Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sat

21

Mar

2009

George Galloway - What has happened to my country?
Saturday, 21 March 2009 22:56
by Richard Kastelein - Publisher, Atlantic Free Press

Having been an expat for more than 20 years - I have only spent a few years in Canada since 1987 - I missed the countries' transition to conservatism... for the greater part.

Stephen Harper, Bush's Enfant terrible - and his band of corporate cronies - have always seemed like an overspill of American Conservatism creeping north and I always had enough faith in the sensible people of Canada to control the beast and vote out the selfish, xenophobic, vermin that prey on fear and use it to push their political agenda.

But I knew things had changed when I came home one trip about a decade ago to British Columbia for a visit and dad was reading the Toronto Globe and Mail. Apparently it was the last vestige of progressive rhetoric in the country. It was a paper he would not wipe his ass with ten years earlier. He said there was virtually no progressive mainstream media left in B.C. and he found himself buying a newspaper from the other side of the country just to get away from the incessant pounding of the conservatives in the provincial media. I was surprised.

How things change.

I grew up with Hippie-ish' Left Coast parents... lots of land, lots of peace - There was a wonderful blend of socio-anarchism in my house - enough leftie values to understand the collective and how we had to share as humans and enough anarchy to understand that government should not be telling people what to read, watch, or what to listen too... along with a healthy resistance to idea of collectivism in the form of a 1984 or Brave New World... we lived a kind of golden centre between despotism and anarchy.

I grew up Canadian - and was kinda' proud of it - in a quiet, personal, modest way.

But I really feel shocked today. And ashamed in a way. What has happened to my country?

It appears that Canada’s pro-war, conservative immigration minister, Jason Kenny, has refused George Galloway entry to the country to give a series of speeches.

Banning George Galloway? Wait... from Canada? I thought the nightmare was ending with the exit of Bush.

A commenter at Common Dreams summed up the surge of feelings I had today quite well.

I am a citizen of a country I don't recognize anymore.
A country where war criminals are invited to speak and peace activists are barred from speaking.
A country where the national police execute confused immigrants at the airport.
A country full of consumers, not citizens.
A complicit population to the Great Leader's manipulation of Parliament and lawbreaking.
A country that has become the most belligerent climate change denier on the planet, eager to run interference for the Bush agenda.
A country that is the world's worst GHG pollution source.
A country willing to serve up its young men upon the altars of greed and oil.
A country eager to embrace all the worst of our southern neighbour, lurching toward more violence, more militarism, more surveillance, more police-state thuggery, more of the same failed policies.


I have today seriously reconsidered the idea of moving my Dutch wife and daughters back to Canada. We have been thinking about if for a couple of years - moving from Holland back to the land of my birth... for the fresh air, for the green... for the sheer space that this flat, chock-full, overdeveloped country of the Netherlands just does not have.

But I refuse to move anywhere where conservative values fuel the government and media - those of fear and not curiosity, those of greed and not generosity, those of hate and not love.

Why oh why is my home, my birth home... the abode of my cousins and uncles and aunts and grandparents and nieces and nephews... going backwards!?

I actually feel pain thinking about it.

The rejection of Galloway is a watershed moment for me.

There's a fight that needs to be fought...  I am going to start paying attention to what's happening at 'home' and that I mean Canada. And I am going to ensure that more progressive news and opinion about Canada is carried in Atlantic Free Press.

While everyone around the globe in the progressive movement has been watching in horror eight years of neocon, conservative hell in the USA for eight years, Canada has suffered some kind of coup - media, government... for sure, but I pray not our national psyche.

Let me leave you with Galloway's reaction on the ban in video:



and text from the Guardian today:

Canada Can't Muzzle Me

To ban me from the country for my views on Afghanistan is absurd, hypocritical, and in vain

by George Galloway

The Canadian immigration minister Jason Kenney gazetted in the Sun yesterday morning that I was to be excluded from his country because of my views on Afghanistan. That's the way the rightwing, last-ditch dead-enders of Bushism in Ottawa conduct their business.

Kenney is quite a card. A quick trawl establishes he's a gay-baiter, gung-ho armchair warrior, with an odd habit of exceeding his immigration brief. Three years ago he attacked the pro-western Lebanese prime minister, Fuad Siniora, for being ungrateful to Canada for its support of Israeli bombardment of his country. Most curiously of all, in 2006 he addressed a rally of the so-called People's Mujahideen of Iran, a Waco-style cult, banned in the European Union as a terrorist organization. On one level being banned by such a man is like being told to sit up straight by the hunchback of Notre Dame or being lectured on due diligence by Conrad Black. On another, for a Scotsman to be excluded from Canada is like being turned away from the family home.

But what are my views on Afghanistan which the Canadian government does not want its people to hear? I've never been to Afghanistan, nor have I ever met a Taliban, but my first impression into the parliamentary vellum on the subject was more than two decades ago. At the time the fathers of the Taliban were "freedom fighters", paraded at US Republican and British Tory conferences. Who knows, maybe even the Canadian right extolled these god-fearing opponents of communism. I did not, however.

On the eve of their storming of Kabul I told Margaret Thatcher that she "had opened the gates to the barbarians" and that "a long, dark night would now descend upon the people of Afghanistan". With the same conviction, I say to the Canadian and other NATO governments today that your policy is equally a profound mistake. From time to time and with increased regularity it is a crime. Like the bombardment of wedding parties and even funerals or the presiding over a record opium crop, which under our noses finds its way coursing through the veins of young people from Nova Scotia to Newcastle upon Tyne. But it is worse than a crime, as Tallyrand said, it's a blunder.

The Afghans have never succumbed to foreign occupation, heaven knows the British empire tried, tried and failed again. Not even Alexander the Great succeeded, and whoever else he is, minister Kenney is no Alexander the Great. Young Canadian soldiers are dying in significant numbers on Afghanistan's plains. Their families are entitled to know how many of us believe this adventure to be similarly doomed and that genuine support for troops - British, Canadian and other - means bringing them home and changing course.

To ban a five-times elected British MP from addressing public events or keeping appointments with television and radio programs is a serious matter. Kenney's "spokesman" told the Sun, "Galloway's not coming in ... end of story." Alas for him, it's not. Canada remains a free country governed by law and my friends are even now seeking a judicial review. And there are other ways I can address those Canadians who wish to hear me.

More than half a century ago Paul Robeson, one of the greatest men who ever lived, was forbidden to enter Canada not by Ottawa but by Washington, which had taken away his passport. But he was still able to transfix a vast crowd of Vancouver's mill hands and miners with a 17-minute telephone concert, culminating in a rendition of the Ballad of Joe Hill. Technology has moved on since then. And so from coast to coast, minister Kenney notwithstanding, I will be heard - one way or another.

More from this author:
Privacy Policy (11325 Hits)
Privacy Policy for V.O.F. Expathos (Atlantic Free Press) V.O.F. EXPATHOS (ATLANTIC FREE PRESS) PRIVACY POLICY Welcome to V.O.F....
Terms of Use (11870 Hits)
V.O.F. Expathos Web Site Agreement The materials that appear on this website are available free of charge. They are published...
About (12478 Hits)
Atlantic Free Press was founded in September 2006 by Publisher Richard Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands and Editor - Journalist Chris...
Advertise (36879 Hits)
To advertise please contact Editor @ atlanticfreepress dot Com ...or use the googleads services here
Help (11868 Hits)
Contact us by email.
Related Articles:
You and What Army? Bush Legions Starting to "Unravel" (11914 Hits)
Is it possible the largest and most advanced military in the history of the universe is ready to bust? According to General Barry McCaffrey (ret.)...
"Boiling Point" - Eroding Freedom: From John Adams to George W. Bush (13113 Hits)
Put a frog into a pot of boiling water, the well-known parable begins, and out that frog will jump to escape the obvious danger. Put that same...
The trial of Saddam Hussein and the coming trials of George W. Bush and Anthony Charles Lynton Blair (6443 Hits)
by Richard Marsden Sunday's announcement of the verdict in the trial of Saddam Hussein and his seven co-defendants was, of course, timed...
What Vote-Theft Conspiracy? (7466 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff, The big losers on Election Day were of course President Bush and the Republican Party, but there was another loser too: the...
What do we do now? (5796 Hits)
by Frank Pitz In the 1972 movie The Candidate, newly (and surprisingly) elected candidate Bill McKay – played by Robert Redford –...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)add comment

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org said:

0
That's precisely why Afghanistan was picked as opposed to Saudi Arabia

I would like to make two observations:

1) The reason for the Canadian descent into police-state conservatism appears to me to be to get her to march in lock-step with the United States in order to facilitate the cementing of the North American Union against the wishes of both nations' peoples. The reason Mexico appears exempt from this is because her peoples will be the ones providing the cheap labor and become the greatest beneficiary of NAU second only to the globalist elite. Each will likely increase their share of wealth at least a hundred fold from what they own today. For the impoverished and indigent to the point of obsenity Mexican peoples, 100 times subsistence can perhaps get them a livelihood. For the banksters, they will come to own the entire industrial/commercial wealth and properties/lands of the new Union through their interlocking relationships with their own globalist organizations like the UN, WB, and IMF, and their commercial banks that hold almost 100% of private and commercial debt of the peoples, and together, it would be no underestimate to suggest that they will end up owning more than 90% of the NAU's real assets and wealth. This transformation simply cannot be opposed efficaciously short of a full scale revolt - for matters are accelarating towards fait accompli. See: http://www.atlanticfreepress.c...rich-.html


2) Mr. Galloway is my close-to-model statesman of modernity. And I salute him for this integrity, his humanity, and his support of the victims of the fabricated war on terror. Therefore, I am also unable to comprehend his incomplete statement above, in which he stops short of taking the thought to its logical forensic conclusion:

"The Afghans have never succumbed to foreign occupation, heaven knows the British empire tried, tried and failed again. Not even Alexander the Great succeeded, and whoever else he is, minister Kenney is no Alexander the Great. Young Canadian soldiers are dying in significant numbers on Afghanistan's plains. Their families are entitled to know how many of us believe this adventure to be similarly doomed and that genuine support for troops - British, Canadian and other - means bringing them home and changing course."

That logical conclusion would be: And this is precisely why Afghanistan was chosen to manufacture World War IV ( http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/04/...world.war/ ) which is intended to last a lifetime.

What other peoples, except the indomitable Afghanis, would have seeded such a continuous bounty of fabricated enemy fodder to fight a lifetime of war against?

Thank you both, for your selfless activism.

Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
 
March 22, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

JS said:

0
...
This Meir Weinsten comes across like nothing more than a street thug with his incessant threats. The JDL is little more than a good squad which attracts bullies and fascists.
 
March 22, 2009
Votes: +1

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top