Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

30

Mar

2009

Best for Obama Not to Talk About the Taliban
Monday, 30 March 2009 09:00
by Jayne Lyn Stahl

Obama's recent decision to escalate troop presence, in Afghanistan, by adding an additional 4,000 troops will be easier to pitch at home, and abroad, if he avoids talking about taking out the Taliban, and sticks to Al Qaeda principally because of the gaping questions as to who has been financing, and training, the Taliban, in Pakistan, over the seven year period before 9/11.

Pakistan was conspicuous in its absence from George W. Bush's laundry list especially in light of the release, in 2007, of a declassified report, by the National Security Archives, which chronicles its role in funding, and arming, the Taliban in the seven years leading up to 9/11. The report also shows who supplied the Taliban with weapons, as well as training.

Documents obtained by the National Security Archive, two years ago, not only demonstrate what we already know, that Pakistan has provided safe haven for Osama bin Laden for years, but also that Islamabad has supported the Taliban not merely in the years prior to the World Trade Center bombing, but in subsequent years, as well. Former president Musharraf himself acknowledged that "There is no doubt that Afghan militants are supported from Pakistani soil." Documents released a week ago indicate, too, that "the Taliban was directly funded, armed and advised by Islamabad itself."

Apart from the obvious that the CIA trained, and equipped, bin Laden when he was one of Ronald Reagan's fierce "freedom fighters," in Afghanistan, during their holy war against the "evil empire" that was the Soviet Union in 1985, Reagan's favorite freedom fighter has become public enemy numero uno under George W. Bush, and now under Barack Obama, though Mr. Bush was busy stuffing the pockets of bin Laden's protegees.

And, as the NSA reported while Musharraf was still at the wheel: "Islamabad denies that it ever provided military support to the Taliban, but the newly-released documents report that in the weeks following the Taliban takeover of Kabul in 1996, Pakistan’s intelligence agency was “supplying the Taliban forces with munitions, fuel, and food.” Pakistan’s Interservice Intelligence Directorate was “using a private sector transportation company to funnel supplies into Afghanistan and to the Taliban forces.” If this is the case, and Pakistan effectively exported trained Taliban fighters to Afghanistan, then the battlefield must inevitably expand from Afghanistan into Pakistan.

And, think about this: while American servicemen and women were in neighboring Afghanistan hunting down the Taliban, Uncle Sam was in bed with General Musharraf and a regime that we now know was working toward a Taliban victory in that country.

Making the Taliban the target of expanded military action in the region opens the U.S. up to logical, and imperative, questions about who is funding the rebels not just in Afghanistan, but in Iran, too. The answer might inspire the kind of international outrage the Obama administration doesn't want, and can ill afford.
More from this author:
Following in the Footsteps... (6171 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The manic warriors, in Washington, are at it again, only now they've found someone who can manage more than one syllable at...
Worldwide Open Season on the Press (8750 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl On an otherwise quiet street in Istanbul, this morning, a 53 year old Turkish citizen of Armenian descent was gunned down...
On Hillary's announcement... (5234 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl You may have read the transcript of a speech given by George McGovern in The Nation last week in which he rightly...
An Open Letter to "The Decider" (5641 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl While the odds are probably better of getting a response from Santa, there are a few things I'd like to say if you can...
"Notes from the Undergrown: State of the Oilman Address" (5610 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The president's speech last night was more important for what it didn't say than for what it did. In an address that could...
Related Articles:
About (12391 Hits)
Atlantic Free Press was founded in September 2006 by Publisher Richard Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands and Editor - Journalist Chris...
They Hate Our Freedom: The Truth about the Military Commissions Act (7722 Hits)
By Aaron Sussman On October 17th, with Dick Cheney, Alberto Gonzales, and Donald Rumsfeld standing behind him, George W. Bush solemnly ...
So the Democrats Won – What About the American Empire? (7074 Hits)
by Shepherd Bliss The Democratic Party prevailed in the Nov. 7 midterm elections. "We’ve just moved out of a straightjacket," a...
“America’s moment in the Middle East is about to end” (7619 Hits)
by Mike Whitney There are no “accidents” in Middle East politics. This week’s assassination of Lebanese Industry Minister, Pierre...
The Rumsfeld Memo: “I was just about to change everything….Really!?!” (7976 Hits)
by Mike Whitney By now, everyone has heard about Rumsfeld’s memo. It was leaked to the New York Times supposedly without Rumsfeld’s...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top