Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





The Rapture Party
Wednesday, 09 July 2008 03:26
by Jayne Lyn Stahl

The way things have been shaping up, over the last couple of weeks, it looks like we no longer have a Republican party, or a Democratic party, we now have a Rapture party. And, the way things are going, instead of pledging allegiance facing a flag, we may soon be pledging allegiance to a cross.

In the past week, both presidential candidates McCain and Obama have had high profile photo ops, and pow-wows, with evangelist Billy Graham, and his son, Franklin. McCain has even prayer, with Frankin, "for God's will to be done in this upcoming election." And, while the senator from Arizona envisons America as a "Christian nation," the senator from Illinois is quick to point out that faith, for him, is a "personal commitment to Christ."

Yes, and both the Republican and Democratic presidential contenders are enraptured by the thought of the Second Coming, and both have ideas to buy the Apocalypse on an installment plan. After all, for some, the war in Iraq isn't just about acquisition of oil, but about establishing, through military means, the Lord's dominion on earth, and breaking down any pesky little irritations like constitutional amendments, the First Amendment, that insist legislators "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

But, luckily for McCain and Obama, sodomy laws don't apply to what they're now doing to the First Amendment. And, while the senator from Illinois touts what he considers the Second Amendment right to bear arms, we don't hear a peep from him about any constitutional guarantees of separation between church and state.

Indeed, while both Bush and McCain are proponents of privatizing social security and health care, Obama now supports privatizing anti-poverty efforts by turning them over to clergy, and religious organizations, thereby seculariing clergy and endowing government with religious powers.

And, sounding more and more like a neo-con every day, on a trip to Zanesville, Ohio, yesterday, Obama said that the country's current challenges "are simply too big for government to solve alone," and that, if elected president, he plans to enhance Bush's faith-based initiatives by steering taxpayer federal bucks, formerly used on social service agencies, to religious groups, and renaming the president's program the "Council for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships."

Yes, Obama pledges to expand the budget for social services by another half a billion a year which would go to an education fund for poor youngsters. Apart from looking to religious organizations for funding, his plan will also allow them to hire and fire based on faith, but only when there is no taxpayer money attached.

But, the thought of looking to the neighborhood ministry, or YMCA, to provide food, shelter, and sustenance to the indigent instead of to the government is ludicrous, and insolent, when one compares the Pentagon budget to that of one's church.

What's more, a budget of $500 million a year for one million indigent inner city youngsters is a drop in the bucket when compared with the obscenity of an estimated $3 trillion spent on the war in Iraq, and many millions more approved for future military exploits.

Frankly, any proposal to let religious charities be earmarked for federal funding only if they use religious observance as a criterion for endowment is strongly reminiscent of the programs that use abstinence-only requirements in order to secure HIV/AIDS funding. This is not only reactionary, but dangerous thinking.

Obama finds himself in the awkward position of being in bed with the president when it comes to his agreement that faith-based organizations have a much larger role to play in serving those most needy among us. There is an important distinction, however. When it comes to employment, Bush backs permitting all religious organizations to make employment decisions based on religious belief whereas Obama would only allow faith-based employment as long as there are no tax dollars involved. Either way, this movement into Bush country comes so close to cloning it would make Dolly the Sheep pale by comparison.

In a country where 80% of its electorate practices some form of religion, it seems like a plausible campaign move to exploit religion. That said, ironically, in a country founded in response to the need for religious diversity, neither Obama nor McCain allow for the existence of religious minorities like Islam, and Judaism, or the freedom not to believe altogether. Obama and McCain both emphasize the importance of Christian faith — -McCain calling this a "Christian nation," and Obama talking about the role his Christian faith played in his work as a community organizer to "fulfill God's will," and do "the Lord's work." (AP)

By now, Thomas Jefferson would be rolling over in his grave were he to hear this nonsense from either of the contenders for, as you recall, it was Jefferson who wrote "History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest of ignorance of which their civil as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes." Indeed, and avail they will.

With this talk of doing the Lord's work, his recent professions of pulp patriotism, his defense of McCain's military service, and references to Ronald Reagan, not to mention response to Supreme Court rulings overturning the death penalty and the D.C. handgun ban, as well as his endorsement of the latest FISA legislation that includes retroactive immunity for telecoms that engaged in electronic surveillance, thereby becoming agents of the National Security Agency, Senator Obama reminds us of another senator, Bill McKay, in the 1972 box office hit, "The Candidate."

Bill McKay, played memorably by Robert Redford, was a liberal lawyer with no political ambition who was chosen, and primed, to run for an important Senate seat against a popular Republican. Many saw parallels between the character of McKay, and that of John F. Kennedy. The movie's tagline was: "Nothing matters more than winning. Not even what you believe in."

Well, there are more than a few parallels between Bill McKay and Barack Obama not only insofar as McKay's opponent was portrayed as old, and haggard, but inasmuch as, the closer he got to election day, the more McKay's support for abortion rights, and gun control started to wane. Funny thing, the more pliable, and maleable he was to party elders, the more success McKay had in the polls. McKay wins the Senate seat, of course, but he is a shill, and a shell of his former self.

During this summer re-run, pre-election, season, it might be instructive for those, including Sen. Obama, who have yet to see "The Candidate," to rent the DVD. Otherwise, come January, we may well hear Obama echo McKay's words "what do we do now?"

More from this author:
Following in the Footsteps... (8479 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The manic warriors, in Washington, are at it again, only now they've found someone who can manage more than one syllable at...
Worldwide Open Season on the Press (12608 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl On an otherwise quiet street in Istanbul, this morning, a 53 year old Turkish citizen of Armenian descent was gunned down...
On Hillary's announcement... (7731 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl You may have read the transcript of a speech given by George McGovern in The Nation last week in which he rightly...
An Open Letter to "The Decider" (8290 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl While the odds are probably better of getting a response from Santa, there are a few things I'd like to say if you can...
"Notes from the Undergrown: State of the Oilman Address" (8166 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The president's speech last night was more important for what it didn't say than for what it did. In an address that could...
Related Articles:
Where Will Blacks Find Justice? - The Civil Rights Movement is Dead and So is the Democratic Party (10627 Hits)
by Roland Sheppard The first civil and human rights movement by and for Black people started during the Civil War and the period of Black...
Some thoughts of the Creation of the Unified Socialist Party of Venezuela (5848 Hits)
By Andy Goodall - VSC Coordinator December 23rd 2006 Over the coming weeks much discussion will be had on the new Socialist party...
Is It Unity Party Time? (5110 Hits)
by Stephen Pizzo Well, are you getting nervous yet about the 2008 presidential race? I know I am. I can't even list the  number of ...
The Mad Tea Party (4164 Hits)
by Mark Bryan CLICK ON THUMBNAIL AFTER PAGE LOADS FOR FULL IMAGE   Mark was born in Southern California in 1950, about...
Interview with Senior Ba'ath Party Member (5262 Hits)
by Dahr Jamail On Sunday April 15th I interviewed a high ranking member of Iraq’s Ba’ath Party in Damascus, Syria. Like many senior...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (1)add comment

Jenkil said:

In 1991-1992 Rolling Stone magazine ran an article on the mental requirements necessary to become President of the United States. It didn't take great intellect, nor did it take quick wit, rather it required the candidate to have such a large ego that they were convinced that their ideas were better than any other. This conviction would thus make the candidate blind to the realities about them and easy prey to the moneyed elite. I did not believe the author's premise at the time, but I believe it now. It is all too evident in both candidates running today.
July 10, 2008
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123