Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Thu

11

Jan

2007

The Ticking Clock
Thursday, 11 January 2007 10:19
by Tom Chartier

I think the fate not only of our own civilization, but I think the fate of world and the future of the human race, is involved in preventing a nuclear war."

“This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. Having said that, all options are on the table.”
-President George W. Bush, February 2005

Mankind invented the damned thing and has used it twice. Sooner or later mankind will use it again.

We all know what the damned thing is, The Bomb. Despite multifarious efforts to contain and control nuclear weapons through a variety of treaties, the promise of a mushroom cloud looms ominously on the horizon.

Must the 21st century be scorched by a nuclear war? I see little chance of stopping it.

In 1967, Secretary of State Robert S. McNamara said: “No sane citizen, political leader or nation wants thermonuclear war.” Do the U.S., Israel and Iran have sane political leaders?

To avoid “mutual assured destruction,” the world needs rational decisions of rational governments headed by rational leaders backed by rational citizens. 


Where are these rational leaders of governments? You tell me. The U.S. is run by trigger-happy, paranoid gunslingers and several other countries, such as North Korea and Iran appear to be just as reckless.

By the ill-advised invasion of Iraq in 2003, the United States exposed a serious vulnerability in its much-vaunted military might. The U.S. cannot fight, or win, a long term, ground-based, guerilla war. The citizens of America do not want a ruthless Empire-building regime… not that what Americans want is of any concern to the Bush Administration or to the “think” tanks which design and drive the policies.

Men who ought to know better are repeating the mistakes made in the Vietnam War.

This ‘back to the future’ state of affairs has not gone unnoticed by Iraq’s neighbor Iran. Hated by the late Saddam Hussein, by the American public, by the manipulators in Washington and by the leaders of Israel, Iran has seen its opportunity for Middle East dominance.  Hoping that the U.S. will suffer a serious humiliation in Iraq, does Iran do more than pray for the Shia majority in Iraq? Remember, Iran has a powerful friend in Russia.

A game of defiance is being played out by the Iranian regime. It is a game of brinksmanship to see just how much Iran can get away with… and gain in the process.

As a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has the right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful uses. Israel, Pakistan and India, all nuclear powers, are not signatories. This is the trump card Iran has been playing all along.

Does Iran have a covert nuclear weapons program? Nobody really knows. This is precisely Iran’s idea, to keep the world guessing. The potential of Iran possessing nuclear weapons gives that country clout and leverage in the Middle East.

The possibility of an Iran capable of launching nuclear weapons certainly has much of the world quite nervous… too nervous. Previously committed to non-nuclear policies, Other Persian Gulf nations, are concerned to the point of reversing those policies and have announced their own plans of developing “peaceful” nuclear capabilities.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has stated quite clearly that Israel will not permit a nuclear Iran.

The United States also considers a nuclear Iran unacceptable. Does the U.S. dare to invade Iran with a conventional ground army? Obviously, this is a ludicrous impossibility. The US military has told Bush only 9,000 troops are available for his “surge” in Iraq. Bush has rejected diplomacy. So what are the remaining options? I think they are fairly obvious. Is wiping Iran off the map one of those “options” Bush has left on the table?

How far does Iran dare to push Israel and the United States? How far do Israel and the U.S. dare to push Iran? At what point will someone lose a nuclear temper? Israel may be standing on the brink right now with reports of plans to nuke Iranian nuclear facilities. Israel denies the report labeling it “incorrect.”

Time and time again Israel has shown little mercy to those who threaten her. The state of Israel believes in ensuring its survivalBrutal retaliation for any threat to her security has been Israel’s modus operandi. And now, after last summer’s Lebanese debacle, Israel sits in embarrassed defeat by Hezbollah… and fearful of another Holocaust.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad needs to learn some tact. Recently the Iranian president further taunted Israel with his Holocaust Conference.

Ahmadinejad has been quoted as calling for Israel to be “wiped off the map.”  Manouchehr Mottaki, Iran’s foreign minister attempted to clarify Ahmadinejad’s speech.  Speaking in Brussels, Mottaki said of Israel “We do not recognize legally this regime." Mottaki asked, “How is it possible to remove a country from the map?” Good question.  Ask Israel, ask Bush?

Will the Israelis use the boastings of an increasingly unpopular loud mouth like Ahmandinejad as one of their excuses to attack Iran?  It’s been done before… in Iraq.

Will Israel say “enough!” and push the button?

Or will George W. Bush beat Israel to it? As “War President,” Mr. Bush has been a failure. Public support for Bush’s “Global War on Terror” has turned against him not because of the illegality, expense or slaughter but because losing another war has embarrassed America and her puffed up president.

Delusional dreams of conquest have addled The Decider’s decision making. Reality is falling dreadfully short of his fantasies.

A second U.S. carrier strike group has been sent to the Persian Gulf, not for diplomatic purposes but as a threat to Iran. Like a sitting duck, these carrier groups are easy targets for Iran’s newly acquired missiles. It’s almost as if Bush is baiting the Iranians to lob a missile at a U.S. aircraft carrier which would give him the green light to push the red button.

Bush means business. A tactical U.S. nuclear strike would serve as a firm warning to the rest of the world that The Will of Bush must be served. Or would it? In the twilight of his second term, Bush is desperate to do something glorious. Is Bush crazy enough to consider nuclear war a crowning glory?

Are any of the involved parties rational enough to back away from Armageddon?

 

Elizabeth Gyllensvard contributed to and edited this story.
More from this author:
America… I Apologize! (8134 Hits)
My fellow Americans, it is with a heavy heart that I must confess. I have transgressed. I have committed the most heinous crime of our great land....
The Land Without Hope (8523 Hits)
“Imagine what it's like to be a young person living in a country that is not moving toward reform. You're 21 years old, and while your peers in...
Dear Dubya: The Iraq Solution! (10070 Hits)
Hey there Georgie Boy, long time no speak. From what I’ve been hearing, you’ve had a rough time as of late. As always, I’m here to help. So...
This Is The Way Of Dictatorships. (9514 Hits)
If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier... just so long as I'm the dictator.” George Walker Bush, 2000 Was...
Nukalert! (9237 Hits)
Hey there nostalgia fans and potential survivors! Don’t you miss the good old days when baby boomers were babies? I sure do. Boy, those were fine...
Related Articles:
The clock ticks ever faster for Leonard Peltier (2709 Hits)
by Harvey Wasserman By Tuesday, August 18, the four sitting members of the Federal Parole Commission must decide whether they will let Leonard...
Can the Ticking Middle East Conflict Be Defused? (1661 Hits)
Bernard Weiner P.h.D. I had a fascinating email conversation over the weekend on the Middle East conflict, and it seems worthy of...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment

Greg said:

January 11, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

mallee said:

0
hear hear
“Do the U.S., Israel and Iran have sane political leaders?” Israel and the U.S., certainly do NOT have sane political leaders, and that’s two strikes against their own citizens, and the rest of the world. A very nicely written article. The only quarrel I have is with the statement: “The state of Israel believes in ensuring its survival.” If only. This statement perpetuates the myth that the poor innocent little state of israel is, in fact, facing Olmert’s manufactured “existential threat” at this time, and is under constant seige at all times. The truth of the matter is that the racist, and expansionist pariah state of israel believes only in ethnic cleansing, in the theft of land and water, and in the brutal and murderous expansion of the borders it refuses to delineate. Otherwise, sadly, I have to totally agree with Mr. Chartier’s glum assessment. As to the asinine comment by the previous poster … the chosen nick pretty much sums up the level of intellectual acuity.
 
January 12, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top