Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sun

28

Jan

2007

Friendly Fire? Another Look at Brazen Raid in Iraq
Sunday, 28 January 2007 23:02
by Chris Floyd

Raid in Iraq that killed 4 soldiers may be boldest yet (Associated Press)

In perhaps the boldest and most sophisticated attack in four years of warfare, gunmen speaking English, wearing U.S. military uniforms and carrying American weapons abducted four U.S. soldiers last week at the provincial headquarters in the Shiite holy city of Karbala and then shot them to death…

The brazen assault, 50 miles south of Baghdad, was conducted by nine to 12 gunmen posing as a U.S. security team, the military confirmed. The attackers traveled in black GMC Suburbans — the type used by U.S. government convoys — had American weapons, wore new U.S. military combat fatigues, and spoke English, according to senior U.S. military and Iraqi officials.

I.
Has anyone considered the possibility that these gunmen dressed as Americans, speaking English, driving American-style security vehicles and carrying American weapons were, well, Americans? Given the Pentagon's never-repudiated plan to foment terrorism to achieve the Bush Regime's geopolitical objectives; given the fact that Iraq is filled with private military "contractors," some of whom are almost certainly on retainer to U.S. security organs for various bits of "wetwork" and other ops on what Dick Cheney calls "the dark side"; given that we are already being told that the people who carried out this killing were "Iranian operatives" or Iraqis funded, armed and trained by same; and given the fact that the Bush Regime is now openly seeking any half-plausible pretext to launch its long-planned attack on Iran – would it not be irresponsible of us not to speculate on the ultimate origin of this bloody strike?

After all, who benefits from such a raid? All those who want more war and chaos in Iraq. This desire is not exclusive to the Bush Regime, of course – but the latter are definitely the beneficiaries of continued bloodshed, as it justifies their current policies, obscures past policies --  their deep-dyed crime against humanity in launching the war in the first place -- and it will most definitely be used to justify future policies: the "surge," the coming hellstorm of intensified urban warfare in Baghdad and the attack on Iran.

The obvious benefits that accrue to the Bush gang from this atrocity don't necessarily mean they are responsible for it; but it certainly puts them in the frame along with several other suspects.

II.
But let us say, for argument's sake, that the "official" story now being cobbled together is true: that the raid was carried out by the Mahdi Army forces of Shiite cleric Motqada al-Sadr. (Of course, to carry out this thought-exercise, we must put aside the fact that Sadr – who holds the balance of power in the Bush-backed Iraqi government in his hands, and who has been told by the government which is dependent upon him to have his troops lie low for a spell, while Bush feeds his "surge" fodder into the meat grinder in hopes of a temporary PR boost – would get no discernible benefit from such a brazen provocation, but could definitely be hurt in a number of ways if he were tied to it.)

But let us go forward. If Sadr's forces did it, then this too is an instance of "friendly fire" – because the Mahdi Army not only receives arms from Iran; many of its troops are even now being armed, trained, paid and deployed by the United States. They control whole units of the Iraqi military and other Iraqi security forces – the very forces whose close cooperation with U.S. troops is absolutely essential for the successs of the "surge," or indeed, of the entire American "mission" in Iraq. Or so we're told, at least.

Although Sadr opposes the American presence in Iraq as fiercely as he opposed the regime of Saddam Hussein, he has been brought into the Bush-backed "sovereign" Iraqi government, and his support was the key element that allowed Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to form the government. Sadr's troops have filled the ranks of Iraq's security forces, which they are using to conduct a sectarian war and carry out murderous "ethnic cleansing" operations.

One of the main thrusts of Bush's "surge" plan is that U.S. forces will soon be directly engaging the Mahdi Army. Thus American troops will be fighting against a sectarian militia that has in part been armed and trained by American troops. What's more, these "surging" Americans will be fighting alongside Mahdi Army troops that have infiltrated the official Iraqi army.

George W. Bush has put U.S. soldiers – the ones he and his sycophants claim so loudly to "support" – into a circular firing squad, where they will, in effect, be killed with their own weapons. All questions of moral equivalency aside, you would have to go back to Nazi Germany to find a major power whose leaders act in such a howlingly stupid and self-destructive fashion.

For more on the Mahdi Army's penetration of the Bush-trained Iraqi army, see the Guardian report by the remarkable Ghaith Abdul-Ahad, who is virtually the only Western reporter who is able to report from "behind the lines" on the insurgency and the militias'

The Kidnapper's Story (Guardian)
Excerpts: Fadhel and other Mahdi Army commanders describe an intimate relationship with Iraqi security services, especially the commandos of the Iraqi interior ministry. He says the Mahdi Army often uses these official forces in conducting its own operations against Sunni "terrorists".

"We have specific units that we work with where members of the Mahdi Army are in command. We conduct operations together. We can't ask any army unit to come with us, we just ask the units that are under the control of our men.The police are all under our control, we ask them to help or inform them that shooting will take place in a street and it involves the Mahdi Army, and that's it."

In one operation Fadhel took part in last summer, Iraqi interior ministry commandos attacked a Sunni area in Dora called "Arab Jubour". The raid involved 28 pickup trucks, he told me. Of them 16 were ministry of interior, the rest Mahdi Army.

The new Bush plan to secure Baghdad gives a major role to the Iraqi army and police units in securing Baghdad. Few in the city expect that these predominantly Shia forces will seriously challenge their fellow Shia.
More from this author:
Immaculate Conception: A Squirt in the White House (13695 Hits)
George W. Bush's innumerable sycopants like to potray him as a down-to-earth man of the people: a man's man, tough and fearless, a good-ole-boy...
Thunder on the Mountain: The Murderers of Democracy (11757 Hits)
“Shame on your greed, shame on your wicked schemes. I tell you this right now, I don’t give a damn about your dreams.” -- Bob Dylan,...
War in Heaven: Woodward's Book and the Establishment Insurgency (12468 Hits)
Bob Woodward has long been the voice of the American Establishment – or of certain quadrants of it, at any rate. When Richard Nixon's...
Swing Blades: Don Rumsfeld Bats Both Ways (10338 Hits)
In February 2003, I wrote a column for the Moscow Times detailing Don Rumsfeld's personal – and profitable – connection with North Korea's...
Red October: Killing the Truth in Moscow (11731 Hits)
I. Early October can be dismal in Moscow. The short, harsh summer is over, the brief and beautiful refreshment of September has passed,...
Related Articles:
Dear Dubya: The Iraq Solution! (9821 Hits)
Hey there Georgie Boy, long time no speak. From what I’ve been hearing, you’ve had a rough time as of late. As always, I’m here to help. So...
Why Bush Smiles: Victory is at Hand in Iraq (11877 Hits)
Despite George W. Bush's ostentatious bucking up of the Iraqi government yesterday, it is very likely that there will indeed be an...
U.S. Service Academy Graduates Unite Against Illegal Iraq War (12112 Hits)
Atlantic Free Press Netherlands – (October 26, 2006) – The overwhelming response by alumni of United States service academies to the...
Is Another Recession Looming? Growth Slows, Housing Fizzles (6071 Hits)
By Seth Sandronsky U.S. economic growth rose at an annual rate of 1.6 percent in July–September, the slowest in more than three...
The New Media Offensive for the Iraq War (10280 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The American media establishment has launched a major offensive against the option of withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. ...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (5)add comment

a guest said:

0
Argument II better than I
Both arguments importantly pointed out that things aren't always what they appear to be. The idea of Americans dressing up as Americans for the purpose of blaming Iran doesn't work for me. It sounds like the author is trying too hard to villify the US.

I'm curious how the troops are managing the threat of "friendly" fire.
 
January 29, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
Argument I
To justify a war the US would need a more significant attack on their own, so I agree this is unlikely to be American on American, though one shouldn't entirely discount competitive rivalries among regular troops and US mercenaries, the latter often not being much more than organized criminals.

 
January 29, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
Seeing American calls to murder Iranians scares the sht out of me as an expat-Iranian. I don't want a holocaust against Iranians.
 
January 29, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
Canadian
Yeah! not to healthy to be an Iranian in the ME these days. Call yourself a Canadian! It seems to work for most Americans traveling around the planet . smilies/grin.gif
 
January 29, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
A third way to look at it
Maybe it was Americans disguised as Americans. Maybe a Shiite death squad linked to Moktada's militia. Or maybe the kidnapping and execution of four American soldiers by fake American soldiers driving General Motors SUV's was a signal of what's in store, a taste of the tactical response to George Bush's big upcoming surge into Sadr City and other Baghdad neighborhoods that are anti-American, anti-Maliki strongholds.

Please note that the bold, sophisticated Karbala operation took place at the same time that mortar and rocket attacks into the "secure" Green Zone are also on the rise, along with reports of successful assaults upon US helicopters using shoulder-fired weponry like the Stinger missles the CIA long provided to Afghan mujadaheen for use against the evil Russian occupation forces.

These disturbing recent field developments may be coincidental. They may however be a sign of trends to come. Welcome back to Baghdad, General Patraeus.

Urban guerilla warfare against an unpopular occupying force insures that the local civilians will always have superior day-to-day intelligence, particularly when the "friendly" Iraqi military and police forces are tasked to fight alongside the western infidel outsiders. Those indigenous forces are riddled with double agents and casual informers, most of whom understandably hold stronger allegiance to various (often competing) insurgency factions than their current mission.

The inherent imbalance of snitches created a perpetual, horrendous security problem for US ground operations throughout the Vietnam war, especially when search & destroy & secure & hold was supposed to be coordinated with our South Vietnamese allies. The Iraq occupation promises to be many times more Byzantine, and much more dangerously worse.

Friendly fire? Sorry to be a pessimist, but when 85% of the grassroots wants US troops pulled out yesterday and over 60% consider it moral to shoot Americans on sight, please tell me how a surge in violence in Baghdad will win friends and influence people.

If the Karbala false flag murders and other foreboding developments foreshadow what's likely to come, when the surge surges into Sadr City expect the Mahdi army to temporarily melt away like good guerilla warriors usually do, popping back up along the supply routes from Kuwait, the air corridors, and right inside those sanitized, Americanized security bubble military installations that haven't been much targeted before. And the White House will try to pin it on Iran.

 
January 29, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top