Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Wed

17

Jan

2007

Are the Bushites Bringing on Impeachment?
Wednesday, 17 January 2007 22:33
by Andrew Bard Schmookler

A speculation I’ve expended some virtual ink here laying out my thoughts, post election, regarding the idea of impeachment. In a nutshell, I’ve said that while the Bushites deserve impeachment like none others in American history, the Democrats should proceed very carefully if at all to make sure that they do not play into the Bushites’ hands and lose the center of the American electorate. What I had in mind was that the Dems conduct the right kinds of hearings in the right way, and see how things evolve.

But of course, the situation in the system evolves in other ways as well. And with the Bushites’ latest military gambit –the so-called surge, as president in GWB’s talk to the nation this past week– may lead to a different scenario from any I’d imagined before. My purpose here is to lay out a conceibable scenario that may lead to impeachment sooner and for different reasons than I’d envisioned before.

1) Signs are accumulating that the new Bushite gambit is NOT about Iraq but about expanding the existing disaster in Iraq into a wider regional war, with Iran in particular as the target.

Among these signs are a) some language in the president’s statement, b) the replacement of the commander of American forces in Iraq by a Navy man whose expertise has nothing to do with the kind of war being fought in Iraq but would be appropriate for managing an air assault on Iran, and c) the the sending of a carrier fleet to the Persian Gulf.

I’m not yet ready to say that the launching of a new war is really what all this is about, but it would not be the first time that this gang had lied us into a conflict. And the possibility seems real enough to justify thinking through the implications of the possibility.

2) It is clear that there are many in Congress –including some Republicans– who want to stop this administration from unilaterally escalating and expanding America’s involvement in war in that region. A variety of possible checks are being discussed, from using the power of the purse to revoking the president’s authorization to use force to the War Powers Act.

Even if the Bushites are NOT trying to expand the war beyond Iraq, their incredible defiance not only of the message from the electorate in November and of the Baker-Hamilton report, but of reality, seems to be evoking significant opposition not only from Democrats in Congress but from Republicans as well.

3) It is also pretty clear that the Bushites will not recognize the authority of Congress to prevent the president from doing whatever he wishes to do. Not only is there a long record of this administration’s making claims of virtually unchecked power for the “commander-in-chief,” but such statements are continuing as Congress and the administration appear to be moving toward a constitutional confrontation over these matters of checks and balances.

4) The question then arises over how this confrontation will be resolved. Perhaps the issues could be taken to the Supreme Court. With that scenario, I wonder two things: first, would it be possible to get a resolution in a timely way, i.e. before the “commander-in-chief” might have taken the actions forbidden him by Congress; second, could one count on the Court –with its new members Roberts and Alito– to come down against the Bushite interpretation in which the president gets the power of an autocrat? Might Congress decide that resolving the specific issues through the Court would not be a workable solution?

That leads to the final point.

5) Perhaps it is in the context of such a struggle that a bi-partisan majority in Congress could conceivably decide that the best way to block the Bushites from compounding the disaster they’ve created would be simply to remove them from office. After all, it would not be difficult at all to find the legal bases of “high crimes and misdemeanors” on which to base an impeachment.

Thus, the Bushites’ latest gambit may change the picture regarding the chances for impeachment. Previously, Congress might well have calculated that with less than two years left in Bush’s second term, removing him from office would not achieve enough to warrant the mess and hassle of an impeachment. But now, if enough in Congress feel that an impeachment is the surest way to prevent this gang from creating a whole new disaster, immediate removal might seem important and not superfluous.

Previously, it has seemed that not that many members of Congress have felt, as many of us do, that the defense of something so abstract as the Constitution and the rule of law required them to expose and punish the lawlessness of this regime. But even for people who don’t take seriously such abstractions, the concrete matter of expanding the present disaster into a still larger disaster of regional war might provoke them into action.

I’m not saying that I necessarily expect that things will unfold in this way. But this now seems at least a genuine possibility.

The recklessness and ruthlessness of the Bushites continually surprise, and take us into waters dark and dangerous and unforeseen. 
More from this author:
The “Prophetic Social Movement”: Then and Now (6792 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler On Election Night of 2004, as I lay in bed much of the night awake and miserable, I found myself teetering on the...
The Dems’ New Power: Investigative Hearings Done Right (5921 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler On Election Day, America took a step that history may show to have been absolutely crucial in saving this republic....
Waging Battle, Building Peace: The Paradox Confronting the Democrats (6104 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler Confronting the Paradox The goal is no less than to defeat the evil that, in recent years,...
The Dems’ First Step on Iraq: The Kind of Hearings We Need (6422 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler WHERE CHICKENS COME TO ROOST The Democrats need to achieve two things with respect to the mess in Iraq: 1)...
When Failure is Better than Success: What Americans, and the World, Owe to the Disaster in Iraq (9311 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler There can be no doubt that the failed American invasion of Iraq has been a terrible thing. Because of...
Related Articles:
Tomgram: Elizabeth de la Vega, Bringing Bush to Court (8897 Hits)
by Tom Engelhardt Keep in mind, I've run Tomdispatch.com for only a few years, but I've been a book editor in mainstream publishing for over 30...
Bringing the "Perps," Bush and Cheney, to Justice (5455 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler A Review of U.S. v. Bush By Elizabeth de la Vega According to President Bush, Saddam Hussein was brought to...
Bringing Africa Together: The Unsung Triumph of George W. Bush (6478 Hits)
by Chris Floyd You know, we give George W. Bush a lot of good-natured guff around here – strictly for fun, of course, in the spirit of...
Nancy & Harry: Bringing Down the House (and Senate) (4594 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Vice President Cheney says he doesn’t have to obey the law relating to national security records held in the executive ...
Bringing Die-hard War Supporters and Feckless War Opponents to Their Knees (4157 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler I was reminded of my mid-1960s high school days in conservative Lebanon, Pennsylvania, when I read that Senator John...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment

a guest said:

0
Chief coffee maker
Impeachment is a must-do for the sake of the country, and the sooner the better!
We must not let the precedent of Nixon's pardon continue. We must set up the strongest, possible defense against further tyrany. If we allow Bush to get away with what he has done so far, every like minded president to follow will use his example as an excuse. We must set the message in stone: Any president who breaks the law will be subject to the full weight of prosecution and penalties.
Impeachement will not hurt America, it will make us stronger. We wll once again become a nation of laws and law abiding citizens. We wll become a people who not only believe that no one is above the law, but we will have an example to point to for all time.
We will be able to say to every crook and crooked politcian: "Everybody, even the President is answerable to the law". It will no longer matter who you are, but what you did wrong that counts.
 
January 17, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
One thing is certain:
Bush didn't tap Alito and Roberts for the Supremes because they were world-class legal scholars.

Start thinking about why those guys were tapped and you end up worrying that Bush may already be unstoppable. If Bush knows he's unstoppable and plans therefore to govern by decree (executive orders and signing statements), that would explain why Bush doesn't seem to care about the ass-whuppin' the GOP got from voters last November.
 
January 18, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top