Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Bush and Cheney hyped the terrorist threat
Saturday, 28 February 2009 09:48
by Dennis Jett
Dennis Jett, a former U.S. ambassador to Mozambique and Peru, is a professor of international affairs at Penn State's School of International Affairs. His most recent book is "Why American Foreign Policy Fails: Unsafe at Home and Despised Abroad."

Did George W. Bush really keep us safe after 9-11?

Those who try to construct a positive legacy from his eight years in power claim that as a major accomplishment. They argue the absence of a terrorist attack during the 2,688 days he was in office following 9-11 proves the effectiveness of his policies and is all that's needed to justify them.

They're wrong. Three other conclusions should be drawn from the failure of terrorists to strike at the U.S. again.

- First, terrorism isn't as big a threat as the Bush administration made it out to be.
- Second, there eventually will be another attack, because the thuggish tactics of the Bush administration have made one inevitable.
- Finally, no president can prevent any and all attacks, and we shouldn't expect absolute protection from terrorism.

Despite the horrific events of 9-11, terrorism was never that big a threat to the homeland. Al-Qaida attracted a limited number of fanatics and had very little capacity to mount operations outside the Middle East. Once Afghanistan's Taliban government was removed, al-Qaida lost its operating base and much of its ability to do anything but run for cover.

That didn't prevent hysterical editorials such as the one from a State Department official (who happened to be Vice President Dick Cheney's daughter) claiming that America faced an existential threat. Just think of it. A handful of fanatics supposedly could end life as we know it. Who knew that the world's only superpower was so vulnerable, and its very existence so precarious?

That overwrought view prevailed in Washington because in the aftermath of 9-11, the officials there were like kids at camp gathered around a fire telling scary stories. No scenario was too far-fetched, and no government action was excessive or illegal in their minds if it somehow would make us safer.

The government overreaction started with Cheney in his bunker on that fateful day, ordering a fighter plane without weapons to shoot down an airliner that didn't exist on the basis of authority he didn't have. Then came Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, torture, rendition, our own secret gulag and more. Such tactics, accompanied by pronouncements about democracy, human rights and the rule of law, only demonstrated to the rest of the world that America was as hypocritical as it was powerful.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.


Neoconservatives think that being the strongest country in the world means being able to impose our will wherever and whenever we feel like it. What it really means is that we're the largest target, as well as the largest economy and the strongest military power.

Timothy McVeigh blew up the federal building in Oklahoma City with some fuel oil, fertilizer and a rented truck. That, plus fanaticism and a total disregard for the lives of innocent people, is all that's required to be a terrorist. There've been many such people in the past, and there will be more in the future. The tactics employed in the so-called war on terror have added to their ranks and ensured that it's only a matter of time until the next attack.

A president cannot protect everyone in America from rapists, serial killers or other criminals. How is he supposed to prevent every possible act of terrorism? And if there is one, is his term in office a failure? What kind of Stalinist police state at home and aggression abroad would be necessary to provide total security? Would it require government intrusion into the lives of all Americans and the targeting of especially dangerous groups such as journalists? A whistleblower who worked for the National Security Agency claims that's already happened.

That gives no pause to the chorus of conservative cowards demanding total security. They abhor the idea of a "mommy" government and believe the free market is the only protection needed from contaminated food, unsafe products or financial scams. Yet they insist on the need for a "daddy" government that will keep them safe from any terrorist threat.

The reality is no president can guarantee our safety from all terrorist acts, anymore than he or she can protect us from a hurricane. So get used to living with the idea that terrorism is a possibility, because there never will be a final victory over a tactic.

Comfort yourself, however, with the thought that becoming a victim of it is about as likely as seeing George W. Bush on Mount Rushmore. 

More from this author:
The Iraq reality: No way forward (5340 Hits)
by Dennis C. Jett The year 2007 undoubtedly will bring its share of unexpected events. But here is one that should catch...
Get out - now (4563 Hits)
by Dennis Jett Despite all the rhetoric and resolutions emanating from Washington, two fundamental facts about the war in Iraq won't...
Expect no World War III for now (3965 Hits)
by Dennis Jett Everybody relax. We are not going to bomb Iran. The reason why we are not is obvious. But because it does not add ...
What YouTube doesn't show - YouTube spread news of Florida's Taser incident fast. But instant media doesn't always tell the whole story. (5681 Hits)
by Dennis Jett If a picture is worth a thousand words, how many are conveyed by a video tape? Whatever the number, it is not always enough...
Patriot Act (3780 Hits)
by Dennis Jett Why is it that those who proclaim their patriotism the loudest often demonstrate the least understanding of what this country...
Related Articles:
The Bush Magical Mystery Political Capital Tour (14062 Hits)
The Bush War Cabinet is invoking the memory of 9/11 as justification for their systematic shredding of constitutional and human...
Why Bush wants immunity from prosecution for war crimes (244543 Hits)
Although not as widely remarked as the elimination of habeas rights and the consecration of torture, the recently passed Senate torture legislation...
You and What Army? Bush Legions Starting to "Unravel" (15857 Hits)
Is it possible the largest and most advanced military in the history of the universe is ready to bust? According to General Barry McCaffrey (ret.)...
"Boiling Point" - Eroding Freedom: From John Adams to George W. Bush (18661 Hits)
Put a frog into a pot of boiling water, the well-known parable begins, and out that frog will jump to escape the obvious danger. Put that same...
Why Bush Smiles: Victory is at Hand in Iraq (15101 Hits)
Despite George W. Bush's ostentatious bucking up of the Iraqi government yesterday, it is very likely that there will indeed be an...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123