Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sun

07

Jan

2007

Selling the Execution of Saddam Hussein (and Related Products)
Sunday, 07 January 2007 21:33
by Patricia Alessandrini,

This is the first in a series of articles on advertising and propaganda vs. the dissemination of information on-line.


“I was truly shocked yesterday, upon clicking the link on the front page of the internet edition of the New York Times to a video with commentary on the execution of Saddam Hussein, to be accosted by two different advertisements for the new film about Idi Amin, The Last King of Scotland, one in video form preceding the news report, and one as an image just next to the video. Today I found the latter in the same place, just next to the video, when clicking to a new front-page link to the footage of the execution. It is thus impossible to view these materials without having them linked to the brooding image of an actor portraying the notorious African dictator.

This is either a very serious oversight on the part of the editors of the web edition, or a willful attempt at ideological subliminal suggestion by the New York Times. In either case, readers of the Times should not tolerate this, unless they read the Times specifically for the purpose of being force-fed pro-government propaganda – as one cannot imagine a better way to gain support for this extremely questionable, internationally-condemned execution than by linking Saddam Hussein to a murderous dictator, as he was linked to Hitler and Stalin in the run-up to the first war against Iraq. This is not at all to say that he was not a dictator guilty of crimes against humanity, and the US was of course completely in the wrong to have ever supported him, particularly in his bloody campaign against Iran and his use of chemical weapons in that war; however, readers should be allowed to come to their own conclusions about the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein and about the legitimacy of his execution through factual reporting, rather than subliminal persuasion.”



The above paragraph is a text I submitted to the New York Times “Reader’s Comments” section on December 31st, in response to the invitation to “Share your thoughts on the hanging of Saddam Hussein” (1). As you can see from the screenshot taken the same day, it was indeed impossible to view the execution footage from Iraqi state television posted on the New York Times web edition (already a questionable editorial decision) without being confronted by the image of an actor portraying Idi Amin. It is improbable that two different video clips on the same subject would be accompanied by the same advertising without this connection having been made either consciously or by a Google-style content- search machine. One might speculate that the ultimate interest of the New York Times is to sell the products they are advertising, and that therefore the linkage was not designed to influence opinion about the execution but rather to sell the film by fusing it to a tangentially related news story. But even if advertising had nothing to do with a corporate agenda, and the commercial dealings of the New York Times could be examined without taking into account its problematic relationship with the current administration, the end result is still the same: the association of Saddam Hussein with Idi Amin and his label in the ad, “charming, magnetic, murderous”; in a word, propaganda.

It is impossible to say precisely how effective this propaganda may have been. One reader welcomed it as a “wonderful juxtaposition of images” (2), while four other readers included Idi Amin among the numerous dictators listed in the comments; he was nonetheless beaten out by Pol Pot, who made the lists six times (3). Beyond a specific comparison between Hussein and Amin, this linkage functions in the same way that the current government propaganda regarding “Islamic Fascism” does: all of America’s “enemies,” past and present, are equated. If you accept this equivalence, the question of whether or not the U.S. ignored or even supported and funded Saddam Hussein’s worst deeds becomes irrelevant, as his massacres no longer have any specificity, any context, any history; they are the same as those of Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc. You can then further extrapolate in order to believe that Saddam collaborated with Osama Bin Laden, or even that invading Iran will halt nuclear development in North Korea.

The consideration that Idi Amin’s name may have unconsciously come to the minds of four readers is less significant than the fact that, while voices around the world condemned the execution with horror and disgust, we as readers of the Times counted dictators on our fingers, dictators as alike to us as one finger to another. Many of the readers’ comments were critical of the execution, one might argue, and at least the Times gives readers a forum to express themselves, where even harsh criticism of the Bush administration is printed. My own criticism of the Times was not, however, included in the list of comments: after seeing the message posted once under the phrase “Your comment is awaiting moderation,” it was taken off the page (see the before and after screenshots here, or look at the link given in note 1 below). The Times later printed a comment in which I complained about the fact that my text had been suppressed, but the original comment never appeared again. Although the reader’s comments page states that: “Comments…will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive,” the NYTD (New York Times Digital) member agreement states more specifically that the “NYTD reserves the right to delete, move, or edit messages that it, in its sole discretion, deems abusive, defamatory, obscene, in violation of copyright or trademark laws, or otherwise unacceptable.”

My experience confirms that in order to have a truly free discussion of important issues, internet forums that are out of the reach of institutions compromised by their relations to the current administration must be used. While pressure must be brought to bear on the New York Times and other such sources, and their unconscionable practices need to be called out, another solution is to frequent alternative news sources as opposed to media that subjects us to propaganda and does not allow discussion about it.

(1) See “Reader’s Comments”, “Hussein is Executed”, at the New York Times blog: http://news.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=119

(2) “What a wonderful juxtaposition of images; first came clips from a film about Idi Amin, then clips from the execution of Hussein.”; ibid.

(3) It isn’t surprising that the name of Pol Pot comes to readers’ minds so frequently, given the instrumentalization of this dictator’s massacres by the New York Times and other US media in order to minimize the devastation wreaked by Nixon and Kissinger’s war crimes in Cambodia. Inconsistencies and inaccuracies in media coverage concerning Pol Pot - including the particular attention given to him while other dictator’s crimes were ignored - have been pointed about by Noam Chomsky and others; for one on-line source, see Edward S. Herman in Z Magazine, September, 1997: http://www.zmag.org/zmag/articles/hermansept97.htm
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
More from this author:
Image, Anecdote, and Reality: Why Sarkozy Really Is to Be Feared (6735 Hits)
by Patricia Alessandrini I have yet to see a Sarkozy poster in Paris – or even just a sticker with his name on it – that has not been...
MEMBERS OF OVER 35 PEACE AND ADVOCACY GROUPS OPPOSE NICOLAS SARKOZY (4062 Hits)
by Patricia Alessandrini A Petition Asking French Voters to Reject Sarkozy in the May 6th Presidential Election Receives Strong...
How far will the New York Times go to get a neo-con elected in France? (5441 Hits)
by Patricia Alessandrini It isn’t surprising that the New York Times would oppose Ségolène Royal, the French presidential candidate who...
Related Articles:
Selling Satan: Iraqi War Dead and the Collateral Damage to America's Soul (8806 Hits)
by Phil Rockstroh Headline (Reuters): "United States numb to Iraq troop deaths: experts" "O Nature, and O...
The sentencing of Saddam Hussein (6985 Hits)
by Craig Murray I hold no brief for Saddam Hussein. He is a gruesome dictator who is much better out of power, and a dangerous man who is...
The trial of Saddam Hussein and the coming trials of George W. Bush and Anthony Charles Lynton Blair (6555 Hits)
by Richard Marsden Sunday's announcement of the verdict in the trial of Saddam Hussein and his seven co-defendants was, of course, timed...
Shouting Truth to Depraved Power (and Its Unwitting Accomplices): “Stephen Lendman Sounds Off” (7349 Hits)
by Jason Miller I recently had the privilege of conducting a “cyber interview” with one of the preeminent domestic critics of the...
Lynching Saddam - Part 10: Virtue, Terror and the Western public opinion’ s bloodthirsty schizophrenia (8034 Hits)
by Gabriele Zamparini, The notorious Kafka-esque trial is over; the Baghdad’s bordello turned its red lights off. Iraq President...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment

Escualido said:

0
...
What is wrong with linking Idi Amin with Saddam? They belong to the same crowd as well as Pol Pot, Fidel, Uncle Joe, Mao etc.... Nothing wrong with that!
 
January 08, 2007
Votes: +0

Parker Q. said:

0
...
"This is a farewell kiss, you dog!" shouted the protester in Arabic, later identified as Muntadar al-Zeidi, a correspondent for Al-Baghdadia television. Muntadar al-Zeidi felt almost disgusted at the U.S. President’s treatment of his country had decisively taken off his shoes and hurled them at President Bush. In Muslim culture, hit footwear fling is an insult of the highest magnitude. Good Muslims remove their shoes before taking sanctuary in a mosque. Besieged Iraqi citizens threw their shoes at the toppling statue of Saddam Hussein during liberation, so that should better explain the depth of this insult. The “Bush Shoe-Thrower”, identified as Muntadhar al-Zeidi, is viewed as a hero across the Middle East. A Libyan charity group called Wa Attassimou proclaims that the Iraqi authorities should release al-Zeidi and he should be honored for his deed. Bush, on the other hand, laughed it off and referred to it as a “sign of a free society,” similar to what payday loans are. The mad journalist is still in custody and the infamous footwear is being held for evidence. Click to read more on Payday Loans.
 
December 23, 2008
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top