Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sun

14

Sep

2008

Britain’s Monarchy set on dominating Islamic Middle East for at least another 30 years?
Sunday, 14 September 2008 11:49
by Bryan Rayner

That is the shocking and unwelcome news for Muslims and the Islamic world as we are informed of the Queen’s agreement with her government, to lead her Navy in the Middle East. This appalling resolution relates to the construction of two of the largest WAR ships ever built for the ROYAL Navy; and the ill-mannered names given to   these two colossal exponents of WAR?  I hope that   readers will enjoy puzzling over the official names for a short while, but all will be revealed quite soon!  Appallingly, none of the following names put forward by Peace campaigners, will be painted on the prow of these colossal Aircraft Carriers when they surge towards Middle East waters: HMS Peace – HMS Peace Seeker – HMS Reconciliation – HMS End all War – HMS End Hostilities – HMS Freedom from  Strife – HMS Amity – HMS End to all Conflict – HMS End  of British Empire – HMS End of Colonialism – HMS End to Islamic Subjugation – HMS End to Islamic Oppression – HMS End to Imperial Dominance – HMS End to Monarchical Intervention – HMS Fair-minded – HMS Racially Unprejudiced – HMS Peace be with You.  

It was at high level meetings at Government secure offices in London and purportedly Buckingham Palace also, where it was unanimously agreed by the autocratic Establishment hierarchy, that these floating fortress islands of British Monarchical antagonism and subjugation  be given the names of…….. Wait for it!!  

HMS Queen Elizabeth & HMS Prince of Wales!!!!
 
And the Monarchy is deemed by blinkered, head-in-sand pro Monarchists NOT to be involved in Britain’s political shennanigans and foreign policy war mongering? Ho hum!  This brazen naming is yet another example indisputably proving     that this most obnoxious of  dynasties continues its rabid involvement in Imperial Empire, Christian and Crusading subjugation of Arab nations in the Middle East. Regrettably under the “Freedom” of Information Act, a naive British public will have to wait a lifetime to learn the full details regarding meetings that involved the building and deployment of these gigantic ships of WAR. Meetings which allegedly included the Establishment’s Military Commander, her relations and her toadying government.  

An  acquiescent  government   that seeks undemocratically, to uphold an absolutist   dynasty  that wields enormous unchallenged influence and power over the lives of ordinary individuals in Britain and  the rest of the  world! Moreover, each of these floating islands, terrifying examples of British Empire and its intrusive insolence, will displace a massive 65,000 tons, and cost the British tax payer an “estimated” £8 billions pounds sterling. That is the estimate, but previous sums have invariably been way above the original computation. Furthermore, each WAR ship will be bristling with death wielding armaments: Fifty WAR planes, huge arsenals of bombs, missiles, and shells all operated and serviced by a vast complement of nearly two thousand men and women.

A Different and Alternative Scenario for Monarchical Britain to mull over? “A well equipped Naval Force from a Middle Eastern country is sending two fully loaded Aircraft Carriers to reconnoitre the waters off the British Isles.  Ports at Plymouth, Portsmouth, and Dover will be subjected to intensive scrutiny, and the Admiralty along with the M.O.D has decided that the WAR ships will patrol the English Channel, areas of the North Sea and the Irish Sea indefinitely.” End of statement.

Quoting from Wikipedia, the following comments are of interest:
The report concluded that aircraft carriers offered the ability to “Operate OFFENSIVE aircraft abroad,” and “…interoperability with the UNITED STATES Navy was a factor in deciding the size of the carriers’ firepower of the carrier’s air wing…”  while a US Naval Commander wants us to have “the same sort of clout as one of their (USA) carriers.” A British Military Spokesperson.
Nevertheless, the comments here offer contradictions, and I quote:
“Russia and China have invested big in much faster and more formidable anti-ship missiles than Exocet…the Moskit 3M80 … and the even more advanced SS-N-27 Sizzler. These missiles fly two and a half times faster than the American ones. The Russian Moskit technology sold to China has been renamed the Hai Ying or Sea Eagle HY2, and the threat of the Hai Ying is so great that it has effectively barred operational access to the Taiwan Strait to US. Aircraft carriers. In other words, these missiles have given the USA a ‘bloody’ nose, without blood shedding. Bravo to that! China has also supplied the Hai Ying to Iran. Carriers today are far more vulnerable to missile attack than 65 years ago…” 
Deterrent Missiles Stopping Conflict & Saving Lives. On the other hand if the warring bully boys of Monarchical Britain conclude that their Aircraft Carriers can be seen off or sunk easily, then it is likely that it might be decided NOT to enter into a bloody conflict and the inevitable tragic loss of life that would follow. Perhaps, and it is a slender one, if this information is  accepted as correct, then these terrible ships of war will never be built and reach the stage of being launched in the first place?  Now that would be a decision endorsed by all peace seekers everywhere.  

However, be that as it may, both  British ships of WAR,  purveyors of death and destruction will be ready for their  intrusive belligerent  warring in the Middle East shortly after 2016, and are  anticipated to be constantly ‘active’  in their Imperial role for at least another twenty years. This may be bad news for Muslims and Islamic States who have no desire to see these floating extensions of troublesome Monarchical British Imperialism, patrolling dangerously close in the Arabian Sea, the Gulf or the Indian Ocean and within air striking distance.

A pressing response to all this terrifying, dangerous and provocative western aggression will inevitably mean an unsought   increase in defensive armaments for   Sovereign States in the Middle East. They will be faced with an urgent necessity to prevent or minimise the coming menace to their people and infrastructures, and required to spend money that would be better spent on hospitals, schools and other major national benefits.  But while the west goes down the repressive road of war, nations that justifiably resist its unwarranted aggression and professed dominance, have no option but to arm and defend   against it. This will mean     a mushrooming in the age old race for armaments, and more death and annihilation.  Therefore, sovereign States in the East will have no choice but to stockpile enormous numbers of expensive “specialist” weapons capable of immobilising or thwarting the vast warring forces waged against them; the aircraft carriers, war planes and other lethal war machines intent on death and devastation.

Islamic countries deterrence might include   high-speed ‘attack’ boats, sophisticated torpedoes, and the stockpiling of   Exocet type missiles in the hope of dissuading the west from   ruthless military attacks instead of peaceful negotiation. On the other hand, why should any Middle Eastern country placate an aggressor? Clearly, Monarchical Britain is hell bent on venturing down the rocky road of war in the decades ahead, and yet the billions spent on these appalling war machines, could provide much needed hospitals and other  worthwhile benefits, both  at home and abroad.   

Nevertheless, it looks as if for decades to come the world will witness another sorrowful period of mayhem, death and devastation, with Monarchical Britain at the forefront.   Until    glorious change comes, and our Monarchical Establishment resolves to adopt peace instead of war, then those of us opposed to all this perilous warring gibberish are duty and morally bound to offer apologies to those that   are suffering and will suffer from Britain’s malicious, unjustifiable, inexcusable wrath in the years ahead. 

On behalf of the Queen therefore, her obnoxious Princes and her toadying Government Ministers,   Peace Seekers everywhere tender a belated but sincere apology. What is more,   we   condemn without hesitation   this Imperial belligerence, and regard   those who seek to enforce it as utterly repellent and beneath contempt.  Peace – Peace – Peace.  William Gladys. August 9th.2008.

     
More from this author:
Royal Porton Down (3478 Hits)
by Brian Raynor Before royalty opens or gives its name to anything, exhaustive checks are made to eliminate any adverse and potentially...
Britain’s Monarchy set on dominating Islamic Middle East for at least another 30 years? (5131 Hits)
by Bryan Rayner That is the shocking and unwelcome news for Muslims and the Islamic world as we are informed of the Queen’s agreement with her...
In Praise of Killing Muslims - The British ‘Royal Public Relations’ Disaster (3187 Hits)
by Bryan Raynor The over bloated coverage relative to Prince Harry in the British media has been unyielding in the last few days, and even out...
Governing Monarchy: It’s manifest role in the Radicalisation of British Politics, Culture & Society. (5712 Hits)
by William Gladys If there were Lunatic Asylums for Institutions, I have no doubt that ‘Megalomanic’ British Monarchy would have been...
Iran's Elections 2009 and Western Hypocricy and Interference (2041 Hits)
by Brian Rayner It is evident from the frenzied hourly reporting emanating from the mainstream media in Monarchical Britain, that the rationale of...
Related Articles:
Mosaic TV - World News from the Middle East (14537 Hits)
Mosaic features selections from daily TV news programs produced by national and regional broadcasters throughout the Middle East....
Bush's Middle East Strategy, and Presidency, Lie in Ruins as Republicans Scurry Away (9867 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Well, so much for Iraqi “sovereignty.” So much too for "staying the course" and for "fighting the terrorists...
Texas Versus Tel Aviv: US Policy in the Middle East (8699 Hits)
By James Petras The struggle within the US power structure between the economic empire builders (EEB) and the civilian ...
Baghdad is Surrounded: “The American Era in the Middle East has ended” (8820 Hits)
by Mike Whitney Don Rumsfeld is not a good leader. In fact, he is a very bad leader. Leadership is predicated on three basic factors:...
Is Another Recession Looming? Growth Slows, Housing Fizzles (6296 Hits)
By Seth Sandronsky U.S. economic growth rose at an annual rate of 1.6 percent in July–September, the slowest in more than three...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top