Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





The Politics of Codependency
Tuesday, 05 August 2008 14:43
by Jayne Lyn Stahl

When Barack Obama warns that a vote for John McCain is a vote for a third term of George W. Bush, he's not speaking figuratively. However hard he might appear to try, McCain can't seem to be able to shake Bush. The Arizona senator's plans for the economy, health care, his foreign policy, or war plan, are almost identical to that of the current president. He's even going along with off shore drilling. A McCain presidency will come about as close to cloning Dolly the Sheep as humanly possible.

Indeed, the relationship between Republican presumptive presidential nominee and his President is more than merely symbiotic, it is one of textbook codependency, a maladaptive, obsessive behavior acquired in order to survive in an emotionally turbulent and chaotic environment.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

After all, what is it if not compulsive after five years of nonstop combat for a prospective commander-in-chief to say "I know how to win wars." He'd better---at the rate of $10 billion a month! With all the foreclosures, job cuts, the fall of Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae, and predicted volatility in the banking industry, we may need that $10 billion a month just to bail out the FDIC.

So, save us from any presidential candidate who claims to be strong on national security while, at the same time, going along with an economic policy that is bound to perpetuate an unstable housing, and financial market, as well as an shaky global economy. How pray tell, can that possibly be good for national security? Unless, of course, Sen. McCain's plan is for economic isolationism. If so, someone ought to tell him it's a little late for that---after all, we're not only dependent on the Middle East for oil, we are China's biggest debtor after the second largest banking failure in U.S. history, and a cash-eating bacteria is quickly spreading from Wall Street to the global markets. If nothing else, thanks to the past seven years, we've learned how to say "national security" in Chinese---John McCain

Oh, and the Republican candidate boasts of supporting the surge in the face of mounting evidence it was effective. There's only one problem with his logic, as Barack Obama has deftly shown, we're "winning" the war in the wrong battlefield. Senator McCain doesn't want an exit strategy--he wants to continue an irrelevant war, one that the puppet leadership itself now considers an occupation.

And if, as Mitt Romney suggests, McCain invented the surge, bragging about that is the equivalent of bragging about inventing bait and switch!

To think you've accomplished victory in combat when you're in the wrong battlefield is like a surgeon who declares an amputation a success after being told he amputated the wrong limb. Bottom line: can McCain say he knows how to win wars if he needs a map to find them?

If you want good foreign policy--show people some return for their money. What does the average working man and woman have to show for the past eight years we've had a Republican in the White House? The overwhelming majority of us, 270 million, have seen our annual income decline while the upper one percent has seen its income grow astronomically, by 650% since 1975. LBJ's "war on poverty" was transformed into GWB's "war on terror" which, as Senator Obama rightly says, was never a war at all, but rather a flawed effort to gain leverage in a region that contains what is now the world's greatest asset.

Not that I think foreign policy should come down to who is better at target practice, mind you, but it would help if one didn't have to consult Thomas Guide before taking the wheel. And, apart from his willingness to dialogue with those who might otherwise harm us, Obama combines the charm, wit, and eloquence of JFK with the political shrewdness, and dealmaker savvy, of LBJ, an unbeatable combination.

But, don't let the mainstream media fool you. This election isn't about who will make the best commander-in-chief in Iraq, any more than it is about race. After all, we're the progeny of another global adventurist, Christopher Columbus, who didn't have a sense of direction either and who would, no doubt, also be hunting down Al Qaeda in Iraq.

This election isn't about photo ops, and comfort zones, either. It's as simple as this---are you better off today than you were eight years ago? If your answer is yes, then vote for John McCain, and give this executive, George W. Bush, the privilege of claiming permanent incumbency and, guaranteed, you won't be dancing in the streets eight years from now.

More from this author:
Following in the Footsteps... (7834 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The manic warriors, in Washington, are at it again, only now they've found someone who can manage more than one syllable at...
Worldwide Open Season on the Press (11912 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl On an otherwise quiet street in Istanbul, this morning, a 53 year old Turkish citizen of Armenian descent was gunned down...
On Hillary's announcement... (7079 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl You may have read the transcript of a speech given by George McGovern in The Nation last week in which he rightly...
An Open Letter to "The Decider" (7594 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl While the odds are probably better of getting a response from Santa, there are a few things I'd like to say if you can...
"Notes from the Undergrown: State of the Oilman Address" (7479 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The president's speech last night was more important for what it didn't say than for what it did. In an address that could...
Related Articles:
From Liberating Spirituality to Oppressive Dogma: The Politics of Religion (22780 Hits)
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. Spirituality is intrapersonal. It’s a liberating and uplifting awareness. It nurtures personal growth. It inspires...
Israeli Politics of ‘Archeology’ in Jerusalem (7529 Hits)
by Nicola Nasser The Israeli arrogance of being the regional military super power, unequivocally backed by the U.S. world super power, is...
The Politics of Pragmatism (4350 Hits)
by Remi Kanazi The latest back and forth between Israel and the Palestinian unity government (and its regional interlocutors) will not bring...
Rising Above Politics - Can we quit talking and start walking? (5876 Hits)
by Joe Bageant Well, lo and beshit! I never thought I’d ever see the day. But even in my hardcore Republican run hometown, many...
Tomgram: Dilip Hiro, Head-Scarf Politics in Turkey (6635 Hits)
by Tom Engelhardt For Americans, whose view of Islam and Islamic politics is, to put the matter politely, less than complex, it's worth being...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (1)add comment

PF said:

Stop the electioneering
I'm sorry Lady Jayne, but this is too much. The condescending tone, the simplistic political assessments, and the outright shilling for Barak Obama are insulting to readers of this site who expect some sort of insightful analysis. You want to pose the election as some sort of "choice" between good and evil, between progress and regression, between liberal and conservative. But what do you do when the good/progressive/liberal side includes calls for more war, bigger armies, spying on Americans, expanded capital punishment, and all the rest? Who does the antiwar majority vote for? Of course, we vote for the "right" war, the one that is killing only hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians rather than millions, under the guise of the "War on Terror" that even Brezinski has admitted is the 2008 version of the Big Lie.

How do you live with yourself?
August 05, 2008
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123