Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





The Foreign Policy of an Obama Administration
Monday, 17 November 2008 11:06
by Rodrigue Tremblay
“Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man.”
- Bertrand Russell

“In the field of world policy I would dedicate this nation to the policy of the good neighbor—the neighbor who resolutely respects himself and, because he does so, respects the rights of others.”
- President Franklin D. Roosevelt (March 4, 1933)

“I believe in a whole lot of things that make me progressive and put me squarely in the Democratic camp.”
- Sen. Barack Obama, (July 8, 2008)

President-elect Barack Obama is a nice guy and a fresh political face. His election on November 4 (2008), as president of the United States, is a great personal achievement. At the very least, he deserves the benefit of the doubt. Indeed, President-elect Obama has received from the American electorate an unequivocal public mandate for change. It is fair to say that his election creates an opportunity for the United States to tackle a number of systemic problems that have beset this proud nation for a long while.

The most important revision that could be made is the way Americans see their country in the world. Is the U.S. an old-style empire that uses empty phrases to advance imperialistic interests through military force? Or is the U.S. rather the first country truly founded on the Enlightenment principles of equality of all human beings, of individual freedom and responsibility, and of the democratic system of government, as embodied in the U.S. Constitution? Which is it going to be under an Obama administration?

Since World War II, the United States has been obsessed with its military power. The fact that the U.S. played such a central role in defeating Nazi Germany and imperial Japan went to the head of most American politicians and of many American citizens. Suddenly, the U.S. saw itself as grander than nature, a messianic, self-appointed “leader of the free world”. It was a mission that the military-industrial complex was eager to embrace with enthusiasm.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

Towards the end of World War II, General Motors CEO Charles Wilson advanced the fateful idea of a permanent war economy with ever increasing military expenditures, and with military bases all around the world. On April 14, 1950, Wilson's ideas were officially adopted by the U.S. government when National Security Council Document 68 was issued by the Truman administration. It was the framework for an amoral and costly foreign policy that propelled the United States upon a dangerous path and which, nearly sixty years later, is threatening to push it toward financial and moral bankruptcy. Indeed, it is because of this far-reaching policy that the United States today spends more on the military than all the other nations of the world combined and has been willing, under George W. Bush, to engage in a war of aggression.

Even before, however, numerous foreign military adventures, beginning with the Korean War (1950–53), followed the adoption of this militaristic policy. The worst blunder was undoubtedly the ill-advised and gratuitous Vietnam War (1959–1975), in which some 55,000 young Americans and more than one million Vietnamese lost their lives, all for naught. It was also a major component of the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

The obsession with anything military turned tragic in the 1980s, under Ronald Reagan, when propagandists began to present the United States as the “good empire” as compared with other “evil empires”. Of course, the most grotesque rendering of this delusion reached its zenith under George W. Bush, when the United States perceived itself as being above international law, in its self-appointed “mission” or “crusade” to impose American-style democracy and promote U.S. economic interests around the world with tanks and bombs.

This transformation of a law-abiding American republic into a somewhat rogue empire above the law was bound to have many dire consequences, for both itself and for the world.

In the past, the myth of a so-called U.S. "Manifest Destiny" under a divine authority, and of American exceptionalism, has often surfaced in American history, but rarely as intensely as it was witnessed during the last quarter century. Used initially by the Jacksonian Democrats to justify the extermination of the Indians and the conquest of the American West, the myth was promoted by the Republicans in the 1980s to pave the way for the ideology of an American world hegemony.

As if to corroborate historian Arnold Toynbee's 100 year cycle of imperial wars, the same myth had been used in the 1890s by members of the Republican Party to justify their seizure and occupation of former Spanish foreign colonies during the Spanish-American War of 1898. At that time, the United States embraced a policy of imperial conquests, with the occupation of the Philippines, Puerto Rico and Panama.

Recently, the powerful neo-conservative movement adopted the same ideology of American moral superiority, presenting the policy of militarism and of imperialism as something "good". The neocons, indeed, have been the principal proponents of total global military domination by the United States. They have been the main driving force within the Bush-Cheney administration behind the American-led war of aggression against Iraq.

Soon, in January 2009, a new Obama administration will be inaugurated. Normally, if it really wants to change things, a new administration must spell out clearly its agenda during the first 100 days, before everything becomes “business as usual”. This is a moment to be seized and not be wasted, especially with the type of widespread mandate the incoming administration has received.

Will President Barack Obama deliver on his promise of change and adopt new and bold progressive policies? Indeed, will he have the wisdom and courage to revisit a more than half-century old foreign policy that has outlived its pertinence, and dare bring forward a new vision and a necessary change of direction? —At the very least, the question deserves to be raised.

Rodrigue Tremblay is professor emeritus of economics at the University of Montreal and can be reached at: rodrigue.tremblay@ yahoo.com.

He is the author of the book 'The New American Empire' .

Visit his blog site at www.thenewamericanempire.com/blog.

Author's Website: www.thenewamericanempire.com/

Check Dr. Tremblay's coming book " The Code for Global Ethics< at: www.TheCodeForGlobalEthics.com/
More from this author:
The Iraq Occupation and the Coming War Against Iran: Political Wickedness and Moral Bankruptcy (6399 Hits)
by Rodrigue Tremblay "Justice is as strictly due between neighbor nations as between neighbor citizens. A highwayman is as much a robber...
The Neocons' Crazy Dream of World War III (5853 Hits)
by Rodrigue Tremblay "There are roads one does not follow. There are armies one does not strike. There are cities one does not attack....
A Financial System under Siege (5237 Hits)
by Rodrigue Tremblay "If these items [promised benefits in Social Security, Medicare, Veterans Administration and other entitlement...
Questions About the Financial Crisis (5996 Hits)
by Rodrigue Tremblay "The problem [of loan defaults] will be significantly bigger next year [2008] because 2006 [mortgages] had ...
Mr. Ban Ki-moon and the Future of the United Nations (5578 Hits)
by Rodrigue Tremblay [The] "recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is...
Related Articles:
Civil War in Iraq: The Salvador Option and US/UK Policy (11971 Hits)
by Craig Murray,   As the catastrophe in Iraq continues to unfold, an unresolved question remains on the role of Bush, Blair, and the US/UK...
Texas Versus Tel Aviv: US Policy in the Middle East (11885 Hits)
 By James Petras The struggle within the US power structure between the economic empire builders (EEB) and the civilian ...
GOP Senator Lashes Administration For "Insensitive" Troop Treatment (4782 Hits)
by Bob Geiger In a vivid sign that George W. Bush's incompetent handling of the Iraq war has fully reached across the political aisle and...
Is Barack Obama Ready to Be Leader of the Free World? (7245 Hits)
by Ed Kociela The question isn't if America is ready for a black president. The question is if Barack Obama is ready to be president. ...
Lying and Spying - How the Administration Slip-Slides Away (5005 Hits)
by Elizabeth de la Vega I hope I can be forgiven if animal images kept coming into my mind during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123