Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Methinks they do protest too much
Sunday, 23 November 2008 22:43
by William Bowles

I’m coming across quite a few essays by lefties bemoaning the fact that Barack Obama has somehow ‘let us down’. For example there’s a piece by Dave Lindorff ‘Obama's First Big Mistake on the Job - Rescuing Joe Lieberman’

Mistake? There is no mistake. The gist of the piece is about the “treacherous” Joe Lieberman, former Dem, who when he lost the race for nomination as Democratic Senator for Connecticut, turned around and joined the Republicans and got elected. Okay, the guy is as Lindorff says, “…a wretched example of a man without principle—a back-stabbing slimeball of a politician whose only allegi[a]nce, apparently, besides to himself, is to Israel”, something else I object to in Lindorff’s piece is his qualification of his reference to Lieberman’s Zionist ‘credentials’,

“Now I don’t want anyone to think I’m some rabid anti-semite. My wife and kids are Jewish, we have good friends who are Israeli, and no, I don’t think the Jews run the media or the country. I do, however, think that Joe Lieberman thinks more about what, in his warped and shriveled worldview, is good for Israel, than about what is good for America.”
Come on Dave, ‘some of my best friends are Jews’? There’s no need to apologize for attacking Zionism, you’ll be branded as an anti-semite no matter how much you protest that you ain’t. Get used to it. No, my major objection to the piece is the implication that somehow Obama has ‘let down’ us progressives. This is the man whose first appointment was Rahm Emmanuel (see ‘Ali Abunimah: Obama picks pro-Israel hardliner for top post’) and since then Obama appears to have invited Madeleine Albright onboard. Remember her infamous statement about the deaths of half a million children who died as a result of the 12-year long sanctions of Iraq prior to the invasion, “We think the price is worth it.”[1] Why do we persist in maintaining illusions about Barack Obama? Because he’s black? If I remember correctly isn’t Colin Powell black and wait, so is Condoleeza Rice. Clearly ‘blackness’ is very much a state of mind at least when it comes to measuring the worth of a politician. Okay, Obama is streets ahead of GW Bush, but when you start this low, it doesn’t take much to raise the bar. But in any case, that isn’t the point, or rather, the point of selecting Obama in the first place was precisely because he is black and not because he is an alleged progressive, or come that, an alleged anything except a ‘nice guy’.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

To the contrary, it was a carefully calculated act to make a ‘break with the past’ and what better way to do it than with a black man, given the role of racism under capitalism.

How could it be anything else, given the nature of the racist, white power structure that rules the United States, that selected Barack Obama?

In fact selecting Barack Obama is a perfect example of the ideology of racism in action for its function is, in part, to ‘disarm’ opposition to US policies. Witness the millions of black and hispanic folks who voted for him. It should be clear to all that Obama could never have become the candidate, let alone the president without having been ‘cleared’ as it were, by the Democratic power brokers. Never mind his association with Bill Ayers or whoever, inevitably such ‘associations’ are part and parcel of becoming a politician and are easily dealt with by the candidate disassociating himself from such individuals (put it down to youthful and inexperienced enthusiasm). I think the best measure of the value of Barack Obama to capitalism was the huge—and audible across the planet—sigh of relief breathed by virtually every corporate/state media outlet, let alone the politicians, when he got elected. It amounted to a ‘stay of execution’, that is until the economic collapse came along and screwed it up.

And here too, we see Obama’s real colour, green.

“There is no indication that Obama will break his ties to his Wall Street sponsors, who largely funded his election campaign. “Goldman Sachs, J. P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Bill Gates’ Microsoft are among his main campaign contributors.

“Warren Buffett, among the the world’s richest individuals, not only supported Barak Obama’s election campaign, he is a member of his transition team, which plays a key role deciding the composition of Obama’s cabinet.”[2]

The lesson here is that one doesn’t bite the hand that feeds, no matter what colour it is. Notes

1. Quoted in Mark Curtis’ ‘Web of Deceit-Britain’s real role in the world’, p.38

2. ‘Michel Chossudovsky: Who are the Architects of Economic Collapse? Will an Obama Administration Reverse the Tide?’

For more on Obama’s seamless continuation of the Cheney/Bush programme see, ‘Why Obama Will Continue Star Wars’, Time Magazine, 16 November, 2008.

More from this author:
NATO’s Inferno (10084 Hits)
Civilised (adjective): cultured, educated, refined, enlightened, polite, elegant, sophisticated, urbane Civilise (verb): to enlighten, educate,...
Leaving the Scene of the Crime? (9942 Hits)
by William Bowles “ The Armed Forces Press Service recently quoted Army Chief of Staff General Peter J. Schoomaker as saying that the current...
Crisis Management (9512 Hits)
by William Bowles Perhaps the most difficult thing to do when dealing with current events is to establish the link between economics and politics....
Capitalism – past its sell-by date? (11106 Hits)
by William Bowles Review: The Chávez Code – Cracking US Intervention in Venezuela by Eva Golinger Perhaps the greatest triumph of...
Capitalism first – climate last (10892 Hits)
by William Bowles I think it should be pretty clear to all by now that regardless that the ruling elites of the planet know what’s in store...
Related Articles:
They Are No Angels: Throw The Bums Out! (13252 Hits)
By Tom Chartier When does our government actually function at it’s best? Stop laughing! This is a serious question. Ponder it for a...
They Hate Our Freedom: The Truth about the Military Commissions Act (10495 Hits)
By Aaron Sussman On October 17th, with Dick Cheney, Alberto Gonzales, and Donald Rumsfeld standing behind him, George W. Bush solemnly ...
“Times they are a-changin’…” (11164 Hits)
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. Pennsylvania Republican senator Rick Santorum – Golden Boy of the Christian Right, rabid homophobe, and Bush...
What Do They Think We Are, Idiots? (6485 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff In at least one area, President Bush is on the run. Congress should run him to ground. The issue, which should...
The Neocon Nasties: Are They Naive Idealists? (5116 Hits)
by Edward Strong Were the Neocons Naive? Have we done the neocons an injustice? The Left has impugned them with base motivations. Yet the...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123