October 2003, another key timeframe when the White House was caught up in a growing scandal over the leaking of Wilson’s wife’s status as a covert CIA officer in reaction to Wilson’s public criticism of the Niger claims.

Senior administration officials disclosed Valerie Plame Wilson’s identity to several journalists in early summer 2003, leading to its publication in a July 14, 2003, article by right-wing columnist Robert Novak.

However, it was not until September 2003 that a CIA complaint to the Justice Department sparked a criminal investigation into the identity of the leakers. At first, however, the probe was under the control of Attorney General John Ashcroft and did not appear likely to lead to a major scandal.

The White House responded to press inquiries disingenuously, claiming Bush took the leak very seriously and would punish anyone involved.

“The President has set high standards, the highest of standards, for people in his administration,” press secretary Scott McClellan said on Sept. 29, 2003. “If anyone in this administration was involved in it, they would no longer be in this administration.”

Bush personally announced his determination to get to the bottom of the matter.

“If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is,” Bush said on Sept. 30, 2003. “I want to know the truth. If anybody has got any information inside our administration or outside our administration, it would be helpful if they came forward with the information so we can find out whether or not these allegations are true.”

Hiding the White House Role

Yet, even as Bush was professing his curiosity and calling for anyone with information to step forward, he was withholding the fact that he had authorized the declassification of some secrets about the Niger uranium issue and had ordered Vice President Dick Cheney to arrange for those secrets to be given to reporters to undermine Wilson’s criticism.

In other words, though Bush knew a great deal about how the anti-Wilson scheme got started – since he was involved in starting it – he uttered misleading public statements to conceal the White House role.

The missing e-mails from March 1, 2003, to May 23, 2003, cover another timeframe that is important to the “Plame-gate” affair. During this period, questions about the veracity of Bush’s Niger claims first surfaced.

During his State of the Union Address on Jan. 28, 2003, President Bush had cited what are now called the “16 Words” – “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

However, on March 7, 2003, Mohammed ElBaradei, head of International Atomic Energy Agency, told the UN Security Council that the Niger documents were forgeries and could not be used to prove Iraq was a nuclear threat.

The next day, Wilson appeared on CNN
, commenting on Bush’s use of information that the IAEA had refuted.

"Well, this particular case is outrageous,” Wilson said. “We know a lot about the uranium business in Niger, and for something like this to go unchallenged by U.S. – the U.S. government – is just simply stupid.

“It would have taken a couple of phone calls. We have had an embassy there since the early '60s. All this stuff is open. It's a restricted market of buyers and sellers.”

Wilson added: "For this to have gotten to the IAEA is on the face of it dumb, but more to the point, it taints the whole rest of the case that the government is trying to build against Iraq."
 
What Wilson didn’t disclose at the time was that he had personally traveled to Niger a year earlier on behalf of the CIA – in response to an inquiry from Vice President Dick Cheney – to investigate whether Iraq had tried to buy uranium from the African country. Wilson had reported back to the CIA that the suspicions were almost certainly false.

Wilson’s critical CNN comments apparently caught the attention of the Bush administration. A month-old Chicago Tribune op-ed by then-Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley that had promoted the Niger allegations was redistributed by the State Department on March 10, two days after Wilson appeared on CNN.

The column, "Two Potent Iraqi Weapons: Denial and Deception," repeated the suspicion that Iraq had tried to purchase uranium from Niger.

On the Attack

The Bush administration also went on the offensive against the IAEA. In an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on March 16, Vice President Cheney rebutted ElBaradei’s debunking of the Niger documents as forgeries.

“I think Mr. ElBaradei frankly is wrong," Cheney said. The IAEA “has consistently underestimated or missed what it was Saddam Hussein was doing. I don't have any reason to believe they're any more valid this time than they've been in the past.”

The next day – March 17 – Rep. Henry Waxman, D-California, sent a letter to President Bush further challenging his use of the Niger suspicions and citing ElBaradei’s findings.

“As subsequent media accounts indicated, the evidence contained ‘crude errors,’ such as a ‘childlike signature’ and the use of stationery from a military government in Niger that has been out of power for over a decade,” Waxman wrote.

Waxman demanded “a full accounting of what you knew about the reliability of the evidence linking Iraq to uranium in Africa, when you knew this, and why you and senior officials in the Administration presented the evidence to the UN Security Council, the Congress, and the American people without disclosing the doubts of the CIA.”

Bush didn’t respond to Waxman. Two days later – on March 19, 2003 – Bush ordered U.S. military forces to invade Iraq.

Now, more than five years later, it appears internal White House e-mails that could shed light on what Bush and his circle knew about the unreliability of their evidence on Iraq’s WMD may have been lost in an electronic black hole.

The black hole also may have swallowed internal e-mail traffic relating to the then-escalating conflict with former Ambassador Wilson as he edged toward going public with his inside knowledge about the unreliability of the Niger suspicions.

The Early Plame-gate Affair

On May 6, 2003, a New York Times column by Nicholas Kristoff used Wilson as an anonymous source to report that the administration may have knowingly used the phony Niger documents to win support for the war.

“I'm told by a person involved in the Niger caper that more than a year ago the vice president's office asked for an investigation of the uranium deal, so a former U.S. ambassador to Africa was dispatched to Niger,” Kristoff wrote.

“In February 2002, according to someone present at the meetings, that envoy reported to the CIA and State Department that the information was unequivocally wrong and that the documents had been forged. The envoy's debunking of the forgery was passed around the administration and seemed to be accepted – except that President Bush and the State Department kept citing it anyway.”

Two months later, on July 6, 2003, Wilson attached his name to his Niger accusations in a New York Times op-ed. By then, the White House was working aggressively behind the scenes to cast doubt on Wilson’s credibility, including the suggestion that his CIA wife, Valerie Plame Wilson, had arranged Wilson’s trip to Niger as a junket.

When Novak blew Plame’s cover 10 days later, CIA officials were outraged, leading to their demand for the leak investigation which began in September 2003. That, in turn, prompted misleading White House statements about the non-involvement of key figures, such as Bush’s political adviser Karl Rove and Cheney’s chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby.

However, the leak investigation took a surprise turn in December 2003 when Attorney General Ashcroft recused himself over a conflict of interest and Deputy Attorney General James Comey named U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald as a special prosecutor.

Fitzgerald approached the investigation more aggressively and eventually secured the indictment and conviction of Libby on perjury and obstruction of justice charges. In the aftermath, Bush commuted Libby’s prison sentence, sparing him from 30 months in jail.

Since then, the Plame-gate affair has faded from public attention, but it now appears that historians, too, will be denied anything approaching a full record of the scandal.

Payton, the White House chief information officer, said any further attempt by U.S. Magistrate John M. Facciola to force the administration to retain all e-mails on the White House network would "yield marginal benefits at best, while imposing substantial burdens and disruptions."

But David Gewirtz, an expert on e-mail, and the author of the book Where Have All the Emails Gone? believes the loss of e-mails covering the March to May 2003 period is suspicious.

“Sadly, neither elected nor appointed officials in Washington are making the situation any better,” Gewirtz wrote in a technical column about the issue. “In fact, it's getting worse. I've reached the conclusion that it's time to call for a special prosecutor. We now have official White House statements that federal laws are being broken, and I don't see any way for this to be resolved without escalation.”

Gewirtz said he contacted Judge Facciola to offer some technical advice on how to possibly uncover the lost e-mails but was told, “The judge is quite technical.”

“White House e-mail is very problematic and, instead of productive action, we're seeing our Washington friends – even those charged with ultimate oversight – ignoring very practical solutions and instead spinning their wheels, at the expense of both present-day Americans and the historical record,” Gewirtz added.

“What offends me as an IT professional is that none of these problems are insurmountable. In fact, most of them are easy to solve. What's worse: not a single private-sector CIO [chief information officer] would be allowed to get away with negligence on this massive scale.”

Jason Leopold launched a new online investigative news magazine, The Public Record, www.pubrecord.org.
More from this author:
Jason Leopold: Armitage Shmarmitage (15596 Hits)
By Jason Leopold In April, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald filed a court document in the CIA leak case claiming his staff had obtained...
RNC Now Seeks Shelter of Executive Privilege (4956 Hits)
by Jason Leopold The Republican National Committee said it will not abide by a subpoena and turn over documents to a Congressional committee...
Torture Question Hovers Over Chertoff (16878 Hits)
by Jason Leopold John Yoo and some other Bush administration lawyers who built the legal framework for torture are now out of the U.S....
Bush Operative Pushes Voter-ID Law (4658 Hits)
by Jason Leopold A senior legal adviser to the Bush-Cheney 2004 reelection campaign is working behind the scenes to help enact a Missouri state...
McCain Defends 'Enron Loophole' (6734 Hits)
by Jason Leopold Sen. John McCain says he opposes the $307 billion farm bill because it would dole out wasteful subsidies, but his chief...
Related Articles:
Direct Democracy Lost in Florida and Colorado (8195 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn With all the hoopla about the big Democratic win, little attention has been given to the assault on direct democracy....
Lost in the Lust of Werewolves (4409 Hits)
by Sheila Samples "A lost infant in the ashes, lost faces in the dust, a lost finger in the garbage dumps, a lost mother...
The Palestinian Left: A Lost Opportunity for Relevance (4765 Hits)
by Ramzy Baroud When Hamas members were elected as the majority bloc of the Palestinian Legislative Council, and as it became apparent that a...
Tomgram: Peter Galbraith, The War Is Lost (4079 Hits)
by Tom Engelhardt The week in Iraq began with a particularly brutal triple bombing in the oil-rich, disputed city of Kirkuk — a truck bomb...
Beware the Wounded Beast: Bush Has Lost the Iraq War (3752 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff The Iraq War has been lost. The British are acknowledging this fact by pulling out their troops from Basra, Iraq’s...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)add comment

Don Carlson said:

0
Is It True?
Mr. Leopold has certainly uncovered a big conspiracy here! How many others will be uncovered before Barak takes office? Will it be possible then to put these monsters in prison? If nothing comes of this, then democracy is just crap, right? Right?

Clearly more work is needed to undo the terrible crimes of the Bush administration. Raising taxes is just the tip of the iceberg. In order to bring back affirmative action, the courts will have to be dealt with---either lots more judgeships that can be given to Democratic appointees, or the rapid impeachment of all those judges appointed by Bush. Whatever it takes, the left must be restored to power.
 
May 10, 2008
Votes: +0

Dan said:

0
Truth, honesty and integrity
Truth, honesty and integrity know no political allegiance.

Politics, however, RARELY knows truth honesty or integrity.

Keep that in mind Mr. Carlson, when nothing changes.

Right, left, republican, democrat....just flip sides of the exact same corporate owned coin.
 
May 12, 2008
Votes: +0

PF said:

0
Non-issue
Ok, is the outrage here because the Bushies have (once again) laid lie upon lie to cover up their motives for invading Iraq. This is hardly big news. Is it news that the administration invaded a foreign country simply to pursue its imperial agenda? Again, we already know this. If the issue is "exposing" a CIA cover, think again. All of us subjected to the tyranny of our criminal rulers should not lament the exposure of a spy. Further, it is clear that Mr. Wilson himself is a covert agent, having played that role in Iraq in the early 90s and elsewhere. This whole affair is a struggle between two sectors of the ruling class -- between the CIA "establishment" and the neo-cons -- and the rest of us have no stake in it.

It is worse than naive for any competent journalist in 2008 to maintain illusions in openness, democratic institutions, or accountability from this government, or the next. The wars rage on, hundreds are maimed and slaughtered every week. Our economy is quickly melting down. Our so-called democratic institutions sometimes work to elect a popular mayor in a small town, but national voting is completely compromised by "black box" manipulation and corporate money.

Rather than lament the latest lies out of the Bush White House and elsewhere, let's talk about what we are going to do about it? Vote them out? Please. Like Barrack will go against Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, et al who are bankrolling him. No, we need to mobilize against these monsters, without illusions that the "political process" will somehow fix it. The political process is the problem.
 
May 14, 2008
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top