Islamofascism, militant Islam, radical Islam, suicide bombers, jihadis, et. al., occupy the mind of not just the beleaguered Pakistani suffering its categorical imperatives, but also the Western mind worrying about the end of their modern Western Civilization at the hands of some antediluvian 'Ali Baba' barbarians.  In fact, Daniel Pipes had put it thusly: “[It is] Not a Clash of Civilizations, It's a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians.” 
While it is expected that the purveyors of “Imperial Mobilization”  will try to sell the burden of their 'la mission civilisatrice' to the barbarians, it is always a bit inexplicable that the barbarians should, in every generation, young and old, man and woman, also sell the same to their own 'sheep to the slaughter' – except of course if one recalls the perceptive wisdom of Dr. Martin Luther King, whence, the colonized Negro trivially “changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro.”  Even having understood that tortuous colonizing effect which synthesizes voluntary servitude, I am still filled with consternation when I come across Pakistani Negroes pitching the 'white man's burden'. In an empirical modernity when even distant reality is visible to all and sundry, the astute observation of MLK is no consolation: “The tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.” [ibid.]
Take for example, the recent article “Suicide attacks – religious flair!”  by a relatively unknown Pakistani “freelance journalist” which stated: “Radical forces in Pakistan have given a new dimension to suicide attacks in today’s environment by intermixing it with religion and collective tasks. Religious flair concept is borrowed from freedom fighters engaged mostly with US or Israeli security apparatus in Palestine or Iraq”, and went on to analyze the construction of this “new dimension”. This colonists' conceptualization of manufactured reality, borne entirely of seeding circuses of “doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification”  for the benefit of its own Western peoples, as well as for blinding the pending meals to their own slaughter under the Hegelian butcher's knife, is endemic throughout the mainstream newsmedia in Pakistan. And of course, it is also systemic everywhere else, wherever the “Mighty Wurlitzer's”  suzerainty reigns supreme . In this essay I take the bull by the horn and cleave it asunder, yet again – for the 'Negro' disease continues to plague the 'untermenschen' and shows no sign of being contained, never mind eradicated.
The cited article is quite illustrative of fabricated narratives which attempt to give reality to the 'Unbirthday party' of tortuous “Islamofascism” while entirely omitting to recognize its deliberately manufactured roots to create the pretexts for fighting the lifetime of “World War IV” , and therefore, its omissions – the cardinal sin of the vulgar propagandists – cannot be taken lightly. Inadvertent or calculated is immaterial, because, as was duly noted by one more skilled and insightful on matters existential, its utility in modernity to manufacture consent remains unsurpassed
The grotesque fact of the matter is that the following PBS video clip of Zbigniew Brzezinski from 1980, and the February 18, 1980 Time Magazine's description of what the jihadist American National Security Advisor was doing at the Pak-Afghan border “Selling the Carter Doctrine”, are in action triple-replay today in some Hegelian variations:“Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects... totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could have by the most eloquent denunciations.”
- Aldous Huxley
“God is on your side”
Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.
The transcription of that one-minute video clip of not too distant past is revealing of America's covert role in making patsies of the 'untermenschen' without any moral compunction:
News voice over 1980: “US National Security Advisor Brzezinski flew to Pakistan to set about rallying resistance. He wanted to arm the Mujahideen without revealing America's role. On the Afghan border near the Khayber Pass, he urged the Soldiers of God to redouble their efforts”
Brzezinski 1980: “We know of their deep belief in God, and we are confident that their struggle will succeed. That land over there, is yours, you'll go back to it one day, because your fight will prevail, and you'll have your homes and your mosques back again; because your cause is right; God is on your side.” Mujahideens>
Brzezinski 1990s in the studio speaking to the PBS interviewer: “... [garbled] coordinated with the Pakistanis will be to make the Soviets bleed, for as much, as long, as possible.”
Surely, the learned “freelance journalist” does not work for the RAND Corporation as shill for the New World Order, like all the other two-bit 'native-informants' from Pakistan, to not know of such modus operandi?
Surely, the “freelance journalist” is herself not so co-opted as to not realize that when she imaginatively alludes to the “Indian” hand like the Pakistani newsmedia and the ISI routinely parrot: “Or some external elements, like Indian spy agencies protecting their interest, and utilising local hands for logistics and support in orchestrating suicide attacks in urban parts of the country”, that a diabolical 'Jundallah-plusplus' is operational in Pakistan with full cooperation from Pakistan's own military apparatchiks?
Or is it genuinely way past the wit of all Pakistani columnists, purported scholars, lauded think-tankers, career foreign service bureaucrats, military intelligence, and indeed the entire highly paid Pakistani newsmedia, to realize that these manufactured covert-ops are funded by NATO and Pentagon black-ops dollars, and doing to Pakistan from her own soil with suitcases full of dollars, precisely what the CIA-ISI tag-team covertly did to the USSR from the same “PAK” soil not too long ago?
Suitcases full of cash and cultivated “well-placed bureaucrats” for orchestrating covert operations is an old phenomenon in Pakistan as even candidly admitted by a former Director of the ISI in his 1995 memoirs “Profiles of Intelligence” . As an insider to the intelligence apparatus, he observed of the history of American Interventionism in Pakistan:
'Essentially, the US policy configurations vis-a-vis Pakistan have been that of a “master” and not of a “friend”. Oscillating between persuasion and coercion, the US tends to employ all available means to keep Pakistan under watch, pressure and diplomatic subjugation. At times, it has used the 'carrot and stick' of aid, and at others, lashed out threats of economic strangulation or declaring Pakistan a terrorist state.
Pakistan's geostrategic position, nuclear capability, agricultural and technological potential, as well as the Islamic ideological base are matters of vital concern to US policy makers. The US will not and cannot allow Pakistan to govern her own affairs. While Pakistan was still in its infancy, the American hawks pounced upon and hijacked our national interests by building up an exaggerated threat of the former Soviet Union's expansionist designs against Pakistan and their so called 'mad' drive to the warm waters. ...'
Having been trivially made patsies once by selling Pakistan's military the “strategic-depth” snake-oil, the Americans have invented the new boogieman to make patsies of the Negroes once again, for Pakistanis are entirely eager to dance to the tune of the 'white man'. The Director of the ISI further noted of the covert-ops penetration (in Pakistan) by the CIA:
'The CIA is known for adopting various covert and overt means to undermine the integrity of other countries for achieving their own objectives and furthering their 'nefarious' designs. It is equipped with colossal material resources and its men are canny and ruthless in executing their assignments. Their methods in madness include:
a) Espionage and penetration in all areas of interest like defence, foreign affairs, science/technology, developmental programmes, economy, education, and politics. b) Propaganda, disinformation campaigns, subversion, terrorism, psy warfare, assassinations, blackmail, bribes, coercion and intimidation. ...
j) Install CIA agents as presidents, prime ministers, ministers, generals and senior advisors, etc.' (pages 20 – 22)
Therefore, as existential proof of the State itself deceptively abetting such covert-ops in Pakistan today, is simply examining what the already 'well-outed in the Western mainstream' terrorist outfit named 'Jundallah' is doing to beleaguered Iran, our next door Muslim neighbor, even as we speak, and again from the same “PAK” soil, and yet how it is plainly getting away with it, really beyond the sensible wit of rational man to make logical deductions from?
Are these geopolitically driven orchestration of events, while closely spaced in time for which no hard receipts and confessionals can be found until after fait accompli, but which are altogether quite transparently being orchestrated on the Grand Chessboard, really so hard to fathom? Surely not! Please see for instance “Iran, the Associated Press, and Covert-War of 'Imperial Mobilization'”. 
Pakistan today is truly the “petri-dish of international terrorism” as was stated by the late Benazir Bhutto at the Council on Foreign Relations on August 15, 2007  before she ventured to return to Pakistan with their overt blessings. But that unfortunate source of terror is the despicable State itself, and the equally despicable Western apparatus which fully controls and funds it as a subservient client-state. The erstwhile twice-leader of Pakistan and the scion of a worthy-name simply neglected to mention that fact as she graced the 'radical Islamists' – the state's own construction – with that lofty aphorism thinking that's what the rulers of the world wanted to hear. The same blunder is being made by Nawaz Sharif and all the others in Pakistan.
The Pakistani newsmedia therefore, is also following the diktats of wisdom du jour. Thus it is unsurprising that the perspective developed in the article by the “freelance journalist” would also characteristically omit any mention of the tortuous set-up for the deliberate orchestration of the balkanization of Pakistan  with the devilish connivance of the state's own fifth columnists. The history of clever deployment of “doctrinal motivation” through a high degree of “intellectual commitment” to craftily re-synthesize “God is on your side” for illiterate and aggrieved patsies has been so cleverly omitted, that one might think such Machiavellian concepts don't, and cannot, exist in West's highly ethical modernity (sic!).
While no one is surely perfect and all-knowing, especially when it comes to the complex deception laden, Hegelian dialectics driven “imperial mobilization” agendas for 'one-world' government , perhaps all who wish to pay lip service to concern for humanity and eagerly pick up the mighty pen to defend it against tyranny, might spend some useful time first researching how “imperial mobilization” is actually conducted with false-flag operations seeding the enabling pretexts, lest they inadvertently lead others astray. They might delve into how NATO intelligence conducted 'Operation Gladio' for creating and sustaining the 'Strategy of Tension' in Western Europe in order to keep the fear of the barbaric 'communists taking over' perpetually alive in the mind of the European public. Many a wanton terrorist act (purportedly) by NATO intelligence, were blamed on their own manipulated patsies like the Red Brigade and the boogieman then in vogue, the godless armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons “communists”. 
And today, it is the fully god-imbibed, but supposedly even more barbaric armed to the teeth with box-cutters “islamofascists”. The play of Hegelian dialectics is so superbly orchestrated that no conventional mind can reach the zenith of its moral depravity. The seeds of which, interestingly so, were devilishly re-planted by Bernard Lewis in 1990 right after the demise of the communist USSR, when he coined the mantra “Clash of Civilization” for the same Council on Foreign Relations to which Benazir Bhutto continually paid homage throughout her career.
Bernard Lewis, the “vulgar propagandist” (as knighted by Noam Chomsky in a video interview on CBC, December 9, 2003, see part-2 ), seeded this devilish mantra in CFR's Foreign Affairs in 1990 thusly, in order to re-harvest the previously celebrated Brzezinski appendage now left adrift after the satisfactory conclusion of the ten year Afghan War. The bleeding dissolution of the USSR for which both Brzezinski , and the judeofascist American Enterprise Institute from where George W. Bush had “borrowed twenty [of its] finest minds”  to wage the new lifetime of 'war on terror', had entirely taken full unshared-credit. 
“In 1990 Bernard Lewis, a leading Western scholar of Islam, analyzed 'The Roots of Muslim Rage,' and concluded: 'It should now be clear that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them. This is no less than a clash of civilizations - that perhaps irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both. It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against our rival.' ” (Samuel Huntington in “Clash of Civilization”).
Only eleven years later, that 'Muslim rage' was catastrophically enacted on the international scene – a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”  – supposedly by an islamofascist 'Ali Baba'  named 'Bin Laden'  to re-enable “imperial mobilization”. The distance between seeding mantras and its harvesting does not seem to be a very long epoch in the scientific modernity du jour when only “Prisoners of the Cave”  abound in astronomically large numbers.
This isn't rocket science, only political science. And as noted elsewhere on Project Humanbeingsfirst's website, while sensibly trying to talk Pakistani military out from bombing our own peoples in 2007, when I had gratuitously suggested to some newly retired Pakistani Generals that I could trivially construct a suicide bomber to their precise specification, of ht, wt, sex, and other unmentionably body-part specification for less than a certain amount of dollars to make the palpable point how easy it was to manufacture “jihadis” after you have shattered their tabula rasa to smithereens and created an ambiance of sustained “jihadist” indoctrination over the past 30 years, I had been stunned when one of them had immediately remarked, something to the effect: “Zahir you are asking too much – I can do it for much less, around 2000 dollars”.
After having patiently listened to me rant non-stop for over three hours on how Machiavellian political theology runs the modern world, the mighty military men (Ret. with full honors I hasten to add) of Pakistan had silently departed, having first agreed with me that the suicide bombings in Pakistan weren't very difficult to fabricate under the present manufactured triumvirate climate of deprivation, indoctrination, and civilian-killings, that these suicide attacks were not a native part of our historical-cultural-sociological-makeup, and that it had suddenly cropped up in Pakistan only in the aftermath of 911. They however left hanging, the plaintiff's obvious begging question, why persist in acts which only create more of that?
The real issue is not that the suicide bombings are fabricated, or how they are fabricated and inculcated as an expression of political dissatisfaction (see for instance 'Dying to Win – The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism' by Robert A. Pape, 2005), but WHO is manufacturing this abhorrence at the top of the compartmentalized chain of command! That isn't very hard to answer either. Simply ask cui bono!
Much has been written about the latent motivations and the overarching global and local agendas of the puppetmaster ruling oligarchs by Project Humanbeingsfirst. For anyone to pretend that the blatant agenda for the balkanization of Pakistan by the United States of America – the self proclaimed hectoring hegemons  – is not the crucial prime-mover behind Pakistan's calculated destabilization with these wanton acts of terror that are entirely reminiscent of 'Operation Gladio' even to the extent of rapid blame attribution to the 'communists' du jour, i.e., the 'Islamofascists', can only be for the perpetuation of America's fabricated mantras as “Our War”. Indeed, before coming to power, Mr. Zardari had openly asserted, echoing his late wife's sentiments, as also Pakistan military's and its politicians' and newsmedia's aspiration:
'The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), if it comes into power, must persuade the people that the fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war' ( Daily Times, February 17, 2008, 'Taliban fight is our war: Zardari' )
For one given to much rational cynicism, the sole intent of this vulgar propaganda today appears to be for putting Pakistan's military back in the driving seat for the much desired 'unity of command' that was lost when America's favorite posterchild braving the line-of-fire, General PM, fell into disfavor. The terrorist act in Lahore, as was also noted by dictatorshipwatch.com editor , suggests precisely that calculated highest order purpose, of manufacturing sympathy for the previously maligned local bad-guys in order for the elected politicians to officially hand control back to the 'unity of command' of the military as the lesser of all evils without any resistance from the public.
And while I too believe that Pakistan's nuclear-armed military today (assuming they haven't already been disarmed) still holds the infernal key to saving Pakistan through rational and independent-minded realpolitik – as noted in this 2007 open Letter to Pakistani General  – that courageous act of finally putting out the deliberately lighted fire cannot happen while the 'arsonists are running all the fire brigades in town':
It must be obvious to anyone that it is rather trivial today to curry favor from the ruling elite – become their shill and bleat the mantra of 'Islamofascism', delve deeply into some arcane aspects of it but keep that very axiom intact. One will surely get noticed eventually, and perhaps acquire a chair at the Hudson, or get employment at the RAND. Minimally, one will get invited to speak at JINSA and Heritage, get published in mainstream news, and variously earn tangible and intangible benefits. And if one would rather play dissent to win over the odd rabble rouser and 'malcontent', composing something like “Between Imperialism and Islamism” (as Pervez Hoodbhoy did in the Himal Southasian, October-November 2007 issue), will surely lead to invitation at the 911 memorial in New York to speak to 'Muslim-terrorism'.
In either case, whether participating in manufacturing consent among the gullible masses, or dissent among the 'malcontent' , so long as one keeps intact the core-axioms of empire – which today happens to be the narratives of 'Islamofascism' – in these hard times when the military-industrial complex is emerging as the largest and the only superfunded global employer for its war-making global police-state agenda, which of course also includes vulgar propaganda for both Orwellian and Huxleyan imposition of forced and voluntary servitude, it's surely a rational move to join empire. One can, at least, finally earn a decent living when only joblessness and despair surrounds one. After all, one has to feed the family first, before one can fight the good fight.
Perhaps Project Humanbeingsfirst.org and all those upholding the same categorical imperatives, ought to do the same. We are surely wasting our valuable time and our life going against the grain and suffering the threats of Hemlock – when we can simply become the favored peoples of our rulers! Okay, perhaps the skin-color for some might get in the way. But surely, that can be made up by the “virtue” of empire also acquiring the remaining un co-opted type-3 people “who critically examine ... and judge accordingly” on their payroll (see Mein Kampf, vol 1, ch 10, pg 240, for Hitler's classification of populations). Imagine all the riches.... all of which we shall surely take with us to our grave to bribe the hungry maggots and entice the proverbial Soul Extractor.
 Zahir Ebrahim, Ali Baba in Mumbai – Eid 2008 Reflections, December 09, 2008.Puppetmasters: The Political Use of Terrorism in Italy, 2002 ;
 Zahir Ebrahim, Open Letter To Middle East Scholar Daniel Pipes, April 03, 2007.
 Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, Basic Books, 1996, pg 36, full quote: “Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”
 Zahir Ebrahim, The Prized Negroes of Pakistan, March 26, 2009.
 Nadia Khan, Suicide attacks – religious flair!, April 02, 2009, Dictatorshipwatch.com.
 Brzezinski, Op. Cit., pg 212. Full quote: “More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.”
 WILLIAM SCHAAP, attorney, expert witness on media disinformation under sworn court testimony, full statement: “When you read the books about the history of the CIA, one of the heroes was the first man in charge of media operations, a man named Frank Wizner. And they referred to his organization as the Mighty Wurlitzer. And there's this image of this guy sitting at one of those giant organs, you know, with seventeen keyboards and you're playing this -- sort of like The Phantom of the Opera in that scene, and there was the guy running the CIA media operations all around the world. And he really was because every single city of any size on earth, he had some employee who was -- supposedly worked for a newspaper or a magazine or a radio station or a wire service, and they could get stories anywhere.” video here. transcript at here.
 Carl Bernstein, THE CIA AND THE MEDIA, Richard Keeble, Hacks And Spooks,
 Charles Feldman and Stan Wilson, Ex-CIA director: U.S. faces 'World War IV', April 03, 2003, CNN, full statement: 'Former CIA Director James Woolsey said Wednesday the United States is engaged in World War IV, and that it could continue for years. In the address to a group of college students, Woolsey described the Cold War as the third world war and said "This fourth world war, I think, will last considerably longer than either World Wars I or II did for us. Hopefully not the full four-plus decades of the Cold War." He said the new war is actually against three enemies: the religious rulers of Iran, the "fascists" of Iraq and Syria, and Islamic extremists like al Qaeda. Woolsey told the audience of about 300, most of whom are students at the University of California at Los Angeles, that all three enemies have waged war against the United States for several years but the United States has just "finally noticed." "As we move toward a new Middle East," Woolsey said, "over the years and, I think, over the decades to come ... we will make a lot of people very nervous." It will be America's backing of democratic movements throughout the Middle East that will bring about this sense of unease, he said. "Our response should be, 'good!'" Woolsey said. '
 Brigadier Tirmazi, Profiles of Intelligence, 1995, excerpted in Zahir Ebrahim, Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!, February 04, 2008
 Zahir Ebrahim, Iran, the Associated Press, and Covert-War of 'Imperial Mobilization', April 13, 2008,
 CFR Transcript, A Conversation With Benazir Bhutto, August 15, 2007, NY. Introduced by CFR President RICHARD N. HAASS as follows: “It is, for me, a personal pleasure to welcome back to the Council on Foreign Relations an old friend of mine and someone who is familiar to many of you in this room and knows well this organization, the former prime minister of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto.” The full quote of Benazir Bhutto: “I seek to lead a democratic Pakistan which is free from the yoke of military dictatorship and that will cease to be a haven, the very petri dish of international terrorism.”
 Zahir Ebrahim, The Day After – American Agenda for Pakistan, March 21, 2009.
 Zahir Ebrahim, The Enduring Capitalist Conspiracy For World Government, September 25, 2008.
 Daniele Ganser, NATO's Secret Army: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, 2005 ; Daniele Ganser, Operation Gladio, Interview ; Daniele Ganser, Secret Warfare: Operation Gladio and NATO's Stay-Behind Armies, Introduction Overview ; Daniele Ganser, Secret Warfare: From Operation Gladio to 9/11, EIR Interview, April 08, 2005, ; Chris Floyd, Sword Play: Attacking Civilians to Justify “Greater Security”,; Philip P. Willan,Timewatch: Operation Gladio, BBC Ch 2, 3-part Documentary, June 1992, available online.
 Noam Chomsky, Interview with Evan Solomon on CBC, pt1 - pt2
 Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1998 interview to French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur, translation by William Blum,
 George W. Bush, 26 February 2003, speaking to AEI: “Some of the finest minds of our nation are at work on some of the greatest challenges to our nation. You do such good work that my administration has borrowed twenty such minds. I want to thank them for their service.”
 AEI history, under the heading “AEI's Diamond Jubilee, 1943-2003”, at http://aei.org, full statement: “The 1980s were great years for AEI's ideas but troubled years for the institution itself. President Ronald Reagan appointed several dozen AEI scholars and fellows to his administration and to federal judgeships, where they helped him to achieve monumental improvements in economic, regulatory, and legal policy and to deploy the more assertive foreign policy that dispatched Soviet Communism by decade's end.”
 PNAC Report, Rebuilding America's Defenses, 2000, full context: “Until the process of transformation is treated as an enduring military mission – worthy of constant allocation of dollars and forces – it will remain stillborn”, page 58. “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”, page 51.
 Zahir Ebrahim, Op. Cit.,
 Zahir Ebrahim, 'Bin Laden': Key enabler of “imperial mobilization” and nuclear attack on Iran-Pakistan, April 17, 2008.
 Zahir Ebrahim, Prisoners of the Cave, 2003.
 Abid Jan, Lahore Attack: One in the many steps towards making Pakistan another Afghanistan, editorial, March 30, 2009
 Zahir Ebrahim, Re-Imagining Pakistan's Defenses - Open Letter to a Pakistani General, November 30, 2007.
 Zahir Ebrahim, Weapons of Mass Deception – The Master Social Science, Jun 01, 2008.
by Zahir Ebrahim Written April 17, 2008 - Updated April 22, 2008. The abominable shared fates that unite Iran (“Bush and Iran,...
by Zahir Ebrahim Written April 26, 2008 - Revised May 2, 2008. Douglas J. Feith, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, in his Hearing...
by Zahir Ebrahim March 31, 2007: I wrote this essay as the Preface to "Prisoners of the Cave" during 2003. That was four years ago....
by Zahir Ebrahim It appears that a majority of conscionable peoples opposed to their nation's war mongering for “imperial mobilization” in...
by Zahir Ebrahim Sunday April 06, 2008. It is à propos to begin this brief observation in 2008, on a cloudy Sunday morning while...
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites