Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

22

Jan

2007

Carlotta Gall Asks "Where Is Mulla Omar?" And Gets Punched In The Face For Her Efforts
Monday, 22 January 2007 22:06
by Winter Patriot

Journalist Carlotta Gall has been asking tough questions in Pakistan, and she has the bruises to show for it. In Rough treatment for 2 journalists she describes being attacked by Pakistani intelligence agents.
My photographer, Akhtar Soomro, and I were followed over several days of reporting in Quetta by plainclothes intelligence officials who were posted at our respective hotels.

That is not unusual in Pakistan, where accredited journalists are free to travel and report, but their movements, phone calls and interviews are often monitored.

On our fifth and last day in Quetta, Dec. 19, four plainclothesmen detained Soomro at his hotel in the downtown area and seized his computer and photographic equipment. They raided my hotel room that evening, using a key card to open the door and then breaking through the chain that I had locked from the inside. They seized a computer, notebooks and a cellphone.

One agent punched me twice in the face and head and knocked me to the floor. I was left with bruises on my arms, temple and cheekbone, swelling on my eye and a sprained knee. One of the men told me that I was not permitted to visit Pashtunabad, a neighborhood in Quetta, and that it was forbidden to interview Taliban members.
Carlotta Gall's offense? She was asking questions like: Are Pakistani intelligence agencies promoting Islamic insurgency?

The government of Pakistan vehemently rejects the allegation and insists that it is fully committed to helping U.S. and NATO forces prevail against the Taliban militants who were driven from power in Afghanistan in 2001.

But Western diplomats in both countries and Pakistani opposition figures say that Pakistani intelligence agencies — in particular the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence and Military Intelligence — have been supporting a Taliban restoration, motivated not only by Islamic fervor but also by a longstanding view that the jihadist movement allows them to assert greater influence on Pakistan's vulnerable western flank.

More than two weeks of reporting along this frontier, including dozens of interviews with residents on each side of the porous border, leaves little doubt that Quetta is an important base for the Taliban.

There are many signs that Pakistani authorities are encouraging the insurgents, if not sponsoring them.
The "signs" consist of anecdotal evidence, told in fearful whispers:
At Jamiya Islamiya, a religious school here in Quetta, Taliban sympathies are on flagrant display, and residents say students have gone with their teachers' blessings to die in suicide bombings in Afghanistan.

Three families whose sons had died as suicide bombers in Afghanistan said they were afraid to talk about the deaths because of pressure from Pakistani intelligence agents. Local people say dozens of families have had sons die as suicide bombers and fighters in Afghanistan.

One former Taliban commander said in an interview that he had been jailed by Pakistani intelligence officials because he would not go to Afghanistan to fight. He said that, for Western and local consumption, his arrest had been billed as part of Pakistan's crackdown on the Taliban in Pakistan. Former Taliban members who have refused to fight in Afghanistan have been arrested — or even mysteriously killed — after resisting pressure to re-enlist in the Taliban, Pakistani and Afghan tribal elders said.

"The Pakistanis are actively supporting the Taliban," declared a Western diplomat in an interview in Kabul. He said he had seen an intelligence report of a recent meeting on the Afghan border between a senior Taliban commander and a retired colonel of the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence.
The history goes way back.
The Pakistani military and intelligence services have for decades used religious parties as a convenient instrument to keep domestic political opponents at bay and for foreign policy adventures, said Husain Haqqani, a former adviser to several of Pakistan's prime ministers and the author of a book on the relationship between the Islamists and the Pakistani security forces.

The religious parties recruited for the jihad in Kashmir and Afghanistan from the 1980s, when the Pakistani intelligence agencies ran the resistance by the mujahedeen and channeled money to them from the United States and Saudi Arabia to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, Haqqani said.

In return for help in Kashmir and Afghanistan the intelligence services would rig votes for the religious parties and allow them freedom to operate, he said. "The religious parties provide them with recruits, personnel, cover and deniability," Haqqani said in a telephone interview from Washington, where he is now a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

The Inter-Services Intelligence once had an entire wing dedicated to training jihadis, he said. Today the religious parties probably have enough of their own people to do the training, but, he added, the Inter-Services Intelligence so thoroughly monitors phone calls and people's movements that it would be almost impossible for any religious party to operate a training camp without its knowledge.

"They trained the people who are at the heart of it all, and they have done nothing to roll back their protégés," Haqqani said.
Some of the evidence is much more visible:
Hamid Gul, the former director general of Pakistani intelligence, remains a public and unapologetic supporter of the Taliban, visiting madrasas and speaking in support of jihad at graduation ceremonies.
Big surprise! The civilians who dared to speak with Carlotta Gall have been visited by Pakistani intelligence, according to this report:
It has become clear that intelligence agents copied data from our computers, notebooks and cellphones and have tracked down contacts and acquaintances in Quetta. All the people I interviewed were subsequently visited by intelligence agents, and local journalists who helped me were later questioned by Pakistan's intelligence service, the Inter-Services Intelligence.

[Photographer Akhtar] Soomro has been warned not to work for The New York Times or any other foreign news organization.
Of course the obvious question is:

If Pakistan is not providing assistance to the Taliban, why would ISI agents assault a reporter who asked questions about the relationship, and why would they intimidate anyone who dared to speak to her?

A report from The Times of India contains a few additional details: Civilians on the border fear ISI
Carlotta Gall, a New York Times correspondent, who was manhandled and punched on December 19 by Pakistani agents who broke into her hotel room in Quetta, said Pakistanis and Afghans interviewed on the frontier — frightened by the long reach of Pakistan's intelligence agencies, spoke only with assurances that they would not be named. Even then, they spoke cautiously.

Despite this, they were visited by the ISI because the goons who broke into her hotel room copied data from the computers, notebooks and cellphones they seized, and tracked down her contacts and acquaintances.

They have been lucky not to have been killed so far because the ISI has a built a hideous reputation for bumping off people they see as being inimical to hardline Pakistani interests.

Some months back, Hayatullah Khan, a Pakistani journalist who exposed as lie the Pakistan military's claim of an attack on a terror camp (which was actually conducted by the US) was killed in cold blood. Several other journalists have been killed since the trend began with the unsolved murder of Daniel Pearl.

Gall also wrote that a dirty war is building between Afghan and Pakistani intelligence agencies. An Afghan intelligence official told her that one of its informers in Pakistan was recently killed and dumped in pieces in Peshawar. Gall's story quoted the brother of a Pakistani jehadi saying, "All Taliban are ISI Taliban. It is not possible to go to Afghanistan without ISI help."
How about that?

The Pakistani Foreign Ministry denies everything but provides no information: Taliban Chief Said Likely in Afghanistan
Taliban leader Mullah Omar is likely based in southern Afghanistan and leading the resurgent Islamic militia from there, Pakistan's Foreign Ministry said Monday. A spokeswoman for the Pakistani Foreign Ministry said that Omar's exact whereabouts remain unknown.

"But generally the likely scenario is that he is in Kandahar, from where he is marshaling his troops," spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said at a news conference, referring to a city in southern Afghanistan.

Aslam's comments follow claims by Afghan officials that a captured spokesman for the Taliban militia told interrogators that Omar was living in the southwestern Pakistani city of Quetta and that he was protected by Pakistan's ISI intelligence service. The purported Taliban spokesman, Mohammad Hanif, was arrested last week in eastern Afghanistan.
And there's more here: Fugitive Mullah Omar leaves only a trail of devotees
More from this author:
Tony Blair Makes a Donation -- to a Government including an International Terrorist (7175 Hits)
by Winter Patriot Tony Blair went to Pakistan last weekend with a quarter of a billion pounds in his back pocket and high hopes of making a...
Foiled German Terror Plot Was A Joke? (6022 Hits)
by Winter Patriot According to the BBC, the NYT, CNN, and many other sources, German officials announced on Monday that they had foiled a...
The Alleged "Liquid Bombing" Plot Revisited -- Maybe It Was Possible After All (8025 Hits)
by Winter Patriot As described in media reports of the day, the alleged "liquid bombing" plot which was allegedly foiled during the...
Double Standards in the Phony War: Small Errors Cost Big Bucks, but Enormous Lies Remain Standing (6587 Hits)
by Winter Patriot Here's something you don't see every day! Papers compensate man wrongly implicated in alleged bomb plot: A group...
Happy 65th Birthday -- Now Will You Please Retire? (5941 Hits)
Sixty-five years ago today, on December 7th, 1941, Japanese pilots bombed the American naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. World War II had...
Related Articles:
Putin Gets Mugged in Finland (6936 Hits)
By Mike Whitney Most people won’t pay any attention to this week’s energy summit in Lahti, Finland, but they should. It is particularly...
"Where Commerce Sits on Every Tree" Pushing India Toward a Dollar Democracy (6217 Hits)
By Aseem Shrivastava In an article concerned with the rapid urbanization of India and China, Victor Mallet of London's Financial ...
This is where George Bush gets dangerous (5219 Hits)
By Ahmed Amr We now have six years of evidence that George Bush is not all there. The occupant of the White House has consistently...
This, Pat Robertson, Is How a Nation Gets Punished for Its Sins (4440 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler You’re right, Pat, that nations pay a price for their sins. But – even disregarding the question of which sins...
Canadian Military Interferes with Killer Whale Recovery Strategy - Federal Government could face lawsuit over further delays (7066 Hits)
VANCOUVER, BC (Pacific Free Press) – After nearly a year of unlawful delays, the latest caused by the Canadian military, environmental groups...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (4)add comment

a guest said:

0
Carlotta Gall, Mulla Omar, and the Pakistani ISI
Winter Patriot's post, like journalist Carlotta Gall, are nibbling towards the core question that Daniel Pearl was chasing after at the time of his kidnapping and murder: what was (is) the connection between the Pakistani ISI and the 9/11 highjacking attack? For readers willing to delve into the convoluted twists and turns of the decades long incestuous relationship between the CIA/DIA, the ISI, al Queda, and the Taliban, try Steven Coll's detailed history in his book entitled Ghost Wars (a comprehensive tome well worthy of a Pulitzer).

What with the invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003, and all the horrendous and shameful bloody events flowing from that act of naked military aggression, it is easy for Americans to ignore or forget key details of the immediate run up to our attack upon Afghanistan back in the fall of 2001. The US media glossed key details over at the time, caught up as they of course were in their breathless drive to cover the big story of the big US air strikes and the imminent big boots special forces operation that was going into Afghanistan, the land that neither the colonial Brits nor the commie Soviets could ever tame.

First, literally within days of 9/11, Colin Powell and everybody at the White House assured us all that there was absolutely no evidence of "state involvement" by any foreign intelligence service in the attacks on New York and Washington. This was accompanied with some very serious behind-the-scenes arm twisting of Pres. Mushariff's arms to enlist Pakistan as a key, largely unwilling ally in the US GWOT. The head of the ISI (who was physically visiting DC on the morning of the 9/11 attacks to confer with George Tenet) took a hasty and unexpected early retirement back into private life while the rubble at ground zero was still smoldering.

Second, with Pakistan on board, the White House and Secretary Powell issued a stark ultimatum to Mulla Omar's government in October, 2001, demanding that the Taliban immediately turn over Osama bin Laden - and all his followers - and dismantle all the training camps and madrassas within Afghanistan that had built up over the previous 25 years, to avoid bombing and rude regime change courtesy of Uncle Sam. Pakistan carried the messages back and forth between the two sides.

All the wise insider international relations pundits on the TV knew the Islamic radical Mulla Omar would tell George Bush to blow off. But surprize! The Taliban leader gave a positive diplomatic response to what any sane person should recognize lay at the real heart of this life-or-death matter: Mullah Omar acknowledged Osama was in Afghanistan as his guest, and responded that he WOULD depart from historic Islamic practice, and withdraw his country's continued hospitality. The Taliban regime offered to oust Osama, with safe passage to a "neutral" Muslim country willing to accept him. There were some media reports that Pakistan even offered to fulfill this "neutral state" role.

This unexpected conciliatory response to the American ultimatum (a response that opened the way to perhaps try Osama bin Laden as an international war criminal) was perfunctorily rejected out-of-hand, and with great rhetorical bluster, by the Bush White House.

We aren't gonna get involved in no long, drawn out negotiations.

You're either with us or against us.

What about Zahwahiri, the training camps, and all those madrassas?

Not only did the US State Department slap down an olive branch offer that might actually subject Osama to the rule of international law, but the offeror - Mulla Omar - was himself simultaneously put on the "Wanted Dead or Alive" list, right alongside Osama bin Laden. So much for diplomacy.

Turn him over so's we can lynch him in Times Square.

The gloves are coming off.

We're gonna smoke him outa his cave, 'cause here comes shock and awe!

The story of the Bush White House/CIA/DIA relationship with the Pakistani ISI in the summer and fall of 2001 is buried among the deeply classified pages still withheld from all the official reports to the Congress and to the 911 Commission.

And you don't have to be a conspiracy monger to see how asking questions like those that got Daniel Pearl beheaded in 2001 just might provoke "rough treatment" of other nosey western journalists like Ms. Gall and her photographer even today.

 
January 23, 2007
Votes: +0

Winter Patriot said:

Winter Patriot
Excellent Comment!!
Thank you very much for adding all this background info.

Cheers

WP
 
January 23, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
Tough Questions
Why is it journalists always ask tough questions abroad, but never here in the US? Fly Carlotta Gall to Washington. This is where we need her (journalists generally) to risk getting punched in the face.
 
January 23, 2007
Votes: +0

al said:

0
none
mullah omar is half blinded big liar of end of life
 
November 12, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top